Skip to main content
Log in

Protocols for Assessing Derived Relations in Typically Developing Children and Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

  • ORIIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The Psychological Record Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There have been numerous developmental studies of relational framing in children with and without developmental disabilities. In the current research, we sought to explore various facets of the core repertoires of arbitrarily applicable relational responding in order to determine how these repertoires potentially influenced one another. In particular, we assessed repertoires of coordination, distinction, comparison, and opposition with both mutually entailed (ME) and combinatorially entailed (CE) relations, as well as deictic relations in typically developing children and in children with autism spectrum disorder. We also systematically investigated the contextual conditions under which the two groups of children could or could not demonstrate the target relational responses (i.e., by testing the relations in contexts that were more or less naturalistic). Overall, the results indicated no uniform patterns that differentiated the two groups, suggesting that relational repertoires do not develop in a linear manner from nonarbitrary to arbitrary or from mutual to combinatorial entailment. Furthermore, the context in which these repertoires are assessed also appears to be important. That is, naturalistically presented trials do not necessarily appear to be easier for these children to demonstrate than when trials are presented in a more abstract format. The novel protocols presented here show how key patterns of derived relational responding can be systematically assessed and potentially compared, in a manner that may be of use to developmental and educational researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The Intelligence and Development Scales (IDS), the Unexpected Change Test, and the John and Mary Test were administered, but the data are not reported in the current research for reasons of brevity. Please contact Krystyna Pomorska for further information relating to these measures.

References

  • Auyeung, B., Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., & Allison, C. (2008). The Autism Spectrum Quotient: Children’s Version (AQ-Child). Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders, 38(7), 1230–1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Luciano, C., & McEnteggart, C. (2017). From the IRAP and REC model to a multi-dimensional multi-level framework for analyzing the dynamics of arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(4), 434–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, D., Hayes, S., Dymond, S., & O’Hora, D. (2001). In S. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 51–72). New York, NY: Plenum- Kluwer Academic.

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y. (2001). Analysing relational frames: Studying language and cognition in young children. (Doctoral dissertation, National University of Ireland Maynooth).

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2001a). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry. The Psychological Record, 51(2), 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Roche, B., & Smeets, P. M. (2001b). Exemplar training and a derived transformation of function in accordance with symmetry: II. The Psychological Record, 51(4), 559–586.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., Smeets, P. M., Strand, P., & Friman, P. (2004). Establishing relational responding in accordance with more-than and less-than as generalized operant behavior in young children. International Journal of Psychology & Psychological Therapy, 4(3), 531–558.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes-Holmes, Y., Kavanagh, D., & Murphy, C. (2016). Relational Frame Theory: Implications for education and developmental disabilities. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 227–253). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berens, N. M., & Hayes, S. C. (2007). Arbitrarily applicable comparative relations: Experimental evidence for a relational operant. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40(1), 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D., Wilkinson, K. M., Blackman, D., & McIlvane, W. J. (2000). Equivalence classes in individuals with minimal verbal repertoires. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74(1), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassidy, S., Roche, B., & Hayes, S. C. (2011). A relational frame training intervention to raise intelligence quotients: A pilot study. The Psychological Record, 61(2), 173–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J. O., Heron T. E., & Heward W. L. (2007). Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson.

  • Dunne, S., Foody, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Murphy, C. (2014). Facilitating repertoires of coordination, opposition distinction, and comparison in young children with autism. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 19(2), 37–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorham, M., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Berens, N. (2009). Derived comparative and transitive relations in young children with and without autism. The Psychological Record, 59(2), 221–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, K., Strong, R., & Pasnak, R. (1982). Relational responses in tests of transposition with rhesus monkeys. Learning & Motivation, 13(4), 495–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001a). Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York, NY: Plenum-Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, S., Fox, E., Gifford, E., Wilson, K., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Healy, O. (2001b). Derived relational responding as learned behavior. In S. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & B. Roche (Eds.), Relational Frame Theory: A post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition (pp. 21–49). New York, NY: Plenum-Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, R. M., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Lord, C. (2002). Cognitive profiles and social communicative functioning in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43(6), 807–821.

  • Kent, G., Galvin, E., Barnes-Holmes, Y., Murphy, C., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2017). Relational responding: Testing, training, and sequencing effects among children with autism and typically-developing children. Behavioral Development Bulletin, 22(1), 94–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipkens, R., Hayes, S. C., & Hayes, L. J. (1993). Longitudinal study of the development of derived relations in an infant. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 56(2), 201–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, C., Gomez-Becerra, I., & Rodriguez- Valverde, M. (2007). The role of multiple-exemplar training and naming in establishing derived equivalence in an infant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87(3), 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luciano, C., Rodríguez, M., Mañas, I., Ruiz, F., & Valdivia-Salas, S. (2009). Acquiring the earliest relational operants: Coordination, distinction, opposition, comparison, and hierarchy. In R. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Application for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities: A progressive guide to change (pp. 149–172). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, L., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2009). Understanding and training perspective taking as relational responding. In R. Rehfeldt & Y. Barnes-Holmes (Eds.), Derived relational responding: Application for learners with autism and other developmental disabilities: A progressive guide to change (pp. 281–300). Oakland, CA: New Harbinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya-Rodríguez, M. M., Molina, F. J., & McHugh, L. (2017). A review of relational frame theory research into deictic relational responding. The Psychological Record, 67(4), 569–579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisula, E., Kawa, R., Szostakiewicz, Ł., Łucka, I., Kawa, M., & Rynkiewicz, A. (2013). Autistic traits in male and female students and individuals with high functioning autism spectrum disorders measured by the Polish version of the Autism-Spectrum Quotient. PLoS One, 8(9), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisula, E., Rynkiewicz, A., & Łucka, I. (2010). Kwestionariusz Zachowania i Osobowości (AQ) wersja dla dzieci. [Behavior and Personality Questionnaire (AQ) version for children]. Retrieved from http://www.psychologia.pl/rehabilitacja/publikacje.html

  • Próżyński, S., & Wciórka, J. (2000). Klasyfikacja zaburzeń psychicznych i zaburzeń zachowania w ICD-10. Opisy Kliniczne i wskazówki diagnostyczne. [Classification of mental and behavioral disorders in ICD-10. Clinical descriptions and diagnostic suggestions]. Kraków/Warsaw, Poland: Vesalius.

  • Rehfeldt, R. A., Dillen, J. E., Ziomek, M. M., & Kowalchuk, R. K. (2007). Assessing relational learning deficits in perspective-taking in children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorder. The Psychological Record, 57(1), 23–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, I., McElwee, J., & Ming, S. (2013). Language generativity, response generalization, and derived relational responding. The Analysis of verbal behavior, 29(1), 137–155.

  • Törneke, N., Luciano, C., Barnes-Holmes, Y., & Bond, F. W. (2016). RFT for clinical practice. In R. D. Zettle, S. C. Hayes, D. Barnes-Holmes, & A. Biglan (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of contextual behavioral science (pp. 254–272). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ciara McEnteggart.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Krystyna Pomorska declares that she has no conflict of interest. Paweł Ostaszewski declares that he has no conflict of interest. Yvonne Barnes-Holmes declares that she has no conflict of interest. Ciara McEnteggart declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants and their parents or guardians included in the study.

Availability of Data and Materials

Krystyna Pomorska (kpomorska@swps.edu.pl) may be contacted to request access to the data supporting the current findings.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pomorska, K., Ostaszewski, P., Barnes-Holmes, Y. et al. Protocols for Assessing Derived Relations in Typically Developing Children and Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Psychol Rec 71, 435–460 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00442-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40732-020-00442-x

Keywords

Navigation