Skip to main content
Log in

Small Signal Modeling, Control and Experimentation of Boost Converter Including Parasitic Elements

  • Published:
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents an improved state space average model of a boost DC–DC converter considering all the parasitic elements present in the circuit. The small signal transfer function derived from the modified averaged model is used to design an improved voltage and current mode cascaded control (CMC) using linear quadratic regulator. Major improvements in the proposed CMC technique include improved performance (overshoot, undershoot and settling time for both voltage and current) compared to the conventional controllers and the protection system for limiting overcurrent flow through the circuit. The performance of the proposed controller is evaluated by experimental results. The proposed controller performance is compared with voltage mode as well as CMC-based PI controllers. The experimental results show that the proposed controller improves the ability to track the instantaneous change in reference voltage, maintain stable output voltage during load change and show robustness against converter component value change and exceeding the maximum current limit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdel-Gawad, H., & Sood, V. (2014). Small-signal analysis of boost converter, including parasitics, operating in CCM. In 2014 6th IEEE power India international conference (PIICON) (pp. 1–5).IEEE.

  • Abdullah, M., Tan, C., & Yatim, A. (2015). A simulation comparison of pi and linear quadratic regulator controllers in dc-dc converter. In 2015 IEEE conference on energy conversion (CENCON) (pp. 37–41). IEEE.

  • Abdullah, M. A., Tan, C. W., Yatim, A. H., Al-Mothafar, M., & Radaideh, S. M. (2012). Input current control of boost converters using current-mode controller integrated with linear quadratic regulator. International Journal of Renewable Energy Research (IJRER), 2(2), 262–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, N., Samanta, S., et al. (2020). Modified LQR technique for fuel cell integrated boost converter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

  • Al Towati, A. (2008). Dynamic control design of switched mode power converters. Ph.D. thesis, Helsinki University of Technology.

  • Alonge, F., D’Ippolito, F., & Cangemi, T. (2008). Identification and robust control of dc/dc converter Hammerstein model. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 23(6), 2990–3003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Smadi, M. K., Hu, Y., & Mahmoud, Y. (2018). LQR-based PID voltage controller for photovoltaic systems. In IECON 2018-44th annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society (pp. 1854–1859). IEEE.

  • Aouani, N., & Olalla, C. (2020). Robust LQR control for PWM converters with parameter-dependent Lyapunov functions. Applied Sciences, 10(21), 7534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, B., & Kazimierczuk, M. K. (2006). Voltage loop of boost PWM dc-dc converters with peak current-mode control. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Regular Papers, 53(1), 99–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corina, M. I., Lascu, D., & Popescu, V. (2006). A new averaged switch model including conduction losses for PWM converters operating in discontinuous inductor current mode. Facta Universitatis-Series: Electronics and Energetics, 19(2), 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, H. S., Tan, C. W., Yatim, A., & Li, S. (2019). Fuel cell and ultracapacitor energy system control using linear quadratic regulator proportional integral controller. Electrical Engineering, 101(2), 559–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Melo Bento, A. A. (2020). Hybrid operational high step-up dc-dc converter. Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, 31(2), 350–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deihimi, A., & Mahmoodieh, M. E. S. (2017). Analysis and control of battery-integrated dc/dc converters for renewable energy applications. IET Power Electronics, 10(14), 1819–1831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, F., Montagner, V., Pinheiro, J., Pinheiro, H., Oliveira, S., & Péres, A. (2013). Comparison of linear quadratic controllers with stability analysis for dc-dc boost converters under large load range. Asian Journal of Control, 15(3), 861–871.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, R. W. (2001). Dc-dc power converters. In Wiley encyclopedia of electrical and electronics engineering.

  • Kouro, S., Cortés, P., Vargas, R., Ammann, U., & Rodríguez, J. (2008). Model predictive control-a simple and powerful method to control power converters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 56(6), 1826–1838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari, M. L., Bhattacharya, S., & Triar, U. (2016). Stabilization of boost converter with output filter using LQR based state-feedback controller. In 2016 10th international conference on intelligent systems and control (ISCO) (pp. 1–6). IEEE.

  • Li, P., & Lehman, B. (2004). A design method for paralleling current mode controlled dc-dc converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 19(3), 748–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, N., Undeland, T. M., & Robbins, W. P. (2003). Power electronics: Converters, applications, and design. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naim, R., Weiss, G., & Ben-Yaakov, S. (1997). H/sup/spl infin//control applied to boost power converters. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 12(4), 677–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neacsu, D. O., & Sirbu, A. (2018). Energy savings with LQR control of dc/dc converters. In IECON 2018-44th annual conference of the IEEE industrial electronics society (pp. 1198–1203). IEEE.

  • Neacşu, D. O., & Sîrbu, A. (2019). Design of a LQR-based boost converter controller for energy savings. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 67(7), 5379–5388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oucheriah, S., & Guo, L. (2012). Pwm-based adaptive sliding-mode control for boost dc-dc converters. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 60(8), 3291–3294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, R. B. (1991). A new, continuous-time model for current-mode control (power convertors). IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 6(2), 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skvarenina, T. L. (2018). The power electronics handbook. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Su, J.-H., Chen, J.-J., & Wu, D.-S. (2002). Learning feedback controller design of switching converters via matlab/simulink. IEEE Transactions on Education, 45(4), 307–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomescu, B., & Van Landingham, H. F. (2002). On the use of fuzzy logic to control paralleled dc-dc converters. In Soft computing in industrial electronics (pp. 137–195) Springer.

  • Utkin, V. I. (1993). Sliding mode control design principles and applications to electric drives. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 40(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma, S., Singh, S., & Rao, A. (2013). Overview of control techniques for dc-dc converters. Research Journal of Engineering Sciences ISSN, 2278, 9472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorpérian, V. (1990). Simplified analysis of PWM converters using model of PWM switch. II. Discontinuous conduction mode. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, 26(3), 497–505.

  • Vorpérian, V. (2002). Fast analytical techniques for electrical and electronic circuits. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wai, R.-J., & Shih, L.-C. (2010). Design of voltage tracking control for dc-dc boost converter via total sliding-mode technique. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 58(6), 2502–2511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Li, X., Liu, J., Su, H., & Song, J. (2016). Digital LQR steady-state optimal control with feedforward for nonminimum phase boost dc-dc converter. In 2016 Chinese control and decision conference (CCDC) (pp. 384–389). IEEE.

  • Zhang, M., Li, X., Liu, J., & Su, H. (2017). Dual-mode LQR-feedforward optimal control for non-minimum phase boost converter. IET Power Electronics, 10(1), 92–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to pay gratitude to The University of Alabama for supporting with lab and library facilities. In addition, the authors would like to express their appreciation to The Graduate School and Department of ECE of the University of Alabama and to those colleagues who have directly or indirectly contributed to the completion of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Himadry Shekhar Das.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Das, H.S., Li, Z., Li, S. et al. Small Signal Modeling, Control and Experimentation of Boost Converter Including Parasitic Elements. J Control Autom Electr Syst 32, 956–967 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-021-00735-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40313-021-00735-8

Keywords

Navigation