Skip to main content
Log in

Reducing ZHD–ZWD mutual absorption errors for blind ZTD model users

  • Original Study
  • Published:
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In precise point positioning (PPP), the zenith hydrostatic delay (ZHD) is traditionally treated as a priori value from the ZHD model but the zenith wet delay (ZWD) is treated as an unknown parameter to estimated. For some near real-time PPP tasks, priori ZHD from the blind ZHD models are often used because external meteorological measurement or information about atmospheric pressure or ZHD can not be obtained in such conditions. On the other hand, a priori ZHD errors can project into GNSS height estimates errors in the PPP analysis, because unmodeled part of the ZHD is usually absorbed into the estimated ZWD while there is the difference between the hydrostatic mapping function and the wet mapping function. In this study, we found the errors of the ZHD seasonal models are not always less than those of the ZWD seasonal models, which implies that the traditional strategy for treating ZTD (priori ZHD and estimated ZWD) is not always the best choice when using the blind zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) models. A decision model for the ZTD blind model (DMZBM), which is a new strategy of dealing with ZTD in PPP when using blind ZTD models, was proposed. For most cases, the traditional strategy works while for some exception cases, it is recommended that priori ZWD from the blind ZWD model was set but ZHD is treated as an unknown parameter to estimated. The DMZBM can directly reduce ZHD–ZWD mutual absorption errors which potentially reduce GNSS height estimates errors due to the difference between the hydrostatic mapping function and the wet mapping function. The results show that there are significant reductions of ZHD–ZWD mutual absorption errors in polar regions when using the new ZTD-treating strategy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrei CO, Chen R (2009) Assessment of time-series of troposphere zenith delays derived from the global data assimilation system numerical weather model. GPS Solut 13(2):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bałdysz Z, Nykiel G, Figurski M, Szafranek K, Kroszczyński K (2015) Investigation of the 16-year and 18-year ZTD time series derived from GPS data processing. Acta Geophys 63(4):1103–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm J, Werl B, Schuh H (2006) Troposphere mapping functions for GPS and very long baseline interferometry from European centre for medium-range weather forecasts operational analysis data. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 111:B02406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm J, Heinkelmann R, Schuh H (2007) Short note: a global model of pressure and temperature for geodetic applications. J Geod 81(10):679–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm J, Kouba J, Schuh H (2009) Forecast Vienna mapping functions 1 for real-time analysis of space geodetic observations. J Geod 83(5):397–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Böhm J, Möller G, Schindelegger M, Pain G, Weber R (2015) Development of an improved empirical model for slant delays in the troposphere (GPT2w). GPS Solut 19(3):433–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins JP, Langley RB (1997) A tropospheric delay model for the user of the Wide Area Augmentation System. Final contract report prepared for Nav Canada, Department of geodesy and geomatics engineering technical report no. 187, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N. B., Canada

  • Ding M (2018) A neural network model for predicting weighted mean temperature. J Geod 92(10):1187–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield HS (1969) Two-quartic tropospheric refractivity profile for correcting satellite data. J Geophys Res 74(18):4487–4499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopfield HS (1971) Tropospheric effect on electromagnetically measured range: prediction from surface weather data. Radio Sci 6(3):357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin S, Park JU, Cho JH, Park PH (2007) Seasonal variability of GPS-derived zenith tropospheric delay (1994–2006) and climate implications. J Geophys Res Atmos (1984–2012) 112:D09110

  • Kouba J (2009) Testing of global pressure/temperature (GPT) model and global mapping function (GMF) in GPS analyses. J Geod 83(3–4):199–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagler K, Schindelegger M, Böhm J, Krásná H, Nilsson T (2013) GPT2: empirical slant delay model for radio space geodetic techniques. Geophys Res Lett 40(6):1069–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landskron D, Möller G, Hofmeister A, Böhm J, Weber R (2015) Refined and site-augmented tropospheric delay models in the analysis of VLBI observations. In: 26th IUGG general assembly, Prague, 6, 22-2007

  • Leandro R, Santos MC, Langley RB (2006) UNB neutral atmosphere models: development and performance. Proc ION NTM 52(1):564–573

    Google Scholar 

  • Leandro RF, Langley RB, Santos MC (2008) UNB3m_pack: a neutral atmosphere delay package for radiometric space techniques. GPS Solut 12(1):65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Yuan YB, Ou JK et al (2012) A new global zenith tropospheric delay model IGGtrop for GNSS applications. Chin Sci Bull 57(17):2132–2139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Dick G, Ge M, Heise S, Wickert J, Bender M (2014) Real-time gps sensing of atmospheric water vapor: precise point positioning with orbit, clock, and phase delay corrections. Geophys Res Lett 41(10):3615–3621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li W, Yuan Y, Ou J, Chai Y, Li Z, Liou YA, Wang N (2015) New versions of the BDS/GNSS zenith tropospheric delay model IGGtrop. J Geodesy 89(1):73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu C, Li X, Zus F, Heinkelmann R, Dick G, Ge M, Wickert J, Schuh H (2017) Improving beidou real-time precise point positioning with numerical weather models. J Geod 91(9):1019–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mendes V, Langley R (1998) Tropospheric zenith delay prediction accuracy for airborne GPS high-precision positioning. In: proceedings of the Institute of Navigation 54th annual meeting, Denver, CO, USA, pp 337–347

  • Möller G, Weber R, Böhm J (2014) Improved troposphere blind models based on numerical weather data. Navig J Inst Navig 61(3):203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penna N, Dodson A, Chen W (2001) Assessment of EGNOS tropospheric correction model. J Navig 54(01):37–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen J (1972) Atmospheric correction for the troposphere and stratosphere in radio ranging satellites. The use of artificial satellites for geodesy, American Geophysics Union. Geophys Monogr Ser 15:274–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Saastamoinen J (1973) Contributions to the theory of atmospheric refraction. Bull Géod (1946–1975) 107(1):13–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z, Zhang B, Yao Y (2019) A global model for estimating tropospheric delay and weighted mean temperature developed with atmospheric reanalysis data from 1979 to 2017. Remote Sens 11(16):1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tregoning P, Herring TA (2006) Impact of a priori zenith hydrostatic delay errors on GPS estimates of station heights and zenith total delays. Geophys Res Lett 33(23):L23303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CS, Liou YA, Yeh TK (2008) Impact of surface meteorological measurements on GPS height determination. Geophys Res Lett 35:L23809

  • Yao Y, He C, Zhang B (2013) A new global zenith tropospheric delay model GZTD. Chin J Geophys Chin Edn 56(7):2218–2227

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Xu C, Zhang B, Cao N (2014) GTm-III: a new global empirical model for mapping zenith wet delays onto precipitable water vapour. Geophys J Int 197(1):202–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao Y, Xu C, Shi J, Cao N, Zhang B, Yang J (2015) Itg: a new global GNSS tropospheric correction model. Sci Rep 5:10273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng F, Lou Y, Gu S, Gong X, Shi C (2018) Modeling tropospheric wet delays with national GNSS reference network in China for BeiDou precise point positioning. J Geod 92(5):545–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Integrated Global Radiosonde Archive (IGRA) for providing the radiosonde data to calculate the ZTD time series and the Department of Geodesy and Geoinformation at the Vienna University of Technology, Austria for their GPT2w model and ZHD and ZWD data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maohua Ding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, M. Reducing ZHD–ZWD mutual absorption errors for blind ZTD model users. Acta Geod Geophys 55, 51–62 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-019-00280-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-019-00280-6

Keywords

Navigation