Abstract
Preference analysis is an essential component of the decision-making (DM) process for identifying the optimal object. The rough set (RS) theory has been successfully extended to accommodate preference analysis by substituting the equivalence relation (ER) with the dominance relation (DR). On the other hand, bipolarity refers to the explicit handling of positive and negative aspects of data. In this article, we first established the idea of bipolar fuzzy preference relation (BFPR) from the bipolar fuzzy information system and studied some of its basic properties. Then, based on BFPR, a novel idea of \((\alpha , \beta )\)-bipolar fuzzified preference RSs (\((\alpha , \beta )\)-BFPRSs) is offered. Several significant structural properties of \((\alpha , \beta )\)-BFPRSs are analyzed in detail. Moreover, some significant uncertainty measures associated with \((\alpha , \beta )\)-BFPRSs are proposed. Meanwhile, we put forward the idea of bipolar fuzzy preference \(\delta \)-covering (\(BFP\delta C\)), bipolar fuzzy preference \(\delta \)-neighborhood (BFP\(\delta \)-nghd), and bipolar preference \(\delta \)-neighborhood (BP\(\delta \)-nghd). Moreover, we establish a new type of bipolar fuzzy RS (BFRS) model in the context of BFP\(\delta \)-nghd, and several relevant properties are explored. Using the theory of the \(BFP\delta C\)-based BFRS model, we develop a novel approach for multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. A real-life example of a smartphone selection is provided to show the applicability of our suggested approach. We further investigate the effectiveness of the developed technique using a comparative analysis. Last but not least, theoretical investigations and practical examples reveal that our suggested approach dramatically enriches the RS theory and offers a novel knowledge discovery strategy that is applicable in real-world circumstances.
We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.
Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.
Data availability
No data was used for the research described in the article.
References
Akram M, Shumaiza, Arshad M (2020) Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis. Comput Appl Math 39(7):1–21
Alghamdi MA, Alshehri NO, Akram M (2018) Multi-criteria decision-making methods in bipolar fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(6):2057–2064
Ali G, Akram M, Alcantud JCR (2020) Attributes reductions of bipolar fuzzy relation decision systems. Neural Comput Appl 32(14):10051–10071
Chen SM, Lin TE, Lee LW (2014) Group decision making using incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Inf Sci 259:1–15
Chen H, Li T, Luo C, Hu J (2015) Dominance-based neighborhood rough sets and its attribute reduction. Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology: 10th International Conference, RSKT 2015, Held as Part of the International Joint Conference on Rough Sets, IJCRS 2015, Tianjin, China, November 20–23, 2015, Proceedings (89–99). Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 89–99
Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J General Syst 17(2–3):191–209
Dubois D, Prade H (1992) Putting rough sets and fuzzy sets together, In Intelligent Decision Support. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 203–232
Gai T, Cao M, Chiclana F, Zhang Z, Dong Y, Herrera-Viedma E, Wu J (2023) Consensus-trust driven bidirectional feedback mechanism for improving consensus in social network large-group decision making. Group Decis Negot 32(1):45–74
Gediga G, Düntsch I (2001) Rough approximation quality revisited. Artif Intell 132(2):219–234
Golden BL, Wasil EA, Harker PT (1989) The analytic hierarchy process. Appl Stud Berlin Heidelberg 2(1):1–273
Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowinski R (1999) Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. Eur J Oper Res 117(1):63–83
Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowinski R (1999) The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM. Multicriteria decision making. Springer, Boston, pp 397–455
Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowinski R (2001) Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 129(1):1–47
Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowinski R (2002) Rough approximation by dominance relations. Int J Intell Syst 17(2):153–171
Greco S, Matarazzo B., Słowinski R (2000) Fuzzy extention of the rough set approach to multicriteria and multiattribute sorting, Preferences and decisions under incomplete knowledge, p 131–151
Gul R, Shabir M (2020) Roughness of a set by \((\alpha,\beta )\)-indiscernibility of Bipolar fuzzy relation. Comput Appl Math 39(3):1–22
Han Y, Shi P, Chen S (2015) Bipolar-Valued Rough Fuzzy Set and Its Applications to the Decision Information System. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(6):2358–2370
Han Y, Chen S, Shen X (2022) Fuzzy rough set with inconsistent bipolarity information in two universes and its applications. Soft Comput 26(19):9775–9784
Hu YC (2016) Pattern classification using grey tolerance rough sets. Kybernetes 45(2):266–281
Hu YC (2016) Tolerance rough sets for pattern classification using multiple grey single-layer perceptrons. Neurocomputing 179:144–151
Jana C, Pal M (2021) Extended bipolar fuzzy EDAS approach for multi-criteria group decision-making process. Comput Appl Math 40:1–15
Jana C, Pal M, Wang JQ (2019) Bipolar fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its application in multiple-attribute decision-making process. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10:3533–3549
Jin L, Yager RR, Chen ZS, Mesiar R, Martínez L, Rodríguez RM (2023) Averaging aggregation under uncertainty and bipolar preference environments, Soft Computing, p 1–7
Jun YB, Park CH (2009) Filters of BCH-algebras based on bipolar-valued fuzzy sets. In Int Math Forum 4(13):631–643
Jun YB, Kim HS, Lee KJ (2009) Bipolar fuzzy translations in BCK/BCI-algebras. J Chungcheong Math Soc 22(3):399–408
Kim J, Samanta SK, Lim PK, Lee JG, Hur K (2019) Bipolar fuzzy topological spaces. Ann Fuzzy Math Inform 17(3):205–229
Lee KM (2000) Bipolar-valued fuzzy sets and their basic operations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference, p 307–317
Lee KJ (2009) Bipolar fuzzy subalgebras and bipolar fuzzy ideals of BCK/BCI-algebra. Bull Malays Math Sci Soc 22:361–373
Li Z, Zhang Z, Yu W (2022) Consensus reaching with consistency control in group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 170:108311
Luo J, Hu M (2023) A bipolar three-way decision model and its application in analyzing incomplete data. Int J Approx Reason 152:94–123
Ma J, Atef M, Khalil AM, Hassan N, Chen GX (2020) Novel Models of Fuzzy Rough Coverings Based on Fuzzy \(\alpha \)-Neighborhood and its Application to decision-making. IEEE Access 8:224354–224364
Malik N, Shabir M (2019) A consensus model based on rough bipolar fuzzy approximations. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(4):3461–3470
Orlovsky S (1993) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Readings in fuzzy sets for intelligent systems. Kaufmann, Morgan, pp 717–723
Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inform Sci 11:341–356
Pawlak Z, Skowron A (2007) Rudiments of rough sets. Inform Sci 177:3–27
Riaz M, Tehrim ST (2021) A robust extension of VIKOR method for bipolar fuzzy sets using connection numbers of SPA theory based metric spaces. Artif Intell Rev 54:561–591
Shabir M, Shaheen T (2017) A new methodology for fuzzification of rough sets based on \(\alpha \)-indiscernibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 312:1–16
Skowron A, Stepaniuk J (1996) Tolerance approximation spaces. Fundam Inform 27(2–3):245–253
Slezak D, Ziarko W (2005) The investigation of the Bayesian rough set model. Int J Approx Reason 40(1–2):81–91
Wei G, Wei C, Gao H (2018) Multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued bipolar fuzzy information and their application to emerging technology commercialization evaluation. IEEE Access 6:60930–60955
Wei G, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2018) Bipolar fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(1):1–12
Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Inf Sci 177(11):2363–2379
Yang B (2022) Fuzzy covering-based rough set on two different universes and its application. Artif Intell Rev 55(6):4717–4753
Yang HL, Li SG, Wang S, Wang J (2012) Bipolar fuzzy rough set model on two different universes and its application. Knowl Based Syst 35:94–101
Yang HL, Li SG, Guo ZL, Ma CH (2012) Transformation of bipolar fuzzy rough set models. Knowl Based Syst 27:60–68
Yao YY (1998) Relational interpretations of neighborhood operators and rough set approximation operators. Inf Sci 111(1–4):239–259
Yao YY (2010) Notes on Rough Set Approximations and Associated Measures. J Zhejiang Ocean Univ 29(5):399–410
Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353
Zakowski W (1983) Approximations in the space \((U, \prod )\). Demonstr Math 16(3):761–770
Zhang WR (1994) Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: A computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis. In Proceedings of the Industrial Fuzzy Control and Intelligent Systems Conference, and the NASA Joint Technology Workshop on Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Information Processing Society Biannual Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, p 305–309
Zhang WR (1998) Bipolar fuzzy sets, In: Proceedings of FUZZYIEEE, 835–840
Zhang Z, Li Z, Gao Y (2021) Consensus reaching for group decision making with multi-granular unbalanced linguistic information: A bounded confidence and minimum adjustment-based approach. Inf Fusion 74:96–110
Zhang X, Wang J, Zhan J, Dai J (2021) Fuzzy measures and Choquet integrals based on fuzzy covering rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 30(7):2360–2374
Ziarko W (1993) Variable precision rough set model. J Comput Syst Sci 46(1):39–59
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work under Project No. IFP22UQU4310396DSR080.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gul, R., Shabir, M. & Naeem, M. A comprehensive study on \((\alpha , \beta )\)-bipolar fuzzified rough set model based on bipolar fuzzy preference relation and corresponding decision-making applications. Comp. Appl. Math. 42, 310 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02430-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02430-7
Keywords
- Rough set
- Bipolar Fuzzy Preference Relation
- \((\alpha , \beta )\)-Bipolar fuzzified preference rough sets
- Decision-making