Abstract
Background
Peritoneal dialysis (PD) has multiple advantages over other dialysis modalities. As a home-based therapy, it allows patients to keep their autonomy, avoid frequent hospital visits and carry on with their usual lifestyle. However, as a self-care therapy, dependency has been traditionally considered a contraindication. However, assistance to perform PD (asPD) can be provided regardless of the patient’s age and the duration of such help. This paper is aimed at reporting on assisted PD use in a Spanish Center, and is the first report on asPD from this country.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the electronic medical records of all patients consecutively treated with PD between May 1997 and December 2020 in our PD Unit. Assisted PD was defined as PD treatment requiring the help of another person. On the basis of the duration of dependency, we divided our cohort into: Group 1: Patients totally dependent at the start of PD treatment; Group 2: self-care patients that developed total dependency during follow up; Group 3: patients who needed short-term PD assistance. Group 4, consisting of 175 self-care PD, served as the control group.
Results
Seventy-three percent of patients who required asPD did so during their follow up, showing that an important proportion of patients may require some help even if they were autonomous at the beginning of PD. Even for short time periods, asPD should be an option, as up to 44% of autonomous PD patients became dependent for different reasons over time. Spouses were the most frequent caregivers and absence or loss of caregiver was a main reason for switching to hemodialysis. Fourteen percent of the patients received asPD as palliative care, with clinical symptoms and perceived well-being as the main treatment goals, with adequate results. The need for support and the quality of life were periodically discussed by patients, family members and hospital staff.
Conclusion
Assisted PD is a safe option for dependent patients, young or elderly, and may result less expensive for our healthcare system, even when caregivers receive a financial incentive.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kramer A, Boenink R, Stel VS, Santiuste-de-Pablos C, Tomović F, Golan E, Kerschbaum J, Seyahi N, Ioanou K, Beltrán P, Zurriaga O, Magaz Á, Slon Roblero MF, Gjorgjievski N, Garneata L, Arribas F, Galvão AA, Bell S, Ots-Rosenberg M, Muñoz-Terol JM, Winzeler R, Hommel K, Åsberg A, Spustova V, Palencia García MÁ, Vazelov E, Finne P, ten Dam MAGJ, Lopot F, Trujillo-Alemán S, Lassalle M, Kolesnyk MO, Santhakumaran S, Idrizi A, Andrusev A, Comas Farnés J, Komissarov K, Resić H, Palsson R, Kuzema V, Garcia Bazaga MA, Ziginskiene E, Stendahl M, Bonthuis M, Massy ZA, Jager KJ (2020) The ERA-EDTA Registry annual report 2018: a summary. Clin Kidney J 14(1):107–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfaa271
Oliver MJ, Quinn RR, Richardson EP, Kiss AJ, Lamping DL, Manns BJ (2007) Home care assistance and the utilization of peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 71:673–678
Guilloteau S, Lobbedez T, Guillouët S, Verger C, Ficheux M, Lanot A, Béchade C (2018) Impact of assisted peritoneal dialysis modality on outcomes: a cohort study of the French Language Peritoneal Dialysis Registry. Am J Nephrol 48(6):425–433. https://doi.org/10.1159/000494664 (Epub 2018 Nov 21 PMID: 30463079)
Giuliani A, Karopadi AN, Prieto-Velasco M et al (2017) Worldwide experiences with assisted peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int 37(5):503–508. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2016.00214
Ley 41/2002, BOE-A-2002-22188, updated 5TH June 2021. https://www.boe.es/eli/es/l/2002/11/14/41/con Accessed 11th Jul 2022
Remón-Rodríguez C, Quirós-Ganga P, Portolés-Pérez J, Gómez-Roldán C, Miguel-Carrasco A, Borràs-Sans M, Rodríguez-Carmona A, Pérez-Fontán M, Sánchez-Álvarez JE, Rodríguez SC, Grupo Cooperativo Registros Españoles de Diálisis Peritoneal (2014) Resultados del trabajo cooperativo de los registros españoles de diálisis peritoneal: análisis de 12 años de seguimiento [Results of the cooperative study of Spanish peritoneal dialysis registries: analysis of 12 years of follow-up]. Nefrologia 34(1):18–33. https://doi.org/10.3265/Nefrologia.pre2013.Jul.12106
Memoria Registro Español de Enfermos Renales (REER): Informe 2020—datos preliminares. https://www.senefro.org/contents/webstructure/MEMORIA_REER_2020_PRELIMINAR.pdf. Accessed 20 Mar 2022
Woodrow G, Fan SL, Reid C, Denning J, Pyrah AN (2017) Renal Association Clinical Practice Guideline on peritoneal dialysis in adults and children. BMC Nephrol 18(1):333
Li PK, Szeto CC, Piraino B, de Arteaga J, Fan S, Figueiredo AE et al (2016) ISPD peritonitis recommendations: 2016 update on prevention and treatment. Perit Dial Int 36(5):481–508
Gorrin MR, Teruel-Briones JL, Vion VB, Rexach L, Quereda C (2015) Palliative peritoneal dialysis: implementation of a home care programme for terminal patients treated with peritoneal dialysis (PD). Nefrologia 35(2):146–149
Puapatanakul P, Kanjanabuch T, Tungsanga K, Cheawchanwattana A, Tangjittrong K, Lounseng N, Songviriyavithaya P, Zhao J, Wang AY, Shen J, Perl J, Davies SJ, Finkelstein FO, Johnson DW (2022) Assisted peritoneal dialysis performed by caregivers and its association with patient outcomes. Perit Dial Int. https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608221078903 (Epub ahead of print. PMID: 35164609)
Lobbedez T et al (2006) Assisted peritoneal dialysis. Experience in a French renal department. Perit Dial Int 26:671–676
Song Q, Yan H, Yu Z et al (2021) Assisted peritoneal dialysis: a feasible KRT modality for frail older patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). Sci Rep 11:14928. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-94032-8
Lanot A, Bechade C, Boyer A, Ficheux M, Lobbedez T (2021) Assisted peritoneal dialysis and transfer to haemodialysis: a cause-specific analysis with data from the RDPLF. Nephrol Dial Transplant 36(2):330–339. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaa289 (PMID: 33313920)
Htay H, Cho Y, Pascoe EM, Hawley C, Clayton PA, Borlace M, Badve SV, Sud K, Boudville N, Chen JH, Sypek M, Johnson DW (2020) Multicentre registry data analysis comparing outcomes of culture-negative peritonitis and different subtypes of culture-positive peritonitis in peritoneal dialysis patients. Perit Dial Int 40(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860819879891 (PMID: 32063153)
Yu Y, Liu ZW, Zhou W, Zhao M, Qiu D, Li YL, Xiao SY (2019) Cutoff of the Zarit Burden Interview in predicting depression and anxiety. Qual Life Res 28(9):2525–2533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02208-7 (Epub 2019 May 14 PMID: 31089989)
Teixidó-Planas J, Tarrats Velasco L, Arias-Suárez N, Cosculluela MA (2018) Carer’s burden of peritoneal dialysis patients Questionnaire and scale validation. Nefrologia (Engl Ed) 38(5):535–544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nefro.2018.02.006 (Epub 2018 Apr 21. PMID: 29685333)
Brown EA, Hurst H (2020) Delivering peritoneal dialysis for the multimorbid, frail and palliative patient. Perit Dial Int 40(3):327–332. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860819893558 (Epub 2020 Jan 17 PMID: 32063211)
American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity (2012) Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians. J Am Geriatr Soc 60:E1–E25
Bear RA, Stockie S (2014) Patient engagement and patient-centred care in the management of advanced chronic kidney disease and chronic kidney failure. Can J Kidney Health Dis 1:24
Lu E, Chai E (2021) Kidney supportive care in peritoneal dialysis: developing a person-centered kidney disease care plan. Kidney Med 4(2):100392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xkme.2021.10.005 (PMID: 35243304; PMCID: PMC8861952)
Blake PG, Quinn RR, Oliver MJ (2013) Peritoneal dialysis and the process of modality selection. Perit Dial Int 33(3):233–241. https://doi.org/10.3747/pdi.2012.00119
Brown EA, Ekstrand A, Gallieni M, Gorrín MR, Gudmundsdottir H, Guedes AM, Heidempergher M, Kitsche B, Lobbedez T, Lundström UH, McCarthy K, Mellotte GJ, Moranne O, Petras D, Povlsen JV, Punzalan S, Wiesholzer M (2022) Availability of assisted peritoneal dialysis in Europe: call for increased and equal access. Nephrol Dial Transpl. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfac193
van der Eck-Sluijs A, van Jaarsveld BC, Allen J, Altabas K, Béchade C, Bonenkamp AA, Burkhalter F, Clause AL, Corbett RW, Dekker FW, Eden G, François K, Gudmundsdottir H, Lundström UH, de Laforcade L, Lambie M, Martin H, Pajek J, Panuccio V, Ros-Ruiz S, Steubl D, Vega A, Wojtaszek E, Davies SJ, Van Biesen W, Abrahams AC (2021) Assisted peritoneal dialysis across Europe: practice variation and factors associated with availability. Perit Dial Int 41(6):533–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/08968608211049882 (Epub 2021 Oct 21. PMID: 34672219)
Giuliani A, Sgarabotto L, Manani SM, Tantillo I, Ronco C, Zanella M (2022) Assisted peritoneal dialysis: strategies and outcomes. Ren Replace Ther 8(1):2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41100-021-00390-4 (Epub 2022 Jan 10. PMID: 35035998; PMCID: PMC8744043)
Maierean SM, Oliver MJ (2021) Health outcomes and cost considerations of assisted peritoneal dialysis: a narrative review. Blood Purif 50:662–666
Nadeau-Fredette AC, Bargman JM (2019) Characteristics associated with peritoneal dialysis technique failure: are we asking the right questions? Am J Kidney Dis 74(5):586–588. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.07.002 (Epub 2019 Sep 9 PMID: 31515139)
Acknowledgements
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We have read and understood the journal policy on disclosing conflicts of interest and declare that we have none. None of the authors have any financial interests.
Human and animal rights
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board at which the studies were conducted (IRB approval number 047/22) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
As data were retrospectively collected and derived from routine clinical practice, further consent was waived.
Data availability statement
The data underlying this article will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.
Author contributions
All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. RHSB analysis and interpretation of data, drafting and revising the article. VBV analysis of data, revising the article. MFL revising the article. MERG Conception, design, interpretation of data, providing intellectual content of critical importance to the work described. Final approval of the version to be published.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sosa Barrios, R.H., Burguera Vion, V., Fernández Lucas, M. et al. Assisted peritoneal dialysis (asPD): age is not the key. J Nephrol 35, 2451–2457 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01420-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40620-022-01420-y