Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of administrative health databases to estimate incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in Piedmont Region, Italy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Endocrinological Investigation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Recent studies from national registries have described changing patterns in epidemiology of acromegaly. Our retrospective study used administrative databases to estimate prevalence and incidence of acromegaly in the Piedmont Region, Italy.

Methods

This study was conducted in Piedmont between 2012 and 2016 on administrative health databases for inpatients and outpatients of any age. Enrollees were included if claims suggestive of acromegaly were identified in at least two of the following databases: Drug Claims Registry, Hospital Information System, Co-payment Exemption Registry and Outpatient Specialist Service Information System.

Results

369 individuals (M = 146, F = 223) met our criteria. Overall incidence was 5.3 per million person years (95% CI 4.2–6.7), and prevalence was 83 cases per million inhabitants (95% CI 75–92). Mean age was 50.9 years. Both incidence and prevalence were slightly higher among women (rate ratio 1.08, prevalence ratio 1.43). Age-specific incidence was similar between sexes up to 39 years and diverged thereafter, with an increasing trend recorded among men. Prevalence was higher in women aged 40–79 years, and increased continuously up to 79 years in both sexes.

Conclusions

This is the first population-based study conducted in Italy to estimate incidence and prevalence of acromegaly and results show a higher prevalence than previously reported. Although our algorithm requires proper validation, it constitutes a promising tool to describe the epidemiology of acromegaly.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Melmed S (2009) Acromegaly: pathogenesis and treatment. J Clin Investig 119:3189–3202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Katznelson L, Laws ER Jr, Melmed S, Molitch ME, Murad MH, Utz A, Wass JA, Endocrine Society (2014) Acromegaly: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(11):3933–3951

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Katznelson L, Atkinson JL, Cook DM, Ezzat SZ, Hamrahian AH, Miller KK, American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (2011) American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for the diagnosis and treatment of acromegaly-2011 update. Endocr Pract 17(Suppl 4):1–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mestron A, Webb SM, Astorga R, Benito P, Catala M, Gaztambide S, Gomez JM, Halperin I, Lucas-Morante T, Moreno B, Obiols G, de Pablos P, Paramo C, Pico A, Torres E, Varela C, Vazquez JA, Zamora J, Albareda M, Gilabert M (2004) Epidemiology, clinical characteristics, outcome, morbidity and mortality in acromegaly based on the Spanish Acromegaly Registry (Registro Espanol de Acromegalia, REA). Eur J Endocrinol 151:439–446

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Starke RM, Raper DM, Payne SC, Vance ML, Oldfield EH, Jane JA Jr (2013) Endoscopic vs microsurgical transsphenoidal surgery for acromegaly: outcomes in a concurrent series of patients using modern criteria for remission. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:3190–3198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Giustina A, Chanson P, Kleinberg D, Bronstein MD, Clemmons DR, Klibanski A, van der Lely AJ, Strasburger CJ, Lamberts SW, Ho KK, Casanueva FF, Melmed S, Acromegaly Consensus Group (2014) Expert consensus document: A consensus on the medical treatment of acromegaly. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10(4):243–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giustina A, Arnaldi G, Bogazzi F, Cannavò S, Colao A, De Marinis L, De Menis E, Degli Uberti E, Giorgino F, Grottoli S, Lania AG, Maffei P, Pivonello R, Ghigo E (2017) Pegvisomant in acromegaly: an update. J Endocrinol Investig 40(6):577–589

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Alexander L, Appleton D, Hall R, Ross WM, Wilklnson R (1980) Epidemiology of acromegaly in the Newcastle region. Clin Endocrinol 12:71–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bengtsson BA, Eden S, Ernest I, Oden A, Sjogren B (1988) Epidemiology and long-term survival in acromegaly. A study of 166 cases diagnosed between 1955 and 1984. Acta Med Scand 223:327–335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritchie CM, Atkinson AB, Kennedy AL, Lyons AR, Gordon DS, Fannin T, Hadden DR (1990) Ascertainment and natural history of treated acromegaly in Northern Ireland. Ulst Med J 59(1):55–62

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Daly AF, Rixhon M, Adam C, Dempegioti A, Tichomirowa MA, Beckers A (2006) High prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a cross-sectional study in the provence of Liege, Belgium. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 91:4769–4775

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sesmilo G (2013) Epidemiology of acromegaly in Spain. Endocrinol Nutr 60:470–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Burton T, Le Nestour E, Neary M, Ludlam WH (2016) Incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in a large US health plan database. Pituitary 19(3):262–267

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Dal J, Feldt-Rasmussen U, Andersen M et al (2016) Acromegaly incidence, prevalence, complications and long-term prognosis: a nationwide cohort study. Eur J Endocrinol 175(3):181–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lavrentaki A, Paluzzi A, Wass JAH, Karavitaki N (2017) Epidemiology of Acromegaly: review of population studies. Pituitary 20:4–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Broder MS, Chang E, Reddy SR, Neary MP (2017) An approach to using data mining to support early identification of acromegaly. Endocr Pract 23(4):422–431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Broder MS, Chang E, Cherepanov D, Neary MP, Ludlam WH (2016) Incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in the united states: a claims-based analysis. Endocr Pract 22(11):1327–1335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sesmilo G, Webb SM, Neuroendocrinology Group of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition (2010) Twelve years of the Spanish acromegaly registry: a historical view of acromegaly management in Spain. Endocrinol Nutr 57:39–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bex M, Abs R, T’Sjoen G, Mockel J, Velkeniers B, Muermans K, AcroBel Maiter D (2007) The Belgian registry on acromegaly: a survey of the “real-life” outcome in 418 acromegalic subjects. Eur J Endocrinol 157:399–409

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reincke M, Petersenn S, Buchfelder M, Gerbert B, Skrobek-Engel G, Franz H, Lohmann R, Quabbe HJ (2006) The German Acromegaly Registry: description of the database and initial results. Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 114:498–505

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tjörnstrand A, Gunnarsson K, Evert M, Holmberg E, Ragnarsson O, Rosén T, Filipsson Nyström H (2014) The incidence rate of pituitary adenomas in western Sweden for the period 2001–2011. Eur J Endocrinol 171(4):519–526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Arnardottir S, Burman P, Dahlqvist P et al (2014) Acromegaly in Sweden 1991–2011: prospective study based on the Swedish pituitary registry. In: Program of the 16th International Congress of Endocrinology and the Endocrine Society’s 96th annual meeting and expo, Chicago (Abstract)

  23. Hoskuldsdottir GT, Fjalldal SB, Sigurjonsdottir HA (2015) The incidence and prevalence of acromegaly, a nationwide study from 1955 through 2013. Pituitary 18(6):803–807

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Agustsson TT, Baldvinsdottir T, Jonasson JG, Olafsdottir E, Steinthorsdottir V, Sigurdsson G, Thorsson AV, Carroll PV, Korbonits M, Benediktsson R (2015) The epidemiology of pituitary adenomas in Iceland, 1955–2012: a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Endocrinol 173(5):655–664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Arosio M, Reimondo G, Malchiodi E, Berchialla P, Borraccino A, De Marinis L, Pivonello R, Grottoli S, Losa M, Cannavò S, Minuto F, Montini M, Bondanelli M, De Menis E, Martini C, Angeletti G, Velardo A, Peri A, Faustini-Fustini M, Tita P, Pigliaru F, Borretta G, Scaroni C, Bazzoni N, Bianchi A, Appetecchia M, Cavagnini F, Lombardi G, Ghigo E, Beck-Peccoz P, Colao A, Terzolo M, Italian Study Group of Acromegaly (2012) Predictors of morbidity and mortality in acromegaly: an Italian survey. Eur J Endocrinol 167(2):189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ribeiro-Oliveira A Jr, Barkan A (2012) The changing face of acromegaly—advances in diagnosis and treatment. Nat Rev Endocrinol 8(10):605–611

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Heitkamp DE, Gunderman RB (2014) The interventional radiology/diagnostic radiology certificate: asking the hard questions. Radiology 273(2):322–325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Freda PU, Beckers AM, Katznelson L, Molitch ME, Montori VM, Post KD, Vance ML, Endocrine Society (2011) Pituitary incidentaloma: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(4):894–904

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Lonser RR, Kindzelski BA, Mehta GU, Jane JA Jr, Oldfield EH (2010) Acromegaly without imaging evidence of pituitary adenoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(9):4192–4196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by PRIN (Progetti di ricerca di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale) 2015 (2015ZHKFTA_001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Aimaretti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study protocol was approved by the local ethical committee of the “Maggiore della Carità” Hospital, Novara (CE 58/18).

Informed consent

The study was performed using data routinely collected in the regional administrative health care databases and the authors had access only to anonymized data, so for this type of study informed consent was not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caputo, M., Ucciero, A., Mele, C. et al. Use of administrative health databases to estimate incidence and prevalence of acromegaly in Piedmont Region, Italy. J Endocrinol Invest 42, 397–402 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0928-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-018-0928-7

Keywords

Navigation