Abstract
The behavior-analytic approach to language and cognition is consistent with parsimony and coherence in explanatory systems within and across fields of science. Some disagreement exists regarding the appropriate composition of the conceptual tool kit that behavior analysts apply to problems in language and cognition, but ultimately these differences in perspective are minor within the context of shared goals and assumptions. This article summarizes two lines of research guided by the analyses of derived relational responding in terms of contingencies or stimulus correlations acting directly upon its components. The two lines of research eventually produced different conclusions regarding the utility of the analysis within the boundaries of the parameters that were studied. Successful prediction and control of DRR should serve to identify strength and boundaries of utility of different levels of analysis, which could lead to theoretical progress.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study. Raw data relating to online supplementary information are available from the author upon request.
Notes
Horne and Lowe (1996) proposed appetitive Pavlovian perceptual functions as the source of automatic reinforcement for echoic response in this situation (a somewhat similar idea was explored empirically by Longano & Greer, 2015). As an alternative, it might be proposed that the echoic response is reinforced via parity (Palmer, 1996, 1998); that is, automatic reinforcement resulting from a match between what is heard (e.g., “wrench”) and what is said (“wrench”) overtly or covertly. The reinforcing potential of that match might be due to prior reinforcement histories (Palmer, 1996), result from conditioning in utero (e.g., Greer et al., 2017), or even have a genetically innate basis (Newman, 2014). Detailed discussion is beyond the scope of this article, as the primary intent here is to point out that automatic reinforcement of an echoic response has been proposed to be responsible for emergent tact control as a result of tact modeling.
According to NH (Horne & Lowe, 1996), intraverbal relations, even if established via unidirectional training contingencies, are inherently bidirectional. This is proposed to be due to a tendency to echo and self-echo, in close succession, auditory stimuli produced by oneself and others.
References
Aguirre, A. A., & Rehfeldt, R. A. (2015). An evaluation of instruction in visual imagining on the written spelling performance of adolescents with learning disabilities. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 118–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-015-0028-0
Barnes, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44(1), 91–124.
Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Cullinan, V. (2000). Relational frame theory and Skinner’s Verbal Behavior: A possible synthesis. The Behavior Analyst, 23, 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392000
Barnes-Holmes, D., & Harte, C. (2022). Relational frame theory 20 years on: The Odysseus voyage and beyond. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 117(2), 240–266. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.733
Baum, W. M. (2002). From molecular to molar: A paradigm shift in behavior analysis. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78(1), 95–116. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.78-95
Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental evidence for a relational operant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(1), 45–71. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2007.7-06
Boelens, H., Hofman, B., Tamaddoni, T., & Eenink, K. (2007). Specific effect of modeling on young children’s word production. The Psychological Record, 57(1), 145–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395569
Bower, G. H., & Winzenz, D. (1970). Comparison of associative learning strategies. Psychonomic Science, 20(2), 119–120. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03335632
Byrne, B. L., Rehfeldt, R. A., & Aguirre, A. A. (2014). Evaluating the effectiveness of the stimulus pairing observation procedure on tact and listener responses in children with autism. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15(2), 160–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0020-0
Cao, Y., & Greer, R. D. (2018). Mastery of echoics in Chinese establishes bidirectional naming in Chinese for preschoolers with naming in English. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 34(1–2), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0106-1
Chelonis, J. J., Cox, A. R., Karr, M. J., Prunty, P. K., Baldwin, R. L., & Paule, M. G. (2014). Comparison of delayed matching-to-sample performance in monkeys and children. Behavioural Processes, 103, 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2014.01.002
Chelonis, J. J., Daniels-Shaw, J. L., Blake, D. J., & Paule, M. G. (2000). Developmental aspects of delayed matching-to-sample performance in children. Neurotoxicology & Teratology, 22(5), 683–694. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-0362(00)00090-8
Cirulli, F., & Easton, A. (2022). Placing behaviour at the forefront of brain science. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 142, 104861.
Connell, P. J., & McReynolds, L. V. (1981). An experimental analysis of children’s generalization during lexical learning: Comprehension or production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 2(4), 309–332. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400009760
Contreras, B. P., Cooper, A. J., & Kahng, S. (2020). Recent research on the relative efficiency of speaker and listener instruction for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 53(1), 584–589. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.543
Cox, R. E. (2022). Sources of stimulus control in tests for emergent stimulus relations. (Publication No. 29168523) [Doctoral dissertation, Texas Christian University]. Proquest.
Cox, R. E., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2021). Training sequence effects on emergent conditional discriminations: Replication and extension to selection-based training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 116(2), 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.713
Cox, R. E., Roberts, C. R., & Petursdottir, A. I. (under review). Effects of instructed visual imagining on emergent conditional discriminations.
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2013). The value of epistemic disagreement in scientific practice. The case of Homo floresiensis. Studies in History & Philosophy of Science Part A, 44, 169–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.02.002
Delfs, C. H., Conine, D. E., Frampton, S. E., Shillingsburg, M. A., & Robinson, H. C. (2014). Evaluation of the efficiency of listener and tact instruction for children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(4), 793–809. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.166
Dellsén, F., & Baghramian, M. (2021). Disagreement in science: Introduction to the special issue. Synthese, 198, 6011–6021.
Diaz, J. E., Luoma, S. M., & Miguel, C. F. (2020). The role of verbal behavior in the establishment of comparative relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 113(2), 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.582
Dixon, M. R., Belisle, J., Hayes, S. C., Stanley, C. R., Blevins, A., Gutknecht, K. F., Partlo, A., Ryan, L., & Lucas, C. (2021). Evidence from children with autism that derived relational responding is a generalized operant. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 14, 295–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-020-00425-y
Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bruce, V., Bonner, L., Longbotham, S., & Doyle, C. (2002). Development of gaze aversion as disengagement from visual information. Developmental Psychology, 38(3), 438–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.438
Engelkamp, J., Zimmer, H. D., & Denis, M. (1989). Paired associate learning of action verbs with visual- or motor-imaginal encoding. Psychological Research, 50, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00309262
Finn, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., McEnteggart, C., & Kavanagh, D. (2019). Predicting and influencing the single-trial-type dominance effect. The Psychological Record, 69(3), 425–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-019-00347-4
Fisher, W. W., Retzlaff, B. J., Akers, J. S., DeSouza, A. A., Kaminski, A. J., & Machado, M. A. (2019). Establishing initial auditory-visual conditional discriminations and emergence of initial tacts in young children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 52(4), 1089–1106. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.586
Gavidia, V. L., Bergmann, S., & Rader, K. A. (2022). The use of instructive feedback to promote emergent tact and intraverbal control: A replication. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 38(2), 95–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-022-00171-y
Gilic, L., & Greer, R. D. (2011). Establishing naming in typically developing two-year-old children as a function of multiple exemplar speaker and listener experiences. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27(1), 157–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393099
Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L., & Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 651–658. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03211385
Greer, R. D., Pohl, P., Du, L., & Moschella, J. L. (2017). The separate development of children‘s listener and speaker behavior and the intercept as behavioral metamorphosis. Journal of Behavioral & Brain Science, 7(13), 674–704. https://doi.org/10.4236/jbbs.2017.713045
Greer, R. D., & Speckman, J. (2009). The integration of speaker and listener responses: A theory of verbal development. The Psychological Record, 59(3), 449–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395674
Greer, R. D., Stolfi, Chavez-Brown, & Rivera-Valdes (2005). The emergence of the listener to speaker component of naming in children as a function of multiple exemplar instruction. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 21(1), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393014
Gross, A. C., & Fox, E. J. (2009). Relational frame theory: An overview of the controversy. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 25(1), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393073
Guerrero, M., Alós, F. J., & Moriana, J. A. (2015). Emergent relations with compound stimuli in conditional and simple discriminations: an experimental application in children. The Psychological Record, 65(3), 475–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-015-0123-6
Haq, S. S., Zemantic, P. K., Kodak, T., LeBlanc, B., & Ruppert, T. E. (2017). Examination of variables that affect the efficacy of instructive feedback. Behavioral Interventions, 32(3), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1470
Hawkins, E., Gautreaux, G., & Chiesa, M. (2018). Deconstructing common bidirectional naming: A proposed classification framework. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 34(1–2), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0100-7
Hawkins, E., Kingsdorf, S., Charnock, J., Szabo, M., & Gautreaux, G. (2009). Effects of multiple exemplar instruction on naming. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10(2), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2009.11434324
Hayes, S. C., Fox, E., Gifford, E. V., & Wilson, K. G. (2001). Derived relational responding as learned behavior. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 21–49). Plenum.
Hayes, S. C., Blackledge, J. T., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2001). Language and cognition: Constructing an alternative approach within the behavioral tradition. In S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 3–20). Plenum.
Hendricks, P., & Koster, C. (2010). Production/comprehension asymmetries in language acquisition. Lingua, 120(8), 1887–1897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.002
Horne, P. J., Hughes, J. C., & Lowe, C. F. (2006). Naming and categorization in young children: IV: Listener behavior training and transfer of function. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 85, 247–273.
Horne, P. J., Lowe, C. F., & Harris, F. D. A. (2007). Naming and categorization in young children: V. Manual sign training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87(3), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2007.52-06
Horne, P. J., Lowe, C. F., & Randle, V. R. L. (2004). Naming and categorization in young children: II. Listener behavior training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81(3), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.81-267
Horne, P. J., & Lowe, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 185–241. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-185
Hotchkiss, R. M., & Fienup, D. M. (2020). A parametric analysis of a protocol to induce bidirectional naming: Effects of protocol intensity. The Psychological Record, 70(3), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00383-5
Ivancic, M., & Belisle, J. (2019). Resolving barriers to an applied science of the human condition: Rule governance and the verbal behavior of applied scientists. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 35(2), 196–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-019-00117-x
Jennings, A. M., & Miguel, C. F. (2017). Teaching intraverbal bidirectional naming to establish generalized equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 108(2), 269–289. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.277
Kisamore, A. N., Carr, J. E., & LeBlanc, L. A. (2011). Training preschool children to use visual imagining as a problem-solving strategy for complex categorization tasks. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(2), 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-255
Kobari-Wright, V. V., & Miguel, C. F. (2014). The effects of listener training on the emergence of categorization and speaker behavior in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47(2), 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.115
Longano, J. M., & Greer, R. D. (2015). Is the source of reinforcement for naming multiple conditioned reinforcers for observing responses? Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31(1), 96–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0022-y
Lowe, C. F., Horne, P. J., Harris, F. D. A., & Randle, V. R. L. (2002). Naming and categorization in young children: Vocal tact training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 78(3), 527–549. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2002.78-527
Lowe, C. F., Horne, P. J., & Hughes, J. C. (2005). Naming and categorization in young children: III. Vocal tact training and transfer of function. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 83(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2005.31-04
Lowenkron, B. (1998). Some logical functions of joint control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69(3), 327–354. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1998.69-327
Ma, M. L., Miguel, C. F., & Jennings, A. M. (2016). Training intraverbal naming to establish equivalence class performances. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 105(3), 409–426. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.203
Mahoney, A. M., Miguel, C. F., Ahearn, W. H., & Bell, J. (2011). The role of common motor responses in stimulus categorization by preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 95(2), 237–262. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2011.95-237
Malott, R. W. (2003). Behavior analysis and linguistic productivity. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 19(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392978
Mastroberardino, S., & Vredeveldt, A. (2014). Eye-closure increases children‘s memory accuracy for visual material. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 241. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00241
Meyer, C. S., Cordeiro, M. C., & Miguel, C. F. (2019). The effects of listener training on the development of analogical reasoning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 112(2), 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.549
Michael, J. (1985). Two kinds of verbal behavior plus a possible third. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 3(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392802
Miguel, C. F. (2016). Common and intraverbal bidirectional naming. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0066-2
Miguel, C. F. (2018). Problem-solving, bidirectional naming, and the development of verbal repertoires. Behavior Analysis: Research & Practice, 18(4), 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/bar0000110
Miguel, C. F., & Kobari-Wright, V. V. (2013). The effects of tact training on the emergence of categorization and listener behavior in children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(3), 669–673. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.62
Miguel, C. F., Petursdottir, A. I., Carr, J. E., & Michael, J. (2008). The role of naming in stimulus categorization by preschool children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 89(3), 383–405. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2008-89-383
Miller, A. C., Cox, R. E., Swensson, R. M., Oliveira, J. S. C. D., & Petursdottir, A. I. (2021). Effects of blocking echoic responses on tact emergence following stimulus pairing. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 22(2), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2021.1896070
Moore, J. (2009). Some thoughts on the relation between derived relational responding and verbal behavior. European Journal of Behavior Analysis, 10, 31–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2009.11434307
Newman, J. D. (2014). Vocal coordination and vocal imitation: A role for mirror neurons? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37(2), 211–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13002410
Normand, M. P. (2009). Much ado about nothing? Some comments on B. F. Skinner‘s definition of verbal behavior. The. Behavior Analyst, 32(1), 185–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392182
Olaff, H. S., & Holth, P. (2020). The emergence of bidirectional naming through sequential operant instruction following the establishment of conditioned social reinforcers. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 36(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-019-00122-0
Olaff, H. S., Ona, H. N., & Holth, P. (2017). Establishment of naming in children with autism through multiple response-exemplar training. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 22(1), 67–85. http://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/bdb0000044
Palmer, D. C. (1996). Achieving parity: The role of automatic reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65(1), 289–290. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1996.65-289
Palmer, D. C. (1998). The speaker as listener: The interpretation of structural regularities in verbal behavior. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 15(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392920
Palmer, D. C. (2004). Data in search of a principle: A review of relational frame theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 81(2), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.2004.81-189
Palmer, D. C. (2012). The role of atomic repertoires in complex behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 35(1), 59–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392266
Palmer, D. C. (2016). On intraverbal control and the definition of the intraverbal. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 96–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0061-7
Pérez-González, L. A., Cereijo-Blanco, N., & Carnerero, J. J. (2014). Emerging tacts and selections from previous learned skills: A comparison between two types of naming. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30(2), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0011-1
Petursdottir, A. I., & Carr, J. E. (2011). A review of recommendations for sequencing receptive and expressive language instruction. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 44(4), 859–876. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-859
Petursdottir, A. I., Carp, C. L., Peterson, S. P., & Lepper, T. L. (2015). Emergence of visual-visual conditional discriminations following intraverbal training. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 103, 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.136
Petursdottir, A. I., Cox, R. E., McKeon, C. A., & Mellor, J. R. (2019). Baseline training sequence affects speed of emergent conditional discriminations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 112(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.539
Petursdottir, A. I., Lepper, T. L., & Peterson, S. P. (2014). Effects of collateral response requirements and exemplar training on listener training outcomes in children. The Psychological Record, 64, 703–717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-014-0051
Petursdottir, A. I., Neaves, S., & Thomas, O. (2020). Emergent tact control following stimulus pairing: Comparison of procedural variations. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 36(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-020-00132-3
Pohl, P., Greer, R. D., & Moschella, J. L. (2020). Verbal development, behavioral metamorphosis, and the evolution of language. Perspectives on Behavior Science, 43(1), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40614-018-00180-0
Rimm, D. C., Alexander, R. A., & Eiles, R. R. (1969). Effects of different mediational instructions and sex of subject on paired-associate learning of concrete nouns. Psychological Reports, 25(3), 935–940. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1969.25.3.9
Santos, P. M., Ma, M. L., & Miguel, C. F. (2015). Training intraverbal naming to establish matching-to-sample performances. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 31, 162–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-015-0040-4
Shimp, C. P. (2013). Toward the unification of molecular and molar analyses. The Behavior Analyst, 36(2), 295–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392316
Sidman, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-5
Silveira, M. V., Camarco, J. C., Aggio, N. M., Ribeiro, G. W., Cortez, M. D., Young, M. E., & de Rose, J. C. (2021). The influence of training procedure and stimulus valence on long-term maintenance of equivalence relations. Behavioural Processes, 185, 104343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104343
Sivaraman, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., Greer, R. D., Fienup, D. M., & Royers, H. (2023). Verbal behavior development theory and relational frame theory: Reflecting on similarities and differences. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.836
Sivaraman, M., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Royers, H. (2021). Nonsimultaneous stimulus presentations and their role in listener naming. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 116(3), 300–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.715
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Solares, L., & Fryling, M. J. (2018). Further evaluation of the stimulus pairing observation procedure with children with autism spectrum disorder. Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 35(1), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-018-0101-6
Steele, D., & Hayes, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56(3), 519–555.
Su, P. L., Castle, G., & Camarata, S. (2019). Cross-modal generalization of receptive and expressive vocabulary in children with autism spectrum disorder. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2396941518824495
Vanderschuren, L. J. M. J., Shaham, Y., & Flagel, S. B. (2023). Behavior matters for neuroscience and neuroscience matters for behavior. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 144, 104963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104963
Vladescu, J. C., & Kodak, T. M. (2013). Increasing instructional efficiency by presenting additional stimuli in learning trials for children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 46(4), 805–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.70
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain data from human participants or animals; human participant data included as supplementary information were collected in accordance with the ethical standards of the relevant institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
ESM 1
(PDF 276 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Petursdottir, A.I. To Dismantle or Not to Dismantle: Components of Derived Relational Responding. Psychol Rec (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-023-00573-x
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-023-00573-x