Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Striking a Balance in School Psychology Training: a Comparison of Blended Delivery Formats and Student Outcomes

  • Published:
Contemporary School Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As higher education faces declines in federal funding and enrollment, academic programs are increasingly tasked with examining their recruitment and admissions practices, mode and flexibility of delivery, and student retention. In particular, some programs may encounter pressure to introduce part-time or distance learning options into traditionally full-time, on-campus programs. Concurrently, the field of school psychology suffers from a critical nationwide shortage, which further strengthens the impetus for programs to attract and successfully prepare graduate students in greater numbers. In this article, we examine various metrics of student success from one graduate program that concurrently offered program curriculum in two blended delivery formats. In particular, we examine (a) enrollments; (b) timely remediation; (c) retention and degree completion; and (d) intern performance and post-graduation employment across the two delivery formats. We discuss potential benefits and challenges of distance education in school psychology training and offer recommendations for balancing quality and accessibility in curriculum delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Materials are available from the first author upon request. Requests for de-identified data will be considered pending appropriate institutional approvals.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors made substantive contributions to the development and presentation of this work, which utilizes existing data. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Carrie Ball and Jennifer McNeany. All authors contributed to subsequent revisions and have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carrie Ball.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Authors have no financial conflicts of interest or competing interests associated with conducting this research. The first and third authors are affiliated faculty of the program reviewed in this manuscript and therefore have a non-financial interest in the reputation and success of the program.

Ethics Approval

This study utilizes existing program data and has been approved with “exempt” status by the institutional review board at the authors’ institution.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ball, C., McNeany, J. & Hopple, A. Striking a Balance in School Psychology Training: a Comparison of Blended Delivery Formats and Student Outcomes. Contemp School Psychol 26, 43–54 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00332-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00332-7

Keywords

Navigation