Skip to main content
Log in

Bivariate Weibull Distribution: Properties and Different Methods of Estimation

  • Published:
Annals of Data Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The bivariate Weibull distribution is an important lifetime distribution in survival analysis. In this paper, Farlie–Gumbel–Morgenstern (FGM) copula and Weibull marginal distribution are used for creating bivariate distribution which is called FGM bivariate Weibull (FGMBW) distribution. FGMBW distribution is used for describing bivariate data that have weak correlation between variables in lifetime data. It is a good alternative to bivariate several lifetime distributions for modeling real-valued data in application. Some properties of the FGMBW distribution are obtained such as product moment, skewness, kurtosis, moment generation function, reliability function and hazard function. Three different estimation methods for parameters estimation are discussed for FGMBW distribution namely; maximum likelihood estimation, inference function for margins method and semi-parametric method. To evaluate the performance of the estimators, a Monte Carlo simulations study is conducted to compare the preferences between estimation methods. Also, a real data set is introduced, analyzed to investigate the model and useful results are obtained for illustrative purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basu AP (1971) Bivariate failure rate. J Am Stat Assoc 66(333):103–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen X (2007) Large sample sieve estimation of semi-nonparametric models. Handb Econom 6:5549–5632

    Google Scholar 

  3. Elaal MKA, Jarwan RS (2017) Inference of bivariate generalized exponential distribution based on copula functions. Appl Math Sci 11(24):1155–1186

    Google Scholar 

  4. Flores AQ (2009) Testing copula functions as a method to derive bivariate Weibull distributions. Am Polit Sci Assoc (APSA) 2009:3–6

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fredricks GA, Nelsen RB (2007) On the relationship between Spearman’s rho and Kendall’s tau for pairs of continuous random variables. J Stat Plan Inference 137(7):2143–2150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Galiani SS (2003) Copula functions and their application in pricing and risk managing multiname credit derivative products. University of London Master of Science Project

  7. Genest C, Huang W, Dufour J-M (2013) A regularized goodness-of-fit test for copulas. J Soc Fran Stat 154:64–77

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gumbel EJ (1960) Bivariate exponential distributions. J Am Stat Assoc 55:698–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Joe H (2005) Asymptotic efficiency of the two-stage estimation method for copulabased models. J Multivar Anal 94:401–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim G, Silvapulle MJ, Silvapulle P (2007) Comparison of semiparametric and parametric methods for estimating copulas. Comput Stat Data Anal 51(6):2836–2850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kotz S, Balakrishnan N, Johnson NL (2004) Continuous multivariate distributions, volume 1: models and applications, vol 1. Wiley, Hoboken

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Kundu D, Dey AK (2009) Estimating the parameters of the Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution by EM algorithm. Comput Stat Data Anal 53(4):956–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kundu D, Gupta AK (2013) Bayes estimation for the Marshall–Olkin bivariate Weibull distribution. Comput Stat Data Anal 57(1):271–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mardia KV (1970) Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika 57(3):519–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McGilchrist CA, Aisbett CW (1991) Regression with frailty in survival analysis. Biometrics 47:461–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Nelsen RB (2006) An introduction to copulas. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Osmetti SA, Chiodini PM (2011) A method of moments to estimate bivariate survival functions: the copula approach. Statistica 71(4):469–488

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sklar A (1973) Random variables, joint distributions, and copulas. Kybernetica 9:449–460

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tsukahara H (2005) Semiparametric estimation in copula models. Can J Stat 33(3):357–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Weiß G (2011) Copula parameter estimation by maximum-likelihood and minimum-distance estimators: a simulation study. Comput Stat 26(1):31–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ehab Mohamed Almetwally.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almetwally, E.M., Muhammed, H.Z. & El-Sherpieny, ES.A. Bivariate Weibull Distribution: Properties and Different Methods of Estimation. Ann. Data. Sci. 7, 163–193 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-019-00197-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-019-00197-5

Keywords

Navigation