Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of network architectures in multi-agent reinforcement learning for denoising digital tomosynthesis images

  • Original Paper - Cross-Disciplinary Physics and Related Areas of Science and Technology
  • Published:
Journal of the Korean Physical Society Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A supervised-learning strategy has showed outstanding performance in various fields. However, the application of the supervised learning for restoring digital tomosynthesis (DT) image is limited due to the necessity of a large amount of training data, the high computational cost and the occurrence of structural distortion in an output image. In this study, a multi-agent reinforcement learning (RL) network was developed to provide a denoising model for the DT image, and the effect of the network architecture was evaluated in terms of noise property, quantitative accuracy and training time. The multi-agent RL network consisted of shared, value and policy sub-networks, and the each sub-network was connected with the others in the form of a fully convolutional network (FCN). Five types of the shared sub-network were designed using general convolution layers, dilated convolution layers and residual blocks to modify the network architecture. The network training was implemented to extract image features, output a self-calculated reward and determine an optimal policy for the shared, value and policy sub-networks, respectively. The results showed that the proposed denoising models not only preserved the high quantitative accuracy but also improved the noise property of the output DT image by an average factor of 6.73. The applications of the dilated convolution layer and residual block enhanced the noise reduction capability of the proposed denoising models, and the training efficiency was dependent on the architecture type of the shared sub-network. In conclusion, the proposed model based on the multi-agent RL enables the DT image denoising, and the performance of the denoising model can be optimized by modifying the architecture of the shared sub-network.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. Zhong, B. Li, N. Luo, Y. Xu, L. Zhou et al., IEEE Access 8, 112078 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Zhang, W. Zuo, Y. Chen, D. Meng, L. Zhang, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 26, 3142 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. Zhang, W. Zuo, L. Zhang, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 27, 4608 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Thanapol, K. Lavangnananda, P. Bouvry, F. Pinel, F. Leprevost, in the International Conference on Information Technology (Chonburi, Thailand, 2020) p. 300

  5. W. Zhao, W. Zhang, X. Pan, P. Zhuang, X. Xie et al., Inf. Sci. 615, 475 (2022)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. L. Gao, K. Xie, X. Wu, Z. Lu, C. Li et al., Radiat. Oncol. 16, 1 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. T. Pang, H. Zheng, Y. Quan, H. Ji, in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Nashville, 2021) p. 2043

  8. M. Meng, S. Li, L. Yao, D. Li, M. Zhu, et al., in Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging (Houston, 2020) p. 67

  9. E. Levin, R. Pieraccini, W. Echkert, in Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Seattle, 1998) p. 201

  10. R. Furuta, N. Inoue, T. Yamasaki, IEEE Trans. Multimed. 22, 1704 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. Graves, I. Antonoglou, et al., arXiv:1312.5602 (2013). Accessed 2 May 2023

  12. J.D. Williams, K. Asadi, G. Zweig, arXiv:1702.03274 (2017). Accessed 2 May 2023

  13. K. Vassilo, C. Heatwole, T. Taha, A. Mehmood, in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Seattle, 2020) p. 512

  14. J.T. Dobbins III., H.P. McAdams, D.J. Godfrey, C.M. Li, J. Thorac. Imaging 23, 86 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Smith, Fundamentals of breast tomosynthesis, White Paper, Hologic Inc., WP-00007 8 (2008)

  16. T. Nguyen, G. Levy, E. Poncelet, T. Le Thanh, J.F. Prolongeau et al., Diagn. Interv. Imaging 96, 843 (2015)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. J.S. Kirby, S.G. Armato, K. Drukker, F. Li, L. Hadjiiski et al., J. Med. Imaging 3, 004506 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. R.L. Siddon, Med. Phys. 12, 252 (1985)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. M.A.C. Vieira, P.R. Bakic, A.D.A. Maidment, H. Schiabel, N.D.A. Mascarenhas, in the International Workshop on Digital Mammography (Philadelphia, 2012) p. 268

  20. L.R. Borges, P.R. Bakic, A. Foi, A.D.A. Maidment, M.A.C. Vieira, in Proceedings of SPIE Medical Imaging (Orlando, 2017) p. 36

  21. K. Nam, D. Lee, S. Lee, Phys. Med. Biol. 68, 125006 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Las Vegas, 2016) p. 770

  23. K. Zhang, W. Zuo, S. Gu, L. Zhang, in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Honolulu, 2017) p. 3929

  24. V. Mnih, A.P. Badia, M. Mirza, A. Graves, T. Harley, et al. in the International Conference on Machine Learning (2016) p. 1928

  25. D.P. Kingma, J.L. Ba, arXiv:1412.6980 (2014). Accessed 2 May 2023

  26. J.T. Dobbins III., E. Samei, N.T. Ranger, Y. Chen, Med. Phys. 33, 1466 (2006)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Z. Wang, A.C. Bovik, H.R. Sheikh, E.P. Simoncelli, IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13, 600 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Hore, D. Ziou, in the International Conference on Pattern Recognition (Istanbul, Turkey, 2010) p. 2366

  29. Y. Lee, S. Lee, J. Instrum. 10, P10035 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Y. Bengio, P. Simard, P. Frasconi, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 5, 157 (1994)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. X. Glorot, Y. Bengio, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (Sardinia, Italy, 2010), p. 249

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the Konyang University Research Fund in the second half of 2021. And, this work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. RS-2023-00211810).

Funding

This paper was supported by the Konyang University Research Fund in the second half of 2021. And, this work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. RS-2023–00211810).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seungwan Lee.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that I have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nam, K., Lee, S. Effect of network architectures in multi-agent reinforcement learning for denoising digital tomosynthesis images. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 84, 479–487 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-024-01009-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40042-024-01009-7

Keywords

Navigation