Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of natural frequencies of Rayleigh pipe by hybrid meta-heuristic artificial neural network

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper focuses on determination of the natural frequencies in slenderness pipe flows by considering fluid–structure interaction approach. Rayleigh beam theory is used to model the pipe. The fluid in the pipe is assumed as ideal, steady and uniform. Hamilton’s variation principle is demonstrated to obtain the equation of motion of pipe–fluid system. The dimensionless partial differential equations of motion are converted into matrix equations, and the values of natural frequencies of first three modes are archived with the analytical method. The results are arranged to be a data set for hybrid meta-heuristic artificial neural network (ANN) method. Three different meta-heuristic algorithms are used to train the ANN: particle swarm optimization (PSO) and artificial bee colony (ABC) and grey wolf optimizer (GWO). The comparison is presented to find a suitable algorithm based on accuracy for determining the natural frequency of the Rayleigh pipe conveying fluid. The results show that the PSO algorithm outperforms the other meta-heuristics in terms of performance indicators in prediction analysis. However, all algorithms and models can predict the natural frequencies with rate with satisfactory accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a y :

Acceleration

A p :

Cross-sectional areas of the pipe

A f :

Cross-sectional areas of the fluid

E :

Young’s modulus of the pipe material

J p :

Moment of inertia of the pipe

L :

Straight and uniform length of pipe

P :

Pressure

T :

Total kinetic energy

t* :

Time

u :

Axial fluid velocity

U :

Elastic potential energy

x* :

Spatial coordinate

w*:

Transverse displacement

Ρ p :

Density of the pipe

Ρ f :

Density of the fluid

y* :

Vertical displacement of the pipe

Y:

Vertical force

\(\vec{A}\), \(\vec{C}\) :

Coefficient vectors

D :

The number of parameters to be optimized

d r (L) (t) :

The r-th expected vector of the t-th teaching sample

εr (L) :

Prediction nonlinear error

F(θ i ) :

The nectar amount of the food source

m p :

Mass of the pipe

m f :

Mass of the fluid

Q :

Samples’ number

θ i :

Position of the food source

p i :

Probability value

R :

Standard deviation coefficient

s :

Number of food source

λ :

Slenderness ratio

ω :

Natural frequencies

β :

Mass ratio

References

  1. Ibrahim RA (2010) Overview of mechanics of pipes conveying fluids—part I: fundamental studies. J Press Vessel Technol. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4001271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang JR, Lin WJ, Huang CJ, Choi ST (2010) Vibration and stability of an axially moving Rayleigh beam. Appl Math Model 34(6):1482–1497

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Yi-Min H, Yong-Shou L, Bao-Hui L, Yan-Jiang L, Zhu-Feng Y (2010) Natural frequency analysis of fluid conveying pipeline with different boundary conditions. Nucl Eng Des 240(3):461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2009.11.038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang L, Gan J, Ni Q (2013) Natural frequency analysis of fluid-conveying pipes in the ADINA system. J Phys: Conf Ser 448(1):012014

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benjamin TB (1962) Dynamics of a system of articulated pipes conveying fluid-I. Theory. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 261(1307): 457–486

  6. Paidoussis MP, Issid NT (1974) Dynamic stability of pipes conveying fluid. J Sound Vib 33(3):267–294

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paıdoussis MP, Li GX (1993) Pipes conveying fluid: a model dynamical problem. J Fluids Struct 7(2):137–204

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paidoussis MP (1998) Fluid-structure interactions: slender structures and axial flow, vol 1. Academic press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lim JH, Jung GC, Choi YS (2003) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of cantilever tube conveying fluid with system identification. KSME Int J 17:1994–2003

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang YL, Chen LQ (2012) Internal resonance of pipes conveying fluid in the supercritical regime. Nonlinear Dyn 67:1505–1514

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Ritto TG, Soize C, Rochinha FA, Sampaio R (2014) Dynamic stability of a pipe conveying fluid with an uncertain computational model. J Fluids Struct 49:412–426

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li M, Zhao X, Li X, Chang XP, Li YH (2018) Stability analysis of oil-conveying pipes on two-parameter foundations with generalized boundary condition by means of Green’s functions. Eng Struct 173:300–312

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dai HL, Wang L, Qian Q, Ni Q (2014) Vortex-induced vibrations of pipes conveying pulsating fluid. Ocean Eng 77:12–22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yang XS (2010) Engineering optimization: an introduction with metaheuristic applications. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ben-Daya M, Kumar U, Murthy DP (2016) Introduction to maintenance engineering: modelling, optimization and management. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rao SS (2019) Engineering optimization: theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lu P, Chen S, Zheng Y (2012) Artificial intelligence in civil engineering. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/145974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huang Q (2016) Application of artificial intelligence in mechanical engineering. In: 2nd International conference on computer engineering, information science & application technology (ICCIA 2017). pp 882–887. Atlantis Press

  19. Kaveh A (2017) Applications of metaheuristic optimization algorithms in civil engineering. Springer International Publishing, Basel

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Li H, Yu H, Cao N, Tian H, Cheng S (2021) Applications of artificial intelligence in oil and gas development. Arch Comput Methods Eng 28(3):937–949

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bhattacharya B, Solomatine DP (2005) Neural networks and M5 model trees in modelling water level–discharge relationship. Neurocomputing 63:381–396

    Google Scholar 

  22. Najafzadeh M, Laucelli DB, Zahiri A (2017) Application of model tree and evolutionary polynomial regression for evaluation of sediment transport in pipes. KSCE J Civ Eng 21(5):1956–1963

    Google Scholar 

  23. Solomatine DP, Xue Y (2004) M5 model trees and neural networks: application to flood forecasting in the upper reach of the Huai River in China. J Hydrol Eng 9(6):491–501

    Google Scholar 

  24. Singh KK, Pal M, Singh VP (2010) Estimation of mean annual flood in Indian catchments using backpropagation neural network and M5 model tree. Water Resour Manag 24(10):2007–2019

    Google Scholar 

  25. Etemad-Shahidi A, Ghaemi N (2011) Model tree approach for prediction of pile groups scour due to waves. Ocean Eng 38(13):1522–1527

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yoo DG, Kim JH (2014) Meta-heuristic algorithms as tools for hydrological science. Geosci Lett 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sinha JK, Rao AR, Sinha RK (2005) Prediction of flow-induced excitation in a pipe conveying fluid. Nucl Eng Des 235(5):627–636

    Google Scholar 

  28. Maalawi KY, EL-Sayed HE (2011) Stability optimization of functionally graded pipes conveying fluid. Int J Struct Constr Eng 5(7):1296–1301

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yun-dong L, Yi-ren Y (2017) Vibration analysis of conveying fluid pipe via He’s variational iteration method. Appl Math Model 43:409–420

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. El-Sayed TA, El-Mongy HH (2019) Free vibration and stability analysis of a multi-span pipe conveying fluid using exact and variational iteration methods combined with transfer matrix method. Appl Math Model 71:173–193

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Beheshti Z, Shamsuddin SMH (2013) A review of population-based meta-heuristic algorithms. Int J Adv Soft Comput Appl 5(1):1–35

    Google Scholar 

  32. XieXun QIN, WenBin LIU, LiangChao CHEN (2021) Pipeline corrosion prediction based on an improved artificial bee colony algorithm and a grey model. J Beijing Univ Chem Technol 48(1):74

    Google Scholar 

  33. Liu X, Sun W, Gao Y, Ma H (2021) Optimization of pipeline system with multi-hoop supports for avoiding vibration, based on particle swarm algorithm. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 235(9): 1524-1538

  34. Delir S, Foroughi-Asl A, Talatahari S (2019) A hybrid charged system search-firefly algorithm for optimization of water distribution networks. دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران, 9(2): 273–290

  35. Mandal S, Dutta P, Kumar A (2019) Modeling of liquid flow control process using improved versions of elephant swarm water search algorithm. SN Appl Sci 1(8):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pankaj BS, Naidu MN, Vasan A, Varma MR (2020) Self-adaptive cuckoo search algorithm for optimal design of water distribution systems. Water Resour Manag 34(10):3129–3146

    Google Scholar 

  37. Devikanniga D, Vetrivel K, Badrinath N (2019) Review of meta-heuristic optimization based artificial neural networks and its applications. J Phys: Conf Ser 1362(1):012074

    Google Scholar 

  38. Shi H, Li W (2009) Artificial neural networks with ant colony optimization for assessing performance of residential buildings. In: 2009 International Conference on Future BioMedical Information Engineering (FBIE). pp 379–382. IEEE

  39. Yaghini M, Khoshraftar MM, Fallahi M (2013) A hybrid algorithm for artificial neural network training. Eng Appl Artif Intell 26(1):293–301

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ojha VK, Abraham A, Snášel V (2017) Metaheuristic design of feedforward neural networks: a review of two decades of research. Eng Appl Artif Intell 60:97–116

    Google Scholar 

  41. Tran-Ngoc H, Khatir S, Ho-Khac H, De Roeck G, Bui-Tien T, Wahab MA (2021) Efficient artificial neural networks based on a hybrid metaheuristic optimization algorithm for damage detection in laminated composite structures. Compos Struct 262:113339

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jočković M, Radenković G, Nefovska-Danilović M, Baitsch M (2019) Free vibration analysis of spatial Bernoulli-Euler and Rayleigh curved beams using isogeometric approach. Appl Math Model 71:152–172

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  43. Mawhin J (2013) Critical point theory and Hamiltonian systems, vol 74. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dagli BY, Ergut A (2019) Dynamics of fluid conveying pipes using Rayleigh theory under non-classical boundary conditions. Eur J Mech-B/Fluids 77:125–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2019.05.001

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  45. Mirhashemi S, Saeidiha M, Ahmadi H (2023) Dynamics of a harmonically excited nonlinear pipe conveying fluid equipped with a local nonlinear energy sink. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 118:107035

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  46. Han SM, Benaroya H, Wei T (1999) Dynamics of transversely vibrating beams using four engineering theories. 225(5). J Sound Vib 225:935–988. https://doi.org/10.1006/jsvi.1999.2257

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Karnovsky IA, Lebed OI (2001) Formulas for structural dynamics: tables, graphs and solutions. McGraw-Hill Education, New York

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ebrahimi-Mamaghani A, Sotudeh-Gharebagh R, Zarghami R, Mostoufi N (2022) Thermo-mechanical stability of axially graded Rayleigh pipes. Mech Based Des Struct Mach 50(2):412–441

    Google Scholar 

  49. Wang Y, Wu D (2016) Thermal effect on the dynamic response of axially functionally graded beam subjected to a moving harmonic load. Acta Astronaut 127:171–181

    Google Scholar 

  50. Aghazadeh R (2021) Dynamics of axially functionally graded pipes conveying fluid using a higher order shear deformation theory. Int Adv Res Eng J 5(2):209–217

    Google Scholar 

  51. Dağlı BY, Sınır BG (2015) Dynamics of transversely vibrating pipes under non-classical boundary conditions. Univers J Mech Eng 3(2):27–33

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sınır BG, Demi̇r DD, (2015) The analysis of nonlinear vibrations of a pipe conveying an ideal fluid. 52. Eur J Mech-B/Fluids 52:38–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euromechflu.2015.01.005

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  53. Haberman R (1998) Mathematical models: mechanical vibrations, population dynamics, and traffic flow. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Nikoo M, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Karlo Nyarko E, Nikoo M (2018) Determining the natural frequency of cantilever beams using ANN and heuristic search. Appl Artif Intell 32(3):309–334

    Google Scholar 

  55. Mirjalili S, Hashim SZM, Sardroudi HM (2012) Training feedforward neural networks using hybrid particle swarm optimization and gravitational search algorithm. Appl Math Comput 218(22):11125–11137

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  56. Chow SC (2018) Advanced linear models: theory and applications. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  57. Bilski J, Kowalczyk B, Marchlewska A, Zurada JM (2020) Local Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for learning feedforwad neural networks. J Artif Intell Soft Comput Res 10:299–316

    Google Scholar 

  58. Cuevas E, Cienfuegos M, Zaldívar D, Pérez-Cisneros M (2013) A swarm optimization algorithm inspired in the behavior of the social-spider. Expert Syst Appl 40(16):6374–6384

    Google Scholar 

  59. Kennedy J, Eberhart R (1995) Particle swarm optimization. In: Proceedings of ICNN'95-International Conference on Neural Networks. vol. 4: pp. 1942–1948. IEEE

  60. Marini F, Walczak B (2015) Particle swarm optimization (PSO). A tutorial. Chemom Intell Lab Syst 149:153–165

    Google Scholar 

  61. Venter G, Sobieszczanski-Sobieski J (2003) Particle swarm optimization. AIAA J 41(8):1583–1589

    Google Scholar 

  62. Karaboga D, Basturk B (2008) On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 8(1):687–697

    Google Scholar 

  63. Mirjalili S, Mirjalili SM, Lewis A (2014) Grey wolf optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 69:46–61

    Google Scholar 

  64. Nadimi-Shahraki MH, Taghian S, Mirjalili S (2021) An improved grey wolf optimizer for solving engineering problems. Expert Syst Appl 166:113917

    Google Scholar 

  65. Liu M, Wang Z, Zhou Z, Qu Y, Yu Z, Wei Q, Lu L (2018) Vibration response of multi-span fluid-conveying pipe with multiple accessories under complex boundary conditions. Eur J Mech-A/Solids 72:41–56

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  66. Mediano Valiente B, García Planas MI (2014) Modelling of a clamped-pinned pipeline conveying fluid for vibrational stability analysis. Cybernetics and Physics 3(1):28–37

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Begum Yurdanur Dagli.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Daniel Onofre de Almeida Cruz.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dagli, B.Y., Ergut, A. & Turan, M.E. Prediction of natural frequencies of Rayleigh pipe by hybrid meta-heuristic artificial neural network. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 45, 221 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04156-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-023-04156-3

Keywords

Navigation