Skip to main content
Log in

A comprehensive study on \((\alpha , \beta )\)-bipolar fuzzified rough set model based on bipolar fuzzy preference relation and corresponding decision-making applications

  • Published:
Computational and Applied Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Preference analysis is an essential component of the decision-making (DM) process for identifying the optimal object. The rough set (RS) theory has been successfully extended to accommodate preference analysis by substituting the equivalence relation (ER) with the dominance relation (DR). On the other hand, bipolarity refers to the explicit handling of positive and negative aspects of data. In this article, we first established the idea of bipolar fuzzy preference relation (BFPR) from the bipolar fuzzy information system and studied some of its basic properties. Then, based on BFPR, a novel idea of \((\alpha , \beta )\)-bipolar fuzzified preference RSs (\((\alpha , \beta )\)-BFPRSs) is offered. Several significant structural properties of \((\alpha , \beta )\)-BFPRSs are analyzed in detail. Moreover, some significant uncertainty measures associated with \((\alpha , \beta )\)-BFPRSs are proposed. Meanwhile, we put forward the idea of bipolar fuzzy preference \(\delta \)-covering (\(BFP\delta C\)), bipolar fuzzy preference \(\delta \)-neighborhood (BFP\(\delta \)-nghd), and bipolar preference \(\delta \)-neighborhood (BP\(\delta \)-nghd). Moreover, we establish a new type of bipolar fuzzy RS (BFRS) model in the context of BFP\(\delta \)-nghd, and several relevant properties are explored. Using the theory of the \(BFP\delta C\)-based BFRS model, we develop a novel approach for multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. A real-life example of a smartphone selection is provided to show the applicability of our suggested approach. We further investigate the effectiveness of the developed technique using a comparative analysis. Last but not least, theoretical investigations and practical examples reveal that our suggested approach dramatically enriches the RS theory and offers a novel knowledge discovery strategy that is applicable in real-world circumstances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Data availability

No data was used for the research described in the article.

References

  • Akram M, Shumaiza, Arshad M (2020) Bipolar fuzzy TOPSIS and bipolar fuzzy ELECTRE-I methods to diagnosis. Comput Appl Math 39(7):1–21

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Alghamdi MA, Alshehri NO, Akram M (2018) Multi-criteria decision-making methods in bipolar fuzzy environment. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(6):2057–2064

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali G, Akram M, Alcantud JCR (2020) Attributes reductions of bipolar fuzzy relation decision systems. Neural Comput Appl 32(14):10051–10071

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen SM, Lin TE, Lee LW (2014) Group decision making using incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on the additive consistency and the order consistency. Inf Sci 259:1–15

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chen H, Li T, Luo C, Hu J (2015) Dominance-based neighborhood rough sets and its attribute reduction. Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology: 10th International Conference, RSKT 2015, Held as Part of the International Joint Conference on Rough Sets, IJCRS 2015, Tianjin, China, November 20–23, 2015, Proceedings (89–99). Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 89–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1990) Rough fuzzy sets and fuzzy rough sets. Int J General Syst 17(2–3):191–209

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D, Prade H (1992) Putting rough sets and fuzzy sets together, In Intelligent Decision Support. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 203–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Gai T, Cao M, Chiclana F, Zhang Z, Dong Y, Herrera-Viedma E, Wu J (2023) Consensus-trust driven bidirectional feedback mechanism for improving consensus in social network large-group decision making. Group Decis Negot 32(1):45–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Gediga G, Düntsch I (2001) Rough approximation quality revisited. Artif Intell 132(2):219–234

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Golden BL, Wasil EA, Harker PT (1989) The analytic hierarchy process. Appl Stud Berlin Heidelberg 2(1):1–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowinski R (1999) Rough approximation of a preference relation by dominance relations. Eur J Oper Res 117(1):63–83

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowinski R (1999) The use of rough sets and fuzzy sets in MCDM. Multicriteria decision making. Springer, Boston, pp 397–455

    Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowinski R (2001) Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 129(1):1–47

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B, Słowinski R (2002) Rough approximation by dominance relations. Int J Intell Syst 17(2):153–171

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Greco S, Matarazzo B., Słowinski R (2000) Fuzzy extention of the rough set approach to multicriteria and multiattribute sorting, Preferences and decisions under incomplete knowledge, p 131–151

  • Gul R, Shabir M (2020) Roughness of a set by \((\alpha,\beta )\)-indiscernibility of Bipolar fuzzy relation. Comput Appl Math 39(3):1–22

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Shi P, Chen S (2015) Bipolar-Valued Rough Fuzzy Set and Its Applications to the Decision Information System. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(6):2358–2370

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Chen S, Shen X (2022) Fuzzy rough set with inconsistent bipolarity information in two universes and its applications. Soft Comput 26(19):9775–9784

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu YC (2016) Pattern classification using grey tolerance rough sets. Kybernetes 45(2):266–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu YC (2016) Tolerance rough sets for pattern classification using multiple grey single-layer perceptrons. Neurocomputing 179:144–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Jana C, Pal M (2021) Extended bipolar fuzzy EDAS approach for multi-criteria group decision-making process. Comput Appl Math 40:1–15

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jana C, Pal M, Wang JQ (2019) Bipolar fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its application in multiple-attribute decision-making process. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 10:3533–3549

    Google Scholar 

  • Jin L, Yager RR, Chen ZS, Mesiar R, Martínez L, Rodríguez RM (2023) Averaging aggregation under uncertainty and bipolar preference environments, Soft Computing, p 1–7

  • Jun YB, Park CH (2009) Filters of BCH-algebras based on bipolar-valued fuzzy sets. In Int Math Forum 4(13):631–643

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jun YB, Kim HS, Lee KJ (2009) Bipolar fuzzy translations in BCK/BCI-algebras. J Chungcheong Math Soc 22(3):399–408

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Samanta SK, Lim PK, Lee JG, Hur K (2019) Bipolar fuzzy topological spaces. Ann Fuzzy Math Inform 17(3):205–229

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KM (2000) Bipolar-valued fuzzy sets and their basic operations. In: Proceedings of the International Conference, p 307–317

  • Lee KJ (2009) Bipolar fuzzy subalgebras and bipolar fuzzy ideals of BCK/BCI-algebra. Bull Malays Math Sci Soc 22:361–373

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Zhang Z, Yu W (2022) Consensus reaching with consistency control in group decision making with incomplete hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Comput Ind Eng 170:108311

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo J, Hu M (2023) A bipolar three-way decision model and its application in analyzing incomplete data. Int J Approx Reason 152:94–123

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ma J, Atef M, Khalil AM, Hassan N, Chen GX (2020) Novel Models of Fuzzy Rough Coverings Based on Fuzzy \(\alpha \)-Neighborhood and its Application to decision-making. IEEE Access 8:224354–224364

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik N, Shabir M (2019) A consensus model based on rough bipolar fuzzy approximations. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 36(4):3461–3470

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlovsky S (1993) Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Readings in fuzzy sets for intelligent systems. Kaufmann, Morgan, pp 717–723

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Comput Inform Sci 11:341–356

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Pawlak Z, Skowron A (2007) Rudiments of rough sets. Inform Sci 177:3–27

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Tehrim ST (2021) A robust extension of VIKOR method for bipolar fuzzy sets using connection numbers of SPA theory based metric spaces. Artif Intell Rev 54:561–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Shabir M, Shaheen T (2017) A new methodology for fuzzification of rough sets based on \(\alpha \)-indiscernibility. Fuzzy Sets Syst 312:1–16

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Skowron A, Stepaniuk J (1996) Tolerance approximation spaces. Fundam Inform 27(2–3):245–253

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Slezak D, Ziarko W (2005) The investigation of the Bayesian rough set model. Int J Approx Reason 40(1–2):81–91

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Wei C, Gao H (2018) Multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued bipolar fuzzy information and their application to emerging technology commercialization evaluation. IEEE Access 6:60930–60955

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei G, Alsaadi FE, Hayat T, Alsaedi A (2018) Bipolar fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(1):1–12

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZS (2007) Intuitionistic preference relations and their application in group decision making. Inf Sci 177(11):2363–2379

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang B (2022) Fuzzy covering-based rough set on two different universes and its application. Artif Intell Rev 55(6):4717–4753

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang HL, Li SG, Wang S, Wang J (2012) Bipolar fuzzy rough set model on two different universes and its application. Knowl Based Syst 35:94–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang HL, Li SG, Guo ZL, Ma CH (2012) Transformation of bipolar fuzzy rough set models. Knowl Based Syst 27:60–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao YY (1998) Relational interpretations of neighborhood operators and rough set approximation operators. Inf Sci 111(1–4):239–259

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yao YY (2010) Notes on Rough Set Approximations and Associated Measures. J Zhejiang Ocean Univ 29(5):399–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8:338–353

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zakowski W (1983) Approximations in the space \((U, \prod )\). Demonstr Math 16(3):761–770

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang WR (1994) Bipolar fuzzy sets and relations: A computational framework for cognitive modeling and multiagent decision analysis. In Proceedings of the Industrial Fuzzy Control and Intelligent Systems Conference, and the NASA Joint Technology Workshop on Neural Networks and Fuzzy Logic and Fuzzy Information Processing Society Biannual Conference, San Antonio, TX, USA, p 305–309

  • Zhang WR (1998) Bipolar fuzzy sets, In: Proceedings of FUZZYIEEE, 835–840

  • Zhang Z, Li Z, Gao Y (2021) Consensus reaching for group decision making with multi-granular unbalanced linguistic information: A bounded confidence and minimum adjustment-based approach. Inf Fusion 74:96–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wang J, Zhan J, Dai J (2021) Fuzzy measures and Choquet integrals based on fuzzy covering rough sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 30(7):2360–2374

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziarko W (1993) Variable precision rough set model. J Comput Syst Sci 46(1):39–59

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors extend their appreciation to the Deputyship for Research and Innovation, Ministry of Education in Saudi Arabia for funding this research work under Project No. IFP22UQU4310396DSR080.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Naeem.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gul, R., Shabir, M. & Naeem, M. A comprehensive study on \((\alpha , \beta )\)-bipolar fuzzified rough set model based on bipolar fuzzy preference relation and corresponding decision-making applications. Comp. Appl. Math. 42, 310 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02430-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40314-023-02430-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation