Abstract
Purpose of Review
The goal of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the recent advances in the management options for proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
Recent Findings
For many years, cases of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) have been managed by pan retinal photocoagulation (PRP). The advent of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents has changed the future of PDR management and has provided an alternative to PRP.
Summary
Management of PDR requires the identification of high-risk characteristics for PDR and the decision regarding the most appropriate treatment modality. The risk to benefit ratio for each treatment modality must be considered in determining the appropriate choice between surgical intervention (PRP) versus medical intervention with anti-VEGF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Lee R, Wong T, Sabanayagam C. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy, diabetic macular edema and related vision loss. Eye Vis. 2015;2:17.
Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clinical application of diabetic retinopathy study (DRS) findings, DRS report number 8. Ophthalmology. 1981;88(7):583–600.
Antonetti DA, Klein R, Gardner TW. Diabetic retinopathy. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(13):1227–39.
Ashton N. Studies of the retinal capillaries in relation to diabetic and other retinopathies. Br J Ophthalmol. 1963;47:521–38.
Cogan DG, Kuwabara T. Capillary shunts in the pathogenesis of diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes. 1963;12:293–300.
Cogan DG, Toussaint D, Kuwabara T. Retinal vascular patterns. IV. Diabetic retinopathy. Arch. Ophthalmol. 1961;66:366–78.
Kobayashi et al. Vitreous levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in eyes with anterior hyaloidal fibrovacular proliferation. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010;4:1043–6.
Gupta N, Mansoor S, Sharma A, Sapkal A, Sheth J, Falatoonzadeh P, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and VEGF. Open Ophthalmol J. 2013;7:4–10.
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):977–86.
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: UKPDS 38. Br Med J. 1998;317(7160):703–13.
Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Preliminary report on effects of photocoagulation therapy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1976;81:383–96.
Hamilton AM. Management of diabetic retinopathy. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK. 1977;97:494–6.
Hercules BL, Gayed II, Lucas SB, Jeacock J. Peripheral retinal ablation in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a three-year interim report of a randomised, controlled study using the argon laser. Br J Ophthalmol. 1977;61:555–63.
Meyers SM. Macular edema after scatter laser photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1980;90:210–6.
Meyer-Schwickerath GRE, Schott K. Diabetic retinopathy and photocoagulation. Am J Ophthalmol. 1968;66:597–603.
Okun E, Cibis PA. The role of photocoagulation in the therapy of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1966;75:337–52.
Patz A, Schatz H, Ryan SJ. Argon laser photocoagulation for treatment of advanced diabetic retinopathy. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1972;76:984–9.
Plumb AP, Swan AV, Chignell AH, Shilling JS. A comparative trial of xenon arc and argon laser photocoagulation in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 1982;66:213–8.
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Early photocoagulation for diabetic retinopathy. ETDRS report number 9. Ophthalmology. 1991;98(5 suppl):766–85.
Mugit M, Marcellino G, Henson D, et al. Pascal panretinal laser and regression analysis in proliferative diabetic retinopathy: Manchester Pascal Study Report 4. Eye (Lond). 2011;25(11):1447–56.
Mendrinos E, Mangioris G, Papadopoulou DN, et al. Retinal vessel analyzer measurements of the effect of panretinal photocoagulationon the retinal arteriolar diameter in diabetic retinopathy. Retina. 2010;30(4):555–61.
Funatsu H, Hori S, Yamashita H, Kitano S. Effective mechanisms of laser photocoagulation for neovascularization in diabetic retinopathy. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1996;100(5):339–49.
Marshall J, Clover G, Rothery S. Some new findings on retinal irradiation by krypton and argon lasers. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser. 1984;36:21–37.
Adamis AP, Miller JW, Bernal M-T. Increased vascular endothelial growth factor levels in the vitreous of eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1994;118:445–50.
Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema: EARLY Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study report number 1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1985;103(12):1796–806.
Brucker AJ, Qin H, Antoszyk AN, Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, et al. Observational study of the development of diabetic macular edema following panretinal (scatter) photocoagulation given in 1 or 4 sittings. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127(2):132–40.
Googe J, Brucker AJ, Bressler NM, Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, et al. Randomized trial evaluating short-term effects of intravitreal ranibizumab or triamcinolone acetonide on macular edema after focal/grid laser for diabetic macular edema in eyes also receiving panretinal photocoagulation. Retina. 2011;31(6):1009–27.
Berger AR, Boniuk I. Bilateral subretinal neovascularization after focal argon laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;108:88–90.
Lewis H, Schachat AP, Haimann MH. Choroidal neovascularization after laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1990;97:503–11.
Varley MP, Frank E, Purnell EW. Subretinal neovascularization after focal argon laser for diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmology. 1988;95:567–73.
Guyer DR, D’Amico DJ, Smith CW. Subretinal fibrosis after laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:652–6.
Han DP, Mieler WF, Burton TC. Submacular fibrosis after photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:513–21.
Rutledge BK, Wallow IHL, Poulsen GL. Sub-pigment epithelial membranes after photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:608–13.
Wallow IHL, Bindley CD. Focal photocoagulation of diabetic macular edema; a clinicopathologic case report. Retina. 1988;8:261–9.
Elliott A, Flanagan D. Macular detachment following laser treatment for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1990;228:438–41.
Schatz H, Madeira D, McDonald HR, Johnson RN. Progressive enlargement of laser scars following grid laser photocoagulation for diffuse diabetic macular edema. Arch Ophthalmol. 1991;109:1549–51.
Silva PS, Sun JK, Aiello LP. Role of steroids in the management of diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Semin Ophthalmol. 2009;24:93–9.
Zacks DN, Johnson MW. Combined intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide and panretinal photocoagulation for concomitant diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Retina. 2005;25:135–40.
Machemer R, Sugita G, Tano Y. Treatment of intraocular proliferations with intravitreal steroids. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1979;77:171–80.
Erdol H, Turk A, Akyol N, et al. The results of intravitreal bevacizumab injections for persistent neovascularizations in proliferative diabetic retinopathy after photocoagulation therapy. Retina. 2010;30:570–7.
Yeh PT, Yang CM, Lin YC, et al. Bevacizumab pretreatment in vitrectomy with silicone oil for severe diabetic retinopathy. Retina. 2009;29:768–74.
•• Writing Committee for the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. JAMA. 2015;314(20):2137–46 This study provides an in-depth comparison of the use of intravitreal ranibizumab vs PRP for the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
•• Gross JG, Glassman AR, Liu D, et al. Five-Year outcomes of panretinal photocoagulation vs intravitreal ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3255 This follow up study allowed the reader to observe how the primary outcome seen at 2 years was upheld, as well as allowed the observation of additional outcome measures regarding the use of intravitreal ranibizumab vs PRP for PDR.
Gross JG, Glassman AR, Klein MJ, Jampol LM, Ferris FL III, Bressler NM, et al. Interim safety data comparing ranibizumab with panretinal photocoagulation among participants with proliferative diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(6):672–3.
Figueira J, Fletcher E, Massin P, Silva R, Bandello F, Midena E, et al. Ranibizumab plus panretinal photocoagulation versus panretinal photocoagulation alone for high-risk proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PROTEUS study). Ophthalmology. 2018;125(5):691–700.
DongNguyen Q, Brown D, Marcus D, et al. Ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema: results from 2 phase III randomized trials: RISE and RIDE. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:789–801.
Bressler S, Odia I, Glassman A, et al. Changes in diabetic retinopathy severity when treating diabetic macular edema with ranibizumab: DRCR.net protocol I 5-year report. Retina. 2018;38(10):1896–904.
Arevalo JF, Maia M, Flynn HW Jr, et al. Tractional retinal detachment following intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) in patients with severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(2):213–6.
• Hutton DW, Stein JD, Bressler NM, et al. Cost-effectiveness of intravitreous ranibizumab compared with panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135(6):576–84 This study outlines the cost analysis of the 2-year Protocol S data in comparing the use of ranibizumab vs PRP for DME.
• Lin J, Chang JS, Yannuzzi NA, Smiddy WE. Cost evaluation of early vitrectomy versus panretinal photocoagulation and intravitreal ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmology. 2018;125(9):1393–400 This study suggests that the cost utility of PPV vs PRP is similar and that PPV has a more favorable cost utility as compared to ranibizumab.
Acknowledgements
The editors thank Dr. Fernando Penha for lending his expertise and reviewing this manuscript.
Financial Support
This study is supported by the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Clinical Sciences Research EPID-006-15S, NIH Center Core Grant P30EY014801, and Research to Prevent Blindness Unrestricted Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Retina
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kansora, M.B., Goldhardt, R. Decision Making in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Treatment. Curr Ophthalmol Rep 7, 45–50 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-019-00198-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40135-019-00198-w