Skip to main content
Log in

A critical plane criterion to multiaxial fatigue of metals containing small defects

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A critical plane criterion for the fatigue limit of metals with small defects is developed based on the \(\sqrt{\mathrm{area}}\) parameter. The criterion is designed to reflect the Mode I-dominated physical damage mechanism of small defects. The concept of directionally dependent fatigue strength is introduced to extend the critical plane definition to defects whose projected area varies with the plane. The Walker relation with a critical plane interpretation is used to account for the mean stress effect. The criterion is evaluated using available experimental data of steels containing artificial surface defects and a ductile cast iron having inherent graphite nodules. The experiments include different proportional and nonproportional axial-torsional loading conditions and defect types (cylindrical, hemispherical, and tilted hemiellipsoidal holes). The criterion is found to give good estimates of both fatigue limits and crack directions. A discussion on the physical interpretation of critical plane criteria in the context of the small defect fatigue problem is presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Fitting constant

\(\sqrt {{\text{area}}}\) :

Projected defect area

\(\sqrt {{\text{area}}} _{{{\text{max}}}}\) :

Largest projected defect area

b :

Fitting constant

FP:

Fatigue parameter

\(H_{{\text{v}}}\) :

Vickers hardness

\(k\) :

Defect sensitivity to biaxial stresses

\(m\) :

Constant of the Walker relation

θ :

Plane angle

\(\sigma _{{\text{a}}}\) :

Axial stress amplitude

\(\sigma _{{\text{m}}}\) :

Mean axial stress

\(\sigma _{{\text{w}}}\) :

Uniaxial fatigue strength

\(\sigma _{{{\text{w}^{\prime}}}}\) :

Uniaxial fatigue strength as a function of \(\sqrt {{\text{area}}}\)

\(\sigma _{{\text{x}}}\) :

Axial stress

\(\sigma _{{{\text{x}^{\prime}}}}\) :

Normal stress acting perpendicular to a plane θ

\(\sigma _{{{\text{y}^{\prime}}}}\) :

Normal stress acting parallel to a plane θ

\(\bar{\sigma }\) :

Linear combination of normal stresses at a plane θ

\(\tau _{{\text{a}}}\) :

Shear stress amplitude

\(\tau _{{\text{m}}}\) :

Mean shear stress

\(\tau _{{\text{w}}}\) :

Fatigue strength in shear

\(\tau _{{{\text{xy}}}}\) :

Shear stress

\(\varphi\) :

Phase angle

\(\omega\) :

Angular frequency

References

  1. Beretta S, Blarasin A, Endo M, Giunti T, Murakami Y (1997) Defect tolerant design of automotive components. Int J Fatigue 19:319–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Giglio M, Beretta S, Mariani U, Ratti G (2010) Defect tolerance assessment of a helicopter component subjected to multiaxial load. Eng Fract Mech 77:2479–2490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murakami Y (2012) Material defects as the basis of fatigue design. Int J Fatigue 41:2–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Murakami Y (2019) Metal fatigue: Effects of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  5. Romano S, Miccoli S, Beretta S (2019) A new FE post-processor for probabilistic fatigue assessment in the presence of defects and its application to AM parts. Int J Fatigue 125:324–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Murakami Y, Endo M (1983) Quantitative evaluation of fatigue strength of metals containing various small defects or cracks. Eng Fract Mech 17:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Murakami Y, Endo M (1986) Effects of hardness and crack geometries on of small cracks emanating from small defects. In: Miller KJ, de Los Rios ER (eds), The Behaviour of Short Fatigue Cracks, Mechanical Engineering Publications, London, 1(1):275–93

  8. Nadot Y, Denier V (2004) Fatigue failure of suspension arm: experimental analysis and multiaxial criterion. Eng Fail Anal 11:485–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beretta S, Desimone H, Madia M, Poli A (2006) Multiaxial fatigue and defect assessment of truck stabilisers. Int J Vehicle Design 40:212–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Endo M (1999) Effects of small defects on the fatigue strength of steel and ductile iron under combined axial/torsional loading. In: Small fatigue cracks: mechanics, mechanisms and applications. Elsevier, Amsterdam; pp. 375–87.

  11. Endo M, Ishimoto I (2006) The fatigue strength of steels containing small holes under out-of-phase combined loading. Int J Fatigue 28:592–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Endo M, Ishimoto I (2007) Effects of phase difference and mean stress on the fatigue strength of small-hole-containing specimens subjected to combined load. J Solid Mech Mater Eng (JSME) 1:343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nadot Y, Billaudeau T (2006) Multiaxial fatigue limit criterion for defective materials. Eng Fract Mech 73:112–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Groza M, Nadot Y, Varadi K (2018) Defect size map for nodular cast iron components with ellipsoidal surface defects based on the defect stress gradient approach. Int J Fatigue 112:206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Karolczuk A, Nadot Y, Dragon A (2008) Non-local stress gradient approach for multiaxial fatigue of defective material. Comput Mater Sci 44:464–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Carpinteri A, Spagnoli A, Vantadori S, Viappiani D (2008) A multiaxial criterion for notch high-cycle fatigue using a critical-point method. Eng Fract Mech 75:1864–1874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Endo M, Murakami Y (1987) Effects of an artificial small defect on torsional fatigue strength of steels. ASME J Eng Mater Technol 109:124–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Murakami Y, Takahashi K (1998) Torsional fatigue of a medium carbon steel containing an initial small surface crack introduced by tension-compression fatigue: crack branching, non-propagation and fatigue limit. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 21:1473–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Billaudeau T (2002) Fatigue multiaxiale des matériaux à défauts: mécanismes et critère d’endurance. Thèse, École doctorale des sciences pour l'ingénieur et aéronautique, Université de Poitiers

