Abstract
Technology integration refers to the process of innovation diffusion, from understanding technology knowledge to achieving a high level quality of technology usage. To address the gap in research regarding the critical factors that influence K-12 teachers’ practice of technology integration at the initial stage of a massive government-led training programme in rural areas, this study sought to explore the comprehensive effects of teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) and beliefs on their technology integration. Participants included 267 in-service K-12 teachers from four pilot schools in a remote rural area in north-western China. We found that: (a) T-related knowledge positively predicted the teachers’ technology integration quality and quantity, while T-unrelated knowledge negatively influenced technology integration quality and quantity; (b) the positive valence of teachers’ beliefs (PVTBs) was positively related to technology integration quality, the negative valence of teachers’ beliefs was negatively related to technology integration quantity; (c) the PVTBs impacted the quality and quantity of technology integration through T-related knowledge; and (d) gender significantly moderated the impact of positive beliefs and T-related knowledge on technology integration. This study suggests that improving K-12 teachers’ technology integration in rural areas requires prioritizing professional development programmes that improve teachers’ beliefs in the initial stage of technology diffusion.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
To ensure confidentiality, students’ personal identifiers were removed prior to processing the data. The authors provide free and open access to the SPSS file and EFA, CFA and ESM analysis results of the study through the email as soon as the manuscript is published online.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021). Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility! Computers and Education, 166, 104159.
Belland, B. R. (2009). Using the theory of habitus to move beyond the study of barriers to technology integration. Computers and Education, 52(2), 353–364.
Brun, M., & Hinostroza, J. E. (2014). Learning to become a teacher in the 21st century: ICT integration in Initial Teacher Education in Chile. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(3), 222–238.
Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling using AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Chai, C. S., Chin, C. K., Koh, J. H. L., & Tan, C. L. (2013). Exploring Singaporean Chinese language teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge and its relationship to the teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. The Asia–Pacific Education Researcher, 22(4), 657–666.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., & Tsai, C. C. (2011a). Exploring the factor structure of the constructs of technological, pedagogical, content knowledge (TPACK). The Asia–Pacific Education Researcher, 20(3), 595–603.
Chai, C. S., Koh, J. H. L., Tsai, C. C., & Tan, L. L. W. (2011b). Modeling primary school pre-service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers and Education, 57(1), 1184–1193.
Cheng, S. L., Lu, L., Xie, K., & Vongkulluksn, V. W. (2020). Understanding teacher technology integration from expectancy–value perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 91, 103062.
Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255.
Churches, A. (2010). Bloom’s digital taxonomy. Australian School Library Association NSW, Inc.
de Koster, S., Volman, M., & Kuiper, E. (2017). Concept-guided development of technology in ‘traditional’ and ‘innovative schools: Quantitative and qualitative differences in technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(5), 1325–1344.
Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers and Education, 130, 81–93.
Heinrich, C. J., Darling-Aduana, J., & Martin, C. (2020). The potential and prerequisites of effective tablet integration in rural Kenya. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(2), 498–514.
Hsu, P. S. (2016). Examining current beliefs, practices and barriers about technology integration: A case study. TechTrends, 60(1), 30–40.
Ifinedo, E., Rikala, J., & Hämäläinen, T. (2020). Factors affecting Nigerian teacher educators’ technology integration: Considering characteristics, knowledge constructs, ICT practices and beliefs. Computers and Education, 146, 103760.
Ke, F., & Hsu, Y. C. (2015). Mobile augmented-reality artifact creation as a component of mobile computer-supported collaborative learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 26, 33–41.
Kim, D., So, H. J., & Ryoo, D. (2021). Unpacking teachers’ concerns about CT-based pedagogy: The case of software education in Korea. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 66–82.
Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131–152.
Kosovich, J. J., Hulleman, C. S., Barron, K. E., & Getty, S. (2015). A practical measure of student motivation: Establishing validity evidence for the expectancy–value–cost scale in middle school. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5–6), 790–816.
Lei, J. (2010). Quantity versus quality: A new approach to examine the relationship between technology use and student outcomes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 455–472.
Liu, F., Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Barron, A. E. (2017). Explaining technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A multilevel path analysis model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(4), 795–813.
Liu, S., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2012). Chinese teachers’ work stress and their turnover intention. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 160–170.
Long, T., Zhao, G., Li, X., Zhao, R., Xie, K., & Duan, Y. (2020). Exploring Chinese in-service primary teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for the use of thinking tools. Asia–Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 1–21.
Marwan, A., & Sweeney, T. (2019). Using activity theory to analyse contradictions in English teachers’ technology integration. The Asia–Pacific Education Researcher, 28(2), 115–125.
MOE (Ministry of Education), People's Republic of China. (2018, August 8). Teacher Team Building Action Plan. http://www.moe.gov.cn/srcsite/A10/s7034/201808/t20180815_345323.html
MOE (Ministry of Education), People’s Republic of China. (2020, July 30). Six measures of Ningxia to fight against poverty through education. http://www.moe.gov.cn/jyb_xwfb/s6192/s222/moe_1762/202007/t20200730_475893.html
Muhaimin, A., Habibi, A., Mukminin, A., & Hadisaputra, P. (2020). Science teachers’ integration of digital resources in education: A survey in rural areas of one Indonesian province. Heliyon, 6(8), e04631.
Murthy, S., Iyer, S., & Warriem, J. (2015). ET4ET: A large-scale faculty professional development program on effective integration of educational technology. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 18(3), 16–28.
Sahin, I. (2006). Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(2), 14–23.
Schmid, M., Brianza, E., & Petko, D. (2021). Self-reported technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) of pre-service teachers in relation to digital technology use in lesson plans. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106586.
Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2016). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Routledge.
Taimalu, M., & Luik, P. (2019). The impact of beliefs and knowledge on the integration of technology among teacher educators: A path analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 79, 101–110.
Teo, T. (2010). Establishing gender structural invariance of technology acceptance model (TAM). Asia–Pacific Education Researcher, 19(2), 311–320.
Vandenberg, R. J., & Lance, C. E. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70.
Vongkulluksn, V. W., Xie, K., & Bowman, M. A. (2018). The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers and Education, 118, 70–81.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
Wozney, L., Venkatesh, V., & Abrami, P. (2006). Implementing computer technologies: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14(1), 173–207.
Xie, K., Nelson, M. J., Cheng, S. L., & Jiang, Z. (2021). Examining changes in teachers’ perceptions of external and internal barriers in their integration of educational digital resources in K-12 classrooms. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1951404
Zhao, G., Long, T., Zhao, R., Yang, X., Zhang, X., & Hyerle, D. (2021). How was teaching thinking adopted and diffused in Chinese primary schools? A qualitative study from principals’ perspectives. Asia–Pacific Journal of Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2021.1911786
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Shuang Yu and Shen Ba for assisting data collection, Professor Linjing Wu and Qiyun Wang for their valuable comments on the manuscript, and all the teachers who participated in the study.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Number 61977035; National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Number 61772012; National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Number 71974073.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GL: Initial Conceptualization, Project Design, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—Original Draft, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. QL: Supervision, Project Administration, Funding Acquisition, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. KX: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation. TL: Supervision, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. XZ: Software, Writing—Reviewing and Editing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no potential conflict of interest in this study.
Ethical Approval
Ethical approval and appropriate permissions were requested and approved.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Informed Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from participants.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, G., Liu, Q., Xie, K. et al. Quality or Quantity: How Do Teachers’ Knowledge and Beliefs Persuade Them to Engage in Technology Integration in a Massive Government-Led Training Programme?. Asia-Pacific Edu Res 32, 459–471 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00668-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00668-z