Skip to main content
Log in

Abstract

Metallic iron is present in the waste left when granite blocks are cut. Thus, the purpose of this study was to characterize this waste using chemical and particle size analyses. To achieve this, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy coupled with electron back-scattered diffraction were used. To find the method with the best metallic iron recovery from the waste of ornamental rock, three distinct methods were examined: magnetic separation, table concentration and cyclone processing. The first method involved three steps: (1) use of a wet high-intensity magnetic separator, where only the equipment’s remaining magnetic field was present; (2) the material from the first step was then submitted to separation again, this time using a magnet for rare earth particles; and (3) this material after two separation processes was finally submitted to ferromagnetic separation. The second method used a concentration table set at various inclinations, oscillation frequencies and wash flow rates. Meanwhile, for the third method, the cyclone tests, only the water pressure was varied. After each test, a chemical analysis was performed to determine the metallic iron present in each sample. The tests revealed that magnetic separation presents the best results. Using this technique, a ferrous concentrate with 93 % metallic iron content and a granite concentrate with only 0.6 % metallic iron were obtained. On the other hand, in the table concentrator tests, the ferrous concentrate only had a metallic concentration of 13.6 %. In separation by the cyclone processing, the product barely contained metallic iron (7.2 % maximum).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acchar W, Vieira FA, Hotza D (2006) Effect of marble and granite sludge in clay materials. Mater Sci Eng, A 419:306–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ângulo SC, Ulsen C, John VM, Kahn H, Cincotto MA (2009) Chemical–mineralogical characterization of C&D waste recycled aggregates from São Paulo, Brazil. Waste Manage 29:721–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennadji FG, Beneu B, Laval JP, Blanchart P (2008) Structural transformations of Muscovite at high temperature by X-ray and neutron diffraction. Appl Clay Sci 38:259–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binicia H, Shahb T, Aksoganc O, Kapland H (2008) Durability of concrete made with granite and marble as recycle aggregates. J Mater Process Technol 228:299–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burt R (1999) The role of gravity concentration in modern processing plants. Miner Eng 11:1291–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwari RK, Rao DS, Reddy PSR (2013) Magnetic separation studies for a low grade siliceous iron ore sample. Int J Min Sci Technol 23:1–5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Taher A (2010) Elemental content of feldspar from Eastern Desert, Egypt, determined by INAA and XRF. Appl Radiat Isot 68:1185–1188

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Galvin KP, Zhou J, Walton K (2010) Application of closely spaced inclined channels in gravity separation of fine particles. Miner Eng 23:326–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hojamberdiev M, Eminov A, Xu Y (2011) Utilization of muscovite granite waste in the manufacture of ceramic tiles. Ceram Int 37:871–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maharaj L, Loveday BK, Pocock J (2012) Gravity separation of a UG-2 ore secondary sample of the reduction of chromite minerals. Miner Eng 30:99–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manser RJ, Barley RW, Wills BA (1991) The shaking table concentrator—the influence of operating conditions and table parameters on mineral separation—the development of a mathematical model for normal operating conditions. Miner Eng 4:369–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menezes RR, Ferreira HS, Neves GA, Lira HL, Ferreira HC (2005) Use of granite sawing wastes in the production of ceramic bricks and tiles. J Eur Ceram Soc 25:1149–1158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira JMS, Manhães JPVT, Holanda JNF (2008) Processing of red ceramic using ornamental rock powder waste. J Mater Process Technol 196:88–93

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nouri J, Nouri N, Moeeni M (2012) Development of industrial wastes disposal scenarios using life cycle assessment approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9(3):417–424

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Richards RG, Machunter DM, Gates PJ, Palmer MK (2000) Gravity separation of ultra-fine (-0.lmm) minerals using spiral separators. Miner Eng 13:65–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saboya JF, Xavier GC, Alexandre J (2007) The use of the powder marble by-product to enhance the properties of brick ceramic. Constr Build Mater 21:1950–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satoshi F (2002) Magnetic separation method for continuous separation process. J Cryog Soc Jpn 37:321–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sébastien J, Rabotin K, Bourgeois F, Climent É (2012) Experimental validation of a fluid dynamics based model of the UF Falcon concentrator in the ultrafine range. Sep Purif Technol 92:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segadães AM, Carvalho MA, Acchar W (2005) Using marble and granite rejects to enhance the processing of clay products. Appl Clay Sci 30:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seifelnassr AAS, Moslim EM, Abouzeid AZM (2013) Concentration of a Sudanese low-grade iron ore. Int J Miner Process 122:59–62

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Silva MA, Paes JHR, Holanda JNF (2011) Reuse of ornamental rock-cutting waste in aluminous porcelain. J Environ Manag 92:936–940

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Souza AJ, Pinheiro BCA, Holanda JNF (2010) Recycling of gneiss rock waste in the manufacture of vitrified floor tiles. J Environ Manag 9:685–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres P, Fernandes HR, Olhero S, Ferreira JMF (2009) Incorporation of wastes from granite rock cutting and polishing industries to produce roof tiles. J Eur Ceram Soc 29:23–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Traore A, Conil P, Houot R, Save M (1995) An evaluation of the Mozley MGS for fine particle gravity separation. Miner Eng 8:767–778

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira CMF, Soares TM, Sánchez R, Monteiro SN (2004) Incorporation of granite waste in red ceramics. Mater Sci Eng A 373:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijayalakshmi M, Sekar ASS, Prabhu GG (2013) Strength and durability properties of concrete made with granite industry waste. Constr Build Mater 46:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Authors thank Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) Process 2008/53194-9 for the financial support of this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Junca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Junca, E., de Oliveira, J.R., Espinosa, D.C.R. et al. Iron recovery from the waste generated during the cutting of granite. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 465–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0418-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0418-6

Keywords

Navigation