Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agriculture and Poverty Responses to High Agricultural Commodity Prices

  • Full-Length Research Article
  • Published:
Agricultural Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A rise in global agricultural commodity prices negatively affects the wellbeing of poor people, especially in developing countries and inversely for a decline in prices of these commodities. On the other hand, they may gain or lose from high or low prices especially those groups that work in production of these commodities. This study, by applying a computable general equilibrium approach, aims to investigate the impacts of high and low agricultural commodity prices on agricultural sector and poverty across nine household groups in an unemployment situation of factors of production. It is found that, as a whole, a 45% increase and decrease in agricultural commodity prices negatively influences the economic performance of Malaysia, in real terms, by 0.24 and 0.91%, respectively. While high agricultural price stimulates the investment and export of agricultural sectors and aggregate household consumption, lower agricultural commodity prices declines investment and export in these sectors and causes a decrease in aggregate household consumption. Although both high- and low-price scenarios increase the poverty level of all household groups, with greater magnitude for lower-price scenario, all rural household groups compared to urban groups experience more increase in their poverty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Author's calculation based on Malaysia Economic Planning Unit and FAO databases

Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Urban households who are people living in areas with a combined population of 10,000 or more at the time of the 2000 Population and Housing Census. All other gazetted areas with a population of less than 10,000 persons and nongazetted areas are classified as ‘rural’. Noncitizen households are non-Malaysian people who had stayed or intended to stay in Malaysia for 6 months or more (Household Income and Basic Amenities Survey Report 2009).

  2. Linear Expenditure System (LES).

  3. The DAD software measures the poverty and welfare indices of all household types in the model.

References

  1. Cockburn J, Decaluwe B, Robichoud V (2008) Trade liberalization and poverty: lessons from Asia and Africa. In: Trade liberalization and poverty: a CGE analysis of the 1990s experience in Africa and Asia. Poverty and economic policy (PEP) research network. http://hdl.handle.net/10625/46822

  2. Collier P, Goderis B (2012) Commodity prices and growth: an empirical investigation. Eur Econ Rev 56:1241–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cudjoe G, Breisinger C, Diao X (2010) Local impacts of a global crisis: food price transmission, consumer welfare and poverty in Ghana. Food Policy 35:294–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dávila OG (2010) Food security and poverty in Mexico: the impact of higher global food prices. Food Secur 2:383–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. De Hoyos RE, Medvedev D (2009) Poverty effects of higher food prices a global perspective. The World Bank, Development Economics, Development Prospects Group Policy Research Working Paper, 4887

  6. De Janvry A, Elisabeth S (2010) The global food crisis and Guatemala: what crisis and for whom? World Dev 38:1328–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Decaluwe B, Dumont JC, Savard L (1999) Measuring poverty and inequality in a computable general equilibrium model. Working Paper 99-20 CREFA, Laval University, Quebec

  8. Decaluwe B, Lemlin A, Maisonnave H, Robichoud V (2009) The PEP standard computable general equilibrium model single-country. In: Poverty and economic policy (PEP) research network. Static version PEP-1-1, 2nd edn

  9. Decaluwe B, Savard L, Thorbecke E (2001) General equilibrium approach for poverty analysis. Working Paper, CREFA, Universite Laval, Canada

  10. Dorward A (2012) The short- and medium-term impacts of rises in staple food prices. Food Secur 4:633–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Estrades C, Terra MI (2012) Commodity prices, trade, and poverty in Uruguay. Food Policy 37:58–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Foster J, Greer J, Thorbecke J (1984) A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52(3):761–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fujii T (2013) Impact of food inflation on poverty in the Philippines. Food Policy 39:13–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ivanic M, Martin W (2008) Implications of higher global food prices for poverty in low-income countries. Policy Research Working Paper 4594

  15. Karfakis P, Velazco J, Moreno E, Covarrubias K (2011) Impact of increasing prices of agricultural commodities on poverty. Agricultural Development Economics Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, ESA Working Paper No. 11–14

  16. Lu K, Yu B (2011) The impact of high food prices on poverty in China. Dev Pract 21:679–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCulloch N (2008) Rice prices and poverty in Indonesia. Bull Indones Econ Stud 44:45–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Naranpanawa A, Bandara JS (2012) Poverty and growth impacts of high oil prices: evidence from Sri Lanka. Energy Policy 45:102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Oluoko-Odingo AA (2011) Vulnerability and adaptation to food insecurity and poverty in Kenya. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 101:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robles M, Keefe M (2011) The effects of changing food prices on welfare and poverty in Guatemala. Dev Pract 21:578–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Robles M, Torero M (2010) Understanding the impact of high food prices in Latin America. Economia 10:117–164

    Google Scholar 

  22. Solaymani S (2015) Impacts of energy subsidy reform on poverty and income inequality in Malaysia. Qual Quant 50:2707–2723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Solaymani S, Kari F (2014) Impacts of energy subsidy reform on the Malaysian economy and transportation sector. Energy Policy 70:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Solaymani S, Kari F (2013) Environmental and economic effects of high petroleum prices on transport sector. Energy 60:435–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Solaymani S, Kari F, Zakaria RH (2014) Evaluating the role of subsidy reform in addressing poverty levels in Malaysia: a CGE poverty framework. J Dev Stud 50:556–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Vu L, Glewwe P. (2009). Impacts of rising food prices on poverty and welfare in Vietnam. DEPOCEN, Working Paper Series No. 2009/13

  27. Wodon Q, Zaman H (2010) Higher food prices in Sub-Saharan Africa: poverty impact and policy responses. World Bank Res Obs 25:157–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeed Solaymani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solaymani, S. Agriculture and Poverty Responses to High Agricultural Commodity Prices. Agric Res 6, 195–206 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-017-0253-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40003-017-0253-y

Keywords

Navigation