Skip to main content
Log in

Critical Drawdown Pressure of Depleted Reservoir

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Indian Geotechnical Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For long time production, most oilfields have entered the later development stage, and the pore pressure is seriously depleted. The pressure depletion will affect in situ stress, and change the stress state around the borehole, and then the affect the critical drawdown pressure to cause sand production. The theoretical formula of two horizontal in situ stress changes with pore pressure is obtained based on generalized Hoek’s law, and then the stress distribution formula around the borehole in pressure depleted reservoir is established. The calculation model of sand production critical bottom hole flowing pressure in depleted reservoir is established using the Mohr–Coulomb criterion, Drucker–Prager criterion and Mogi–Coulomb criterion, respectively. The influence of pressure depletion on critical drawdown pressure is analyzed. The results show that: with the pore pressure decreasing, the horizontal in situ stress and critical drawdown pressure become smaller; the error of prediction model based on Mogi–Coulomb criterion is the minimum, and it is more in line with the actual field data; the prediction model based on Mohr–Coulomb criterion is conservative but most safe. The establishment of prediction model provides a guidance for actual production decisions in pressure depleted reservoir.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Aadnoy BS, Kaarstad E (2010) History model for sand production during depletion. SPE EUROPEC/EAGE Annual Conference and Exhibition, Barcelona, paper number 131256

  2. Al-Ajmi AM, Zimmerman RW (2006) Stability analysis of vertical boreholes using the Mogi–Coulomb failure criteria. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43(8):1200–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Antheunis D, Vriezen PB, Schipper BA, Van AC (1976) Perforation collapse: failure of perforated friable sandstones. European Spring Meeting, Amsterdam, paper number 5750

  4. Bratli RK, Risnes R (1981) Stability and failure of sand arches. SPEJ 21(2):236–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charlez PA (1997) Rock mechanics: petroleum applications. Editions Technip, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ewy R (1999) Wellbore-stability predictions by use of a modified Lade criterion. SPE Drill Complet 14:85–91

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fjaer E (2008) Petroleum related rock mechanics. Elsevier Science, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li ZH, Lou YS, Xin XS (2009) Reservoir sandstone prediction in Bozhong 26-3 oilfield. J Oil Gas Technol 3(33):141–143

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lu J, Tang W (2000) On deep wellbore stability for Dagang oil field. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 19:967–970

    Google Scholar 

  10. McLean M, Addis M (1990) Wellbore stability: the effect of strength criteria on mud weight recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 65th annual technical conference and exhibition, Society of petroleum engineers, New Orleans, September 23–26, SPE 20405

  11. Morita N, Whitfill DL, Fedde OP, Lovik TH (1989) Parametric study of sand production prediction: analytical approach. SPE Prod Eng 4(1):25–33

    Google Scholar 

  12. Morita N, Boyd PA (1991) Typical sand production problems: case studies and strategies for sand control. In: Proceeding of the 66th annual technical conference and exhibition of the society of petroleum engineers, Dallas, Tx, paper number 22739

  13. Morita N, Burton RC, Davis E (1998) Fracturing and formation failure control: can screenless completions prevent sand production? SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Denver, Colorado, paper number 51187

  14. Nouri A, Vaziri H, Kuru E, Islam R (2006) A comparison of two sanding criteria in physical and numerical modeling of sand production. J Petrol Sci Eng 50(1):55–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Papamichos E, Malmanger EM (1999) A sand erosion model for volumetric sand productions in a north sea reservoir. SPE Latin American and Caribbean petroleum engineering conference, Caracas, Venezuela, paper number 54007

  16. Rahmati H, Jafarpour M, Azadbakht S, Nouri A, Vaziri H, Chan D, Xiao Y (2013) Review of sand production prediction models. J Petrol Eng 2013:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Risnes R, Bratli RK, Horsrud P (1982) Sand stresses around a wellbore. SPEJ 22:883–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanfilippo F, Ripa G, Brignoli M, Santarelli FJ (1995) Economical management of sand production by a methodology validated on an extensive database of field data. Annual technical conference, Dallas, SPE, 30472

  19. Single B, Goel RK, Mehrotra VK, Garg SK, Allu MR (1998) Effect of intermediate principal stress on strength of anisotropic rock mass. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 13(1):71–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tronvoll J, Larsen I, Li L, Skjetne T, Oyvind G (2004) Rock mechanics aspect of well productivity in marginal sandstone reservoirs: problems, analysis methods and remedial actions. SPE international symposium and exhibition on formation damage control, Lafayette, Louisiana, USA, paper number 86468

  21. Van den Hoek PJ, Herlogh GMM, Kooijman AP, de Bree P, Kenter CJ, Papamichos E (1996) A new concept of sand production prediction: theory and laboratory experiments. SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Denver, paper number 36418

  22. Van den Hoek PJ, Geilikman MB (2005) Prediction of sand production rate in oil and gas reservoirs: field validation and practical use. SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Dallas, Texas, paper number 95715

  23. Vaziri H, Palmer I (1998) Evaluation of open hole cavity completion technique in coalbed methane reservoirs. 3rd North American rock mechanics symposium, Cancun, Mexico

  24. Vaziri H, Allam R, Kidd G, Bennett C, Grose T, Peter R, Jeremy M (2006) Sanding: a rigorous examination of the interplay between drawdown, depletion, startup frequency, and water cut. SPE Prod Oper 21(4):430–440

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zoback MD, Vernik L (1992) Estimation of maximum horizontal principal stress magnitude from stress-induced well bore breakouts in the Cajon Pass scientific research borehole. J Geophys Res 97(B4):5109–5119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang LY, Cao P, Radha KC (2010) Evaluation of rock strength criteria for wellbore stability analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:1304–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Zhao CF, Yang YZ, Zhang CG (2011) Investigation on applicability of common failure criteria considering intermediate principal stress. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 30(2):327–334

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51221003), National Natural Science Foundation Project of China (Grant No. 51174219) and National Oil and Gas Major Project (Grant No. 2011ZX05009-005).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chuanliang Yan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yan, C., Deng, J., Lai, X. et al. Critical Drawdown Pressure of Depleted Reservoir. Indian Geotech J 44, 101–106 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0071-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40098-013-0071-5

Keywords

Navigation