Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Simulating glioblastoma growth consisting both visible and invisible parts of the tumor using a diffusion–reaction model followed by resection and radiotherapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurologica Belgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glioblastoma is known to be among one of the deadliest brain tumors in the world today. There have been major improvements in the detection of cancerous cells in the twenty-first century. However, the threshold of detection of these cancerous cells varies in different scanning techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT). The growth of these tumors and different treatments have been modeled to assist medical experts in better predictions of the related tumor growth and in the selection of more accurate treatments. In clinical terms the tumor consisted of two parts known as the visible part, which is the part of the tumor that is above the threshold of the detecting device and the invisible part, which is below the detecting threshold. In this study, the common reaction–diffusion model of tumor growth is used to simulate the growth of the glioblastoma tumor. Also resection and radiotherapy have been modeled as methods to prevent the growth of the tumor. The results demonstrate that although the selected treatments were effective in reducing the number of cancerous cells to under the threshold of detection, they did not eliminate all cancerous cells and if no further treatments were applied, the cancerous cells would spread and become malignant again. Although previous studies have suggested that the ratio of proliferation to diffusion could describe the malignancy of the tumor, this study in addition shows the importance of each of the coefficients regarding the malignancy of the tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Swanson KR, Bridge C, Murray J, Alvord EC (2003) Virtual and real brain tumors: using mathematical modeling to quantify glioma growth and invasion. J Neurol Sci 216(1):1–10

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Swanson KR, Alvord EC Jr, Murray J (2002) Quantifying efficacy of chemotherapy of brain tumors with homogeneous and heterogeneous drug delivery. Acta Biotheor 50(4):223–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gevertz JL, Torquato S (2006) Modeling the effects of vasculature evolution on early brain tumor growth. J Theor Biol 243(4):517–531

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Harpold HL, Alvord EC, Swanson KR (2007) The evolution of mathematical modeling of glioma proliferation and invasion. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 66(1):1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eikenberry SE, Sankar T, Preul M, Kostelich E, Thalhauser C, Kuang Y (2009) Virtual glioblastoma: growth, migration and treatment in a three-dimensional mathematical model. Cell Prolif 42(4):511–528

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Iwamoto F, Abrey L, Beal K, Gutin P, Rosenblum M, Reuter V, DeAngelis L, Lassman A (2009) Patterns of relapse and prognosis after bevacizumab failure in recurrent glioblastoma. Neurology 73(15):1200–1206

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mahmoudi K, Hadjipanayis CG (2014) The application of magnetic nanoparticles for the treatment of brain tumors. Front Chem 2

  8. Hogea C, Davatzikos C, Biros G (2008) An image-driven parameter estimation problem for a reaction–diffusion glioma growth model with mass effects. J Math Biol 56(6):793–825

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meghdadi N, Soltani M, Niroomand-Oscuii H, Ghalichi F (2016) Image based modeling of tumor growth. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39(3):601–613

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fung LK, Shin M, Tyler B, Brem H, Saltzman WM (1996) Chemotherapeutic drugs released from polymers: distribution of 1, 3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-l-nitrosourea in the rat brain. Pharmaceut Res 13(5):671–682

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Swanson K, Harpold H, Peacock D, Rockne R, Pennington C, Kilbride L, Grant R, Wardlaw J, Alvord E (2008) Velocity of radial expansion of contrast-enhancing gliomas and the effectiveness of radiotherapy in individual patients: a proof of principle. Clin Oncol 20(4):301–308

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang CH, Rockhill JK, Mrugala M, Peacock DL, Lai A, Jusenius K, Wardlaw JM, Cloughesy T, Spence AM, Rockne R (2009) Prognostic significance of growth kinetics in newly diagnosed glioblastomas revealed by combining serial imaging with a novel biomathematical model. Cancer Res 69(23):9133–9140

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Murray JD (2001) Mathematical biology. II Spatial models and biomedical applications {Interdisciplinary Applied Mathematics V. 18}. Springer, New York Incorporated

  14. Murray JD (2002) Mathematical biology I: an introduction, vol 17 of interdisciplinary applied mathematics. Springer, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  15. Swanson K, Rostomily R, Alvord E (2008) A mathematical modelling tool for predicting survival of individual patients following resection of glioblastoma: a proof of principle. Br J Cancer 98(1):113–119

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mandonnet E, Broët P, Swanson K, Carpentier A, Delattre J, Capelle L (2002) Linear growth of mean tumor diameter in low grade gliomas. Neurology 58(Suppl 3):A13

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rockne R, Rockhill J, Mrugala M, Spence A, Kalet I, Hendrickson K, Lai A, Cloughesy T, Alvord E Jr, Swanson K (2010) Predicting the efficacy of radiotherapy in individual glioblastoma patients in vivo: a mathematical modeling approach. Phys Med Biol 55(12):3271

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Swanson KR, Rockne RC, Claridge J, Chaplain MA, Alvord EC, Anderson AR (2011) Quantifying the role of angiogenesis in malignant progression of gliomas: in silico modeling integrates imaging and histology. Cancer Res 71(24):7366–7375

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Rockne R, Alvord E Jr, Rockhill J, Swanson K (2009) A mathematical model for brain tumor response to radiation therapy. J Math Biol 58(4–5):561–578

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hall EJ, Giaccia AJ (2006) Radiobiology for the radiologist. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

  21. Bashir R, Hochberg F, Oot R (1988) Regrowth patterns of glioblastoma multiforme related to planning of interstitial brachytherapy radiation fields. Neurosurgery 23(1):27–30

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Biomechanics, Department of Medical Engineering, Sahand University of Technology, East Azerbaijan, Tabriz, Iran

    Navid Moshtaghi-Kashanian, Hanieh Niroomand-Oscuii & Nargess Meghdadi

Authors
  1. Navid Moshtaghi-Kashanian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hanieh Niroomand-Oscuii
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nargess Meghdadi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hanieh Niroomand-Oscuii.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moshtaghi-Kashanian, N., Niroomand-Oscuii, H. & Meghdadi, N. Simulating glioblastoma growth consisting both visible and invisible parts of the tumor using a diffusion–reaction model followed by resection and radiotherapy. Acta Neurol Belg 120, 629–637 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-018-0952-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-018-0952-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation