Abstract
The current study evaluated a procedure used to teach two children with autism to ask “why” questions maintained by causal information about an event. To increase the value of information as a reinforcer, the experimenter denied access to preferred items and did not provide a reason for the denial. Participants were taught to ask “why” questions and were provided with information that led them to access preferred items. To ensure that “why” questions only occurred when the information was valuable, we included a condition wherein access to preferred items was restricted but causal information was available. Both participants learned to ask “why” questions when causal information was not available and refrained from asking “why” questions when causal information was available.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Because the EO-absent condition seems to include variables that serve to decrease the value of information as a reinforcer and abate question-asking behaviors, referring to it as an AO condition may be more appropriate (Shillingsburg et al., 2014).
References
American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.).
Barlow, D. H., & Hayes, S. C. (1979). Alternating treatments design: One strategy for comparing the effects of two treatments in a single subject. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 12, 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1979.12-199
Bell, M. C., & Williams, B. A. (2013). Conditioned reinforcement in chain schedules when time to reinforcement is held constant. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 99, 179–188. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeab.10
Carr, E. G., & Durand, M. V. (1985). Reducing problem behaviors through functional communication training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1985.18-111
Carr, J. E., Nicolson, A. C., & Higbee, T. S. (2000). Evaluation of a brief multiple-stimulus preference assessment in a naturalistic context. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 353–357. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2000.33-353
Clark, K. M., & Green, G. (2004). Comparision of two procedures for teaching dictated word/symbol relations to learners with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 503–507. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-503
Eikeseth, O. S., & Smith, D. P. (2013). An analysis of verbal stimulus control in intraverbal behavior: Implications for practice and applied research. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 29, 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393130
Endicott, K., & Higbee, T. S. (2007). Contriving motivating operations to evoke mands for information in preschoolers with autism. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 1, 210–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2006.10.003
Frazier, B. N., Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (2009). Preschoolers search for explanatory information within adult-child conversation. Child Development, 80, 1592–1611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01356.x
Friman, P. C., & Poling, A. (1995). Making life easier with effort: Basic findings and applied research on response effort. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 583–590. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1995.28-583
Hagopian, L. P., Wilson, D. M., & Wilder, D. A. (2001). Assessment and treatment of problem behavior maintained by escape from attention and access to tangible items. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 229–232. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2001.34-229
Hall, G., & Sundberg, M. L. (1987). Teaching mands by manipulating conditioned establishing operations. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 5, 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392819
Howlett, M. A., Sidener, T. M., Progar, P. R., & Sidener, D. W. (2011). Manipulation of motivating operations and use of a script-fading procedure to teach mands for location to children with language delays. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 4, 943–947. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2011.44-943
Iwata, B. A., & Dozier, C. L. (2008). Clinical application of functional analysis methodology. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391714
Karsten, A. M., & Carr, J. E. (2009). The effects of differential reinforcement of unprompted responding on the skill acquisition of children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 42, 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2009.42-327
Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single case research designs. Oxford University Press US.
Landa, R. K., Hansen, B., & Shillingsburg, M. A. (2017). Teaching mands for information using “when” to children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 50, 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.387
Lechago, S. A., Carr, J. E., Grow, L. L., Love, J. R., & Almason, S. M. (2010). Mands for information generalize across establishing operations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 43, 381–395. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2010.43-381
Michael, J. (1982). Distinguishing between discriminative and motivational functions of stimuli. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 149–155. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1982.37-149
Michael, J. (1993). Establishing operations. The Behavior Analyst, 16, 191–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392623
Michael, J., & Miguel, C. F. (2020). Motivating operations. In J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, & W. L. Heward (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (3rd ed., pp. 372–394). Pearson.
Michael, J., Palmer, D. C., & Sundberg, M. L. (2011). The multiple control of verbal behavior. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393089
Miguel, C. F. (2017). The generalization of mands. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 33, 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-017-0090-x
Shillingsburg, M. A., Bowen, C. N., & Valentino, A. L. (2013). Mands for information using “how” under EO-absent and EO-present conditions. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30, 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-013-0002-7
Shillingsburg, M. A., Bowen, C. N., Valentino, A. L., & Pierce, L. E. (2014). Mands for information using “who?” and “which?” in the presence of establishing and abolishing operations. Journal for Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.101
Shillingsburg, M. A., Gayman, C. M., & Walton, W. (2016). Using textual prompts to teach mands for information using “who?”. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 32, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-016-0053-7
Shillingsburg, M. A., & Valentino, A. L. (2011). Teaching a child with autism to mand for information using “how?”. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 27, 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03393100
Sidener, T. M., Carr, J. E., Karsten, A. M., Severtson, J. M., Cornelius, C. E., & Heinicke, M. R. (2010). Evaluation of single and mixed verbal operant arrangements for teaching mands and tacts. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 26, 15–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03393079
Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Somers, A., Sidener, T., DeBar, R., & Sidener, D. (2014). Establishing concurrent mands for items and mands for information about location in children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 30, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-014-0007-x
Sundberg, M. L. (2008). Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program: The VB-MAPP. AVB Press.
Sundberg, M. L., Loeb, M., Hale, L., & Eigenheer, P. (2002). Contriving establishing operations to teach mands for information. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 18, 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf03392968
Sundberg, M. L., & Michael, J. (2001). The benefits of Skinner’s analysis of verbal behavior for children with autism. Behavior Modification, 25, 698–724. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445501255003
Sundberg, M. L., & Partington, J. W. (1998). Teaching language to children with autism or other developmental disabilities. Behavior Analysts.
Valentino, A. L., Fu, S. B., & Padover, J. L. (2019). Teaching mands for information using “why” to children with autism. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 35, 245–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-019-00113-1
Van Houten, R., Axelrod, S., Bailey, J. S., Favell, J. E., Foxx, R. M., Iwata, B. A., & Lovaas, O. I. (1988). The right to effective behavioral treatment. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 381–384. https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.1988.21-381
Watson, P. J., & Workman, E. A. (1981). The non-concurrent multiple baseline design across-individuals design: An extension of the traditional multiple baseline. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 12, 257–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7916(81)90055-0
Acknowledgement
Portions of this study are based on a thesis submitted by the first author under the supervision of the third author to the Department of Psychology at California State University, Sacramento, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree in Psychology: Applied Behavior Analysis. We would like to thank Tatiana Zhirnova and Areli Perez-Sotelo for their assistance with data collection.
Funding
Completion of this study was supported by both the Speech and Language Pathology-Applied Behavior Analysis Special Interest Group and the Verbal Behavior Special Interest Group of the Association for Behavior Analysis International.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical approval
All procedures have been approved by the Institutional Review Board at California State University, Sacramento under Protocol #17-18-40.
Informed Consent
Informed consent, as well as participants’ assent, has been obtained.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pyles, M.L., Chastain, A.N. & Miguel, C.F. Teaching Children with Autism to Mand for Information Using “Why?” as a Function of Denied Access. Analysis Verbal Behav 37, 17–34 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-020-00141-2
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40616-020-00141-2