Abstract
Metallic iron is present in the waste left when granite blocks are cut. Thus, the purpose of this study was to characterize this waste using chemical and particle size analyses. To achieve this, X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy coupled with electron back-scattered diffraction were used. To find the method with the best metallic iron recovery from the waste of ornamental rock, three distinct methods were examined: magnetic separation, table concentration and cyclone processing. The first method involved three steps: (1) use of a wet high-intensity magnetic separator, where only the equipment’s remaining magnetic field was present; (2) the material from the first step was then submitted to separation again, this time using a magnet for rare earth particles; and (3) this material after two separation processes was finally submitted to ferromagnetic separation. The second method used a concentration table set at various inclinations, oscillation frequencies and wash flow rates. Meanwhile, for the third method, the cyclone tests, only the water pressure was varied. After each test, a chemical analysis was performed to determine the metallic iron present in each sample. The tests revealed that magnetic separation presents the best results. Using this technique, a ferrous concentrate with 93 % metallic iron content and a granite concentrate with only 0.6 % metallic iron were obtained. On the other hand, in the table concentrator tests, the ferrous concentrate only had a metallic concentration of 13.6 %. In separation by the cyclone processing, the product barely contained metallic iron (7.2 % maximum).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acchar W, Vieira FA, Hotza D (2006) Effect of marble and granite sludge in clay materials. Mater Sci Eng, A 419:306–309
Ângulo SC, Ulsen C, John VM, Kahn H, Cincotto MA (2009) Chemical–mineralogical characterization of C&D waste recycled aggregates from São Paulo, Brazil. Waste Manage 29:721–730
Bennadji FG, Beneu B, Laval JP, Blanchart P (2008) Structural transformations of Muscovite at high temperature by X-ray and neutron diffraction. Appl Clay Sci 38:259–267
Binicia H, Shahb T, Aksoganc O, Kapland H (2008) Durability of concrete made with granite and marble as recycle aggregates. J Mater Process Technol 228:299–308
Burt R (1999) The role of gravity concentration in modern processing plants. Miner Eng 11:1291–1300
Dwari RK, Rao DS, Reddy PSR (2013) Magnetic separation studies for a low grade siliceous iron ore sample. Int J Min Sci Technol 23:1–5
El-Taher A (2010) Elemental content of feldspar from Eastern Desert, Egypt, determined by INAA and XRF. Appl Radiat Isot 68:1185–1188
Galvin KP, Zhou J, Walton K (2010) Application of closely spaced inclined channels in gravity separation of fine particles. Miner Eng 23:326–338
Hojamberdiev M, Eminov A, Xu Y (2011) Utilization of muscovite granite waste in the manufacture of ceramic tiles. Ceram Int 37:871–876
Maharaj L, Loveday BK, Pocock J (2012) Gravity separation of a UG-2 ore secondary sample of the reduction of chromite minerals. Miner Eng 30:99–101
Manser RJ, Barley RW, Wills BA (1991) The shaking table concentrator—the influence of operating conditions and table parameters on mineral separation—the development of a mathematical model for normal operating conditions. Miner Eng 4:369–381
Menezes RR, Ferreira HS, Neves GA, Lira HL, Ferreira HC (2005) Use of granite sawing wastes in the production of ceramic bricks and tiles. J Eur Ceram Soc 25:1149–1158
Moreira JMS, Manhães JPVT, Holanda JNF (2008) Processing of red ceramic using ornamental rock powder waste. J Mater Process Technol 196:88–93
Nouri J, Nouri N, Moeeni M (2012) Development of industrial wastes disposal scenarios using life cycle assessment approach. Int J Environ Sci Technol 9(3):417–424
Richards RG, Machunter DM, Gates PJ, Palmer MK (2000) Gravity separation of ultra-fine (-0.lmm) minerals using spiral separators. Miner Eng 13:65–77
Saboya JF, Xavier GC, Alexandre J (2007) The use of the powder marble by-product to enhance the properties of brick ceramic. Constr Build Mater 21:1950–1960
Satoshi F (2002) Magnetic separation method for continuous separation process. J Cryog Soc Jpn 37:321–327
Sébastien J, Rabotin K, Bourgeois F, Climent É (2012) Experimental validation of a fluid dynamics based model of the UF Falcon concentrator in the ultrafine range. Sep Purif Technol 92:129–135
Segadães AM, Carvalho MA, Acchar W (2005) Using marble and granite rejects to enhance the processing of clay products. Appl Clay Sci 30:42–52
Seifelnassr AAS, Moslim EM, Abouzeid AZM (2013) Concentration of a Sudanese low-grade iron ore. Int J Miner Process 122:59–62
Silva MA, Paes JHR, Holanda JNF (2011) Reuse of ornamental rock-cutting waste in aluminous porcelain. J Environ Manag 92:936–940
Souza AJ, Pinheiro BCA, Holanda JNF (2010) Recycling of gneiss rock waste in the manufacture of vitrified floor tiles. J Environ Manag 9:685–689
Torres P, Fernandes HR, Olhero S, Ferreira JMF (2009) Incorporation of wastes from granite rock cutting and polishing industries to produce roof tiles. J Eur Ceram Soc 29:23–30
Traore A, Conil P, Houot R, Save M (1995) An evaluation of the Mozley MGS for fine particle gravity separation. Miner Eng 8:767–778
Vieira CMF, Soares TM, Sánchez R, Monteiro SN (2004) Incorporation of granite waste in red ceramics. Mater Sci Eng A 373:115–121
Vijayalakshmi M, Sekar ASS, Prabhu GG (2013) Strength and durability properties of concrete made with granite industry waste. Constr Build Mater 46:1–7
Acknowledgments
Authors thank Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) Process 2008/53194-9 for the financial support of this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Junca, E., de Oliveira, J.R., Espinosa, D.C.R. et al. Iron recovery from the waste generated during the cutting of granite. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 465–472 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0418-6
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0418-6