Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Continuum and Discontinuum Analysis of Rock Caverns

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decades, constructions of large underground rock caverns are experiencing a rapid development across the globe. However design and construction of these structures is a complex and challenging task, specifically with limitations of limited investigations data and presence of many uncertainties. Rock mass parameters along with joint configuration such as persistence, spacing and strength of the joints are the main factors which significantly modify stresses and displacements in the vicinity of the openings. Thus, a detailed cavern stability assessment based on field data collection from the excavated cavern’s face is critically important. This paper discusses continuum and discontinuum modelling of underground rock caverns based on case study of crude oil storage project located on southern coast of India. Critical points of observation for these two types of analysis are reviewed in reference to results of the case study. Data obtained from geotechnical monitoring of underground rock cavern is also compared and discussed with the results obtained from both continuum and discontinuum analysis for better understanding of the same. The results obtained from this study indicate that inclusion of discontinuities in rock mass for numerical modelling captures essential instability conditions around the cavern while continuum representation gives a more idealised illustration of the instability. Observed displacement values in most of the cases lie in between the calculated displacement values of continuum and discontinuum analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gerrard CM (1982) Elastic models of rock masses having one, two and three sets of joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 19:15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma KG (2009) Numerical analysis of underground structures. Indian Geotech J 39(1):1–63

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh B (1973) Continuum characterization of jointed rock masses Part I–the constitutive equations. Int. J Rock Mech Sci Geomech 10:311–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hormazabal E, Pereira J, Barindelli G, Alvarez R (2014) Geomechanical evaluation of large excavations at the new level mine—El Teniente. In: 3RD international symposium on block and sublevel caving, pp 486–500

  5. Sitharam TG (2007) Equivalent continuum analyses of jointed rock mass: a practical approach, Chapter No 22. In: Ramamurthy T (ed) Book-engineering in rocks for slopes, foundations and tunnels. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi, pp 518–544. ISBN 978-81-203-3275-1

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mandal A, Chakravarthy CP, Nanda A, Rath R, Usmani A (2013) Analysis and design approach for large storage caverns. Int J Geomech ASCE 13(1):69–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T, Fumio I (1999) Comparison of computational models for jointed rock mass through analysis of large scale cavern excavation. In: Proceedings of the ninth international congress on rock mechanics, Paris, France, ISRM, vol. 1, pp 389–93

  8. Usmani A, Nanda A, Mandal A, Jain SK (2013) Interaction mechanism between two large rock caverns. Int J Geomech ASCE, Int J Geomech ASCE 15(1):06014014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Goodman R, Taylor R, Brekke T (1968) A model for mechanics of jointed rock. J Soil Mech Found Division 94:637–659

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bhasin R, Hoeg K (1998) Parametric study for a large cavern in jointed rock using a distinct element model (UDEC-BB). Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 35:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cundall PA, Hart RD (1993) Numerical modelling of discontinua. Comprehensive rock engineering. In: Hudson JA (ed) Analysis and design methods, vol 2. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 231–261

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Gui YL, Bui HH, Kodikara J, Zhang QB, Zhao J, Rabczuk T (2016) Modelling the dynamic failure of brittle rocks using a hybrid continuum-discrete element method with a mixed-mode cohesive fracture model. Int J Impact Eng 87:146–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc (2008) UDEC-Universal distinct element code online manual, vol 1. Itasca Consulting Group, Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jiao Y, Zhang XL, Zhang HQ, Huang GH (2014) A discontinuous numerical model to simulate rock failure process. Geomech. Geoeng 9(2):133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kulatilake PHSW, Ucpirti H, Wang S, Radberg G, Stephansson O (1992) Use of the distinct element method to perform stress analysis in rock with non-persistent joints and to study the effect of joint geometry parameters on the strength and deformability of rock masses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 25:253–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhou H, Gao Y, Zhang C, Yang F, Hu M, Liu H, Jiang Y (2018) A 3D model of coupled hydro-mechanical simulation of double shield TBM excavation. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 71:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bjureland W, Spross J, Johansson F, Prästings A, Larsson S (2017) Reliability aspects of rock tunnel design with the observational method. Int J Rock Mech Min. 98:102–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lü Q, Low BK (2011) Probabilistic analysis of underground rock excavations using response surface method and SORM. Comput Geotech. 38(8):1008–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pal S, Rath R, Shahri V, Nanda A (2013) Treatment of geological hotspots in large underground storage caverns. J Eng Geol (JOEG) 38(2):41–48

    Google Scholar 

  20. Barton N (2002) Some new Q-value correlations to assist in site characterization and tunnel design. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:185–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoek E, Brown ET (1997) Practical estimates or rock mass strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech 34(8):1165–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Phase 2.0. (2007) Computer software. Rocscience, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hoek E, Carranza-Torres CT, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion—2002 edition. In: Hammah R, Bawden W, Curran J, Telesnicki M (eds). Proceedings of the Fifth North American rock mechanics symposium (NARMS-TAC), University of Toronto Press, Toronto, pp 267–273

  24. Marinos V, Marinos P, Hoek E (2005) The geological strength index: applications and limitations. Bull Eng Geol Environ 64(1):55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bieniawski ZT (1989) Engineering rock mass classifications: a complete manual for engineers and geologists in mining, civil, and petroleum engineering. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pain A, Kanungo DP, Sarkar S (2014) Rock slope stability assessment using finite element based modelling—examples from the Indian Himalayas. Geomech Geoeng 00:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tiwari G, Latha GM (2016) Seismic stability analysis of a Himalayan rock slope. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49:2075–2097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of joints in theory and in practice. Rock Mech 10:1–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Barton N (1976) The shear strength of rock and rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech 13:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Barton N, Bandis S (1990) Review of predictive capabilities of JRC-JCS model in engineering practice. In: Barton N, Stephansson O (eds) Proceedings of the international symposium on rock joints, Loen, Norway. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 603–10

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the management of Engineers Indian Limited for granting permission to publish this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Engineers India Limited, New Delhi, India

    A. Usmani, S. Pal & A. Nanda

Authors
  1. A. Usmani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Pal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Nanda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Usmani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Usmani, A., Pal, S. & Nanda, A. Continuum and Discontinuum Analysis of Rock Caverns. Indian Geotech J 48, 663–676 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0322-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-018-0322-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation