Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Associations between novel jump test measures, grip strength, and physical performance: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background/aims

Weight-bearing jump tests measure lower extremity muscle power, velocity, and force, and may be more strongly related to physical performance than grip strength. However, these relationships are not well described in older adults.

Methods

Participants were 1242 older men (mean age 84 ± 4 years) in the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. Jump peak power (Watts/kg body weight), force (Newton/kg body weight) at peak power, and velocity (m/s) at peak power were measured by jump tests on a force plate. Grip strength (kg/kg body weight) was assessed by hand-held dynamometry. Physical performance included 400 m walk time (s), 6 m usual gait speed (m/s), and 5-repeated chair stands speed (#/s).

Results

In adjusted Pearson correlations, power/kg and velocity moderately correlated with all performance measures (range r = 0.41–0.51; all p < 0.001), while correlations for force/kg and grip strength/kg were weaker (range r = 0.20–0.33; all p < 0.001). Grip strength/kg moderately correlated with power/kg (r = 0.44; p < 0.001) but not velocity or force/kg. In adjusted linear regression with standardized βs, 1 SD lower power/kg was associated with worse: 400 m walk time (β = 0.47), gait speed (β = 0.42), and chair stands speed (β = 0.43) (all p < 0.05). Associations with velocity were similar (400 m walk time: β = 0.42; gait speed: β = 0.38; chair stands speed: β = 0.37; all p < 0.05). Force/kg and grip strength/kg were more weakly associated with performance (range β = 0.18–0.28; all p < 0.05).

Conclusions/discussion

Jump power and velocity had stronger associations with physical performance than jump force or grip strength. This suggests lower extremity power and velocity may be more strongly related to physical performance than lower extremity force or upper extremity strength in older men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hicks GE, Shardell M, Alley DE et al (2012) Absolute strength and loss of strength as predictors of mobility decline in older adults: the InCHIANTI study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 67:66–73

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bean JF, Leveille SG, Kiely DK et al (2003) A comparison of leg power and leg strength within the InCHIANTI study: which influences mobility more? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58:728–733

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Marsh AP, Miller ME, Saikin AM et al (2006) Lower extremity strength and power are associated with 400-meter walk time in older adults: the InCHIANTI study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61:1186–1193

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Lauretani F, Russo CR, Bandinelli S et al (1985) Age-associated changes in skeletal muscles and their effect on mobility: an operational diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Appl Physiol 2003:1851–1860

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cuoco A, Callahan DM, Sayers S et al (2004) Impact of muscle power and force on gait speed in disabled older men and women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 59:1200–1206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Puthoff ML, Nielsen DH (2007) Relationships among impairments in lower-extremity strength and power, functional limitations, and disability in older adults. Phys Ther 87:1334–1347

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Caserotti P, Aagaard P, Simonsen EB et al (2001) Contraction-specific differences in maximal muscle power during stretch-shortening cycle movements in elderly males and females. Eur J Appl Physiol 84:206–212

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Caserotti P, Aagaard P, Larsen JB et al (2008) Explosive heavy-resistance training in old and very old adults: changes in rapid muscle force, strength and power. Scand J Med Sci Sports 18:773–782

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siglinsky E, Krueger D, Ward RE et al (2015) Effect of age and sex on jumping mechanography and other measures of muscle mass and function. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 15:301–308

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Hong N, Kim CO, Youm Y et al (2018) Low peak jump power is associated with elevated odds of dysmobility syndrome in community-dwelling elderly individuals: the Korean Urban Rural Elderly (KURE) study. Osteoporos Int 29:1427–1436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thompson BJ, Whitson M, Sobolewski EJ et al (2018) Effects of age, joint angle, and test modality on strength production and functional outcomes. Int J Sports Med 39:124–132

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hannam K, Hartley A, Clark EM et al (2017) Feasibility and acceptability of using jumping mechanography to detect early components of sarcopenia in community-dwelling older women. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 17:246–257

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Maden-Wilkinson TM, McPhee JS, Jones DA et al (2015) Age-related loss of muscle mass, strength, and power and their association with mobility in recreationally-active older adults in the United Kingdom. J Aging Phys Act 23:352–360

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Caserotti P, Aagaard P, Puggaard L (2008) Changes in power and force generation during coupled eccentric-concentric versus concentric muscle contraction with training and aging. Eur J Appl Physiol 103:151–161

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Holsgaard Larsen A, Caserotti P, Puggaard L et al (2007) Reproducibility and relationship of single-joint strength vs multi-joint strength and power in aging individuals. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:43–53

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rittweger J, Schiessl H, Felsenberg D et al (2004) Reproducibility of the jumping mechanography as a test of mechanical power output in physically competent adult and elderly subjects. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:128–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. De Vito G, Bernardi M, Forte R et al (1998) Determinants of maximal instantaneous muscle power in women aged 50–75 years. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol 78:59–64

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strotmeyer ES, Winger ME, Cauley JA et al (2018) Normative values of muscle power using force plate jump tests in men aged 77–101 years: the osteoporotic fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. J Nutr Health Aging 22:1167–1175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bean JF, Kiely DK, Herman S et al (2002) The relationship between leg power and physical performance in mobility-limited older people. J Am Geriatr Soc 50:461–467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dietzel R, Gast U, Heine T et al (2013) Cross-sectional assessment of neuromuscular function using mechanography in women and men aged 20–85 years. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 13:312–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Stephenson ML, Smith DT, Heinbaugh EM et al (2015) Total and lower extremity lean mass percentage positively correlates with jump performance. J Strength Cond Res 29:2167–2175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zengin A, Pye SR, Cook MJ et al (2017) Associations of muscle force, power, cross-sectional muscle area and bone geometry in older UK men. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 8:598–606

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Dionyssiotis Y, Galanos A, Michas G et al (2010) Assessment of musculoskeletal system in women with jumping mechanography. Int J Womens Health 1:113–118

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Bean JF, Kiely DK, LaRose S et al (2007) Is stair climb power a clinically relevant measure of leg power impairments in at-risk older adults? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88:604–609

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Alcazar J, Guadalupe-Grau A, Garcia-Garcia FJ et al (2018) Skeletal muscle power measurement in older people: a systematic review of testing protocols and adverse events. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 73:914–924

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Blank JB, Cawthon PM, Carrion-Petersen ML et al (2005) Overview of recruitment for the osteoporotic fractures in men study (MrOS). Contemp Clin Trials 26:557–568

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Orwoll E, Blank JB, Barrett-Connor E et al (2005) Design and baseline characteristics of the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study—a large observational study of the determinants of fracture in older men. Contemp Clin Trials 26:569–585

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Harkonen R, Harju R, Alaranta H (1993) Accuracy of the Jamar dynamometer. J Hand Ther 6:259–262

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lange-Maia BS, Newman AB, Strotmeyer ES et al (2015) Performance on fast- and usual-paced 400-m walk tests in older adults: are they comparable? Aging Clin Exp Res 27:309–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ewing JA (1984) Detecting alcoholism. The CAGE questionnaire. JAMA 252:1905–1907

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mackey DC, Manini TM, Schoeller DA et al (2011) Validation of an armband to measure daily energy expenditure in older adults. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 66:1108–1113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Myers MG, Godwin M, Dawes M et al (2011) Conventional versus automated measurement of blood pressure in primary care patients with systolic hypertension: randomised parallel design controlled trial. BMJ 342:d286

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA 288:1889–1897

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Teng EL, Chui HC (1987) The modified mini-mental state (3MS) examination. J Clin Psychiatry 48:314–318

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Reitan RM, Wolfson D (2004) The Trail Making Test as an initial screening procedure for neuropsychological impairment in older children. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 19:281–288

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pahor M, Chrischilles EA, Guralnik JM et al (1994) Drug data coding and analysis in epidemiologic studies. Eur J Epidemiol 10:405–411

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Studenski S, Perera S, Wallace D et al (2003) Physical performance measures in the clinical setting. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:314–322

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sayers SP, Guralnik JM, Thombs LA et al (2005) Effect of leg muscle contraction velocity on functional performance in older men and women. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:467–471

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Edwards MH, Buehring B (2015) Novel approaches to the diagnosis of sarcopenia. J Clin Densitom 18:472–477

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Zbinden-Foncea H, Valenzuela T, Espildora F et al (2014) Muscular power as a function of load in elderly women. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 17:92–93

    Google Scholar 

  41. Canepari M, Pellegrino MA, D'Antona G et al (2010) Single muscle fiber properties in aging and disuse. Scand J Med Sci Sports 20:10–19

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful for the contributions of Tue Skallgaard (Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark) for providing engineering expertise for the development of the custom jump analysis software. Results were presented to The 21st International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics World Congress of Gerontology and Geriatrics, July 26, 2017, San Francisco, CA, USA. The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Research Group: Administrative Center (Oregon Health & Sciences University): E. Orwoll (Principal Investigator), J. Lapidus (co-Investigator), C. Nielson (co-Investigator), L. Marshall (co-Investigator), C. Pedersen (Project Director), M. Abrahamson, Y. Wang, J. Wiedrick, N. Fino, E. Hooker, J. Nava; Coordinating Center (California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute and University of California, San Francisco): S.R. Cummings (Principal Investigator), D.C. Bauer (co-Investigator), D.M. Black (co-Investigator), P.M. Cawthon (co-Investigator), K.L. Stone (co-Investigator), R. Collins (Project Director), B. Black, T. Blackwell, A. Burghardt, L. Concepcion, S. Ewing, S.L. Harrison, L.Y. Lui, S. Majumdar, C. Navy, N. Parimi, S. Patel, K. Peters, A. Schafer, C. Schambach, A. Schwartz, A. Yu; University of Alabama, Birmingham: J. Shikany (Principal Investigator), C. Lewis (co-Investigator), M. Kilgore (co-Investigator), P. Johnson (Project Director), M. Young (Study Coordinator), N. Webb, S. Felder, C. Collier, K. Hardy; University of Minnesota: K. Ensrud (Principal Investigator), H. Fink (co-Investigator), S. Diem (co-Investigator), J. Schousboe (co-Investigator), B. Taylor (co-Investigator), L. Langsetmo (co-Investigator), S. Potter (Project Director), N. Nelson (Clinic Coordinator), P. Van Coevering (Program Director), K. Jacobson, A. Kats, S. Luthi, K. Moen, E. Penland-Miller, T. Vo; Stanford University: M. Stefanick (Principal Investigator), A. Hoffman (co-Investigator), N. Ellsworth, K. Kent; University of Pittsburgh: J. Cauley (Principal Investigator), J. Zmuda (co-Investigator), E. Strotmeyer (co-Investigator), D. Cusick (Project Director), C. Newman, A. Flaugh, S. Happe; University of California, San Diego: D. Kado (Principal Investigator), E Barrett-Connor (co-Investigator), L Claravall (Project Director), M.L. Carrion-Petersen, P Miller, M. Stephens, and J Smith.

Funding

The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study is supported by National Institutes of Health funding. The following institutes provide support: the National Institute on Aging (NIA), the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS), the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research under the following grant numbers: U01 AG027810, U01 AG042124, U01 AG042139, U01 AG042140, U01 AG042143, U01 AG042145, U01 AG042168, U01 AR066160, and UL1 TR000128. Additional support was provided by the Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, NIH National Institute on Aging T32-AG000181 (Newman AB), Department of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics and the Center for Active and Healthy Ageing, University of Southern Denmark (Caserotti P), and in part, by NIH, National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program (Harris TB).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elsa S. Strotmeyer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Human and animal rights statement

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (University of Pittsburgh Institutional Review Board, Committee D, IRB # REN18050217/IRB980305) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Winger, M.E., Caserotti, P., Cauley, J.A. et al. Associations between novel jump test measures, grip strength, and physical performance: the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study. Aging Clin Exp Res 32, 587–595 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01421-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-019-01421-1

Keywords

Navigation