Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The potential impact of sea lice agents on coastal shrimp in Norway: risk perception among different stakeholders

  • Research
  • Published:
Maritime Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we investigate how the uncertain consequences of sea lice agents on the environment affect the management process, focusing on the coastal shrimp in Norway. In this context, the key stakeholders (shrimp fishers and aquaculture owners) have conflicting interests and understand uncertainty from different perspectives. We ask: (1) How do fishers and aquaculture representatives translate uncertainty into risk, and do they link uncertainty to the precautionary approach or not? (2) How is uncertainty dealt with scientifically and related to decisions made by the authorities? Finally, we address organizational aspects related to a “post-normal approach” and ask: (3) Is it possible to organize the risk assessment process differently, to ensure more effective and legitimate advice? In order to answer these questions, we understand these issues as post-normal ones, and lean on both Science and Technology Studies and Risk Governance theory. We use a mix of social scientific methods including literature review, participatory observation, and semi-structured interviews. Our findings indicate that since the effect of sea lice agents is an uncontrollable problem ridden with uncertainty, science alone is insufficient, calling for a more participatory approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/horing%2D%2D-tiltak-mot-negative-miljoeffekter-av-medikamentell-behandling-mot-lakselus/id2505480/?expand=horingssvar

  2. https://www.imr.no/publikasjoner/andre_publikasjoner/risikovurdering_miljovirkninger_av_norsk_fiskeoppdrett/risikovurdering_miljovirkninger_av_norsk_fiskeoppdrett_2010/nb-no

  3. The Norwegian Reference Fleet is an IMR run project using fishers to collect data (see https://www.hi.no/temasider/referanseflaten/nb-no)

  4. See https://www.barentswatch.no/fiskehelse for an updated map over sea lice numbers. These numbers are reported to the Norwegian Food Safety Authority every week.

  5. Cypermethrin, deltamethrin, azamethiphos, hydrogen peroxide

  6. Teflubenzuron, diflubenzuron, emamectin benzoate

  7. See for instance Aftenposten, 2014 (https://www.aftenposten.no/norge/i/21xeR/Bruken-av-gifitige-lakselusmidler-eksploderer) and a large number of articles in the fisheries papers such as “Fiskeribladet fiskaren” https://fiskeribladet.no/.

  8. The Norwegian Fishermen’s Association sent the first letter to the Ministry of Trade, Industries and Fisheries demanding a full stop in the use of kitin synthesis prohibitors in 2011.

  9. https://www.fiskarlaget.no/index.php/nyheter-fiskarlaget-liste/arkiv-2014/item/forby-bruk-av-flubenzuroner

  10. See for instance Ystmark, 16 September 2015, in interview with Hagen JM. (2016) Ingen føre-var i havbruksnæringa. Fiskeribladet.https://fiskeribladet.no/nyheter/?artikkel=48982

  11. https://fiskeridir.no/Akvakultur/Nyheter/2015/0215/Tydeligere-miljoekrav-ved-bruk-av-lusemidler-i-oppdrett

  12. https://fiskeridir.no/Akvakultur/Nyheter/2015/0215/Tydeligere-miljoekrav-ved-bruk-av-lusemidler-i-oppdrett

  13. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/horing%2D%2D-tiltak-mot-negative-miljoeffekter-av-medikamentell-behandling-mot-lakselus/id2505480/

  14. https://www.regjeringen.no/no/aktuelt/strammer-inn-reglene-for-lusemiddelbruk/id2505478/

  15. For a full list, please see https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokumenter/horing%2D%2D-tiltak-mot-negative-miljoeffekter-av-medikamentell-behandling-mot-lakselus/id2505480/

  16. Throughout the reports from 2011 to 2017, the risk report was organized the same way. In their latest report (February 2018), however, the risk report is organized a bit differently.

  17. Recently, the NSL changed its name to “Sjømatbedriftene”.

  18. Since 2003, the Norwegian Directorate of Fisheries has gathered information from the local fishermen’s organization to map spawning grounds and fishing fields, available here: https://kart.fiskeridir.no/ (see for instance Brattland 2012 for more information about this process).

  19. 15 August 2018: https://www.dagbladet.no/mat/mystisk-kollaps-skaper-dramatisk-rekedod%2D%2D-vanskelig-a-fa-ferske-reker-neste-sommer/70091829

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maiken Bjørkan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bjørkan, M., Rybråten, S. The potential impact of sea lice agents on coastal shrimp in Norway: risk perception among different stakeholders. Maritime Studies 18, 173–187 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-00141-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40152-019-00141-6

Navigation