Skip to main content
Log in

Investigation of Atlas V Centaur Upper Stage Fragmentation Events

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Journal of the Astronautical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debris-generating events in orbit pose a significant threat to all space-faring activities. In order to mitigate such events, it is essential to uncover their causes. This paper examines the fragmentations of three Atlas V Centaur upper stages (2009-047B, 2014-55B, 2018-079B) which occured in 2018 and 2019. Three different data sources—data from the Astronomical Institute of the University of Bern (AIUB), the Vimpel catalog, and the Spacetrack catalog—are used for this investigation and the outcomes are compared. Ephemerides and two-line elements (TLEs) from these sources are first propagated to obtain breakup epoch estimates. Subsequently, techniques developed by Tan and Reynolds to obtain Gabbard plots, velocity and angular distributions of fragments, and event intensities, are applied. This work finds that these events stray from existing fragmentation models and patterns exhibited by past events, such as those of the explosive Delta upper stages in the 1970s. Only one of the three events, 2018-079B, may have exploded due to leftover propellant combustion. 2009-047B appears to have endured a structural failure—inferred from clustered fragments with low velocities. A torus-shaped fragment distribution is observed for the 2014-055B event, suggesting it may have been pierced by a small piece of debris.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agopov, V.: Major fragmentation of Atlas 5 Centaur upper stage 2014-055b (SSN#40209). IAA Space Debris Committee Meeting (2018)

  2. Agopov, V., Savin, N.: Updated assessments of the fragmentations of Atlas 5 Centaur upper stages. IAA Space Debris Committee Meeting (2019)

  3. Badhwar, G.D., Anz-Meador, P.D.: Determination of the area and mass distribution of orbital debris fragments. Earth Moon Planets 45(1), 29–51 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00054659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Black, A., Frueh, C.: Uncertainty analysis of atlas v centaur upper stage fragmentation events. In: 33rd AAS/AIAA Space Flight Mechanics Meeting

  5. Boone, N., Bettinger, R.A.: Debris propagation following a spacecraft mishap at the collinear earth-moon Lagrange points. In: 2021 IEEE Aerospace Conference (50100), pp. 1–15 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO50100.2021.9438276

  6. Chobotov, V.A., Spencer, D.B., Schmitt, D.L., Gupta, R.P., Hopkins, R.G., Knapp, D.T.: Dynamics of Debris Motion and the Collision Hazard to Spacecraft Resulting from an Orbital Breakup. The Aerospace Corporation, El Segundo (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cowardin, H., Liou, J.C., Anz-Meador, P., Sorge, M., Opiela, J., Fitz-Coy, N., Huynh, T., Krisko, P.: Characterization of orbital debris via hyper-velocity laboratory-based tests. In: Proceedings of 7th European Conference on Space Debris, Darmstadt, Germany (2017)

  8. Dimare, L., Cicalo, S., Rossi, A., Alessi, E.M., Valsecchi, G.B.: In-orbit fragmentation characterization and parent bodies identification by means of orbital distances. In: First International Orbital Debris Conference, Sugar Land (2019)

  9. ESA: ESA’s annual space environment report (2021). https://www.sdo.esoc.esa.int/environment_report/Space_Environment_Report_latest.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2022

  10. European Space Agency: Space Debris by the Numbers. European Space Agency, Paris (2021). http://www.esa.int/Safety_Security/Space_Debris/Space_debris_by_the_numbers

  11. Fiedler, H., Herzog, J., Ploner, M., Prohaska, M., Schildknecht, T., Weigel, M., Klabl, M.: SMARTnet—first results of the telescope network. In: Proceedings of 7th European Conference on Space Debris, Darmstadt, Germany (2017)

  12. Flegel, S., Bennett, J., Lachut, M., Möckel, M., Smith, C.: An analysis of the 2016 Hitomi breakup event. Earth Planets Space (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0633-3

  13. Gogoi, B.B., Rajarajan, D., Kumari, A., Chandrasekhar, M.V., Nirmala, S., Kartik, A.: Fragmentation analysis of a break-up event in low earth orbit. J. Space Saf. Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsse.2021.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Healy, L., Halpin, B., Kindl, S., Hoskins, B.P., Binz, C.R.: Initial velocity distribution and consequent spatial distribution of fragments. In: First International Orbital Debris Conference (2019)

  15. Hoots, F.R., Roehrich, R.L.: Spacetrack Report No. 3: Models for Propagation of NORAD Element Sets. Aerospace Defense Center, Peterson Air Force Base (1980)

