Abstract
Competition has been recently come to be recognized as a significant factor in the design of strategies for classroom-based learning. However, although the influences of cognitive factors (e.g., ability) and interpersonal factors (i.e., anonymity) on surrogate competitive learning have been investigated, there have been few studies emphasizing the impact of social factors (e.g., friendship) in the classroom. In addition, previous studies have also suggested that gender differences should be taken into account in surrogate competitive learning. Thus, this study investigates how both friendship relations and gender differences influence students’ choice of peers as opponents in the classroom environment. An empirical study with 29 elementary students over a 4-month period was conducted. The results indicated that students tended to choose peers with whom they did not share friendship relations as opponents. Specifically, boys tended to choose from either category, whereas girls liked to choose those without friendship relations. In addition, most students tended to choose same-gender peers. Moreover, if choosing same-gender classmates, boys tended to choose opponents with whom they shared friendship relations, whereas girls tended to choose opponents without friendship relations. In short, both friendship relations and gender differences can serve as predictors for student participation in classroom-based surrogate competitive learning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altermatt, E. R., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2005). The implications of having high-achieving versus low-achieving friends: A longitudinal analysis. Social Development, 14(1), 61–81.
Berndt, T. J., & Perry, T. B. (1986). Children’s perceptions of friendships as supportive relationships. Developmental Psychology, 22(22), 640–648.
Bertozzi, E. (2008). ‘You play like a girl!’ Cross-gender competition and the uneven playing field. Convergence, 14(4), 473–487.
Booth, A., & Hess, E. (1974). Cross-sex friendship. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 36, 38–47.
Bosson, J. K., Haymovitz, E. L., & Pinel, E. C. (2004). When saying and doing diverge: The effects of stereotype threat on self-reported versus non-verbal anxiety. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 247–255.
Bukowski, W. M., Hoza, B., & Boivin, M. (1994). Measuring friendship quality during pre-and early adolescence: The development and psychometric properties of the Friendship Qualities Scale. Journal of social and Personal Relationships, 11(3), 471–484.
Bull, S., & Kay, J. (2007). Student models that invite the learner in: The SMILI:() open learner modelling framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 17(2), 89–120.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of gender development and differentiation. Psychological Review, 106(4), 106–676.
Butler, R., & Kedar, A. (1990). Effects of intergroup competition and school philosophy on student perceptions, group processes, and performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(4), 301–318.
Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16(7), 572–578.
Chafel, J. A. (1984). Social comparisons by young children in classroom contexts. Early Child Development and Care, 44, 109–124.
Chan, T. W., Roschelle, J., Hsi, S., Kinshuk, Sharples, M., Brown, T., et al. (2006). One-to-one technology-enhanced learning: An opportunity for global research collaboration. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 1(01), 3–29.
Chang, S. B., Lin, C. J., Ching, E., Cheng, H. N., Chang, B., Chen, F. C., et al. (2009). EduBingo: Developing a content sample for the one-to-one classroom by the content-first design approach. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 343–353.
Chen, Z. H. (2014a). Exploring students’ behaviors in a competition-driven educational game. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 68–74.
Chen, Z. H. (2014b). Learning preferences and motivation of different ability students for social-competition or self-competition. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(1), 283–293.
Chen, Z. H., & Chen, Y. S. (2013). A surrogate competition approach to enhancing game-based learning. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(6), 35.
Chen, Z. H., & Chen, S. Y. (2014). When educational agents meet surrogate competition: Impacts of competitive educational agents on students’ motivation and performance. Computers & Education, 75, 274–281.
Chen, Z. H., Chien, T. C., & Chan, T. W. (2011). My-Avatar: Using avatars to promote self-competition in pupils’ idiom learning. In T. Hirashima et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Computers in Education (pp. 449–456). Chiang Mai, Thailand: Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education.
Chen, Z. H., Chou, C. Y., Biswas, G., & Chan, T. W. (2012). Substitutive competition: Virtual pets as competitive buffers to alleviate possible negative influence on pupils. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(2), 247–258.
Cheng, H. N., Wu, W. M., Liao, C. C., & Chan, T. W. (2009). Equal opportunity tactic: Redesigning and applying competition games in classrooms. Computers & Education, 53(3), 866–876.
Chou, C., & Peng, H. (2007). Net-friends: Adolescents’ attitudes and experiences vs. teachers’ concerns. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(5), 2394–2413.
Chou, C., & Tsai, M. (2007). Gender differences in Taiwan high school students’ computer game playing. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 812–824.
Dijkstra, P., Kuyper, H., van der Werf, G., Buunk, A. P., & van der Zee, Y. G. (2008). Social comparison in the classroom: A review. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 828–879. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654308321210.
Dumas, F., Huguet, P., Monteil, J., Rastoul, C., & Nezlek, J. B. (2005). Social comparison in the classroom: Is there a tendency to compare upward in elementary school? Current Research in Social Psychology, 10(12), 166–187.
Eglesz, D., Feteke, I., Kiss, O. E., & Izso, L. (2005). Computer games are fun? On professional games and players’ motivations. Educational Media International, 42(2), 117–124.
Fonzi, A., Schneider, B. H., Tani, F., & Tomada, G. (1997). Predicting children’s friendship status from their dyadic interaction in structured situations of potential conflict. Child Development, 68(3), 496–506.
Garcia, S. M., Tor, A., & Schiff, T. M. (2013). The psychology of competition: A social comparison perspective. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 634.
Gneezy, U., Leonard, K. L., & List, J. A. (2009). Gender differences in competition: Evidence from a matrilineal and a patriarchal society. Econometrica, 77(5), 1637–1664.
Griffiths, M. D., & Hunt, N. (1995). Computer game playing in adolescence: Prevalence and demographic indicators. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 5, 189–193.
Hoeft, F., Watson, C. L., Kesler, S. R., Bettinger, K. E., & Reiss, A. L. (2008). Gender differences in the mesocorticolimbic system during computer game-play. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 42(4), 253–258.
Hwang, M. Y., Hong, J. C., Cheng, H. Y., Peng, Y. C., & Wu, N. C. (2013). Gender differences in cognitive load and competition anxiety affect 6th grade students’ attitude toward playing and intention to play at a sequential or synchronous game. Computers & Education, 60(1), 254–263.
Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., et al. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the digital youth project. Chicago, IL: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (3rd ed.). Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ke, F. (2008). Alternative goal structures for computer game-based learning. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(4), 429–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-008-9048-2.
Ladd, G. W., Kochenderfer, B. J., & Coleman, C. C. (1996). Friendship quality as a predictor of young children’s early school adjustment. Child Development, 67(3), 1103–1118.
Liao, C. C. Y., Chen, Z. H., & Chan, T. W. (2009). Designing the game-based environment to facilitate learners’ interaction in performance-based learning by virtual pets. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning—Volume 1 (pp. 429–433). Rhodes, Greece: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Martínez, A., Dimitriadis, Y., Rubia, B., Gómez, E., & de la Fuente, P. (2003). Combining qualitative evaluation and social network analysis for the study of classroom social interactions. Computers & Education, 41(4), 353–368.
Meisel, J. C., & Blumberg, C. J. (1990). The social comparison choices of elementary and secondary school students: The influence of gender, race, and friendship. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(2), 170–182.
Melson, G. F. (2001). Why the wild things are: Animals in the lives of children Cambridge. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Newcomb, A. F., & Bagwell, C. L. (1995). Children’s friendship relations: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 306.
O’Meara, J. D. (1989). Cross-sex friendship: Four basic challenges of an ignored relationship. Sex Roles, 21(7–8), 525–543.
Pepitone, E. A. (1972a). Comparison behavior in elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 9, 45–63.
Pepitone, E. A. (1972b). Comparison behavior in elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 45–63.
Reffay, C., & Chanier, T. (2003). How social network analysis can help to measure cohesion in collaborative distance-learning. In Designing for change in networked learning environments (pp. 352, 343).
Roy, R., Benenson, J. F., & Lilly, F. (2000). Beyond intimacy: Conceptualizing sex differences in same-sex friendships. Journal of Psychology, 134(1), 93–101.
Sanger, J., Willson, J., Davies, B., & Whittaker, R. (1997). Young children, videos and computer games. London: Falmer Press.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Simon & Schuster.
Smith, J. L. (2004). Understanding the process of stereotype threat: A review of mediational variables and new performance goal directions. Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 177–206.
Townsend, M., & Hicks, L. (1995). Classroom goal structures, social satisfaction and the perceived value of academic tasks. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting and Exhibit of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
Vandebosch, H., & Van Cleemput, K. (2009). Cyberbullying among youngsters: Profiles of bullies and victims. New Media & Society, 11(8), 1349–1371.
Vermeulen, L., Castellar, E. N., Janssen, D., Calvi, L., & Van Looy, J. (2016). Playing under threat. Examining stereotype threat in female game players. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 377–387.
Vermeulen, L., Núnez Castellar, E., & van Looy, J. (2014). Challenging the other: Exploring the role of opponent gender in digital game competition for female players. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(5), 303–309.
Wu, W. M. C., Cheng, H. N. H., Chiang, M. C., Deng, Y. C., Chou, C. Y., Tsai, C. C., et al. (2007). Answer matching: A competitive learning game with uneven chance tactic. In T. W. Chan, A. Paiva, & D. W. Shaffer (Eds.), The first IEEE international workshop on digital game and intelligent toy enhanced learning (pp. 89–96). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
Acknowledgements
Funding was provided by Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan (Grant Nos. 101-2511-S-008 -016 -MY3 and 102-2811-S-008 -009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Liao, C.C.Y., Chen, ZH., Cheng, H.N.H. et al. Effects of friendship relations and gender differences on classroom-based surrogate competitive learning. J. Comput. Educ. 5, 259–277 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0108-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0108-y