Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Instrument Development in Choice Experiments. Commentary on: “Applying a Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment to Measure Treatment Preferences in Type 2 Diabetes”

  • Commentary
  • Published:
The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

The Original Article was published on 27 April 2016

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Clark MD, Determann D, Petrou S, Moro D, de Bekker-Grob EW. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature. Pharmacoeconomics. 2014;32:883–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bridges JF, Hauber AB, Marshall D, et al. Conjoint analysis applications in health: a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. Value Health. 2011;14:403–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Reed Johnson F, Lancsar E, Marshall D, et al. Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2013;16:3–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hauber A, Gonzalez J, Groothius-Oudshoorn C, et al. Statistical methods for the analysis of discrete choice experiments: a report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. Value Health. 2016;19(4):300-15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Coast J, Flynn TN, Natarajan L, et al. Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Soc Sci Med. 2008;67:874–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. dosReis S, Ng X, Frosch E, Reeves G, Cunningham C, Bridges JF. Using best-worst scaling to measure caregiver preferences for managing their child’s ADHD: a pilot study. Patient. 2015;8:423–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Peay HL, Hollin I, Fischer R, Bridges JF. A community-engaged approach to quantifying caregiver preferences for the benefits and risks of emerging therapies for Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Clin Ther. 2014;36:624–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ross M, Bridges JF, Ng X, et al. A best-worst scaling experiment to prioritize caregiver concerns about ADHD medication for children. Psychiatr Serv. 2015;66:208–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wittenberg E, Bharel M, Saada A, Santiago E, Bridges JF, Weinreb L. Measuring the preferences of homeless women for cervical cancer screening interventions: development of a best-worst scaling survey. Patient. 2015;8:455–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Hara NN, Roy L, O’Hara LM, et al. Healthcare worker preferences for active tuberculosis case finding programs in South Africa: a best-worst scaling choice experiment. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0133304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Janssen EM, Segal JB, Bridges JF. A framework for instrument development of a choice experiment: an application to type 2 diabetes. Patient. 2016. doi:10.1007/s40271-016-0170-3.

  12. Coast J, Al-Janabi H, Sutton EJ, et al. Using qualitative methods for attribute development for discrete choice experiments: issues and recommendations. Health Econ. 2012;21:730–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Marley AA, Coast J, Peters TJ. Rescaling quality of life values from discrete choice experiments for use as QALYs: a cautionary tale. Popul Health Metr. 2008;6:6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Eve Wittenberg

Authors
  1. Eve Wittenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eve Wittenberg.

Additional information

This comment refers to the article available at doi:10.1007/s40271-016-0170-3.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wittenberg, E. Instrument Development in Choice Experiments. Commentary on: “Applying a Framework for Instrument Development of a Choice Experiment to Measure Treatment Preferences in Type 2 Diabetes”. Patient 9, 379–381 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0186-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-016-0186-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation