Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Social Capital and Socioeconomic Development in Rural China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine the stock of social capital in rural China and explore the different impacts of two types of social capital upon the economic development performance of rural China. This empirical study of social capital is based on an original survey of 410 villages throughout China. The findings indicate that bonding social capital still has a very solid foundation in rural areas of China. Bridging social capital is in formation in Chinese villages, even though the stock of bridging social capital is currently very moderate. Moreover, this study finds that bridging social capital, as manifested in general trust and inclusive social networks, positively affected villages’ development performance. However, bonding social capital, as manifested in particular trust and exclusive social networks, tends to negatively impact villages’ development performance. These findings help to shed some light on the distribution of two types of social capital—bridging and bonding—in rural China and their impact on the socioeconomic development of rural areas. Given the scarcity of representative survey studies of this sort, the findings from this study are especially valuable for establishing some conceptual and empirical baselines for subsequent studies of social capital in rural China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For the detail of the China Rural Quality of Life Index, please see Zhongguo nongcun jingji xingshi fenxi yu yuce 2006-2007 (Analysis and Forecast on China’s Rural Economy: 2006-2007) (Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 2007).

References

  • Beugelsdijk, S., and V.T. Smulders. 2005. Social capital and growth in European regions: An empirical test. European Journal of Political Economy 21: 301–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix, C., and D. Posner. 1998. Social capital: Explaining its origins and effects on government performance. British Journal of Political Science 28(4): 686–693.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J., and W. Rahn. 1997. Individual-Level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science 41(3): 999–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casey, T., and K. Christ. 2005. Social capital and economic performance in the American states. Social Science Quarterly 86(4): 826–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J., and C.L. Lu. 2007. Social capital in urban China: attitudinal and behavioral effects on grassroots self-government. Social Science Quarterly 88(2): 422–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christoforou, A. 2005. On the determinants of social capital in Greece compared to countries of the European Union. FEEM Working Paper No. 68, Fondazione Enrico Mattei, Milano.

  • Coleman, J. 1990. Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N., and J. Scott. 1994. The established and the outsiders: a sociological enquiry into community problems, 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyma, F. 1995. Trust: the social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 2001. Social capital, civil society and development. Third world quarterly 22(1): 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gebremedhin, B., J. Pender, and G. Tesfay. 2004. Collective action for grazing land management in crop-livestock mixed systems in the highlands of northern Ethiopia. Agricultural Systems 82(3): 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiso, L., P. Sapienza, and L. Zingales. 2012. Civic capital as the missing link. In Handbook of social economics, ed. J. Benhabib, A. Bisin, and M. Jackson, 417–480. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. 1999. Social capital in Britain. British Journal of Political Science 29: 417–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. 2005. Social capital. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. 1997. Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic and political change in 43 societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S., and P. Keefer. 1997. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112(4): 1251–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knack, S. 2002. Social capital and the quality of government: Evidence from the states. American Journal of Political Science 46(4): 772–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna, A. 2002. Active social capital: Tracing the roots of development and democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. 1996. Social and unsocial capital. Politics and Society 24(1): 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, N. 2001. Social Capital: A theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, M. 1998. Social capital and poverty in India. Working Paper No. 61, Institute of Development Studies, Sussex.

  • Oi, C.J. 1992. Fiscal reform and the economic foundations of local state corporatism in China. World Politics 45(1): 99–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, M. 1965. The logic of collective action; public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parish, K. 1993. Local initiative and national reform: The Wenzhou model of development. The China Quarterly 134: 242–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, A., and M. Shen. 2003. Joint liability lending and the rise and fall of China’s township and village enterprises. Journal of Development Economics 71(2): 497–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paxton, P. 1999. Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology 105(1): 88–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R., R. Leonardi, and R. Nanetti. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. 2000. Bowling alone: Collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saich, T. 2001. Governance and politics of China. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saxton, G., and A.M. Benson. 2005. Social capital and the growth of the nonprofit sector. Social Science Quarterly 86(1): 16–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, T. 2001. The complementary roles of human and social capital. Isuma: Canadian Journal of Policy Research 2(1): 18–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, E.J. 2000. Formal and informal institutions. In Social Capital: A multifaceted perspective, ed. P. Dasgupta, and I. Serageldin, 59–68. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik, G. 2000. Social capital and economic development: A plea for the mechanism. Rationality and Society 12(4): 451–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torsvik, G. 2004. Social capital and economic development: A plea for mechanisms. In Investigating social capital: Comparative perspectives on civil society, participation and governance, ed. S. Prakash, and P. Selle, 257–280. New Delhi: Sage publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, L.L. 2002. Cadres, temple and lineage institutions, and governance in rural China. The China Journal 48: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, L.L. 2007. Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China. American Political Science Review 101: 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. 2002. The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiting, S.H. 2001. Power and wealth in rural China: The political economy of institutional change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M., and N. Deepa. 2000. Social capital: Implications for development theory, research, and policy. The World Bank Observer 15(2): 225–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock, M. 2001. Microenterprise and social capital: A framework for theory, research, and policy. The Journal of Socio-Economics 30(2): 193–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, and the Research Funds of Renmin University of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of International Studies, Renmin University of China, Beijing, People’s Republic of China

    Min Xia

Authors
  1. Min Xia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Xia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xia, M. Social Capital and Socioeconomic Development in Rural China. Fudan J. Hum. Soc. Sci. 7, 563–581 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-014-0044-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40647-014-0044-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation