Abstract
The rise of social media use among school youth has compelled school districts to implement social media monitoring to prevent active shootings, bullying, harassment, victimization, and suicide in the community. This presents an ethical and legal dilemma, with issues surrounding students’ rights to safety, privacy, and free speech in cyberspace. This paper followed the ethical decision-making model outlined by Armistead et al. (2011) to provide guidance to school psychologists and district personnel who may be deciding whether to implement social media monitoring. Review of National Association of School Psychologists and American Psychological Association ethical codes, legislation, and case law demonstrated many complexities regarding the rights of students and school district personnel. Evidence on the effectiveness of social media monitoring is still limited, so school districts and school psychologists are recommended to explore alternatives for harm and threat prevention that value the rights of students while also meeting their obligation to prevent abusive or hostile learning environments.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
18 U.S.C. § 875.
A.B. 1156. (2008). California legislature, 2011–2012 Reg. Sess.
Adrian, M., & Lyon, A. R. (2018). Social media data for online adolescent suicide risk identification: Considerations for integration within platforms, clinics, and schools. In M. A. Moreno & A. Radovic (Eds.), Technology and adolescent mental health (pp. 155–170). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69638-6_12.
Agatston, P., & Limber, S. (2018). Cyberbullying prevention and intervention: Promising approaches and recommendations for further evaluation. In J. U. Gordon (Ed.), Bullying prevention and intervention at school: Integrating theory and research into best practices (pp. 73–93). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95414-1_5.
Ahrens, D. (2012). Schools, cyberbullies, and the surveillance state. American Criminal Law Review, 49(4), 1669–1722.
American Psychological Association. (2017). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. DC: Washington.
Anderson, M., & Jiang, J. (2018). Teens, social media & technology 2018. Pew Research Center, 31 https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/.
Ang, R. P. (2015). Adolescent cyberbullying: A review of characteristics, prevention and intervention strategies. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 35–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2015.07.011.
Armistead, L., Williams, B. B., & Jacob, S. (2011). Professional ethics for school psychologists: A problem-solving casebook. NASP.
Averill, O. H., Rinaldi, C., & Collaborative, U. S. E. L. (2011). Multi-tier system of supports (MTSS). District Administration, 48(8), 91–99.
Bauman, S., Toomey, R. B., & Walker, J. L. (2013). Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. Journal of Adolescence, 36(2), 341–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.12.001.
Beger, R. R. (2003). The “worst of both worlds”: School security and the disappearing fourth amendment rights of students. Criminal Justice Review, 28(2), 336–354. https://doi.org/10.1177/073401680302800208.
Beidler v. North Thurston School District. (2000). No. 99-2-00236-6, Thurston Cty. Super. Ct.
Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser. (1986). 478 U.S. 675, 106 S. Ct. 3159, 92 L. Ed. 2d 549.
Bracy, N. L. (2011). Student perceptions of high-security school environments. Youth & Society, 43(1), 365–395. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10365082.
Bradshaw, C. P., Pas, E. T., Debnam, K. J., & Lindstrom Johnson, S. (2015). A focus on implementation of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in high schools: Associations with bullying and other indicators of school disorder. School Psychology Review, 44(4), 480–498. https://doi.org/10.17105/spr-15-0105.1.
Brock, S. E., Nickerson, A. B., Reeves, M. A., Conolly, C. N., Jimerson, S. R., Pesce, R. C., & Lazzaro, B. R. (2016). School crisis prevention and intervention: The PREPaRE model. National Association of School Psychologists.
Byars, J., Graybill, E., Wellons, Q., & Harper, L. (2020). Monitoring social media and technology use to prevent youth suicide and school violence. Contemporary School Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00277-x.
California Education Code § 49073.6.
Ceasar, S. (2013). Glendale district says social media monitoring is for student safety. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-glendale-social-media-20130915-story.html.
Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education. (1999). 526 U.S. 629, 119 S. Ct. 1661, 143 L. Ed. 2d 839.
Deaton, S. (2015). Social learning theory in the age of social media: Implications for educational practitioners. Journal of Educational Technology, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.1.3430.
Education Amendments Act of 1972. (2018). 20 U.S.C. §§1681–1688.
Elonis v. United States (2015). 575 U.S. ___. 135 S. Ct. 2001. 192 L. Ed. 2d 1.
Feinberg, T., & Robey, N. (2009). Cyberbullying: Intervention and prevention strategies. National Association of School Psychologists, 38(4), 22–24.
Florida Statutes. (2019). § 1001.212(6).
Flowers, B. F., & Rakes, G. C. (2000). Analyses of acceptable use policies regarding the internet in selected K–12 schools. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(3), 351–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.2000.10782285.
Furlong, M. J., Morrison, G. M., & Dear, J. D. (1994). Addressing school violence as part of schools’ educational mission. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 38(3), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.1994.9944308.
Haeney, O., Ash, D., & Galletly, C. (2018). School shootings – ‘It wouldn’t happen here’? Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 52(5), 405–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004867418771515.
Hankin, A., Hertz, M., & Simon, T. (2011). Impacts of metal detector use in schools: Insights from 15 years of research. Journal of School Health, 81(2), 100–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00566.x.
Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. W. (2010). Bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide. Archives of Suicide Research, 14(3), 206–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2010.494133.
Hobbs, R., & Jensen, A. (2009). The past, present, and future of media literacy education. Journal of media literacy education, 1(1), 1 https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/jmle/vol1/iss1/1.
Hollmann, C. M., & McNamara, J. R. (1999). Considerations in the use of active and passive parental consent procedures. The Journal of Psychology, 133(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223989909599729.
Humphrey, N., & Wigelsworth, M. (2016). Making the case for universal school-based mental health screening. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 21(1), 22–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2015.1120051.
Karimi, F. (2018). “School shooter in the making”: Callers warned authorities about Nikolas Cruz. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/23/us/nikolas-cruz-threat-calls/index.html
Kupchik, A., & Ellis, N. (2008). School discipline and security: Fair for all students? Youth & Society, 39(4), 549–574. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X07301956.
Leibowitz, A. (2018). Could monitoring students on social media stop the next school shooting? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/06/us/social-media-monitoring-school-shootings.html
Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media & mobile internet use among teens and young adults. Millennials. Pew Internet & American Life Project. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED525056
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Smith, A., Purcell, K., Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2011). Teens, kindness and cruelty on social network sites: How American teens navigate the new world of “digital citizenship”. Pew Internet & American Life Project. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED537516
Leskin, P. (2020). Inside the rise of TikTok, the viral video-sharing app whose ties to China are raising concerns in the US. Business Insider. https://www.businessinsider.com/tiktok-app-online-website-video-sharing-2019-7
Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444808089415.
Livingstone, S. (2014). Developing social media literacy: How children learn to interpret risky opportunities on social network sites. Communications, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2014-0113.
Morse v. Frederick. (2007). 551 U.S. 393, 127 S. Ct. 2618; 168 L. Ed. 2d 290.
Naron, N. K., & Estes, N. (1986). Technology in the schools: Trends and policies. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 20(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/08886504.1986.11008433.
National Association of School Psychologists. (2010). Principles for professional ethics.
Pearce, M., Jarvie, J., & Hennessy-Fiske, M. (2018). With graduation just days away, Texas school becomes latest casualty—10 dead, 10 wounded in latest campus shooting. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-santa-fe-school-shooting-20180518-story.html.
Peter, J., & Valkenburg, P. M. (2011). Adolescents’ online privacy: Toward a developmental perspective. In S. Trepte & L. Reinecke (Eds.), Privacy online: Perspectives on privacy and self-disclosure in the social web (pp. 221–234). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21521-6_16.
Porter v. Ascension Parish School Board. (2004). 393 F.3d 608 (5th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 1062, 125 S.Ct.2530.
Probst, D. (2017). Social media literacy as an IEP intervention for social and emotional learning. Journal of Media Literacy Education, 9(2), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.23860/JMLE-2019-09-02-04.
Reid, S., & Braun, J. (2019). Florida Schools Safety Portal & Social Media Monitoring (p. 10).
Rideout, V., & Robb, M. B. (2018). Social media, social life: Teens reveal their experiences. San Francisco, CA: Common Sense Media.
Robinson, J., Cox, G., Bailey, E., Hetrick, S., Rodrigues, M., Fisher, S., & Herrman, H. (2016). Social media and suicide prevention: A systematic review. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 10(2), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/eip.12229.
Sengupta, S. (2013). Warily, schools watch students on the internet. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/29/technology/some-schools-extend-surveillance-of-students-beyond-campus.html
Shade, L. R., & Singh, R. (2016). “Honestly, we’re not spying on kids”: School surveillance of young people’s social media. Social Media + Society, 2(4), 2056305116680005. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116680005.
Sheridan, P. M. (2015). Tracking off-campus speech: Can public schools monitor students’ social media? Southern Law Journal, 25(1), 57–76.
Snakenborg, J., Van Acker, R., & Gable, R. A. (2011). Cyberbullying: Prevention and intervention to protect our children and youth. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 55(2), 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2011.539454.
Strunsky, S. (2018). Prosecutor won’t file charges in suicide of girl bullied at school. NJ.Com. https://www.nj.com/morris/2018/11/no_charges_bullied_12-year-olds_suicide.html
Tanrikulu, I. (2018). Cyberbullying prevention and intervention programs in schools: A systematic review. School Psychology International, 39(1), 74–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034317745721.
Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District. (1969). 393 U.S. 503, 89 S. Ct. 733, 21 L. Ed. 2d 731.
U.S. Cont. amend. I.
U.S. Cont. amend. IV.
Vickery, J. R. (2015). ‘I don’t have anything to hide, but … ’: The challenges and negotiations of social and mobile media privacy for non-dominant youth. Information, Communication & Society, 18(3), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.989251.
Wisniewski v. Board of Education of Weedsport Central School District. (2008). 552 US 1296, 128 S.Ct. 1741.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of Interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fleury, I., Dowdy, E. Social Media Monitoring of Students for Harm and Threat Prevention: Ethical Considerations for School Psychologists. Contemp School Psychol 26, 299–308 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00311-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40688-020-00311-y