Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Act for Effective Strategy Execution: Mediating Role of Adapt

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effective strategy execution has emerged as the source of competitive advantage. There are multiple constructs and subsequent variables affecting the strategy execution. The scholars highlighted the role ‘Act’ in successfully executing strategy and achieving desired organizational performance. This study argues that the mediating role of ‘Adapt’ significantly enhances the influence of ‘Act’ on strategy execution. This study investigates the role of ‘Act’ with mediating role of ‘Adapt’. The research context is firms operating in India. The study uses both exploratory and confirmatory research modes adopting both the qualitative and quantitative research approaches. The findings of the study suggest that the Act approach, focusing on execution leadership, communication etc., significantly improves the strategy execution when supported by the Adapt practices such as incorporation of reflection, adaptive culture, etc. The study contributes to the existing discussion on strategy execution and also suggests managerial implications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aaltonen, P., & Ikavalko, H. (2002). Implementing strategies successfully. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 13(6), 415–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, L. D. (1985). Successfully implementing strategic decisions. Long Range Planning, 18, 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspesi, C., & Vardhan, D. (1999). Brilliant strategy, but can you execute? The McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

  • Beer, M., & Eisenstat, R. A. (2000). The silent killers of strategy implementation and learning. Sloan Management Review, 41(4), 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bossidy, L., & Charan, R. (2002). Execution: The discipline of getting things done. London: Random House Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, T. F., Ong, T. S., & Shaw, N. E. (2007). Traditional or contemporary? the prevalence of performance measurement system types. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 56(7), 583–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiva, R., Grandío, A., & Alegre, J. (2010). Adaptive and generative learning: implications from complexity theories. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(2), 114–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1995). Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delisi, P.S. (2001). An oxymoron or a powerful formula for corporate success, Available at: Synergies website: http://www.org-synergies.com/Strategy%20Execution%20Paper3.pdf (Accessed 17 Sept 2009).

  • Freund, Y. P. (1988). Planner’s guide: critical success factors. Planning Review, 16(4), 20–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giles, W. D. (1991). Making strategy work. Long Range Planning, 24(5), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grover, V., Jeong, S. R., Kettinger, W. J., & Teng, J. T. C. (1995). The Implementation of Business Process Reengineering. Journal of Management Information System, 12(1), 109–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, W. D., & Macmillan, I. C. (1986). Strategy implementation versus middle management self-interest. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley, C.A. (2007). The execution challenge: translating strategy into action. Bank Accounting & Finance, October–November, pp. 17–20

  • Higgins, J. M. (2005). The eight S of successful strategy execution. Journal of Change Management, 5, 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrebiniak, L. G. (2006). Obstacles to effective strategy implementation. Organizational Dynamics, 35, 12–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrebiniak, L. G., & Joyce, W. F. (1984). Implementing Strategy. London: Collier, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. (1995). Instrumental stakeholder theory: a synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20, 404–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review, 74(1), 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2008). The execution premium: linking strategy to operations for competitive advantage. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L. (2010). The execution trap. Harvard Business Review, 88(7/8), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, R., & O’Neill, E. (1999). Taking a critical perspective to the European business excellence model using a balanced scorecard approach: a case study in the service sector. Managing Service Quality, 9(3), 191–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (1990). The icarus paradox: How excellent organizations can bring about their own downfall. New York: Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., Wilson, D., & Hickson, D. (2004). Beyond planning: strategies for successfully implementing strategic decisions. Long Range Planning, 37(3), 201–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasim, S., & Sushil, (2010). Managing continuity and change: A new approach for strategizing in e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(4), 338–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A. (2005). The evaluation of performance measurement research: developments in the last decade and a research agenda for the next. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(12), 1264–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neilson, G. L., Martin, K. L., & Powers, E. (2008). The secret to successful strategy execution. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 60–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, C. H. (1999). The eclectic roots of strategy implementation research. Journal of Business Research, 45, 119–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okumus, F. (2001). Towards a strategy implementation framework. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(7), 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, R. T. (1990). Managing on the edge: How successful companies use conflict to stay ahead. London: Viking Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peng, W., & Litteljohn, D. (2001). Organisational communication and strategy implementation—a primary inquiry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(7), 360–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piercy, N. F. (1998). Marketing implementation: the implications of marketing paradigm weakness for the strategy execution process. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(3), 222–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, D. J., Sohal, A. S., & Rahman, S. (2001). Critical success factors in agile supply chain management—an empirical study. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 31(4), 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad and Hamel. (1990). The corecompetence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qi, H. (2005). Strategy implementation: the impact of demographic characteristics on the level of support received by middle managers. Management International Review, 45(1), 45–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raperta, M. I., Velliquette, A., & Garretson, J. A. (2002). The strategic implementation process: Evoking strategic consensus through communication. Journal of Business Research, 55(4), 301–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reeda, R., & Buckley, M. R. (1988). Strategy in action-techniques for implementing strategy. Long Range Planning, 21(3), 67–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockart, J. (1979). Chief executive defines their own data needs. Harvard Business Review, 57(2), 81–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaap, J. I. (2006). Toward strategy implementation success: an empirical study of the role of senior-level leaders in the Nevada Gaming Industry. UNLV Gaming Research & Review Journal, 10, 13–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneier, C. E., Shaw, D. G., & Beatty, R. W. (1991). Performance measurement and management: A tool for strategy execution. Human Resource Management, 30(3), 279–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art & practice of the learning organization. New York: Currency Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehan, N. T. (2006). Want to improve strategic execution? Simons says levers. Journal of Business Strategy, 27(6), 56–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A., & Sushil, (2013). Modeling strategic performance factors for effective strategy execution. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(6), 254–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava, A., & Sushil, (2014). Adapt: A critical pillar of strategy execution process. Springer: Organizational flexibility and competitiveness.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sull, D. N. (2007). Closing the gap between strategy and execution. MIT Sloan Management Review, 48(4), 30–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2008). How balanced is balanced scorecard. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 9(2–3), 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil, (2009). Execution excellence. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10(2), 1–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sushil. (2014). The concept of a flexible enterprise. In Sushil & E. A. Stohr (Eds.), The flexible enterprise (pp. 3–26). Flexible Systems Management. New Delhi: Springer.

  • Ulrich, D. (1998). A new mandate for human resources. Harvard Business Review, 76(1), 124–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volberda, (1997). Building flexible organizations for fast-moving markets. Long Range Planning, 30(2), 169–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. (1990). The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge, B., & Floyd, S. W. (1992). The strategy process, middle management involvement, and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 231–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, N. (2014). Flexibility aspects in performance management system: An illustration of flexible strategy game-card. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 15(3), 181–189.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Strategy & Competitiveness Lab, Department of Management Studies (DMS), IIT Delhi, 3rd Floor Vishwakarma Bhawan, New Delhi, India

    Amit Kumar Srivastava

Authors
  1. Amit Kumar Srivastava
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amit Kumar Srivastava.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Srivastava, A.K. Act for Effective Strategy Execution: Mediating Role of Adapt. Glob J Flex Syst Manag 15, 305–312 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-014-0075-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-014-0075-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation