Abstract
Background
Progranulin is an anti-inflammatory protein that plays an essential role in the synapse function and the maintenance of neurons in the central nervous system (CNS). It has been shown that the CSF level of progranulin increases in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients and is associated with the deposition of amyloid-beta (Aβ) and tau in the brain tissue. In this study, we aimed to assess the longitudinal changes in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) progranulin levels during different pathophysiological stages of AD and investigate associated AD pathologic features.
Methods
We obtained the CSF and neuroimaging data of 1001 subjects from the ADNI database. The participants were classified into four groups based on the A/T/N framework: A + /TN + , A + /TN−, A−/TN + , and A−/TN−.
Results
Based on our analysis there was a significant difference in CSF progranulin (P = 0.001) between ATN groups. Further ANOVA analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the rate of change of CSF-progranulin ATN groups. We found that the rate of change of CSF progranulin was associated with baseline Aβ-PET only in the A−/TN + group. A significant association was found between the rate of change of CSF progranulin and the Aβ-PET rate of change only in A−/TN +
Conclusion
Our findings revealed that an increase in CSF progranulin over time is associated with faster formation of Aβ plaques in patients with only tau pathology based on the A/T/N classification (suspected non-Alzheimer’s pathology). Together, our findings showed that the role of progranulin-related microglial activity on AD pathology can be stage-dependent, complicated, and more prominent in non-AD pathologic changes. Thus, there is a need for further studies to consider progranulin-based therapies for AD treatment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is considered the most common cause of dementia among the older population with a prevalence of 30% in patients over 60 years old [1, 2]. AD starts with episodic memory loss followed by progressive cognitive decline which in turn can cause disabilities in daily activities [3]. AD is characterized by neuronal loss, dysfunction of synapses, neuroinflammation, and the pathologic deposition of beta-amyloid (Aβ) plaques and phosphorylated tau (P-tau) fibrils [4]. The Aβ peptide is involved in the hemostasis process of the brain and originates from the amyloid precursor protein (APP) gene [5, 6]. It is believed that tau along with Aβ plays an important role in the pathology of AD. Tau is involved in the maintenance of synaptic functions which in turn plays an important role in cognitive functions [7, 8].
The accumulation of amyloid plaques and tau proteins can activate the microglia and as a result, they aggregate around the amyloid plaques which in turn exacerbates disease severity [9, 10]. In response to neuroinflammation, as happens in AD, microglia express particular proteins such as progranulin [11]. Progranulin is an anti-inflammatory protein that originates from the GRN gene. This protein plays an essential role in the synapse function and the maintenance of neurons in the central nervous system (CNS) [12, 13]. The expression of this protein by microglia increases in pathologic conditions [14]. It has been shown that the CSF level of progranulin increases in AD patients [15]. Moreover, the accumulation of progranulin in the margins of amyloid plaques is reported in mouse model studies [16]. Recent studies reported that there is a significant association between amounts of progranulin and the accumulation of Aβ and tau in the brain tissue [17, 18]. Some of these studies reflected that the overexpression of progranulin decreases the risk of Aβ and tau depositions which can decelerate the process of cognitive decline [17, 19].
To better understand the role of mentioned biomarkers in the AD pathophysiology the Amyloid/Tau/Neurodegeneration (A/T/N) system was provided by the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association [8]. In this classification system, A refers to amyloid plaques, T refers to tau neurofibrillary tangles which are two the most reliable indicators of AD, and N in the A/T/N system represents neurodegeneration. These factors can be evaluated through a variety of imaging and enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) methods [20,21,22]. Previous studies reflected contradictory findings in the association of progranulin and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) Aβ and tau and they lacked longitudinal assessment on the role of progranulin in AD pathology. In this study, we aimed to investigate the association of progranulin and longitudinal change in the AD imaging biomarkers including Aβ- and tau-PET to provide a better view on the role of progranulin in the AD pathophysiology.
Methods and materials
Participants
We performed a cross-sectional and longitudinal study that investigates the levels of CSF progranulin in a cohort consisting of 1001 participants with available baseline CSF-progranulin measures enrolled in the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (http://adni.loni.usc.edu). The ADNI project, led by Principal Investigator Michael W Weiner, is a multicenter longitudinal study aimed at the development and validation of biomarkers for subject selection and as surrogate outcome measures in late-onset AD. The study procedures were approved by the institutional review boards (IRB) of all participating centers, and informed consent was obtained from all participants or their surrogates. In addition, the study was approved by our local IRB (LMU).
Classification
In accordance with the recently published 2018 NIA-AA “research framework” for the diagnosis of AD [20], participants enrolled in the ADNI project were categorized into distinct groups based on their biomarker profiles, utilizing the A/T/N scheme [23]. The A/T/N scheme encompasses three biomarker groups: “A” represents aggregated Aβ, “T” represents aggregated tau, and “N” represents neurodegeneration. Each biomarker group was classified as either negative (−) or positive ( +) based on the normal or abnormal status of the respective biomarkers.
In this study, participants were classified as “A + ” if their CSF Aβ1-42 level was below 976.6 pg/ml, “T + ” if their P-tau181 level was higher than 21.8 pg/ml, and “N + /” if their T-tau level surpassed 245 pg/ml. For the purpose of simplifying comparisons, we combined the aggregated tau (T) and neurodegeneration (N) groups. Consequently, TN negative (TN−) was defined as having both aggregated tau (T) and neurodegeneration (N) biomarkers falling within the normal range (T− and N−, specifically P-tau181P ≤ 21.8 pg/ml and T-tau ≤ 245 pg/ml). Participants were classified as TN positive (TN +) if either the aggregated tau (T) or neurodegeneration (N) biomarkers were abnormal (T + or N + , i.e., P-tau181P > 21.8 pg/ml or T-tau > 245 pg/ml). It is noteworthy that only a small proportion, specifically 5.4%, of the total individuals exhibited discrepancies between the aggregated tau (T) and neurodegeneration (N) biomarker groups.
CSF-progranulin measurements
CSF-progranulin measurements were performed using MSD platform-based assay, which has been previously documented [24, 25]. CSF-progranulin levels were measured using an established ELISA protocol. Streptavidin-coated plates were blocked overnight, then incubated with a biotinylated anti- progranulin capture antibody, followed by washing. CSF and internal standard samples were added and incubated, then washed. A detection antibody was added, followed by washing and incubation with a secondary antibody. After washing, an electrochemical signal was generated using MSD Read buffer, and light emission was measured. Recombinant human progranulin protein served as a standard. progranulin levels were reported as pg/mL. The CSF-progranulin measurements used in this study are accessible to the public through the ADNI database. Number of participants with available CSF progranulin in each time-point is detailed in Supplementary 1.
PET imaging
Within the ADNI study, AV45-PET (Aβ) imaging was conducted using a total of 6 5-min time frames, approximately 60–90 min after the injection of 370 Mbq radiolabeled F18-AV45 tracer. These time frames were subsequently co-registered and averaged to generate a mean AV45 image. The global AV45 standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was calculated by averaging across specific cortical regions and normalizing to a composite reference region that encompassed the entire cerebellum and cerebral white matter. This methodology adheres to a previously described protocol, which demonstrated the stability of longitudinal AV45 changes using this composite reference region [26]. To evaluate longitudinal changes in AV45 uptake, we computed the annual rate of change in global AV45 SUVR values for each participant. This involved determining the absolute difference in SUVR between subsequent assessments and dividing it by the time difference in years. For participants with more than two AV45 scans, multiple AV45 change rates were calculated, such as from baseline to any available follow-up visit.
Tau-PET imaging was performed 75 min after the administration of F18-radiolabeled AV1451 tracer, utilizing 6 5-min blocks. The acquired images were co-registered and averaged across blocks, and then intensity-normalized to the inferior cerebellar gray matter, following the methodology outlined in Maass et al. [27]. Specific SUVR scores for regions of interest (ROIs) defined by Braak stages were obtained from the ADNI core and downloaded from the ADNI database. Detailed protocols for these procedures can be found on the ADNI homepage and in previous publications [28]. It is important to note that we excluded Braak stage 2 (i.e., hippocampus) from the analysis due to known off-target binding of the AV1451 tracer in this particular region, as reported in Lemoine et al. [29]. For participants with more than two AV1451 scans, multiple AV1451 change rates were calculated, such as from baseline to any available follow-up visit.
Cognitive assessment
Memory performance was assessed using the ADNI-mem composite memory score, which encompasses various cognitive tests. These tests include the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, AD Assessment Scale—Cognitive Subscale, Word Recall of the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and the Wechsler Logical Memory Scale II. The ADNI-mem score combines the results of these tests to provide a comprehensive evaluation of memory function [30].
Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses were conducted using the R software (https://www.rproject.org/). The normality of the data was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Variables that did not follow a normal distribution were log(10) transformed prior to further analysis. Baseline sociodemographic data were compared between the ATN groups using analysis of variance (ANOVA), while Chi-square tests were employed for comparing dichotomous variables such as APOE status and sex. To account for multiple comparisons, Bonferroni correction was applied to all post-hoc tests.
To evaluate the rate of change over time in CSF-progranulin concentrations, individual slopes were derived for each subject using a linear mixed effect model (LMEM) from the lme4 R package. The LMEM included time (years from baseline) as a fixed factor and subject as a random factor. Subsequently, ANOVA was utilized to compare biomarker slopes and baseline levels between the ATN groups. Linear regression models were employed to investigate whether baseline concentration and the rate of change in CSF-progranulin level predicted ADNI-mem and PET tau and Aβ load. All analyses were adjusted for the effects of age, sex, education, and APOE ε4. Linear regression analyses were performed to assess the association between CSF progranulin (baseline and slope) and tau and Aβ-PET (baseline and rate of change) for the entire cohort and within individual-ATN groups. To control for false positives, the Bonferroni correction method was applied, with a significance level set at P < 0.05.
Results
The demographic and clinical characteristics of the included subjects are detailed in Table 1.
Baseline differences of CSF-progranulin concentrations between the ATN groups
Based on our analysis there was a significant difference in CSF progranulin (P = 0.001) between ATN groups (Fig. 1). The post-hoc pairwise comparisons showed a significant difference between groups for CSF progranulin (P < 0.001)(A−/TN− vs A + /TN−, A + /TN− vs A−/TN + , and A + /TN− vs A + /TN +).
Rate of change of CSF-progranulin concentrations between the ATN groups
We estimated the trajectory of CSF progranulin over 4 years of follow-up across the ATN group using linear mixed-effect models adjusted for the effect of age, sex, and APOE ε4 (Fig. 2A). Further ANOVA analysis revealed that there was no significant difference in the rate of change of CSF-progranulin ATN groups. The Bonferroni post-hoc pairwise comparisons showed the same results (Fig. 2B).
Association between cognitive performance and CSF progranulin
Using linear regression models adjusted for the effect of age, sex, education, and APOE e4 we found that the baseline level of CSF progranulin was significantly associated with lower cognitive performance in A-/TN- (β = − 0.152, P = 0.013) and A + /TN + (β = − 0.102, P = 0.041) (Fig. 3A). Among all participants, there was a significant association between CSF progranulin and cognitive performance (β = − 0.104, P < 0.001).
We analyzed the association between cognitive performance (ADNI-mem) and rate of change of CSF-progranulin concentrations using linear regression adjusted for the effect of age, sex, education, and APOE ε4. There was no significant association between cognitive performance (ADNI-mem) and the rate of change of CSF-progranulin concentrations in ATN groups (Fig. 3B).
Association between Tau- and Aβ-PET with CSF progranulin
In the first step, we investigated the association between baseline neuroimaging findings including tau and Aβ-PET with baseline levels of CSF progranulin (Fig. 4B). There was no association between CSF progranulin and tau and Aβ-PET in ATN groups or the entire cohort (Table 2). Next, we aimed to assess the association between longitudinal changes in tau and Aβ-PET (rate of change) with baseline levels of CSF progranulin. Our analysis revealed that there was no association between CSF progranulin and Aβ-PET rate of change in ATN groups or entire cohorts (Fig. 4A). However, CSF progranulin was associated with the tau-PET rate of change in the entire cohort but not ATN groups.
We analyzed if the longitudinal change in CSF progranulin (slope) was associated with baseline tau and Aβ-PET(Fig. 4D). We found that the rate of change of CSF progranulin was associated with baseline Aβ-PET only in the A−/TN + group. There was no significant association between longitudinal change in CSF progranulin with baseline tau-PET. We then investigated the possible association between the rate of change of CSF progranulin with longitudinal changes in tau and Aβ-PET (rate of change). A significant association was found between the rate of change of CSF progranulin and the Aβ-PET rate of change only in A−/TN + (Fig. 4C).
Discussion
In this study, we evaluated the potential association between CSF progranulin and the level of Aβ and tau deposition in the AD continuum. Considering the increased expression of progranulin by microglia in patients with AD continuum, the results of our study reported significant alterations of CSF progranulin between different ATN groups. Moreover, linear regression provided a considerable association between progranulin level and cognitive performance in all participants. In terms of the rate of progranulin change, no apparent differences were observed between ATN groups. Also, it is shown that cognitive performance is not related significantly to the rate of CSF-progranulin change in ATN groups. Furthermore, there was no significant association between CSF progranulin and the rate of change in Aβ-PET. However, in patients with only tau pathology, we observed a significant association between the rate of change of CSF progranulin and the Aβ-PET rate of change.
Our study suggested that the level of CSF progranulin is significantly distinct between different ATN groups. However, Suárez-Calvet et al. in their study, provided that progranulin level alone cannot be a valuable predictor in AD diagnosis [15]. These findings are consistent with the results of another study assessing CSF-progranulin levels in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) [31]. There are other molecules involved in AD pathology as well as progranulin, some of which are associated with progranulin CSF level. It is shown that higher amounts of CSF progranulin are related to higher levels of triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 2 (TREM2) in CSF and associated with weaker cognitive performance in patients with late AD. Thus, they concluded that measuring both CSF progranulin and TREM2 can be a more reliable indicator of microglia activity in AD patients [15]. Moreover, studies trying to find a therapy for FTD by modifying the levels of progranulin were unsuccessful [32]. TREM2 is expressed by microglia of CNS and is involved in phagocytosis and the migration of microglia [33,34,35]. The roles of progranulin and TREM2 are against each other since the loss of TREM2 leads to the maintenance of microglia in a hemostatic stage. In contrast, the deficiency in progranulin increases the activity of microglia [34]. Chen et al., in their study, reported a significant association between TREM2 and cognitive decline in AD pathology-positive participants. However, this study reflected no reliable value for CSF progranulin in the diagnosis or the prognosis of AD [36]. Previously we found that the CSF soluble TREM2 is associated with a decrease in tau aggregate spreading through functional connection [37].
Morenas-Rodríguez et al. in their study evaluating the role of CSF progranulin in neurodegenerative diseases, reported no significant association between this biomarker and the performance of patients with different neurodegenerative disorders in MMSE assessment nor cortical atrophy algorithm in these patients [31]. None of these studies attempted to evaluate the association of CSF progranulin and AD longitudinally and this can be a reason for different results with our study. Animal studies suggested that CSF-progranulin insufficiency is correlated to the increased risk of Aβ deposition and the phosphorylation of tau protein in mouse models and it is involved in the progression of AD pathology in these animals [17, 18]. Another longitudinal study observing potential associations between imaging alterations and progranulin level in FTD patients revealed that patients with progranulin mutations reflect a faster rate of whole-brain atrophy and there is a significant correlation between the progranulin level and asymmetric atrophies in the inferior frontal, temporal, and inferior parietal lobe of gray matter [38]. The findings of Whitwell et al. supported the theory of rapid brain atrophy in patients with GRN mutations. This study also revealed that these patients reflect hippocampus atrophy at the same rate as patients with microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene mutations [39]. Some studies reported that brain atrophy and cortical thickness can be more reliable indicators of cognitive decline than other biomarkers such as progranulin or tau [36, 40]. Also, studies evaluating the association of progranulin and tau deposition in cognitive decline have shown that reduced levels of CSF progranulin in AD are associated with increased amounts of T-tau in these patients suggesting that progranulin prevents tau accumulation and in turn the risk of neurodegeneration [41]. Suárez-Calvet et al. reported a significant association between CSF progranulin and CSF T-tau and P-tau in patients with Alzheimer’s continuum category [15]. Our study revealed no significant associations between longitudinal changes in CSF progranulin and baseline tau-PET.
Our study also revealed that increased longitudinal changes of CSF progranulin are associated with increased Aβ-PET alterations over time only in A−/TN + . Patients with either increased tau or neurogenerative diseases and no evidence of Aβ deposition are considered A−/TN + who are recently defined as suspected non-Alzheimer’s pathology (SNAP) and reflect a non-AD related neurodegeneration [42, 43]. This phenotype is more common in older males and reflects lower amounts of APOE 4 [42, 44, 45]. It is shown that progranulin decreases the accumulation risk of Aβ and thus, loss of this protein is associated with increased Aβ plaques. A significant association was reported between CSF progranulin and CSF Aβ in AD patients [46]. Revuelta et al. in their immunohistochemistry (IHC) study also reported a positive correlation between beta-amyloid concentration and progranulin [47].
Previous studies reported that increased activity of microglia is related to the progression of neurodegenerative disorders [48]. Progranulin is one of the main proteins expressed by microglia that is involved in the function of lysosomes in these cells and the reduction of progranulin levels results in increased expression of genes controlling the function of lysosomes [49]. Moreover, it is suggested that progranulin can play an essential role in the formation of lysosomes in microglia [12]. In fact, this protein can significantly decrease the rate of brain aging by suppressing microglial activity through increasing lysosomal trafficking in these cells [50]. Results of our study showed no strong associations between CSF level of progranulin and the pathophysiology process of AD continuum which in turn denies the effect of progranulin-related microglial activity in early AD.
Considering the crucial role of progranulin in lysosomal function, neuronal viability, and CNS inflammation, the restoration of progranulin levels to their physiological range in individuals with granulin mutations holds promising potential as a therapeutic approach [51]. By addressing the deficiency of progranulin, this strategy aims to mitigate the detrimental consequences associated with impaired lysosomal function, neuronal loss, and inflammatory processes within the CNS. Thus, the normalization of progranulin levels may offer significant therapeutic benefits for patients affected by granulin mutations. However, despite the findings of other studies regarding the elevation or restoring the level of progranulin, our findings does not support the role of progranulin in the AD pathophysiology progression [15, 52,53,54]. Thus, there might be need for further studies with larger sample size to reach a definitive conclusion.
Our study included some limitations that are worth mentioning. First, CSF progranulin might not be a complete indicator of complex microglia activity which makes it hard to bring a definitive conclusion on the role of microglia in the AD pathophysiology. Second, more results are needed besides the ADNI database to provide more reliable data about participants with longer follow-up and variable imaging methods. In addition, this study considered both T and N as a single group which can decrease the heterogeneity in our study. Finally, the length of evaluation participants should be increased in further longitudinal studies to report more reliable results.
This study was the first attempt to evaluate the longitudinal association between CSF-progranulin and AD-imaging biomarkers including Aβ and tau in patients with early AD. Based on our findings there was no cross-sectional and longitudinal association between CSF progranulin and AD pathologic hallmarks in the course of the disease. In addition, the absence of significant difference in baseline level and change of CSF progranulin between A/T/N groups showed that there might be no distinctive roles for progranulin in AD-related pathologic changes. However, our findings revealed that an increase in CSF-progranulin over time is associated with faster formation of Aβ plaques in patients with only tau pathology based on the A/T/N classification (SNAP). Together, our findings showed that the role of progranulin-related microglial activity on AD pathology can be stage-dependent, complicated, and more prominent in non-AD pathologic changes. Thus, there is a need for further studies to consider progranulin-based therapies for AD treatment.
Data availability
The datasets analyzed during the current study are available upon request with no restriction. Please contact Dr. Fardin Nabizadeh (fardinnabizade1378@gmail.com) to access data.
References
Ballard C, Gauthier S, Corbett A et al (2011) Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 377:1019–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61349-9
Masters CL, Bateman R, Blennow K et al (2015) Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers 1:15056. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.56
Silva MVF, Loures CMG, Alves LCV et al (2019) Alzheimer’s disease: risk factors and potentially protective measures. J Biomed Sci 26:33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12929-019-0524-y
Bronzuoli MR, Iacomino A, Steardo L et al (2016) Targeting neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease. J Inflamm Res 9:199–208. https://doi.org/10.2147/jir.S86958
Querfurth HW, LaFerla FM (2010) Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med 362:329–344. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0909142
Müller UC, Deller T, Korte M (2017) Not just amyloid: physiological functions of the amyloid precursor protein family. Nat Rev Neurosci 18:281–298. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2017.29
Naseri NN, Wang H, Guo J et al (2019) The complexity of tau in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 705:183–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2019.04.022
Regan P, Piers T, Yi JH et al (2015) Tau phosphorylation at serine 396 residue is required for hippocampal LTD. J Neurosci 35:4804–4812. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2842-14.2015
Lam S, Hérard AS, Boluda S et al (2022) Pathological changes induced by Alzheimer’s brain inoculation in amyloid-beta plaque-bearing mice. Acta Neuropathol Commun 10:112. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-022-01410-y
Merighi S, Nigro M, Travagli A et al (2022) Microglia and Alzheimer’s Disease. Int J Mol Sci. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232112990
Wang XM, Zeng P, Fang YY et al (2021) Progranulin in neurodegenerative dementia. J Neurochem 158:119–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnc.15378
Lui H, Zhang J, Makinson SR et al (2016) Progranulin deficiency promotes circuit-specific synaptic pruning by microglia via complement activation. Cell 165:921–935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.001
Gao X, Joselin AP, Wang L et al (2010) Progranulin promotes neurite outgrowth and neuronal differentiation by regulating GSK-3β. Protein Cell 1:552–562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-010-0067-1
Mendsaikhan A, Tooyama I, Walker DG (2019) Microglial progranulin: involvement in Alzheimer’s disease and neurodegenerative diseases. Cells. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8030230
Suárez-Calvet M, Capell A, Araque Caballero M et al (2018) CSF progranulin increases in the course of Alzheimer’s disease and is associated with sTREM2, neurodegeneration and cognitive decline. EMBO Mol Med. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201809712
Pereson S, Wils H, Kleinberger G et al (2009) Progranulin expression correlates with dense-core amyloid plaque burden in Alzheimer disease mouse models. J Pathol 219:173–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/path.2580
Minami SS, Min SW, Krabbe G et al (2014) Progranulin protects against amyloid β deposition and toxicity in Alzheimer’s disease mouse models. Nat Med 20:1157–1164. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.3672
Hosokawa M, Arai T, Masuda-Suzukake M et al (2015) Progranulin reduction is associated with increased tau phosphorylation in P301L tau transgenic mice. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 74:158–165. https://doi.org/10.1097/nen.0000000000000158
Van Kampen JM, Kay DG (2017) Progranulin gene delivery reduces plaque burden and synaptic atrophy in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS ONE 12:e0182896. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182896
Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K et al (2018) NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement 14:535–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2018.02.018
Kuhlmann J, Andreasson U, Pannee J et al (2017) CSF Aβ(1–42)-an excellent but complicated Alzheimer’s biomarker-a route to standardisation. Clin Chim Acta 467:27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2016.05.014
Hampel H, Blennow K, Shaw LM et al (2010) Total and phosphorylated tau protein as biological markers of Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Gerontol 45:30–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exger.2009.10.010
Jack CR Jr, Bennett DA, Blennow K et al (2016) A/T/N: An unbiased descriptive classification scheme for Alzheimer disease biomarkers. Neurology 87:539–547. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000002923
Suárez-Calvet M, Morenas-Rodríguez E, Kleinberger G et al (2019) Early increase of CSF sTREM2 in Alzheimer’s disease is associated with tau related-neurodegeneration but not with amyloid-β pathology. Mol Neurodegener 14:1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13024-018-0301-5
Suárez-Calvet M, Kleinberger G, Araque Caballero M et al (2016) sTREM2 cerebrospinal fluid levels are a potential biomarker for microglia activity in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease and associate with neuronal injury markers. EMBO Mol Med 8:466–476. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201506123
Landau SM, Fero A, Baker SL et al (2015) Measurement of longitudinal β-amyloid change with 18F-florbetapir PET and standardized uptake value ratios. J Nucl Med 56:567–574. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.114.148981
Maass A, Landau S, Baker SL et al (2017) Comparison of multiple tau-PET measures as biomarkers in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuroimage 157:448–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.058
Schöll M, Lockhart SN, Schonhaut DR et al (2016) PET imaging of tau deposition in the aging human brain. Neuron 89:971–982. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2016.01.028
Lemoine L, Leuzy A, Chiotis K et al (2018) Tau positron emission tomography imaging in tauopathies: The added hurdle of off-target binding. Alzheimers Dement (Amst) 10:232–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.01.007
Crane PK, Carle A, Gibbons LE et al (2012) Development and assessment of a composite score for memory in the Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (ADNI). Brain Imaging Behav 6:502–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-012-9186-z
Morenas-Rodríguez E, Cervera-Carles L, Vilaplana E et al (2016) Progranulin protein levels in cerebrospinal fluid in primary neurodegenerative dementias. J Alzheimers Dis 50:539–546. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-150746
Galimberti D, Fumagalli GG, Fenoglio C et al (2018) Progranulin plasma levels predict the presence of GRN mutations in asymptomatic subjects and do not correlate with brain atrophy: results from the GENFI study. Neurobiol Aging 62:245.e9-245.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2017.10.016
Hickman SE, Kingery ND, Ohsumi TK et al (2013) The microglial sensome revealed by direct RNA sequencing. Nat Neurosci 16:1896–1905. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3554
Mazaheri F, Snaidero N, Kleinberger G et al (2017) TREM2 deficiency impairs chemotaxis and microglial responses to neuronal injury. EMBO Rep 18:1186–1198. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201743922
Xiang X, Werner G, Bohrmann B et al (2016) TREM2 deficiency reduces the efficacy of immunotherapeutic amyloid clearance. EMBO Mol Med 8:992–1004. https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.201606370
Chen YH, Lin RR, Huang HF et al (2022) Microglial activation, tau pathology, and neurodegeneration biomarkers predict longitudinal cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease continuum. Front Aging Neurosci 14:848180. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2022.848180
Nabizadeh F (2023) sTREM2 is associated with attenuated tau aggregate accumulation in the presence of amyloid-β pathology. Brain Commun. https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcad286
Rohrer JD, Ridgway GR, Modat M et al (2010) Distinct profiles of brain atrophy in frontotemporal lobar degeneration caused by progranulin and tau mutations. Neuroimage 53:1070–1076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.12.088
Whitwell JL, Weigand SD, Gunter JL et al (2011) Trajectories of brain and hippocampal atrophy in FTD with mutations in MAPT or GRN. Neurology 77:393–398. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e318227047f
Wu Z, Peng Y, Hong M et al (2021) Gray matter deterioration pattern during Alzheimer’s disease progression: a regions-of-interest based Surface morphometry study. Front Aging Neurosci 13:593898. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.593898
Takahashi H, Klein ZA, Bhagat SM et al (2017) Opposing effects of progranulin deficiency on amyloid and tau pathologies via microglial TYROBP network. Acta Neuropathol 133:785–807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-017-1668-z
Caroli A, Prestia A, Galluzzi S et al (2015) Mild cognitive impairment with suspected nonamyloid pathology (SNAP): Prediction of progression. Neurology 84:508–515. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000001209
Dani M, Brooks DJ, Edison P (2017) Suspected non-Alzheimer’s pathology-Is it non-Alzheimer’s or non-amyloid? Ageing Res Rev 36:20–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2017.02.003
Jack CR Jr, Therneau TM, Wiste HJ et al (2016) Transition rates between amyloid and neurodegeneration biomarker states and to dementia: a population-based, longitudinal cohort study. Lancet Neurol 15:56–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00323-3
Jack CR Jr, Wiste HJ, Weigand SD et al (2014) Age-specific population frequencies of cerebral β-amyloidosis and neurodegeneration among people with normal cognitive function aged 50–89 years: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Neurol 13:997–1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1474-4422(14)70194-2
Körtvélyessy P, Gukasjan A, Sweeney-Reed CM et al (2015) Progranulin and Amyloid-β Levels: relationship to neuropsychology in frontotemporal and Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 46:375–380. https://doi.org/10.3233/jad-150069
Revuelta GJ, Rosso A, Lippa CF (2008) Association between progranulin and beta-amyloid in dementia with Lewy bodies. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 23:488–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317508321910
Aguzzi A, Barres BA, Bennett ML (2013) Microglia: scapegoat, saboteur, or something else? Science 339:156–161. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1227901
Zhou X, Sun L, Bastos de Oliveira F et al (2015) Prosaposin facilitates sortilin-independent lysosomal trafficking of progranulin. J Cell Biol 210:991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201502029
Martens LH, Zhang J, Barmada SJ et al (2012) Progranulin deficiency promotes neuroinflammation and neuron loss following toxin-induced injury. J Clin Invest 122:3955–3959. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci63113
Lee WC, Almeida S, Prudencio M et al (2014) Targeted manipulation of the sortilin–progranulin axis rescues progranulin haploinsufficiency. Hum Mol Genet 23:1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddt534
Cooper YA, Nachun D, Dokuru D et al (2018) Progranulin levels in blood in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 5:616–629. https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.560
Batzu L, Westman E, Pereira JB (2020) Cerebrospinal fluid progranulin is associated with increased cortical thickness in early stages of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging 88:61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2019.12.012
Hosokawa M, Tanaka Y, Arai T et al (2018) Progranulin haploinsufficiency reduces amyloid beta deposition in Alzheimer’s disease model mice. Exp Anim 67:63–70. https://doi.org/10.1538/expanim.17-0060
Acknowledgements
Data collection and sharing for this project were provided by the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (National Institutes of Health Grant U01 AG024904) and DOD ADNI (Department of Defense award number W81XWH-12-2-0012). ADNI is funded by the National Institute on Aging, the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, and through generous contributions from the following: AbbVie, Alzheimer’s Association; Alzheimer’s Drug Discovery Foundation; Araclon Biotech; BioClinica, Inc.; Biogen; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; CereSpir, Inc.; Cogstate; Eisai Inc.; Elan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Eli Lilly and Company; EuroImmun; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd and its affiliated company Genentech, Inc.; Fujirebio; GE Healthcare; IXICO Ltd.; Janssen Alzheimer Immunotherapy Research & Development, LLC.; Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development LLC.; Lumosity; Lundbeck; Merck & Co., Inc.; Meso Scale Diagnostics, LLC.; NeuroRx Research; Neurotrack Technologies; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation; Pfizer Inc.; Piramal Imaging; Servier; Takeda Pharmaceutical Company; and Transition Therapeutics. The Canadian Institutes of Health Research is providing funds to support ADNI clinical sites in Canada. Private sector contributions are facilitated by the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (www.fnih.org). The grantee organization is the Northern California Institute for Research and Education, and the study is coordinated by the Alzheimer’s Therapeutic Research Institute at the University of Southern California. ADNI data are disseminated by the Laboratory for Neuro Imaging at the University of Southern California. As such, the investigators within the ADNI contributed to the design and implementation of ADNI and/or provided data but did not participate in the analysis or writing of this report. A complete listing of ADNI investigators can be found at: http://adni.loni.usc.edu/wp-content/uploads/how_to_apply/ADNI_Acknowledgement_List.pdf
Funding
We do not have any financial support for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
FN: Designed the study, analyzed the data, and supervised the paper; FN: collected data and interpreted the data; FN and RZ: wrote the draft version of the manuscript. The manuscript was revised and approved by all authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The author declares no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.
Ethical approval and consent to participate.
Since the data in this paper were obtained from the ADNI database (adni.loni.usc.edu), it does not include any research involving human or animal subjects.
Informed consent
For this type of study, formal consent is not required.
Consent for publication
This manuscript has been approved for publication by all authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nabizadeh, F., Zafari, R. & Alzheimer’s disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI). Progranulin and neuropathological features of Alzheimer’s disease: longitudinal study. Aging Clin Exp Res 36, 55 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-024-02715-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-024-02715-9