Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integrating HPWS and Organisational Memory for Enhanced Employee Performance

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research paper investigates the relationship between high-performance work systems (HPWS), organisational memory, and employee in-role performance, focusing on the direct impact of HPWS on different dimensions of organisational memory and employee in-role performance, as well as the mediating role of organisational memory in this relationship. Utilizing a sample of employees working in the telecommunications industry, the study employed structural equation modelling to analyse the relationships among HPWS, organisational memory, and employee in-role performance. The findings revealed that HPWS positively influence all three dimensions of organisational memory and employee in-role performance, with organisational memory partially mediating the relationship between HPWS and employee in-role performance. However, the study was limited to the telecommunications industry and Dhofar region and did not examine the potential moderating effects of individual-level or contextual factors on the relationships among HPWS, organisational memory, and employee in-role performance. The study offers practical implications for organizations seeking to improve employee performance and overall effectiveness by highlighting the importance of implementing high-performance work systems and managing organisational memory effectively. This study contributes to the literature on the relationships among HPWS, organisational memory, and employee in-role performance, providing valuable insights into the dynamics of organisational effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Ackerman, Mark S, and Halverson, Christine. 1998. Considering an organization's memory. Proceedings of the 1998 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work

  • Al-Ajlouni, Mohammed Iqbal. 2021. Can high-performance work systems (HPWS) promote organisational innovation? Employee perspective-taking, engagement and creativity in a moderated mediation model. Employee Relations: THe International Journal 43 (2): 373–397. https://doi.org/10.1108/ER-09-2019-0369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Baghdadi, D., and Adil Hadi. 2007. Relationship and the impact of organisational memory on organisational performance Applied study in a sample of general industrial companie. Journal of Administration and Economics 65: 154–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anand, Vikas, Charles C. Manz, and William H. Glick. 1998. An organisational memory approach to information management. Academy of Management Review 23 (4): 796–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes, Helder de Jesus Ginja., and Paulo Goncalves Pinheiro. 2020. Linking knowledge management, organizational learning and memory. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge. 5 (2): 140–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, Eileen, Bailey, Thomas, Berg, Peter, and Kalleberg, Arne L. 2000. Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.

  • Argote, Linda, and Ella Miron-Spektor. 2011. Organisational learning: From experience to knowledge. Organization Science 22 (5): 1123–1137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, Ch, Sch, XF, and N, D. A. 1997. Organisational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reis(77/78), 345-348. https://doi.org/10.2307/40183951

  • Barney, Jay. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17 (1): 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, Brian. 1998. High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. In Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management (Vol. 16, pp. 53).

  • Becker, Thomas E., and Mary C. Kernan. 2003. Matching commitment to supervisors and organizations to in-role and extra-role performance. Human Performance 16 (4): 327–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borman, Walter C., and Stephan J. Motowidlo. 1997. Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance 10 (2): 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, Peter, and Keith Macky. 2009. Research and theory on high-performance work systems: Progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal 19 (1): 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, John P. 1990. Modelling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organisational psychology.

  • Cao, Man, Shuming Zhao, and Yunfei Xu. 2022. How HR systems are implemented matters: High-performance work systems and employees’ thriving at work. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources 60 (4): 880–899. https://doi.org/10.1111/1744-7941.12307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, Abraham, and John Schaubroeck. 2007. The influence of leaders’ and other referents’ normative expectations on individual involvement in creative work. The Leadership Quarterly 18 (1): 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cegarra-Navarro, Juan-Gabriel., and Silvia Martelo-Landroguez. 2020. The effect of organisational memory on organisational agility. Journal of Intellectual Capital 21 (3): 459–479. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIC-03-2019-0048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Song, Liangding Jia, Riki Takeuchi, and Yahua Cai. 2014. Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology 99 (4): 665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Sze-Ting., Kai Yin Haga, and Allison. 2022. The influence of differential leadership and proactive personality on employee in-role performance: An integrated model [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.978495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Hong, Ling Li, and Yong Chen. 2021. Explore success factors that impact artificial intelligence adoption on telecom industry in China. Journal of Management Analytics 8 (1): 36–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1852895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, Yongjun, David J. Yoon, and Dongkyu Kim. 2020. Leader behavioural integrity and employee in-role performance: The roles of coworker support and job autonomy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17 (12): 4303. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clewett, David, Camille Gasser, and Lila Davachi. 2020. Pupil-linked arousal signals track the temporal organization of events in memory. Nature Communications 11 (1): 4007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Christopher J., and Ken G. Smith. 2006. Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal 49 (3): 544–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Combs, James, Yongmei Liu, Angela Hall, and David Ketchen. 2006. How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organisational performance. Personnel Psychology 59 (3): 501–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, Jeff. 1996. Designing organisational memory: Preserving intellectual assets in a knowledge economy. Group Decision Support Systems 1: 362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dastmalchian, Ali, Nick Bacon, Nicola McNeil, Claudia Steinke, Paul Blyton, Satish Kumar, Bayraktar Medha, Auer-Rizzi. Secil, Bodla Werner, Ali Ahmad, Richard Cotton, Tim Craig, Behice Ertenu, Mohammad Habibi, Heh Jason Huang, Havva Pınar. İmer, Che Ruhana Isa, Ayman Ismail, Yuan Jiang, Hayat Kabasakal, and Renin Varnali. 2020. High-performance work systems and organisational performance across societal cultures. Journal of International Business Studies 51 (3): 353–388. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00295-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Datta, Deepak K., James P. Guthrie, and Patrick M. Wright. 2005. Human resource management and labor productivity: Does industry matter? Academy of Management Journal 48 (1): 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, Thomas H, and Prusak, Laurence. 1998. Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.

  • Denison, Daniel R, Haaland, Stephanie, and Goelzer, Paulo. 2003. Corporate culture and organisational effectiveness: is there a similar pattern around the world? In Advances in global leadership (Vol. 3, pp. 205–227). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

  • Dimple, Null, and Vijay Kuriakose. 2023. High-performance work system in service sector: review and framework development. The Service Industries Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2023.2240721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorta-Afonso, Daniel, Laura Romero-Domínguez, and Claudia Benítez-Núñez. 2023. It’s worth it! High performance work systems for employee job satisfaction: The mediational role of burnout. International Journal of Hospitality Management 108: 103364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easa, Nasser Fathi, and Haitham El Orra. 2021. HRM practices and innovation: An empirical systematic review. International Journal of Disruptive Innovation in Government 1 (1): 15–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, Kathleen M., and Jeffrey A. Martin. 2000. Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal 21 (10–11): 1105–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feiz, Davood, Dehghani Soltani, and FarsizadehMahdi Hossein. 2019. The effect of knowledge sharing on the psychological empowerment in higher education mediated by organisational memory. Studies in Higher Education 44 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1328595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foroughi, Hamid, Diego M. Coraiola, Jukka Rintamäki, Sébastien. Mena, and William M. Foster. 2020. Organisational Memory Studies. Organization Studies 41 (12): 1725–1748. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840620974338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Robert M. 1996. Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17 (S2): 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, James P. 2001. High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal 44 (1): 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haar, Jarrod M., and Candice Harris. 2023. A moderated mediation study of high performance work systems and insomnia on New Zealand employees: Job burnout mediating and work-life balance moderating. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 34 (1): 68–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2021.1961161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackbarth, Gary, and Varun Grover. 1999. The knowledge repository: Organisational memory information systems. Information Systems Management 16: 21–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Jr., W. Black, B. Babin, and R. Anderson. 2010. Multivariate data analysis a global perspective, 7458. USR, New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huy, Tran, and Phuong. 2023a. High-performance work system and knowledge hoarding: The mediating role of competitive climate and the moderating role of high-performance work system psychological contract breach. International Journal of Manpower 44 (1): 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-06-2021-0331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huy, Tran, and Phuong. 2023b. How does high-performance work system influence employees’ creativity? The role of critical reflection and human resource management attribution. International Journal of Emerging Markets, Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-03-2022-0508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyder, Shabir, Muhammad Imran Malik, Saddam Hussain, Memoona Tasneem, Muhammad Kaleem, and Adeel Saqib. 2022. Organisational justice and employee in-role performance nexus: A dual theory perspective. Cogent Business & Management 9 (1): 2124602. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2124602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennex, Murray E, and Olfman, Lorne. 2001. Development recommendations for knowledge management/organisational memory systems. Contemporary Trends in Systems Development, 209–222.

  • Jiang, Kaifeng, David P. Lepak, Kyongji Han, Ying Hong, Andrea Kim, and Anne-Laure. Winkler. 2012a. Clarifying the construct of human resource systems: Relating human resource management to employee performance. Human Resource Management Review 22 (2): 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Kaifeng, David P. Lepak, Jia Hu, and Judith C. Baer. 2012b. How does human resource management influence organisational outcomes? A meta-analytic investigation of mediating mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal 55 (6): 1264–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Kaifeng, Riki Takeuchi, and David P. Lepak. 2013. Where do we go from here? New perspectives on the black box in strategic human resource management research. Journal of Management Studies 50 (8): 1448–1480. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12057.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jo, Hyunyoung, Samuel Aryee, Hsin-Hua. Hsiung, and David Guest. 2023. Service-oriented high-performance work systems and service role performance: Applying an integrated extended self and psychological ownership framework. Human Relations 76 (1): 168–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267211035656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J.F., Jr., M.C. Howard, and C. Nitzl. 2020. Assessing measurement model quality in PLS-SEM using confirmatory composite analysis. Journal of Business Research. 1 (109): 101–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jude, Rachel Zara, Nazim, Aqeel, and Al Hatmi, Said Saud Said. 2023. An Evaluation on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Facilitating Digital Marketing in Telecommunication Industry, Oman. GSJ, 11(6).

  • Jyoti, Jeevan, and Asha Rani. 2017. High performance work system and organisational performance: Role of knowledge management. Personnel Review. 46 (8): 1770–1795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, Sung-Choon., Shad S. Morris, and Scott A. Snell. 2007. Relational archetypes, organisational learning, and value creation: Extending the human resource architecture. Academy of Management Review 32 (1): 236–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kling, Jeffrey. 1995. High performance work systems and firm performance. Monthly Lab. Rev. 118: 29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundi, Yasir Mansoor, Mohammed Aboramadan, and Ahmad Abualigah. 2023. Linking paradoxical leadership and individual in-role and extra-role performance: A multilevel examination. Management Decision Ahead-of-Print. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2022-1353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler III, Edward E, Mohrman, Susan Albers, and Ledford Jr, Gerald E. 1998. Strategies for High Performance Organizations--The CEO Report, 8.5 X 11: Employee Involvement, TQM, and Reengineering Programs in Fortune 1000 Corporations. Jossey-Bass.

  • Lee, Sang M., DonHee Lee, and Chang-Yuil. Kang. 2012. The impact of high-performance work systems in the health-care industry: Employee reactions, service quality, customer satisfaction, and customer loyalty. The Service Industries Journal 32 (1): 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, Dorothy, Wilson, Edith, and Doyle, John L. 1993. Commercializing technology: imaginative understanding of user needs. Division of Research, Harvard Business School.

  • Lepak, David P., Hui Liao, Yunhyung Chung, and Erika E. Harden. 2006. A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management 25: 217–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, Daniel A., and James G. March. 1993. The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal 14 (S2): 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Zhang, YeZhuang, Tian, and ZhongYing, Qi. 2004. An empirical study on the impact of organisational memory on organisational performance in manufacturing companies. 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the,

  • Liker, Jeffrey K. 2021. Toyota way: 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer. McGraw-Hill Education.

  • Mehralian, Gholamhossein, Mohammad Moradi, and Jafar Babapour. 2022. How do high-performance work systems affect innovation performance? The Organisational Learning Perspective. Personnel Review 51 (9): 2081–2102. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-08-2020-0617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao, Rentao, and Yi. Cao. 2019. High-performance work system, work well-being, and employee creativity: Cross-level moderating role of transformational leadership. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16 (9): 1640. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Christine, and Anne S. Miner. 1997. The impact of organisational memory on new product performance and creativity. Journal of Marketing Research 34 (1): 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mugge, Paul, Haroon Abbu, Timothy L. Michaelis, Alexander Kwiatkowski, and Gerhard Gudergan. 2020. Patterns of digitization. Research-Technology Management 63 (2): 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2020.1707003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, Hang-Yue., Daniel Turban, Chung-Ming. Lau, and Siu-Yu. Lui. 1998. Human resource practices and firm performance of multinational corporations: Influences of country origin. International Journal of Human Resource Management 9 (4): 632–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omantel. May 28, 2023, May 28, 2023. Omantel has penned multiple signings and MoU’s with government and large corporates portfolio at COMEX 2023. Retrieved 22.10.2023 from https://portal.omantel.om/About%20us/Media%20Center/Details/Omantel%20MoU%20goverment%20agreement%20in%20COMEX

  • Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 1998. The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Harvard Business Press.

  • Phuong, Tran Huy. 2020. Impact of organisational characteristics, CEO education, and firm ownership on the adoption and effectiveness of high performance work system in Vietnam. Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies 11 (21): 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ployhart, Robert E., and Robert J. Vandenberg. 2010. Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management 36 (1): 94–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, Philip M., Scott B. MacKenzie, Jeong-Yeon. Lee, and Nathan P. Podsakoff. 2003. Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (5): 879. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Posthuma, Richard A., Michael C. Campion, Malika Masimova, and Michael A. Campion. 2013. A high performance work practices taxonomy: Integrating the literature and directing future research. Journal of Management 39 (5): 1184–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasheed, Rizwana, Aamir Rashid, Noor Aina Amirah, and Asyraf Afthanorhan. 2023. Quantifying the moderating effect of servant leadership between occupational stress and employee in-role and extra-role performance. Calitatea 24 (195): 60–68. https://doi.org/10.47750/QAS/24.195.08.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehman, Junaid, Igor Hawryszkiewycz, Osama Sohaib, Fatuma Namisango, and Abdul Samad Dahri. 2023. Towards the knowledge-smart professional service firms: How high-performance work systems support the transformation. Journal of the Knowledge Economy 14 (4): 3640–3670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00903-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz, Safa. 2016. High performance work systems and organisational performance: An empirical study on manufacturing and service organizations in Pakistan. Public Organization Review 16 (4): 421–442. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-015-0315-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Edgar H. 1996. Three cultures of management: The key to organisational learning. MIT Sloan Management Review 38 (1): 9–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Cem, Korhan Arun, and Olcay Okun. 2023. Organisational memory: A qualitative research study on a multi-cultural organization. Kybernetes 52 (4): 1528–1551. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-08-2021-0783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, Alok. 2010. Enabling knowledge management of organisational memory for groups through shared topic maps. Iowa State University.

  • Stijn, Van, Wensley Eveline, and Anthony. 2001. Organisational memory and the completeness of process modelling in ERP systems: some concerns, methods and directions for future research. Business Process Management Journal 7 (3): 181–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramony, Mahesh. 2009. A meta-analytic investigation of the relationship between HRM bundles and firm performance. Human Resource Management 48 (5): 745–768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Li-Yun., Samuel Aryee, and Kenneth S. Law. 2007. High-performance human resource practices, citizenship behaviour, and organisational performance: A relational perspective. Academy of Management Journal 50 (3): 558–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi, Riki, David P. Lepak, Heli Wang, and Kazuo Takeuchi. 2007. An empirical examination of the mechanisms mediating between high-performance work systems and the performance of Japanese organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology 92 (4): 1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, Guiyao, Bingjie Yu, Fang Lee Cooke, and Yang Chen. 2017. High-performance work system and employee creativity. Personnel Review 46 (7): 1318–1334. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-09-2016-0235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, David J., Gary Pisano, and Amy Shuen. 1997. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18 (7): 509–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ugwoke, Ernest O., Nathaniel Ifeanyi Edeh, Felicia Ogonnia Nwokike, Emeka Promise Ugwunwoti, Wama Binga Emmanuel, Benuh Adama Idris, Clement Odey, Joshua Samson, Victoria Obiageli Nnamani, Joseph Tunga Yaro, Gloria Mgboyibo Eya, Gold Chiamaka Arua, Elisha Terkuma Guma, and Joseph Bonglo Kingsley. 2023. Joint mediation of psychological empowerment and work–life balance between transformational leadership and in-role performance of accounting personnel: 360-degree feedback. Journal of Management Organization. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2023.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, James P., and Gerardo Rivera Ungson. 1991. Organisational memory. Academy of Management Review 16 (1): 57–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Lei, and Ying Chen. 2022. Success or growth? Distinctive roles of extrinsic and intrinsic career goals in high-performance work systems, job crafting, and job performance. Journal of Vocational Behaviour 135: 103714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Zhining, Shuang Ren, and Lijun Meng. 2022. High-performance work systems and thriving at work: The role of cognitive appraisal and servant leadership. Personnel Review 51 (7): 1749–1771. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-10-2019-0561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, Ian. 1998. Applying case-based reasoning: techniques for enterprise systems. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.

  • Williams, Larry J., and Stella E. Anderson. 1991. Job satisfaction and organisational commitment as predictors of organisational citizenship and in-role behaviours. Journal of Management 17 (3): 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, College of Commerce and Business Administration, Dhofar University, Salalah, Oman

    Moaz Gharib

  2. Hertfordshire Business School, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, UK

    Kamaal Allil

Authors
  1. Moaz Gharib
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kamaal Allil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Both authors contributed significantly to the work presented in this manuscript. Moaz Gharib was primarily responsible for the conceptualization of the study, designing the questionnaire, and leading the data collection process. Kamaal Allil took on a comprehensive role, developing the methodology, handling the data analysis, interpreting the results, preparing the manuscript, supervising the research process, and contributing to the theoretical framework that guided the analysis and discussion. Both authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamaal Allil.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Code Availability

No custom code was used in the performance of this study.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gharib, M., Allil, K. Integrating HPWS and Organisational Memory for Enhanced Employee Performance. Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-024-00412-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-024-00412-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation