Skip to main content
Log in

Trajectories of Benzodiazepine Use among Older Adults from a Concordance-with-Guidelines Perspective: A Nationwide Cohort Study

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
Drugs & Aging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and Objective

Benzodiazepines (including zolpidem and zopiclone) are often associated with higher-than-recommended intake and durations of use, especially in older adults. The objective of this study was to characterize trajectories of benzodiazepine use according to recommended patterns in older adults, and to assess predictors of the risk of developing each of these trajectories.

Methods

Using the French Health Insurance database, we constituted a cohort of adults aged ≥ 65 years who initiated benzodiazepines in 2007 and were followed for up to 8 years. Concordance with benzodiazepine use guidelines was assessed on a quarterly basis according to a “concordance-with-guideline score” with values 1–5. Group-based trajectory modeling was then applied as implemented in the Proc Traj procedure in SAS to define guideline-concordant trajectories based on seven baseline patient-centered characteristics: sex, complementary health insurance coverage, treated alcohol and tobacco use disorder, polypharmacy, hospital stay, and registered chronic diseases.

Results

Among 5080 new users (64.1% women, median age 74 years), six trajectories of benzodiazepine use were identified. Three, representing 70% of users, were concordant with guidelines, whereas three implied non-concordant benzodiazepine use for part or all of the benzodiazepine use follow-up. Polymedicated patients were more prone to develop chronic non-guideline-concordant initially guideline-concordant use, whereas those with a history of long-term disease and hospitalization were more likely to develop chronic non-guideline-concordant use. The number of prescribers during the first quarter, number of daily defined doses, use of loperamide, and use of psychostimulants were associated with a higher risk of developing an initial and persistent non-guideline-concordant use. Treatment initiation by a psychiatrist, initial use of World Health Organization (WHO) step-2 opioids and non-benzodiazepine anxiolytics or sedatives were associated with a higher risk of late non-guideline-concordant use.

Conclusions

Concordance with guidelines varied over time during benzodiazepine use in older adults. A third of these adults will hypothetically follow one of the identified non-guideline-concordant trajectories, consisting of initial and/or late non-guideline concordance. This was associated with modifiable and nonmodifiable factors that clinicians should be aware of for tailoring the monitoring of patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Huerta C, Abbing-Karahagopian V, Requena G, Oliva B, Alvarez Y, Gardarsdottir H, et al. Exposure to benzodiazepines (anxiolytics, hypnotics and related drugs) in seven European electronic healthcare databases: a cross-national descriptive study from the PROTECT-EU Project. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(Suppl 1):56–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3825.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Smink BE, Egberts ACG, Lusthof KJ, Uges DRA, de Gier JJ. The relationship between benzodiazepine use and traffic accidents: a systematic literature review. CNS Drugs. 2010;24:639–53. https://doi.org/10.2165/11533170-000000000-00000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Orriols L, Philip P, Moore N, Castot A, Gadegbeku B, Delorme B, et al. Benzodiazepine-like hypnotics and the associated risk of road traffic accidents. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2011;89:595–601. https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.13075.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pariente A, Dartigues J-F, Benichou J, Letenneur L, Moore N, Fourrier-Réglat A. Benzodiazepines and injurious falls in community dwelling elders. Drugs Aging. 2008;25:61–70. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002512-200825010-00007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Billioti de Gage S, Bégaud B, Bazin F, Verdoux H, Dartigues J-F, Pérès K, et al. Benzodiazepine use and risk of dementia: prospective population based study. BMJ. 2012;345: e6231. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e6231.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Billioti de Gage S, Pariente A, Bégaud B. Is there really a link between benzodiazepine use and the risk of dementia? Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2015;14:733–47. https://doi.org/10.1517/14740338.2015.1014796.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Penninkilampi R, Eslick GD. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the risk of dementia associated with benzodiazepine use, after controlling for protopathic bias. CNS Drugs. 2018;32:485–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-018-0535-3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nader D, Gowing L. Is long-term benzodiazepine use a risk factor for cognitive decline? Results of a systematic review. J Addict. 2020;2020:1569456. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1569456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Haute Autorité de Santé. Modalités d’arrêt des benzodiazépines et médicaments apparentés chez le patient âgé [Internet]. Communication department, French National Authority for Health, France; 2007 [cited 2021 Jan 10]. https://www.has-sante.fr/jcms/c_601509/fr/modalites-d-arret-des-benzodiazepines-et-medicaments-apparentes-chez-le-patient-age.

  10. Haute Autorité de Santé. Quelle place pour les benzodiazépines dans l’insomnie ? [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2021 Nov 4]. https://news.utip.fr/newsletter/2015/23_03/bzd_insomnie_v2.pdf.

  11. Haute Autorité de Santé. Quelle place pour les benzodiazépines dans l’anxiété ? [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2021 Sep 23]. https://www.has-sante.fr/upload/docs/application/pdf/2018-07/fiche_bum_benzodiazepines_anxiete_cd_27062018.pdf.

  12. Assurance Maladie. Choix d’une benzodiazépine [Internet]. French Health Insurance, France; 2014. https://www.ameli.fr/sites/default/files/Documents/4960/document/choix-benzodiazepine_assurance-maladie.pdf.

  13. Conn DK, Hogan DB, Amdam L, Cassidy K-L, Cordell P, Frank C, et al. Canadian guidelines on benzodiazepine receptor agonist use disorder among older adults title. Can Geriatr J CGJ. 2020;23:116–22. https://doi.org/10.5770/cgj.23.419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. By the 2019 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria® Update Expert Panel. American Geriatrics Society. Updated AGS Beers Criteria® for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;2019(67):674–94. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kurko TAT, Saastamoinen LK, Tähkäpää S, Tuulio-Henriksson A, Taiminen T, Tiihonen J, et al. Long-term use of benzodiazepines: definitions, prevalence and usage patterns—a systematic review of register-based studies. Eur Psychiatry J Assoc Eur Psychiatr. 2015;30:1037–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.09.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Airagnes G, Pelissolo A, Lavallée M, Flament M, Limosin F. Benzodiazepine misuse in the elderly: risk factors, consequences, and management. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2016;18:89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11920-016-0727-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Verger P, Cortaredona S, Jacqmin-Gadda H, Tournier M, Verdoux H. Eight-year follow-up of hypnotic delivery by adults aged 50 and older from an insurance database. Sleep. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsx147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Verger P, Mmadi Mrenda B, Cortaredona S, Tournier M, Verdoux H. Trajectory analysis of anxiolytic dispensing over 10 years among new users aged 50 and older. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2018;137:328–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/acps.12858.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bezin J, Duong M, Lassalle R, Droz C, Pariente A, Blin P, et al. The national healthcare system claims databases in France, SNIIRAM and EGB: powerful tools for pharmacoepidemiology. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:954–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. ATC/DDD Index [Internet]. https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/.

  21. Jones B, Nagin D, Roeder K. A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociol Methods Res. 2001;29:374–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124101029003005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones B, Nagin D. Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociol Methods Res. 2007;35:542–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124106292364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Guillot J, Maumus-Robert S, Bezin J. Polypharmacy: a general review of definitions, descriptions and determinants. Therapie. 2020;75:407–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.therap.2019.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Guillot J, Maumus-Robert S, Marceron A, Noize P, Pariente A, Bezin J. The burden of potentially inappropriate medications in chronic polypharmacy. J Clin Med. 2020;9:E3728. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113728.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Nagin DS, Odgers CL. Group-based trajectory modeling in clinical research. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:109–38. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131413.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Haviland AM, Jones BL, Nagin DS. Group-based trajectory modeling extended to account for nonrandom participant attrition. Sociol Methods Res. 2011;40:367–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124111400041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bénard-Laribière A, Noize P, Pambrun E, Bazin F, Verdoux H, Tournier M, et al. Trends in incident use of benzodiazepines and Z-drugs in France from 2006 to 2012: a population-based study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017;26:162–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.4123.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Panes A, Pariente A, Bénard-Laribière A, Lassalle R, Dureau-Pournin C, Lorrain S, et al. Use of benzodiazepines and z-drugs not compliant with guidelines and associated factors: a population-based study. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020;270:3–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-018-0966-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Panes A, Verdoux H, Fourrier-Réglat A, Berdaï D, Pariente A, Tournier M. Use of benzodiazepines non-compliant with guidelines in patients with psychiatric and non-psychiatric chronic disorders. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2020;65:21–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2020.03.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bénard-Laribière A, Noize P, Pambrun E, Bazin F, Verdoux H, Tournier M, et al. Comorbidities and concurrent medications increasing the risk of adverse drug reactions: prevalence in French benzodiazepine users. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2016;72:869–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-016-2044-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marriott S, Tyrer P. Benzodiazepine dependence. Avoidance and withdrawal. Drug Saf. 1993;9:93–103. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-199309020-00003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Pétursson H. The benzodiazepine withdrawal syndrome. Addiction. 1994;89:1455–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.1994.tb03743.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Chiappini S, Schifano F. A decade of gabapentinoid misuse: an analysis of the European Medicines Agency’s “Suspected Adverse Drug Reactions” database. CNS Drugs. 2016;30:647–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40263-016-0359-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schifano F, Chiappini S, Corkery JM, Guirguis A. Abuse of prescription drugs in the context of novel psychoactive substances (NPS): a systematic review. Brain Sci. 2018;8:E73. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8040073.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Modesto-Lowe V, Barron GC, Aronow B, Chaplin M. Gabapentin for alcohol use disorder: a good option, or cause for concern? Cleve Clin J Med. 2019;86:815–23. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.86a.18128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. McHugh RK, Geyer RB, Chase AR, Griffin ML, Bogunovic O, Weiss RD. Sex differences in benzodiazepine misuse among adults with substance use disorders. Addict Behav. 2021;112:106608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106608.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jacob L, Rapp MA, Kostev K. Long-term use of benzodiazepines in older patients in Germany: a retrospective analysis. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2017;7:191–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/2045125317696454.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Noize P, Bazin F, Dufouil C, Lechevallier-Michel N, Ancelin M-L, Dartigues J-F, et al. Comparison of health insurance claims and patient interviews in assessing drug use: data from the Three-City (3C) Study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18:310–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.1717.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor and anonymous reviewers whose careful reading allowed improving the quality of the manuscript. We thank Dr. Sophie Billioti de Gage (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé, ANSM) for her collaboration in developing in-house algorithms for alcohol and tobacco dependence treatment identification.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antoine Pariente.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This work was supported by the French Medicines Agency (Agence Nationale de Sécurité du Médicament et des Produits de Santé, ANSM) (Grant number 2019S015), in the context of a partnership with the Health Product Epidemiology Scientific Interest Group (EPI-PHARE). The present study is part of the Drugs Systematized Assessment in real-liFe EnviRonment (DRUGS-SAFER) research program. This program aims at providing an integrated system allowing the concomitant monitoring of drug use and safety in France. The potential impact of drugs, frailty of populations and seriousness of risks drive the research program. The French Medicines Agency played no role in the study design, conduct, and interpretation of results or discussion. This publication represents the views of the authors and does not necessarily represent the opinion of the French Medicines Agency.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

By agreement of the French Data Protection Supervisory Authority, neither ethics committee approval nor informed consent were required for this observational study based on medico-administrative databases because of the anonymous nature of the data.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Availability of data and material/code availability

No additional data available by author (French law to access SNDS https://www.snds.gouv.fr). The SAS code used is available from the corresponding author, antoine.pariente@u-bordeaux.fr, upon request.

Authors’ contributions

Conception or design of the work: SMR, AJM, MT, BB, AP; data acquisition and analysis: AJM; data interpretation: SMR, AJM, MT, BB, AP; manuscript drafting: SMR, AJM, AP; manuscript critical reviewing: SMR, AJM, MT, BB, AP; final approval of the version to be published: SMR, AJM, MT, BB, AP; administrative, technical, or material support: SMR, AJM; study supervision: AP. All the authors have read and approved the final submitted manuscript, and agree to be accountable for the work.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 286 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maumus-Robert, S., Jarne-Munoz, A., Tournier, M. et al. Trajectories of Benzodiazepine Use among Older Adults from a Concordance-with-Guidelines Perspective: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Drugs Aging 40, 919–931 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01057-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-023-01057-x

Navigation