Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging of Hepatocellular Adenomas: From Molecular Biology to MRI

  • Gastrointestinal Imaging (J Olpin, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Radiology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Hepatocellular adenomas are a heterogeneous group of liver tumors that are typically asymptomatic, but can present with hemorrhage or rarely degenerate into hepatocellular carcinoma. These tumors can be classified based on unique genotype–phenotype characteristics, with each subtype demonstrating unique imaging features and clinical courses. Imaging influences the management of hepatocellular adenomas by risk stratifying and identifying complications of these tumors.

Recent Findings

The identification of genetic and molecular bases for different hepatic adenoma subtypes has led to a better understanding of the histologic features of these masses. This ultimately informs the imaging appearance of each subtype, and explains the variation in risk for tumor hemorrhage and malignant degeneration.

Summary

This article provides a review of the genotype-phenotype classification of hepatocellular adenomas, associated imaging findings, and risks for complications that may influence clinical management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Recently published papers of particular interest have been highlighted as: • Of importance

  1. Rooks JB, Ory HW, Ishak KG, et al. Epidemiology of hepatocellular adenoma. The role of oral contraceptive use. JAMA. 1979;242(7):644–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jeannot E, Wendum D, Paye F, et al. Hepatocellular adenoma displaying a HNF1alpha inactivation in a patient with familial adenomatous polyposis coli. J Hepatol. 2006;45(6):883–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2006.06.020.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liau SS, Qureshi MS, Praseedom R, Huguet E. Molecular pathogenesis of hepatic adenomas and its implications for surgical management. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17(10):1869–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-013-2274-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chang CY, Hernandez-Prera JC, Roayaie S, Schwartz M, Thung SN. Changing epidemiology of hepatocellular adenoma in the United States: review of the literature. Int J Hepatol. 2013;2013:604860. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/604860.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakao A, Sakagami K, Nakata Y, et al. Multiple hepatic adenomas caused by long-term administration of androgenic steroids for aplastic anemia in association with familial adenomatous polyposis. J Gastroenterol. 2000;35(7):557–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s005350070081.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Velazquez I, Alter BP. Androgens and liver tumors: Fanconi’s anemia and non-Fanconi’s conditions. Am J Hematol. 2004;77(3):257–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.20183.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Labrune P, Trioche P, Duvaltier I, Chevalier P, Odievre M. Hepatocellular adenomas in glycogen storage disease type I and III: a series of 43 patients and review of the literature. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1997;24(3):276–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005176-199703000-00008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Talente GM, Coleman RA, Alter C, et al. Glycogen storage disease in adults. Ann Intern Med. 1994;120(3):218–26. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-120-3-199402010-00008.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Inaba K, Sakaguchi T, Kurachi K, et al. Hepatocellular adenoma associated with familial adenomatous polyposis coli. World J Hepatol. 2012;4(11):322–6. https://doi.org/10.4254/wjh.v4.i11.322.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferrell LD. Hepatocellular carcinoma arising in a focus of multilobular adenoma. A case report. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993;17(5):525–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-199305000-00013.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Zucman-Rossi J, Jeannot E, Nhieu JT, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlation in hepatocellular adenoma: new classification and relationship with HCC. Hepatology. 2006;43(3):515–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.21068.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Dokmak S, Paradis V, Vilgrain V, et al. A single-center surgical experience of 122 patients with single and multiple hepatocellular adenomas. Gastroenterology. 2009;137(5):1698–705. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.07.061.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ros PR, Goodman ZD. Genetics and imaging of hepatocellular adenomas: 2011 update. Invited commentary. Radiographics. 2011;31(6):1543–5. https://doi.org/10.1148/Radiographics.31.6.111543 (discussion 1545).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. ∙Julien C, Le-Bail B, Ouazzani Touhami K, et al. Hepatocellular adenoma risk factors of hemorrhage: size is not the only concern!: single-center retrospective experience of 261 patients. Ann Surg. 2021;274(5):843–50. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005108. This single center study identifies additional risk factors of hemorrhagic complication, which influences treatment approaches to these tumors.

  15. Stoot JH, Coelen RJ, De Jong MC, Dejong CH. Malignant transformation of hepatocellular adenomas into hepatocellular carcinomas: a systematic review including more than 1600 adenoma cases. HPB (Oxford). 2010;12(8):509–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00222.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karkar AM, Tang LH, Kashikar ND, et al. Management of hepatocellular adenoma: comparison of resection, embolization and observation. HPB (Oxford). 2013;15(3):235–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00584.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Spinazzi A, Lorusso V, Pirovano G, Kirchin M. Safety, tolerance, biodistribution, and MR imaging enhancement of the liver with gadobenate dimeglumine: results of clinical pharmacologic and pilot imaging studies in nonpatient and patient volunteers. Acad Radiol. 1999;6(5):282–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1076-6332(99)80451-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Zizka J, Klzo L, Ferda J, Mrklovsky M, Bukac J. Dynamic and delayed contrast enhancement in upper abdominal MRI studies: comparison of gadoxetic acid and gadobutrol. Eur J Radiol. 2007;62(2):186–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamm B, Staks T, Muhler A, et al. Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging. Radiology. 1995;195(3):785–92. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.195.3.7754011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. van Montfoort JE, Stieger B, Meijer DK, Weinmann HJ, Meier PJ, Fattinger KE. Hepatic uptake of the magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent gadoxetate by the organic anion transporting polypeptide Oatp1. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1999;290(1):153–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ringe KI, Husarik DB, Sirlin CB, Merkle EM. Gadoxetate disodium-enhanced MRI of the liver: part 1, protocol optimization and lesion appearance in the noncirrhotic liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195(1):13–28. https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.10.4392.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nault JC, Couchy G, Balabaud C, et al. Molecular classification of hepatocellular adenoma associates with risk factors, bleeding, and malignant transformation. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(4):880–94. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.042.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bioulac-Sage P, Laumonier H, Couchy G, et al. Hepatocellular adenoma management and phenotypic classification: the Bordeaux experience. Hepatology. 2009;50(2):481–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.22995.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhingra S, Fiel MI. Update on the new classification of hepatic adenomas: clinical, molecular, and pathologic characteristics. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(8):1090–7. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2013-0183-RA.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grazioli L, Olivetti L, Mazza G, Bondioni MP. MR imaging of hepatocellular adenomas and differential diagnosis dilemma. Int J Hepatol. 2013;2013:374170. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/374170.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Thomeer MG, Broker MEE, de Lussanet Q, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations in hepatocellular adenoma: an update of MRI findings. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20(3):193–9. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2013.13315.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Her GM, Chiang CC, Chen WY, Wu JL. In vivo studies of liver-type fatty acid binding protein (L-FABP) gene expression in liver of transgenic zebrafish (Danio rerio). FEBS Lett. 2003;538(1–3):125–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-5793(03)00157-1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Katabathina VS, Menias CO, Shanbhogue AK, Jagirdar J, Paspulati RM, Prasad SR. Genetics and imaging of hepatocellular adenomas: 2011 update. Radiographics. 2011;31(6):1529–43. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.316115527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vedie AL, Sutter O, Ziol M, Nault JC. Molecular classification of hepatocellular adenomas: impact on clinical practice. Hepat Oncol. 2018;5(1):HEP04. https://doi.org/10.2217/hep-2017-0023.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Valenta T, Hausmann G, Basler K. The many faces and functions of beta-catenin. EMBO J. 2012;31(12):2714–36. https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2012.150.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. ∙∙Klompenhouwer AJ, de Man RA, Dioguardi Burgio M, Vilgrain V, Zucman-Rossi J, Ijzermans JNM. New insights in the management of Hepatocellular Adenoma. Liver Int. 2020;40(7):1529–37. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.14547. This review article covers recent advances in additional subcategorization of molecular subgroups, their concomitant risk for hepatic adenoma complications, and implications for treatment.

  32. van Aalten SM, Thomeer MG, Terkivatan T, et al. Hepatocellular adenomas: correlation of MR imaging findings with pathologic subtype classification. Radiology. 2011;261(1):172–81. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Takigawa Y, Brown AM. Wnt signaling in liver cancer. Curr Drug Targets. 2008;9(11):1013–24. https://doi.org/10.2174/138945008786786127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Farges O, Ferreira N, Dokmak S, Belghiti J, Bedossa P, Paradis V. Changing trends in malignant transformation of hepatocellular adenoma. Gut. 2011;60(1):85–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2010.222109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. ∙∙Bioulac-Sage P, Gouw ASH, Balabaud C, Sempoux C. Hepatocellular adenoma: what we know, what we do not know, and why it matters. Histopathology. 2022;80(6):878–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.14605. This review article presents an overview of the histological characteristics of the sonic hedgehog subtype.

  36. Sala M, Gonzales D, Leste-Lasserre T, et al. ASS1 overexpression: a hallmark of sonic hedgehog hepatocellular adenomas; recommendations for clinical practice. Hepatol Commun. 2020;4(6):809–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep4.1514.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. ∙Krause K, Tanabe KK. A shifting paradigm in diagnosis and management of hepatic adenoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27(9):3330–38. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-020-08580-w. This review article presents a general approach to the management of hepatic adenomas based on patient and tumor characteristics.

  38. Klompenhouwer AJ, de Man RA, Thomeer MG, Ijzermans JN. Management and outcome of hepatocellular adenoma with massive bleeding at presentation. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(25):4579–86. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i25.4579.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristie L. Yang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Kristie Yang has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Douglas Rogers receives royalties from Elsevier, which is unrelated to this work.

Research Involving Human and Animal Participants

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical collection on Gastrointestinal Imaging.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, K.L., Rogers, D. Imaging of Hepatocellular Adenomas: From Molecular Biology to MRI. Curr Radiol Rep 10, 117–127 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-022-00400-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40134-022-00400-1

Keywords

Navigation