  20. Billaudeau T, Nadot Y, Bezine G (2004) Multiaxial fatigue limit for defective materials: mechanisms and experiments. Acta Mater 52:3911–3920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Endo M, Yanase K (2014) Effects of small defects, matrix structures and loading conditions on the fatigue strength of ductile cast irons. Theor Appl Fract Mech 69:34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yanase K, Endo M (2014) Multiaxial high cycle fatigue threshold with small defects. Eng Fract Mech 123:182–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Schönbauer BM, Yanase K, Endo M (2017) Influences of small defects on torsional fatigue limit of 17–4PH stainless steel. Int J Fatigue 100:540–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Walker K (1970) The effect of stress ratio during crack propagation and fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 aluminum. In: Effects of Environment and Complex Load History on Fatigue Life, ASTM STP 462. Am. Soc. for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA, pp. 1–14

  25. Dowling NE, Calhoun CA, Arcari A (2009) Mean stress effects in stress-life fatigue and the Walker equation. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 32:163–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Beretta S, Murakami Y (2000) SIF and threshold for small cracks at small notches under torsion. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 23:97–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitchell MR (1977) Review of the mechanical properties of cast steels with emphasis on fatigue behavior and the influence of microdiscontinuities. ASME J Eng Mater Technol 99:329–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Murakami Y, Takahashi K, Takada M, Toriyama T (1998) Quantitative evaluation of effect of artificial small defects on torsional fatigue strength. J Solid Mech Mater Eng (JSME) 64:271–277

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lorenzino P, Okazaki S, Matsunaga H, Murakami Y (2015) Effect of small defect orientation on fatigue limit of carbon steels. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 38:1076–1086

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Papadopoulos IV, Davoli P, Gorla C, Filippini M, Bernasconi A (1997) A comparative study of multiaxial high-cycle fatigue criteria for metals. Int J Fatigue 19(3):219–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Castro FC, Araújo JA, Mamiya EN, Pinheiro PA (2014) Combined resolved shear stresses as an alternative to enclosing geometrical objects as a measure of shear stress amplitude in critical plane approaches. Int J Fatigue 66:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Murakami Y, Usuki H (1989) Quantitative evaluation of effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue strength of high strength steels. II: Fatigue limit evaluation based on statistics for extreme values of inclusion size. Int J Fatigue 11:299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yanase K (2013) A study on the multiaxial fatigue failure criterion with small defects. ASTM Mater Perform Charact 2(1):371–390

    Google Scholar 

  34. Socie D, Bannantine J (1988) Bulk deformation fatigue damage models. Mater Sci Eng A 103:3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Beretta S (2003) Application of multiaxial fatigue criteria to materials containing defects. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 26:551–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Jiang Y, Hertel O, Vormwald M (2007) An experimental evaluation of three critical plane multiaxial fatigue criteria. Int J Fatigue 29:1409–1502

    Google Scholar 

  37. Miller K (1977) Fatigue under complex stress Metal Sci 11:432–438

    Google Scholar 

  38. Dias AL (2020) Influence of small defects on the fatigue limit of 304L stainless steel: axial-torsional experiments and modeling. M.S. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Brasilia.

  39. Costa RA (2021) Influence of small defects on the fatigue limit of 1045 steel under axial-torsional loading: Experiments and modeling. M.S. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Brasilia, (In Portuguese)

Download references

Acknowledgements

Fábio Castro and Edgar Mamiya would like to thank the support from the National Council for Scientific and Technological Development – CNPq (contracts 308126/2016-5 and 310063/2018-3). Fábio Castro also acknowledges the support from FAP-DF under contract number 0193.001583/2017. This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. C. Castro.

Additional information

Technical Editor: João Marciano Laredo dos Reis.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

A summary of the fatigue limit data and mechanical properties of the materials used in this work are provided below.

See Tables 3, 4, 5 and 6.

Table 3 Fatigue limit data of S35C steel*
Table 4 Fatigue limit data of SCM435 steel*
Table 5 Fatigue limit data of FCD400 ductile cast iron*
Table 6 Fatigue limit data of C36 steel*

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Castro, F.C., Mamiya, E.N. & Bemfica, C. A critical plane criterion to multiaxial fatigue of metals containing small defects. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 43, 517 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03246-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-021-03246-4

Keywords

Navigation