Skip to main content
Log in

Digoxin is Not Related to Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure: Results from the SELFIE-TR Registry

  • Original Research Article
  • Published:
American Journal of Cardiovascular Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aims

Digoxin has been used in the treatment for heart failure for centuries, but the role of this drug in the modern era is controversial. A particular concern is the recent observational findings suggesting an increase in all-cause mortality with digoxin, although such observations suffer from biased results since these studies usually do not provide adequate compensation for the severity of disease. Using a nationwide registry database, we aimed to investigate whether digoxin is associated with 1-year all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure irrespective of phenotype.

Methods

A total of 1014 out of 1054 patients in the registry, of whom 110 patients were on digoxin, were included in the study. Multivariable adjustments were done and propensity scores were calculated for various prognostic indicators, including signs and symptoms of heart failure and functional capacity. Crude mortality, mortality adjusted for covariates, mortality in the propensity score-matched cohort, and Bayesian factors (BFs) were analyzed.

Results

Crude 1-year mortality rate did not differ between patients on and off digoxin (17.3% vs 20.1%, log-rank p = 0.46), and digoxin was not related to mortality following multivariable adjustment (hazard ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.539–1.402, p = 0.57). Similarly, all-cause mortality was similar in 220 propensity-score adjusted patients (17.3% vs 20.0%, log-rank p = 0.55). On Bayesian analyses, there was moderate to strong evidence suggesting a lack of difference between in unmatched cohort (BF10 0.091) and weak-to-moderate evidence in the matched cohort (BF10 0.296).

Conclusions

In this nationwide cohort, we did not find any evidence for an increased 1-year mortality in heart failure patients on digoxin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Georgiopoulou VV, Kalogeropoulos AP, Giamouzis G, et al. Digoxin therapy does not improve outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure on contemporary medical therapy. Circ Heart Fail. 2009;2:90–7. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.807032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Butler J, Anand IS, Kuskowski MA, et al. Digoxin use and heart failure outcomes: results from the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT). Congest Heart Fail. 2010;16:191–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7133.2010.00161.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Freeman JV, Yang J, Sung SH, Hlatky MA, Go AS. Effectiveness and safety of digoxin among contemporary adults with incident systolic heart failure. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013;6:525–33. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.111.000079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Vamos M, Erath JW, Hohnloser SH. Digoxin-associated mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Eur Heart J. 2015;36:1831–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehv143.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ziff OJ, Lane DA, Samra M, et al. Safety and efficacy of digoxin: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and controlled trial data. BMJ. 2015;351: h4451. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h4451.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kapelios CJ, Lund LH, Benson L, et al. Digoxin use in contemporary heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: an analysis from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022;8:756–67. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvab079.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yılmaz MB, Aksakal E, Aksu U, et al. Snapshot evaluation of acute and chronic heart failure in real-life in Turkey: a follow-up data for mortality. Anatol J Cardiol. 2020;23:160–8. https://doi.org/10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2019.87894.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail. 2016;18:891–975. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ambrosy AP, Pang PS, Khan S, et al. Clinical course and predictive value of congestion during hospitalization in patients admitted for worsening signs and symptoms of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: findings from the EVEREST trial. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:835–43. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs444.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Çetin Güvenç R, Güvenç TS, Akıl MA, et al. Estimated plasma volume is not a robust indicator of the severity of congestion in patients with heart failure. Am J Med Sci. 2023;366:374–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjms.2023.08.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inker LA, Eneanya ND, Coresh J, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration, et al. New creatinine- and cystatin C-based equations to estimate GFR without race. N Engl J Med. 2021;385:1737–49. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2102953.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Digitalis Investigation Group. The effect of digoxin on mortality and morbidity in patients with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:525–33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199702203360801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed A, Rich MW, Fleg JL, et al. Effects of digoxin on morbidity and mortality in diastolic heart failure: the ancillary digitalis investigation group trial. Circulation. 2006;114:397–403. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628347.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Rathore SS, Curtis JP, Wang Y, Bristow MR, Krumholz HM. Association of serum digoxin concentration and outcomes in patients with heart failure. JAMA. 2003;289:871–8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.289.7.871.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Adelstein E, Schwartzman D, Jain S, Bazaz R, Saba S. Effect of digoxin on shocks in cardiac resynchronization therapy-defibrillator patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2014;113:970–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.12.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee AY, Kutyifa V, Ruwald MH, et al. Digoxin therapy and associated clinical outcomes in the MADIT-CRT trial. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:2010–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jorge E, Baptista R, Martins H, et al. Digoxin in advanced heart failure patients: a question of rhythm. Rev Port Cardiol. 2013;32:303–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.repc.2012.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Poole-Wilson PA, Swedberg K, Cleland JG, Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial Investigators, et al. Comparison of carvedilol and metoprolol on clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure in the Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial (COMET): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2003;362:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13800-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rossello X, Ariti C, Pocock SJ, et al. Impact of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists on the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with heart failure and left-ventricular systolic dysfunction: an individual patient-level meta-analysis of three randomized-controlled trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019;108:477–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-018-1378-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Blair JE, Manuchehry A, Chana A, et al. Prognostic markers in heart failure–congestion, neurohormones, and the cardiorenal syndrome. Acute Card Care. 2007;9:207–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/17482940701606913.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Patel N, Ju C, Macon C, et al. Temporal trends of digoxin use in patients hospitalized with heart failure: analysis from the American Heart Association get with the Guidelines-Heart Failure Registry. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4:348–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2015.12.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Packer M, Anker SD, Butler J, et al. Cardiovascular and renal outcomes with empagliflozin in heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1413–24. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2022190.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, et al. Dapagliflozin in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:1995–2008. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ambrosy AP, Pang PS, Gheorghiade M. Digoxin for worsening chronic heart failure: underutilized and underrated. JACC Heart Fail. 2016;4:365–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchf.2016.03.005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gerakaris A, Mulita F, Koniari I, Artopoulou E, Mplani V, Tsigkas G, Abo-Elseoud M, Kounis N, Velissaris D. Digoxin impact on heart failure patients with atrial fibrillation. Med Arch. 2022;76:23–8. https://doi.org/10.5455/medarh.2022.76.23-28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Uretsky BF, Young JB, Shahidi FE, Yellen LG, Harrison MC, Jolly MK. Randomized study assessing the effect of digoxin withdrawal in patients with mild to moderate chronic congestive heart failure: results of the PROVED trial. PROVED Investigative Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22:955–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(93)90403-n.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Packer M, Gheorghiade M, Young JB, et al. Withdrawal of digoxin from patients with chronic heart failure treated with angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors. RADIANCE Study. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199307013290101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the investigators of the original SELFIE-TR registry study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rengin Çetin Güvenç.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article. Rengin Çetin Güvenç, Tolga Sinan Güvenç, Mert Efe Çağlar, Abdullah Ayar Al Arfaj, Ailin Behrad, and Mehmet Birhan Yılmaz declare that they have no potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to the contents of this manuscript.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Ethical Standards

The study was conducted according to the principles outlined in the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and its subsequent revisions, and all patients gave their informed consent before participating in the original registry, with no further consent sought for this particular analysis. The study was approved by an ethics committee (decision registration no. B.10.4.ISM.4.06.68.49, protocol no. 288-AU/003).

Data Availability

The authors declare that the data are available upon reasonable request.

Author Contributions

RCG: Conceptualization, design, data curation, writing, review. TSG: Conceptualization, design, methodology, analysis, writing, review. MEC: Design, data curation, writing. AAA: Conceptualization, data curation, analysis, writing. AB: Design, data curation, writing. MBY: Conceptualization, analysis, writing, review.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplemental Figure 1. Flow diagram of the study. (PDF 853 KB)

40256_2024_639_MOESM2_ESM.tiff

Supplemental Figure 2. Kaplan Meier curves for one-year survival in patients presented with acute (A) or chronic (B) heart failure at baseline. Numbers in parentheses denote confidence intervals. (TIFF 425 KB)

40256_2024_639_MOESM3_ESM.tiff

Supplemental Figure 3. Kaplan-Meier curves for one-year survival in patients presented with reduced (A) or mildly reduced / preserved (B) ejection fraction at baseline. Numbers in parentheses denote confidence intervals. (TIFF 419 KB)

40256_2024_639_MOESM4_ESM.tiff

Supplemental Figure 4. Kaplan-Meier curves for one-year survival in patients with sinus or pacemaker rhythm (A) and atrial fibrillation (B) at baseline. Numbers in parentheses denote confidence intervals. (TIFF 461 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Çetin Güvenç, R., Güvenç, T.S., Çağlar, M.E. et al. Digoxin is Not Related to Mortality in Patients with Heart Failure: Results from the SELFIE-TR Registry. Am J Cardiovasc Drugs (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00639-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40256-024-00639-3

Navigation