  16. Hoots, F., Sorge, M.: Satellite breakup parameter determination. J. Astronaut. Sci. 59(1–2), 120–140 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-013-0009-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoots, F., Schumacher, P., Glover, R.: History of analytical orbit modeling in the U.S. space surveillance system. J. Guid. Control Dyn. (2004). https://doi.org/10.2514/1.9161

  18. Jehn, R.: Dispersion of debris cloud from in-orbit fragmentation events. In: IAF, 41st International Astronautical Congress, Dresden, Federal Republic of Germany (1990)

  19. Johnson., N.L., Stansbery, E., Whitlock, D., Abercromby, K., Shoots, D.: History of On-Orbit Satellite Fragmentations 14th edition. NASA, Washington (2008)

  20. Jopek, T.: Remarks on the meteor orbital similarity d-criterion. Icarus 106, 603–607 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. JSC Vimpel—data portal. http://spacedata.vimpel.ru/. Accessed 9 May 2021

  22. Kelso, T.: Space surveillance. https://celestrak.com/columns/v04n01/

  23. Kessler, D.J., Loftus, J.P.: Orbital debris as an energy management problem. Adv. Space Res. 16(11), 139–144 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0273-1177(95)98764-f

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. NASA Content Administrator: Centaur: America’s workhorse in space (2012). https://www.nasa.gov/centers/glenn/about/history/centaur.html

  25. Peterson, G., Sorge, M., McVey, J.: forensic analysis of debris-generating events: Orbcomm FM 16. In: First International Orbital Debris Conference, held 9–12 December, 2019 in Sugar Land, TX (2019)

  26. Ravi, P.: Investigating On-Orbit Satellite Fragmentation Events. Master’s thesis, Purdue University (2021)

  27. Ravi, P., Frueh, C., Schildknecht, T.: Investigation of Three Recent Atlas V Centaur Upper Stage Fragmentation Events. In: 8th European Conference on Space Debris (2021)

  28. Reynolds, R.C., Tan, A., Schamschula, M.: Gabbard diagram formation: the general theory for elliptical orbits. Adv. Aerosp. Sci. Appl. 8(2), 99–112 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Richardson, E., Jackson, A., Hays, M., Bangham, M., Blackwood, J., Skinner, T., Richman, B.: An experimental study of launch vehicle propellant tank fragmentation. In: JANNAF Propulsion Systems Hazards Joint Subcommittee Meeting, pp. M15-4295. Joint Army Navy NASA Air Force Interagency Propulsion Committee, Albuquerque (2014)

  30. Rudman, T., Austad, K.: The Centaur upper stage vehicle. In: 4th IAC on Launcher Technology (2002)

  31. Schildknecht, T., Vananti, A., Cordelli, E.: ESA optical surveys to characterize recent fragmentation events in GEO and HEO. In: Proceedings of ESA NEO SST Conference, Darmstadt, Germany (2019)

  32. Slatton, Z., McKissock, D.: Methods of predicting and processing breakups of space objects. In: 7th European Conference on Space Debris (2017)

  33. Sorge, M., Peterson, G., Mcvey, J.: Forensic analysis of on-orbit debris generation events. In: 7th European Conference on Space Debris (2017)

  34. Stevenson, E., Lemmens, S.: Deriving a unified space object catalogue for the purpose of space debris monitoring and modelling. In: 1st NEO and Debris Detection Conference (2019)

  35. Tan, A., Reynolds, R.C.: Theory of Satellite Fragmentation in Orbit. World Scientific, Singapore (2020)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. U.S. strategic command fact sheet (2018). https://www.stratcom.mil/Portals/8/Documents/CSpOC_Factsheet_2018.pdf. Accessed 15 Feb 2022

  37. Vallado, D.A.: Fundamentals of Astrodynamics and Applications, vol. 12. Springer, Dordrecht (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Watson, E., Durr, N., Schimmerohn, M.: Tracking debris cloud fragments: an experimental method for measuring hypervelocity fragmentation in the context of validating numerical simulations. In: Proceedings of 8th European Conference on Space Debris (virtual), Darmstad (2021)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arly Black.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ravi, P., Black, A. & Frueh, C. Investigation of Atlas V Centaur Upper Stage Fragmentation Events. J Astronaut Sci 70, 12 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-023-00377-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40295-023-00377-9

Keywords

Navigation