Skip to main content
Log in

What About Empathy? A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of a Podcast as an Asynchronous Empathy Teaching Tool

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Medical Science Educator Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Though medical education podcasts are fast gaining popularity, they are overwhelmingly focused on teaching the medical expert role of physicians. We explored how medical learners and educators engaged with and learned from an empathy and communication-focused podcast and sought their recommendations for integrating the podcast into medical curricula.

Methods

Six virtual, semi-structured focus groups were conducted with educators and learners within a large urban hospital and university setting. Participants were asked to listen to pre-selected episodes of the About Empathy podcast in advance. Thematic analysis was used to explore experiences and perceptions of empathy teaching and learning.

Results

There were 24 participants. We identified six themes related to the podcast and empathy learning: (1) forging connection through stories, (2) creating space to reflect on empathy, (3) shifting perspectives and biases, (4) feeling validated and enabling self-compassion, (5) gaining knowledge and building skills through empathetic communication, and (6) translating new knowledge and skills into practice. Participants highlighted that the podcast’s portability and asynchronous nature allowed them to be more fully present, reflective, and intentional in their learning.

Discussion

The About Empathy podcast was experienced as a flexible, just-in-time tool that promoted self-agency over one’s learning, reflective practice, and knowledge and skill acquisition, particularly with respect to empathic communication. Benefits of asynchronous e-learning tools such as podcasts support a shift to a blended learning model. Challenges finding a curricular home for this empathy-focused podcast require further consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author (IY) upon request.

References

  1. Chen D, Lew R, Hershman W, et al. A cross-sectional measurement of medical student empathy. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:1434–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0298-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Hojat M, Vergare MJ, Maxwell K, et al. The devil is in the third year: a longitudinal study of erosion of empathy in medical school. Acad Med. 2009;84:1182–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181b17e55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hojat M, Shannon SC, DeSantis J, et al. Does empathy decline in the clinical phase of medical education? A nationwide, multi-institutional, cross-sectional study of students at DO-Granting Medical Schools. Acad Med. 2020;95(6):911–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Neumann M, Edelhauser F, Tauschel D, et al. Empathy decline and its reasons: a systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Acad Med. 2011;86:996–1009. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318221e615.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Arntfield SL, Slesar K, Dickson J, Charon R. Narrative medicine as a means of training medical students toward residency competencies. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;91(3):280–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2013.01.014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Batt-Rawden SA, Chisolm MS, Anton B, Flickinger TE. Teaching empathy to medical students: an updated, systematic review. Acad Med. 2013;88(8):1171–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299f3e3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Charon R. Narrative medicine: a model for empathy, reflection, profession, and trust. JAMA. 2001;286(15):1897–902. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.286.15.1897.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Davidson SM, Grunau Z, Marcovitz D, Gerdner OA, Stoklosa J, Vestal HS. Narrative podcasts as a teaching tool in psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry. 2019;43(3):275–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-019-01062-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hatfield EF. Narrative learning using podcasts in interpersonal communication. Commun Teach. 2018;32(4):236–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/17404622.2017.1372790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Berk J, Trivedi SP, Watto M, Williams P, Centor R. Medical education podcasts: where we are and questions unanswered. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35:2176–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05606-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chapa H, Dickey D, Milman R, Hagar C, Kintzer J. A novel curricular design exposing clinical medical students to the hidden curriculum. Med Sci Educ. 2022;8:1–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01479-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jalali A, Leddy J, Gauthier M, Sun R, Hincke M, Carnegie J. Use of podcasting as an innovative asynchronous e-learning tool for students. US China Educ Rev. 2011;6:6741–8.

    Google Scholar 

  13. MacDonald CJ, Kellam H, Peirce C. Brain development, mental health and addiction: a podcast series for undergraduate medical education. Interact Technol Smart Edu. 2013;10(3):172–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-02-2013-0002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matava CT, Rosen D, Siu E, Bould DM. eLearning among Canadian anesthesia residents: a survey of podcast use and content needs. BMC Med Educ. 2013;13(59):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-13-59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelly JM, Perseghin A, Dow A, Trivedi SP, Rodman A, Berk J. Learning through listening: a scoping review of podcast use in medical education. Acad Med. 2022;97(7):1079–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000004565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hollinderbaumer A, Hartz T, Uckert F. Education 2.0 -- how has social media and Web 2.0 been integrated into medical education? A systematical literature review. GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2013;30(1):Doc14. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma000857.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Nwosu AC, Mason S. Palliative medicine and smartphones: an opportunity for innovation? BMJ Supp Palliat Care. 2012;2(1):75–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2011-000151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kiger ME, Varpio L. Thematic analysis of qualitative data: AMEE guide No. 131. Med Teach. 2020;42:846–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In: Evaluation Models. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2005. p. 363–81.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lee C, Zhou MS, Wang ER, Huber M, Lockwood KK, Parga J. Health care professional and caregiver attitudes toward and usage of medical podcasting: questionnaire study. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022;5(1): e29857. https://doi.org/10.2196/29857.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hrastinski S. What do we mean by blended learning? TechTrends. 2019;63:564–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00375-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hege I, Tolks D, Adler M, Härtl A. Blended learning: ten tips on how to implement it into a curriculum in healthcare education. GMC J Med Educ. 2020;37(5):Doc45. https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cotarelo A, Martinez Martinez C, Langan D, et al. Lockdown medical education: utilization and effectiveness of virtual modalities for pandemic-safe training. Western J Emerg Med. 2022;23(1.1). Retrieved date February 27, 2023, from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4kw2837g

  25. Rafi A, Anwar MI, Younas A, Manzoor S. Paradigm shift in medical education due to the COVID-19 pandemic: guidelines for developing a blended learning curriculum in medical education. F1000Res. 2022;11(37):37. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.74779.2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

With thanks to Jackie Skinner and Laura Takahashi, producers of the About Empathy Podcast. With thanks to those groups that funded the original development of the About Empathy podcast including the Sunnybrook Education Advisory Council; the Medical Humanities Grant via matching funding from the Postgraduate Medical Education at the University of Toronto and the Department of Family and Community Medicine at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre; and funding via the Sunnybrook Foundation through donations to the Palliative Care team.

Funding

This research was funded by the Education Research and Scholarship Grant from Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada, and the Faculty Development Program Fund from the Department of Family and Community Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design were performed by GS and IY with input from all authors. Data collection was performed by RS with assistance from SW. Data analysis and theme generation/refinement were performed by all authors. The first draft of the manuscript was written by LB with subsequent major revisions by IY. All authors contributed to each version of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Ying.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Research ethics approval was obtained from Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (REB file number 1954) and the University of Toronto (Protocol number 00040267).

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ying, I., Stepita, R., Whyte, S. et al. What About Empathy? A Qualitative Study Exploring the Role of a Podcast as an Asynchronous Empathy Teaching Tool. Med.Sci.Educ. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02020-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-024-02020-0

Keywords

Navigation