Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of a Novel Slow-Release Fertiliser on Crop Yield, Soil Condition, and Nutrient Availability for Paddy Plantation in Bario, Malaysia

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A newly developed fertiliser, namely Xpike having a trade centre mechanism to release nutrients to plants as needed and containing both macronutrients and micronutrients, has been developed. This research aims to investigate its application rate, the capability to maintain good soil pH, microbial activities, and crop yield in a paddy field in Bario, Malaysia. Four different Xpike treatments with three duplications for each treatment and a controlled block using a conventional fertiliser were applied via the randomised block design. It was found that Xpike gives a 44.39% higher yield as compared to the conventional fertiliser, while the optimum Xpike dosage is at 300 kg/ha. After the application of Xpike, the soil pH shifted and was maintained at an average range of pH 5.4 to 5.8, which is the preferable pH for paddy plantation. There were five bacteria colonies identified in the paddy soils, namely Bacillus subtilis, Clostridium perfringens, Alcaligenes faecalis, Pseudomonas, and Streptomyces venezuelae. Except for Clostridium perfringens, which is a common type of soil pathogen, other bacteria colonies are beneficial bacteria that can promote the plant growth and biological control of pathogens. Xpike can increase the rice yield, maintain optimum soil pH, and promote the growth of beneficial bacteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alam SM, Naqvi SSM, Ansari R (1999) Impact of soil pH on nutrient uptake by crop plants. Handb Plant Crop Stress 2:51–60

    Google Scholar 

  2. Babalola OO (2010) Beneficial bacteria of agricultural importance. Biotech Lett 32(11):1559–1570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bah A, Husni M, Teh C, Rafii M, Syed Omar S, Ahmed O (2014) Reducing runoff loss of applied nutrients in oil palm cultivation using controlled-release fertilizers. Adv Agric 2014

  4. Beveridge TJ (2001) Use of the Gram stain in microbiology. Biotech Histochem 76(3):111–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. de Souza R, Schoenfeld R, Passaglia LM (2016) Bacterial inoculants for rice: effects on nutrient uptake and growth promotion. Arch Agron Soil Sci 62(4):561–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferraz G, Ferraz P, Martins F, Silva F, Damasceno F, Barbari M (2019) Principal components in the study of soil and plant properties in precision coffee farming

  7. Firdaus RR, Leong Tan M, Rahmat SR, Senevi Gunaratne M (2020) Paddy, rice and food security in Malaysia: a review of climate change impacts. Cogent Soc Sci 6(1):1818373

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fu ZQ, Yan S, Saleh A, Wang W, Ruble J, Oka N et al (2012) NPR3 and NPR4 are receptors for the immune signal salicylic acid in plants. Nature 486(7402):228–232

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ganeshan G, Manoj Kumar A (2005) Pseudomonas fluorescens, a potential bacterial antagonist to control plant diseases. J Plant Interact 1(3):123–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Glazebrook MA, Doull JL, Stuttard C, Vining LC (1990) Sporulation of Streptomyces venezuelae in submerged cultures. Microbiology 136(3):581–588

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gorlenko M, Chutko E, Churbanova E, Minaev N, Kachesov K, Lysak L et al (2018) Laser microsampling of soil microbial community. J Biol Eng 12(1):27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hirooka K (2014) Transcriptional response machineries of Bacillus subtilis conducive to plant growth promotion. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 78(9):1471–1484

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ilagan LA, Tablizo RP, Barba RB Jr, Marquez N (2014) Soil fertility evaluation for rice production in Catanduanes Province, Philippines. Int J Sci Technol Res 3:81–87

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jolliffe IT, Cadima J (2016) Principal component analysis: a review and recent developments. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 374(2065):20150202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kakar K, Nawaz Z, Cui Z, Almoneafy A, Ullah R, Shu QY (2018) Rhizosphere-associated Alcaligenes and Bacillus strains that induce resistance against blast and sheath blight diseases, enhance plant growth and improve mineral content in rice. J Appl Microbiol 124(3):779–796

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kenawy E-R, Hosny A, Saad-Allah K (2020) Reducing nitrogen leaching while enhancing growth, yield performance and physiological traits of rice by the application of controlled-release urea fertilizer. Paddy Water Environ pp 1–16

  17. Lai CH, Settinayake ARH, Yeo WS, Lau SW, Jong TK (2019) Crop Nutrients review and the impact of fertilizer on the plantation in malaysia: a mini review. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 50(17):2089–2105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Leff JW, Jones SE, Prober SM, Barberán A, Borer ET, Firn JL et al (2015) Consistent responses of soil microbial communities to elevated nutrient inputs in grasslands across the globe. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112(35):10967–10972

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lenz GS, Sahn AJPA (2020) Achieving statistical significance with control variables and without transparency. Politi Anal 29(3):356–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Maji KJ, Chaudhary RJWR (2019) Principal component analysis for water quality assessment of the Ganga river in Uttar Pradesh. India 46(5):789–806

    Google Scholar 

  21. Muthayya S, Sugimoto JD, Montgomery S, Maberly GF (2014) An overview of global rice production, supply, trade, and consumption. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1324(1):7–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Olanrewaju OS, Babalola OO (2019) Streptomyces: implications and interactions in plant growth promotion. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 103(3):1179–1188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Omar SC, Shaharudin A, Tumin SA (2019) The Status of the Paddy and Rice Industry in Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Khazanah Research Institute

  24. Palmer JS, Hough RL, West HM, Avery LM (2019) A review of the abundance, behaviour and detection of clostridial pathogens in agricultural soils. Eur J Soil Sci 70(4):911–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Silhavy TJ, Kahne D, Walker S (2010) The bacterial cell envelope. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biol 2(5):a000414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stefanis C, Alexopoulos A, Voidarou C, Vavias S, Bezirtzoglou E (2013) Principal methods for isolation and identification of soil microbial communities. Folia Microbiol 58(1):61–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Sun S-Q, Cai H-Y, Chang SX, Bhatti JS (2015) Sample storage-induced changes in the quantity and quality of soil labile organic carbon. Sci Rep 5:17496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Van Trinh M, Tesfai M, Borrell A, Nagothu US, Bui TPL, Quynh VD (2017) Effect of organic, inorganic and slow-release urea fertilisers on CH 4 and N 2 O emissions from rice paddy fields. Paddy Water Environ 15(2):317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yimer MA, Sevinç S, Şişman AR, Aktaş Ö, Yildirim O, Yaşar E (2021) Monitoring the treatments and interventions to intensive care patients: a study for multidimensional evaluation of changes in patient test results with principal component analysis. J Electr Comput Eng 9(2):178–186

    Google Scholar 

  30. Young KD (2007) Bacterial morphology: why have different shapes? Curr Opin Microbiol 10(6):596–600

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yu T (1991) Characteristics of soil acidity of paddy soils in relation to rice growth. Plant-soil interactions at low pH. Springer, Berlin, pp 107–112

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Curtin University Malaysia and Botanium Agro-Tech Sdn. Bhd. for providing the support and help for this study.

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HGAP was involved in the samples collection, conducting experiments, data analysis, and writing the first draft of the paper. WSY contributed to writing the paper, providing supervision, reviewing and editing of the paper. CHL was involved in the fertiliser development, experimental design, methodology validation, supervision, and data analysis. TKJ contributed to the fertiliser development, supervision, and samples collection.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan Sieng Yeo.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Panjang, H.G.A., Yeo, W.S., Lai, C.H. et al. Impact of a Novel Slow-Release Fertiliser on Crop Yield, Soil Condition, and Nutrient Availability for Paddy Plantation in Bario, Malaysia. Agric Res 11, 694–702 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-022-00615-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-022-00615-w

Keywords

Navigation