Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of friendship relations and gender differences on classroom-based surrogate competitive learning

  • Published:
Journal of Computers in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Competition has been recently come to be recognized as a significant factor in the design of strategies for classroom-based learning. However, although the influences of cognitive factors (e.g., ability) and interpersonal factors (i.e., anonymity) on surrogate competitive learning have been investigated, there have been few studies emphasizing the impact of social factors (e.g., friendship) in the classroom. In addition, previous studies have also suggested that gender differences should be taken into account in surrogate competitive learning. Thus, this study investigates how both friendship relations and gender differences influence students’ choice of peers as opponents in the classroom environment. An empirical study with 29 elementary students over a 4-month period was conducted. The results indicated that students tended to choose peers with whom they did not share friendship relations as opponents. Specifically, boys tended to choose from either category, whereas girls liked to choose those without friendship relations. In addition, most students tended to choose same-gender peers. Moreover, if choosing same-gender classmates, boys tended to choose opponents with whom they shared friendship relations, whereas girls tended to choose opponents without friendship relations. In short, both friendship relations and gender differences can serve as predictors for student participation in classroom-based surrogate competitive learning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2005). The implications of having high-achieving versus low-achieving friends: A longitudinal analysis. Social Development, 14(1), 61–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berndt, T. J., & Perry, T. B. (1986). Children’s perceptions of friendships as supportive relationships. Developmental Psychology, 22(22), 640–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertozzi, E. (2008). ‘You play like a girl!’ Cross-gender competition and the uneven playing field. Convergence, 14(4), 473–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, A., & Hess, E. (1974). Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosson, J. K., Haymovitz, E. L., & Pinel, E. C. (2004). When saying and doing diverge: The effects of stereotype threat on self-reported versus non-verbal anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre-and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. Journal of social and Personal Relationships, 11(3), 471–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2007). Student models that invite the learner in: The SMILI:() open learner modelling framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(2), 89–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 106–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R., & Kedar, A. (1990). Effects of intergroup competition and school philosophy on student perceptions, group processes, and performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(4), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16(7), 572–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chafel, J. A. (1984). Social comparisons by young children in classroom contexts. Early Child Development and Care, 44, 109–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., et al. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(01), 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, S. B., Lin, C. J., Ching, E., Cheng, H. N., Chang, B., Chen, F. C., et al. (2009). EduBingo: Developing a content sample for the one-to-one classroom by the content-first design approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 343–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. H. (2014a). Exploring students’ behaviors in a competition-driven educational game. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 68–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. H. (2014b). Learning preferences and motivation of different ability students for social-competition or self-competition. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(1), 283–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. H., & Chen, Y. S. (2013). A surrogate competition approach to enhancing game-based learning. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(6), 35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. H., & Chen, S. Y. (2014). When educational agents meet surrogate competition: Impacts of competitive educational agents on students’ motivation and performance. Computers & Education, 75, 274–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. H., Chien, T. C., & Chan, T. W. (2011). My-Avatar: Using avatars to promote self-competition in pupils’ idiom learning. In T. Hirashima et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 449–456). Chiang Mai, Thailand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z. H., Chou, C. Y., Biswas, G., & Chan, T. W. (2012). Substitutive competition: Virtual pets as competitive buffers to alleviate possible negative influence on pupils. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 247–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, H. N., Wu, W. M., Liao, C. C., & Chan, T. W. (2009). Equal opportunity tactic: Redesigning and applying competition games in classrooms. Computers & Education, 53(3), 866–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C., & Peng, H. (2007). Net-friends: Adolescents’ attitudes and experiences vs. teachers’ concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2394–2413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, C., & Tsai, M. (2007). Gender differences in Taiwan high school students’ computer game playing. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 812–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., van der Werf, G., Buunk, A. P., & van der Zee, Y. G. (2008). Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 828–879. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumas, F., Huguet, P., Monteil, J., Rastoul, C., & Nezlek, J. B. (2005). Social comparison in the classroom: Is there a tendency to compare upward in elementary school? Current Research in Social Psychology, 10(12), 166–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eglesz, D., Feteke, I., Kiss, O. E., & Izso, L. (2005). Computer games are fun? On professional games and players’ motivations. Educational Media International, 42(2), 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonzi, A., Schneider, B. H., Tani, F., & Tomada, G. (1997). Predicting children’s friendship status from their dyadic interaction in structured situations of potential conflict. Child Development, 68(3), 496–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gneezy, U., Leonard, K. L., & List, J. A. (2009). Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica, 77(5), 1637–1664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. D., & Hunt, N. (1995). Computer game playing in adolescence: Prevalence and demographic indicators. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 189–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoeft, F., Watson, C. L., Kesler, S. R., Bettinger, K. E., & Reiss, A. L. (2008). Gender differences in the mesocorticolimbic system during computer game-play. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42(4), 253–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, M. Y., Hong, J. C., Cheng, H. Y., Peng, Y. C., & Wu, N. C. (2013). Gender differences in cognitive load and competition anxiety affect 6th grade students’ attitude toward playing and intention to play at a sequential or synchronous game. Computers & Education, 60(1), 254–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., et al. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Chicago, IL: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (3rd ed.). Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F. (2008). Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9048-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1996). Friendship quality as a predictor of young children’s early school adjustment. Child Development, 67(3), 1103–1118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, C. C. Y., Chen, Z. H., & Chan, T. W. (2009). Designing the game-based environment to facilitate learners’ interaction in performance-based learning by virtual pets. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learningVolume 1 (pp. 429–433). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences.

  • Martínez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gómez, E., & de la Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41(4), 353–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, J. C., & Blumberg, C. J. (1990). The social comparison choices of elementary and secondary school students: The influence of gender, race, and friendship. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(2), 170–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melson, G. F. (2001). Why the wild things are: Animals in the lives of children Cambridge. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Meara, J. D. (1989). Cross-sex friendship: Four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21(7–8), 525–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepitone, E. A. (1972a). Comparison behavior in elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepitone, E. A. (1972b). Comparison behavior in elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 45–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2003). How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance-learning. In Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 352, 343).

  • Roy, R., Benenson, J. F., & Lilly, F. (2000). Beyond intimacy: Conceptualizing sex differences in same-sex friendships. Journal of Psychology, 134(1), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanger, J., Willson, J., Davies, B., & Whittaker, R. (1997). Young children, videos and computer games. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. L. (2004). Understanding the process of stereotype threat: A review of mediational variables and new performance goal directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 177–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, M., & Hicks, L. (1995). Classroom goal structures, social satisfaction and the perceived value of academic tasks. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting and Exhibit of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

  • Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1349–1371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, L., Castellar, E. N., Janssen, D., Calvi, L., & Van Looy, J. (2016). Playing under threat. Examining stereotype threat in female game players. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 377–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, L., Núnez Castellar, E., & van Looy, J. (2014). Challenging the other: Exploring the role of opponent gender in digital game competition for female players. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(5), 303–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, W. M. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chiang, M. C., Deng, Y. C., Chou, C. Y., Tsai, C. C., et al. (2007). Answer matching: A competitive learning game with uneven chance tactic. In T. W. Chan, A. Paiva, & D. W. Shaffer (Eds.), The first IEEE international workshop on digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning (pp. 89–96). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funding was provided by Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan (Grant Nos. 101-2511-S-008 -016 -MY3 and 102-2811-S-008 -009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Calvin C. Y. Liao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liao, C.C.Y., Chen, ZH., Cheng, H.N.H. et al. Effects of friendship relations and gender differences on classroom-based surrogate competitive learning. J. Comput. Educ. 5, 259–277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0108-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0108-y

Keywords

Navigation