Skip to main content
Log in

Finite element mesh generation for fracture mechanics in 3D coupled with ansys®: elliptical cracks and lack of fusion in nozzle welds

  • Technical Paper
  • Published:
Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Experience indicates that there are many operating pressure vessels with a lack of fusion defects in their nozzle welds. A fitness for service assessment of such flaws is often required. Due to geometrical complexity, finite element analysis is needed, but inserting a 3D crack mesh in such analysis can be complex and time consuming. To overcome this issue, a C/C++ program capable of generating 3D finite element (FE) meshes for certain common crack configurations found in industry, specifically in the nozzle welds of pressure vessels, was created. This mesh can be perfectly coupled to a FE model in ANSYS® and be adapted to many geometric situations. Tests were performed and the numeric values of the K and J-integral results were compared with known solutions, demonstrating good agreement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Das C, Bhaduri A, Ray S (2003) Fatigue failure of a fillet weld nozzle joint. Eng Fail Anal. doi:10.1016/51350-6307(03)00062-1

    Google Scholar 

  2. Challenger N, Phaal R, Garwood S (1995) Fracture mechanics assessment of industrial pressure vessel failures. Int J Pres Ves Pip 61:433–456. doi:10.1016/0308-0161(94)00120-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yaorong F et al (2001) Failure analysis and fitness-for-service assessment for a pipeline. Eng Fail Anal. doi:10.1016/51350-6307(00)00022-4

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barnes C, Kanninen M, Wiersma S (1984) Structural failures precipitated by weld discontinuities. Theoret Appl Fract Mech 1:73–93. doi:10.1016/0167-8442(84)90022-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bullough R et al (2007) The probability of formation and detection of large flaws in welds. Int J Press Vessel Pip 84:730–738. doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2007.06.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carvalho A et al (2008) Reliability of non-destructive test techniques in the inspection of pipelines uses in the oil industry. Int J Press Vessel Pip. doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.05.001

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sant’Anna HM, Leal MF (2011) A practical procedure to assess crticial defects in pressure vessels subjected to fatigue loads. Eng Fract Mech. doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.12.005

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Iida K (1992) A review of fatigue failures in LWR plants in Japan. Nucl Eng Des 138:297–312. doi:10.1016/0029-5493(92)90068-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Infante V, Silva J (2011) Case studies of computational simulations of fatigue crack propagation using finite element analysis tools. Eng Fail Anal. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2010.09.027

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chandwani R, Timbrell C, Wiehahn M (2006) Crack modeling in power plant components. Chennai, Zentech International Limited

    Google Scholar 

  11. Anderson TL (2005) Fracture mechanics: fundamentals and applications, 3rd edn. Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  12. Broek D (1986) Elementary engineering fracture mechanics, 4th edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Qian X (2010) KI-T estimations for embedded flaws in pipes—Part I: axially oriented cracks. Int J Press Vessel Pip 87:134–149. doi:10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Laham SA (1999) Stress intensity Factor and Limit Load Handbook, 2nd edn. British energy Generation Ltd, Barnwood, pp AI.20–AI.22

    Google Scholar 

  15. API-579 (2007) Fitness for Service. In: s. l: s. n, pp C-36–C37

  16. ANSYS Inc. (2012) ANSYS release 13 user manual. s. l: s. n

  17. Wright K, Patel J (2002) Defect assessment of a pressure vessel nozzle. Zurich, FE-NET. http://www.fe-net.org/downloads/FENet_Meetings/Zurich_Switzerland_Jun_2002/FENET_Zurich_June2002_DLE_Wright.pdf. Accessed 06 March 2013

  18. Perez N (2004) Fracture mechanics, 1st edn. Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received from the following research funding Brazilian agencies: CNPq—Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; and FAPEMIG—Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriel Oliveira de Ribeiro.

Additional information

Technical Editor: Lavinia Maria Sanabio Alves Borges.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Schiara, L.S., de Ribeiro, G.O. Finite element mesh generation for fracture mechanics in 3D coupled with ansys®: elliptical cracks and lack of fusion in nozzle welds. J Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng. 38, 253–263 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0324-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40430-015-0324-6

Keywords

Navigation