Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative assessment of soil properties and heavy metals indices at rehabilitated and non-rehabilitated sites in coal mine spoils

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rehabilitation of open-cast coal mines is a critical intervention for bringing back productive surface soil and sustaining ecosystem functioning. Mining activities not only disturb the key soil properties, but also cause heavy metal contamination. Significantly, 32,000 acres of land in Odisha have been affected by coal mine. In this study, two representative mine areas, Talcher and Jharsuguda in Odisha were selected for our study. The soil physiochemical, available soil nutrient, microbial biomass carbon, soil enzymatic activities and heavy metal contents were estimated in the three sites (rehabilitated, non-rehabilitated and paddy fields) and two soil depth (0–15 and 15–30 cm) of both Talcher and Jharsuguda. The soil pH was higher in rehabilitated sites (5.55 to 8.42) as compared to the paddy fields (5.38 to 5.85) and non-rehabilitated sites (4.16 to 4.57). The average available nitrogen and phosphorus contents were lower in non-rehabilitated sites than the rehabilitated sites and paddy fields. Labile carbon pools (readily mineralizable carbon and microbial biomass carbon), soil enzymatic activities (dehydrogenase and fluorescein di-acetate) were negatively affected by mining activities and it was higher in paddy soil than the rehabilitated and non-rehabilitated sites. Further, the heavy metals (cobalt, copper, iron, and lead) were relatively higher at non-rehabilitated and rehabilitated sites. Heavy metal-based geo-accumulation, integrated pollution and pollution load indices were indicated the possible pollution risk in the rehabilitated study site also. Therefore, we recommend a better technical effort should be made in the top-soil management of coal mine spoil areas during rehabilitation to sustain the productive ecosystem functioning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All research data are available with authors.

References

  • Adam G, Duncan H (2001) Development of a sensitive and rapid method for the measurement of total microbial activity using fluorescein diacetate (FDA) in a range of soils. Soil Biol Biochem 33(7–8):943–951

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali MM, Ali ML, Islam MS, Rahman MZ (2016) Preliminary assessment of heavy metals in water and sediment of Karnaphuli river, Bangladesh. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manage 5:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2016.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • AOAC (1990) AOAC official methods of analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 15th edn. Arlington, Virginia, 84–85.

  • Bakircioglu D, Kurtulus YB, Ibar H (2011) Investigation of trace elements in agricultural soils by BCR sequential extraction method and its transfer to wheat plants. Environ Monit Assess 175:303–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-010-1513-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandick AK, Dick RP (1999) Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol and Biochem 31(11):1471–1479

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bendfeldt ES, Burger JA, Daniels WL (2001) Quality of amended mine soils after sixteen years. Soil Sci Soc Am j 65:1736–1744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedobi.2005.06.003

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bentham H, Harris JA (1992) Birch, Short KC Habitat classification and soil restoration assessment using analysis of soil microbiological and physico-chemical characteristics. J Appl Ecol 29:711–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan MAH, Bodrud-Doza M, Rakib MA, Saha BB, Islam SM (2021) Appraisal of pollution scenario, sources and public health risk of harmful metals in mine water of Barapukuria coal mine industry in Bangladesh. Environ Sci Pol Res 28:22105–22122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brevik EC, Cerda A, Mataix-Solera J, Pereg L, Quinton JN, Six J, Van Oost K (2015) The interdisciplinary nature of SOIL. Soil 1:117–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Casida Jr LE, Klein DA, Santoro T (1964) Soil dehydrogenase activity. Soil Sci 98(6):371–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaulya SK (2003) Assessment and management of air quality for an opencast coal mining area. J Environ Manage 70:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2003.09.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiroma TM, Ebewele RO, Hymore FK (2014) Comparative assessment of heavy metal levels in soil, vegetables and urban grey waste water used for irrigation in Yola and Kano. Int J Eng Sci 3:01–09

    Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury A, Lahkar J, Saikia BK, Singh AKA, Chikkaputtaiah C, Boruah HPD (2021) Strategies to address coal mine-created environmental issues and their feasibility study on northeastern coalfields of Assam, India: a review. Environ Develop and Sustain 23(7):9667–9709

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutta RK, Agarwal M (2002) Effect of tree plantations on the soil characteristics and microbial activity of coal mine spoil land. Trop Ecol 43:315–324

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Esposito V, Maffei AM, Castellano G, Martinelli W, Conversano, Assennato G (2010) Dioxin levels in grazing land and groundwater in the surroundings of a large industrial area in Taranto (Italy). Organohalogen compd

  • Ghose R (2004) Big sky or big sprawl? Rural gentrification and the changing cultural landscape of Missoula. Montana Urba Geol 25(6):528–549

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghose MK, Kundu NK (2004) Deterioration of soil quality due to stockpiling in coal mining areas. Int J Environ Sci 2:327–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020723032000093991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh D, Maiti SK (2020) Can biochar reclaim coal mine spoil? J Environ Manag 272:0301–4797. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Golui D, Datta SP, Dwivedi BS, Meena MC, Varghese E, Sanyal SK, Ray P, Shukla AK, Trivedi VK (2019) Assessing soil degradation in relation to metal pollution–a multivariate approach. Soil Sediment Contam 28:630–649

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goswami S, Goswami R (2014) Coal mining vis-à-vis agriculture in India: a question of sustainability. Int Res J Geo Min 4:154–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Guo Q, Majeed S, Xu R, Zhang K, Kakade A, Khan A, Hafeez FY, Mao C, Liu P, Li X (2019) Heavy metals interact with the microbial community and affect biogas production in anaerobic digestion: a review. J of Environ Manag 240:266–272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hou D, Bolan Nanthi S, Tsang Daniel CW, Kirkham Mary B, O’Connor D (2020) Sustainable soil use and management: an interdisciplinary and systematic approach. Sci Total Environ 729:0048–9697

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha AK, Singh JS (1991) Spoil characteristics and vegetation development of an age series of mine spoils in a dry tropical environment. Vegetatio 97(1):63–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Jie D, Xu X, Guo F (2021) The future of coal supply in China based on non-fossil energy development and carbon price strategies. Ener 220:119644

    Google Scholar 

  • Kızılkaya R, Bayraklı B (2005) Effects of N-enriched sewage sludge on soil enzyme activities. Appli Soil Ecol 30(3):192–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemanowicz J (2019) Activity of selected enzymes as markers of ecotoxicity in technogenic salinization soils. Environ Sci Pol Res 26(13):13014–13024

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Liu R, Chen W (2013) Graphene wrapped Cu2O nanocubes: non-enzymatic electrochemical sensors for the detection of glucose and hydrogen peroxide with enhanced stability. Biosen Bioelectron 45:206–212

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Coal, Govt of India (2021) Annu Repo. https://coal.gov.in/index.php/en/major-statistics/coal-reserves.

  • Maharana JK, Patel AK (2013) Microbial biomass, microbial respiration and organic carbon indicates nutrient cycling in a chronosequence coal mine overburden spoil. Intern J Environ Sci 4(2):171

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez-Toledo Á, Montes-Rocha A, González-Mille DJ, Espinosa-Reyes G, Torres-Dosal A, Mejia-Saavedra JJ, Ilizaliturri-Hernández CA (2017) Evaluation of enzyme activities in long-term polluted soils with mine tailing deposits of San Luis Potosí México. J Soils Sedim 17(2):364–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Milder AI, Fernández-Santos B, Martínez-Ruiz C (2013) Colonization patterns of woody species on lands mined for coal in Spain: preliminary insights for forest expansion. Land Degrad Dev 24(1):39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno Jiménez B, Garrosa Hernández E, Corso de Zúñiga S, Boada M, Rodríguez Carvajal R (2012) Resilient personality and psychological capital: positive personal variables and the processes of exhaustion and vigor. Psychothe.

  • Mukhopadhyay S, Masto RE (2016) Carbon storage in coal mine spoil by Dalbergia sissoo Roxb. Geoderm 284:204–213

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ololade IA (2014) An assessment of heavy-metal contamination in soils within auto-mechanic workshops using enrichment and contamination factors with geoaccumulation indexes. J Environ Prot. https://doi.org/10.4236/jep.2014.511098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen SR (1954) Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate (No. 939). US Department of Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltasingh T, Satapathy J (2021) Unbridled coal extraction and concerns for livelihood: evidences from Odisha, India. Miner Econ 34:491–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Peña-Parás L, Taha-Tijerina J, Garza L, Maldonado-Cortés D, Michalczewski R, Lapray C (2015) Effect of CuO and Al2O3 nanoparticle additives on the tribological behavior of fully formulated oils. Wear 332:1256–1261

    Google Scholar 

  • Penido ES, Martins GC, Mendes TBM, Melo LCA, do Rosário Guimarães I, Guilherme LRG, (2019) Combining biochar and sewage sludge for immobilization of heavy metals in mining soils. Ecotoxicol Environ Safe 172:326–333

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pietrzykowski M, Flanagan W, Pizzi V, Brown A, Sinclair A, Monge M (2013) An environmental life cycle assessment comparison of single-use and conventional process technology for the production of monoclonal antibodies. J Clean Prod 41:150–162

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez-Seijo A, Alfaya MC, Andrade ML, Vega FA (2016) Copper, chromium, nickel, lead and zinc levels and pollution degree in firing range soils. Land Degrad Dev 27(7):1721–1730

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossini-Oliva S, Mingorance MD, Peña A (2017) Effect of two different composts on soil quality and on the growth of various plant species in a polymetallic acidic mine soil. Chemosp 168:183–190

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roy M (2021) Phytoreclamation of abandoned acid mine drainage site after treatment with fly ash. In: Bauddh K, Korstad J, Sharma P (eds) Phytorestoration of abandoned mining and oil drilling sites. Elsevier, 167–206

  • Schnurer J, Rosswall T (1982) Fluorescein diacetate hydrolysis as a measure of total microbial activity in soil and litter. Appl Environ Microbiol 43(6):1256–1261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz SS (2021) The Effectiveness of soil decompaction for stormwater management (No. MD-21- SHA/UMBC/02–1). Maryland. State Highway Administration. Offic of Pol & Res.

  • Sheoran V, Sheoran AS, Poonia P (2010) Soil reclamation of abandoned mine land by revegetation: a review. Int J Soil Sedim Water 3(2):13

    Google Scholar 

  • Shi X, Wang H, Song J, Lv X, Li W, Li B, Shi J (2021) Impact of saline soil improvement measures on salt content in the abandonment-reclamation process. Soil till Res 208:104867

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh P, Choudhury AK (2019) Coal mining induced pollution: a threat to sustainable livelihood In Odisha. Thin Ind J 22:0971–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh AN, Singh JS (2006) Experiments on ecological restoration of coal mine spoil using native trees in a dry tropical environment, India: a synthesis. New Fores 31(1):25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Yadav V, Arif N, Singh VP, Dubey NK, Ramawat N, Prasad R, Sahi S, Tripathi DK, Chauhan DK (2020) Heavy metal stress and plant life: uptake mechanisms, toxicity, and alleviation. In: Tripathi DK, Singh VP, Ramawat N (eds) Plant life under changing environment. Academic Press, 271–287

  • Sinha S, Masto RE, Ram LC, Selvi VA, Srivastava NK, Tripathi RC, George J (2009) Rhizosphere soil microbial index of tree species in a coal mining ecosystem. Soil Biol Biochem 41:1824–1832

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Su X, Wang Y, He Q, Hu X, Chen Y (2019) Biochar remediates denitrification process and N2O emission in pesticide chlorothalonil-polluted soil: role of electron transport chain. Chem Eng J 370:587–594

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Subbiah BV, Asija GL (1956) A rapid method for the estimation of nitrogen in soil. Curr Sci 26:259–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun RY, Sonke JE, Liu GJ, Zheng LG, Dun W (2014) Variations in the stable isotope composition of mercury in coal-bearing sequences: indications for its provenance and geochemical processes. Int J Coal Geol 133:13–23

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swaine DJ, Goodarzi F (1995) Environmental aspects of trace elements in coal. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 1–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Taha Y, Benzaazoua M, Hakkou R, Mansori M (2017) Coal mine wastes recycling for coal recovery and eco-friendly bricks production. Miner Eng 107:123–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang W, Wang DI, Wang J, Wu Z, Li L, Huang M, Xu S, Yan D (2018) Pyrethroid pesticide residues in the global environment: an overview. Chemosph 191:990–1007

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tate RL (2020) Microorganisms, ecosystem disturbance and soil-formation processes. In: Soil reclama process (1–33). CRC Press.

  • Trippe KM, Manning VA, Reardon CL, Klein AM, Weidman C, Ducey TF, Novak JM, Watts DW, Rushmiller H, Spokas KA, Ippolito JA, Johnson MG (2021) Phytostabilization of acidic mine tailings with biochar, biosolids, lime, and locally-sourced microbial inoculum: do amendment mixtures influence plant growth, tailing chemistry, and microbial composition? Appl Soil Ecol 165:103962

    Google Scholar 

  • Urraa J, Mijangosa I, Epeldea L, Alkortab I, Garbisu C (2020) Impact of the application of commercial and farm-made fermented liquid organic amendments on corn yield and soil quality. Appl Soil Ecol 153:0929–1393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance ED, Brookes PC, Jenkinson DS (1987) An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon. Soil Biol Biochem 19(6):703–707

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A, Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 37(1):29–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO/FAO, (1976) List of maximum levels recommended for contaminants by the joint FAO/WHO codex Alimentarias Commission. 2nd series, CAC/FAL 3:1-8

  • Witt C, Gaunt JL, Galicia CC, Ottow JC, Neue HU (2000) A rapid chloroform fumigation extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen in flooded rice soils. Biol Fertil Soils 30:510–519

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worlanyo AS, Jiangfeng L (2021) Evaluating the environmental and economic impact of mining for post-mined land restoration and land-use: a review. J Environ Manag 279:111623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111623

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZX, Liu SQ, Zheng DW, Feng SD (2006) Effects of cadium, zinc and lead on soil enzyme activities. J Environ Sci 18(6):1135–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1001-0742(06)60051-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou CC, Liu GJ, Fang T, Sun RY, Wu D (2014) Leaching characteristic and environmental implication of rejection rocks from Huainan Coalfield, Anhui Province, China. J Geochem Explor 143:54–61

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou M, Liao B, Shu W, Yang B, Lan C (2015) Pollution assessment and potential sources of heavy metals in agricultural soils around four Pb/Zn mines of Shaoguan city, China. Soil Sedim Contam Int J 24(1):76–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2014.914152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors acknowledge the support of ICAR- National Fellow project (Agri. Edn. /27/08/NF/2017-HRD), NICRA and Director, National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack for providing necessary facilities for execution of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SLS and RK had jointly done the laboratory analyses while SLS collected all the soil samples from distant locations. PB conceptualized the study, finalized the methodology, analyzed the data. DB calculated the metal-based indices. PB and DB outlined and drafted the manuscript. AKN did the required editing. PKD and SRP supported in laboratory analysis and statistical analysis of data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. Bhattacharyya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interest to the work reported in this paper.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

All authors informed consent to participate in this paper.

Consent to Publish

All authors informed consent to publish this paper.

Additional information

Editorial responsibility: Samareh Mirkia.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swain, S., Khanam, R., Bhaduri, D. et al. Comparative assessment of soil properties and heavy metals indices at rehabilitated and non-rehabilitated sites in coal mine spoils. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 20, 13769–13782 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04710-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04710-x

Keywords

Navigation