Skip to main content
Log in

Functional Improvement After Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients is Not Related to Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

  • Original article
  • Published:
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) improves the functional capacity and the prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease.

Aim

Our study was aimed at assessing the relationship between functional improvement (evaluated with 6-min Walk Test—6MWT) and the improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after CR.

Methods

We collected data from 249 patients (age 66.79 ± 11.06 years; males 81.52%) with a recent history of Acute Coronary Syndrome that performed CR. The functional improvement after CR was expressed as the Δ between distance covered at the final versus the initial 6-min Walking Test (6-MWT), while LVEF was calculated with transthoracic echocardiogram at the beginning and at the end of the CR.

Results

Patients were divided accordingly to their pre-rehab LVEF (≥ 55% vs < 55%). With superimposable age and baseline 6MWT distance covered (434.58 vs 405.12 m, p = 0.08), the latter group presented higher Δ meter values at 6MWT (167.93 vs 193.97 m, p = 0.018). However, no statistically significant positive correlation between Δ meters and Δ LVEF was found. Moreover, linear regression analyses found that nor baseline LVEF nor Δ LVEF were significant determinants of Δ meters when considering the whole group, with age, basal 6MWT and peak CK-MB as additional covariates in the model.

Conclusion

Although it could be expected that an increase in LVEF is related to the functional improvement after CR, no significant correlation was found in our population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Doll JA, Hellkamp A, Thomas L, et al. Participation in cardiac rehabilitation, readmissions, and death after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2014;127(6):538–46.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schlitt A, Wischmann P, Wienke A, et al. Rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease: participation and its effect on prognosis. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(31–32):527–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Doll JA, Hellkamp A, Thomas L, et al. Effectiveness of cardiac rehabilitation among older patients after acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J. 2015;170(5):855–64.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gathright EC, Goldstein CM, Loucks EB, et al. Examination of clinical and psychosocial determinants of exercise capacity change in cardiac rehabilitation. Heart Lung. 2019;48(1):13–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klempfner R, Tzur B, Sabbag A, et al. Participation in an exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation program and functional improvement of heart failure patients with preserved versus reduced left ventricular systolic function. Isr Med Assoc J. 2018;20(6):358–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Legallois D, Belin A, Nesterov SV, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation improves coronary endothelial function in patients with heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy: a positron emission tomography study. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016;23(2):129–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mehani SH. Correlation between changes in diastolic dysfunction and health-related quality of life after cardiac rehabilitation program in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Adv Res. 2013;4(2):189–200.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wittekind SG, Gerdes Y, Mays W, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation improves cardiometabolic health in young patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Tex Heart Inst J. 2018;45(1):27–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim C, Choi HE, Lee BJ. Cardiac rehabilitation of a patient with an advanced dilated cardiomyopathy: a case report. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014;38(4):554–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Izquierdo-Porrera AM, Gardner AW, Powell CC, et al. Effects of exercise rehabilitation on cardiovascular risk factors in older patients with peripheralarterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31(4):670–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jeger RV, Rickenbacher P, Pfisterer ME, et al. Outpatient rehabilitation in patients with coronary artery and peripheral arterial occlusive disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(4):618–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cousin A, Popielarz S, Wieczorek V, et al. Impact of a rehabilitation program on muscular strength and endurance in peripheral arterial occlusive disease patients. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2011;54(7):429–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bjarnason-Wehrens B, Nebel R, Jensen K, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: the Cardiac Rehabilitation Outcome Study in Heart Failure (CROS-HF): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1177/2047487319854140.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jiang AF, Zhang FC, Gao W, et al. The impact of exercise rehabilitation on left ventricular remodeling and systolic function in acute myocardial infarction patients. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2006;45(11):904–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson L, Thompson DR, Oldridge N, Zwisler AD, Rees K, Martin N, Taylor RS. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;1:CD001800.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Soleimannejad K, Nouzari Y, Ahsani A, et al. Evaluation of the effect of cardiac rehabilitation on left ventricular diastolic and systolic function and cardiac chamber size in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2014;9(2):54–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Franciosa JA, Park M, Levine TB. Lack of correlation between exercise capacity and indexes of resting left ventricular performance in heart failure. Am J Cardiol. 1981;47(1):33–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lele SS, Macfarlane D, Morrison S, et al. Determinants of exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease and mild to moderate systolic dysfunction. Role of heart rate and diastolic filling abnormalities. Eur Heart J. 1996;17(2):204–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mänttäri A, Suni J, Sievänen H et al. Six-minute walk test: a tool for predicting maximal aerobic power (VO2 max) in healthy adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018. (Epub ahead of print)

  20. McCabe N, Butler J, Dunbar SB, et al. Six-minute walk distance predicts 30-day readmission after acute heart failure hospitalization. Heart Lung. 2017;46(4):287–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Blanco Pérez JJ, Arnalich Montiel V, Salgado-Barreira Á, et al. The 6-minute walk test as a tool for determining exercise capacity and prognosis in patients with silicosis. Arch Bronconeumol. 2019;55(2):88–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Demir R, Küçükoğlu MS. Six-minute walk test in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Anatol J Cardiol. 2015;15(3):249–54.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. ATS Statement. Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:111–7.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rosengren A, Wallentin L, Simoons M, et al. Determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction and a novel method to improve its assessment of myocardial contractility. Ann Intensive Care. 2019;9:48.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rosengren A, Wallentin L, Simoons M, et al. Age, clinical presentation, and outcome of acute coronary syndromes in the Euroheart acute coronary syndrome survey. Eur Heart J. 2006;27(7):789–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sanchis-Gomar F, Perez-Quilis C, Leischik R, et al. Epidemiology of coronary heart disease and acute coronary syndrome. Ann Transl Med. 2016;4(13):256.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Isaksson RM, Jansson JH, Lundblad D, et al. Better long-term survival in young and middle-aged women than in men after a first myocardial infarction between 1985 and 2006. An analysis of 8630 patients in the northern Sweden MONICA study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2011;11:1.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Maloberti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors declares that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Institution involved.

Informed consent

Informed consent was not obtained from all participants included in the study because of it's retrospective design.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peretti, A., Maloberti, A., Garatti, L. et al. Functional Improvement After Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients is Not Related to Improvement in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction. High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev 27, 225–230 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-020-00374-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40292-020-00374-1

Keywords

Navigation