Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Current Quality of Life Metrics and Their Feasibility and Applicability in Adaptive Sports

  • Published:
Current Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

There is already widespread evidence that participation in adaptive sports contributes to a significant improvement in quality of life. This review will cover the current metrics in assessing quality of life and determine their feasibility in evaluating large-scale adaptive sports organizations, which can serve populations with very diverse types of disabilities.

Recent Findings

Quality of life has historically been studied in patients with a spinal cord injury, leaving many groups under researched in terms of the benefit from adaptive sports. Multiple metrics have been developed to address different types of disabilities but leave the evidence disconnected.

Summary

No standardized metric has studied the quality of life in a community with a very wide range of disabilities. Previous literature has also pushed for more subjective definitions of quality of life — aspects that current metrics do not address. A single, standardized metric is needed, as consistent evidence is of utmost importance to support these communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Richards R, Murdoch L, Reeder AI, et al. Political activity for physical activity: health advocacy for active transport. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8(1):52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Langballe EM, Tangen GG, Engdahl B, et al. Increased mortality risk for adults aged 25-44 years with long-term disability: a prospective cohort study with a 35-year follow-up of 30,080 individuals from 1984-2019 in the population-based HUNT study. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022;22:100482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100482.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Diaz R, Miller EK, Kraus E, et al. Impact of adaptive sports participation on quality of life. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2019;27(2):73–82. https://doi.org/10.1097/JSA.0000000000000242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The Whoqol Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): development and general psychometric properties. Soc Sci Med. 1998;46(12):1569–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barker RN, Kendall MD, Amsters DI, et al. The relationship between quality of life and disability across the lifespan for people with spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2009;47(2):149–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.2008.82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. • Mira T, Monteiro D, Costa AM, et al. Tokyo 2020: a sociodemographic and psychosocial characterization of the portuguese paralympic team. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10(7):1185. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare10071185. Findings from this study highlight the importance of more subjective aspects of an athleteʼs quality of life, including perceived resilience and confidence, as well as mental health, which are not emphasized in traditional quality of life questionnaires.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sahlin KB, Lexell J. Impact of organized sports on activity, participation, and quality of life in people with neurologic disabilities. PM&R. 2015;7(10). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2015.03.019.

  8. Côté-Leclerc F, Boileau Duchesne G, Bolduc P, et al. How does playing adapted sports affect quality of life of people with mobility limitations? Results from a mixed-method sequential explanatory study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-017-0597-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zabriskie RB, Lundberg NR, Groff DG. Quality of life and identity: the benefits of a community-based therapeutic recreation and adaptive sports program. Ther Recreat J. 2005;39(3):176–91.

    Google Scholar 

  10. McConachie H, Mason D, Parr JR, et al. Enhancing the validity of a quality of life measure for autistic people. J Autism Dev Disord. 2018;48(5):1596–611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3402-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. •• Beck KB, Terhorst LA, Greco CM, et al. Item understanding of common quality of life measures for use with autistic adults. J Autism Dev Disord. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-023-05945-4. Findings from this study illuminate how traditional quality of life metrics are not feasible in populations with all types of disabilities, especially those with neurodevelopmental disorders like autism spectrum disorder. Research on improvements in quality of life from adaptive sports have historically focused on those with a spinal cord injury, preventing reliable evidence supporting the benefit of adaptive sports for people with any type of disability.

  12. Vanesa Bochkezanian, Mitchell G Hill, Katarina Pederick, et al. The association between wheelchair sports participation and quality of life in individuals with physical disabilities, 24 March 2022, PREPRINT (Version 1) available at Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1452412/v1.

  13. Ciampolini V, Pinto MG, GRD S, et al. Do athletes with physical disabilities perceive their quality of life similarly when involved in different Paralympic sports? Mot Rev Educ Física. 2018;24:e101873. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201800040004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feitosa LC, Muzzolon SRB, Rodrigues DCB, et al. The effect of adapted sports in quality of life and biopsychosocial profile of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2017;35(4):429–35. https://doi.org/10.1590/1984-0462/;2017;35;4;00001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawthorne G, Richardson J, Osborne R. The Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) instrument: a psychometric measure of health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res Int J Qual Life Asp Treat Care Rehab. 1999;8(3):209–24. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1008815005736.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirsh AT, Braden AL, Craggs JG, et al. Psychometric properties of the community integration questionnaire in a heterogeneous sample of adults with physical disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92(10):1602–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.004.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kawano T, Moriki G, Bono S, et al. Effects of an adapted sports intervention on elderly women in need of long-term care: a pilot study. Appl Sci. 2022;12(6):3097. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12063097.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lundberg N, Bennett J, Smith S. Outcomes of adaptive sports and recreation participation among veterans returning from combat with acquired disability. Ther Recreat J. 2011;45(2):105–20.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jaarsma EA, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JHB, et al. Barriers to and facilitators of sports participation for people with physical disabilities: a systematic review. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2014;24(6):871–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/sms.12218.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nemcek D. Life satisfaction of people with disabilities: a comparison between active and sedentary individuals. J Phys Educ Sport. 2016;(s02). https://doi.org/10.7752/jpes.2016.s2173.

  21. Shapiro DR, Malone LA. Quality of life and psychological affect related to sport participation in children and youth athletes with physical disabilities: a parent and athlete perspective. Disabil Health J. 2016;9(3):385–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2015.11.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vancini RL, Gomes AA, de Paula-Oliveira H, et al. Quality of life, depression, anxiety symptoms and mood state of wheelchair athletes and non-athletes: a preliminary study. Front Psychol. 2019;10:1848. Accessed July 17, 2023. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01848

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. McDonald SD, Goldberg-Looney LD, Mickens MN, et al. Appraisals of DisAbility Primary and Secondary Scale-Short Form (ADAPSS-sf): psychometrics and association with mental health among U.S. military veterans with spinal cord injury. Rehabil Psychol. 2018;63(3):372–82. https://doi.org/10.1037/rep0000230.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Waters E, Davis E, Mackinnon A, et al. Psychometric properties of the quality of life questionnaire for children with CP. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(1):49–55. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012162207000126.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tulsky DS, Kisala PA, Lai JS, et al. Developing an item bank to measure economic quality of life for individuals with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(4):604–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.02.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Tufts University School of Medicine, 145 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA

    Joseph N. Tingen

  2. Life Rolls On Foundation, Culver City, CA, USA

    Michael Berns

Authors
  1. Joseph N. Tingen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Berns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph N. Tingen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tingen, J.N., Berns, M. Current Quality of Life Metrics and Their Feasibility and Applicability in Adaptive Sports. Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep 12, 138–144 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-024-00430-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40141-024-00430-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation