Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term response to MEK inhibitor monotherapy in a patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma harboring BRAF V600E mutation

  • Case Report - Molecularly targeted therapy
  • Published:
International Cancer Conference Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solid tumors harboring mutations in the Braf gene (BRAF) are currently treated by combination Braf/MEK inhibitor therapy, and there is an extensive literature on patient response rates. Alternatively, few studies have documented the clinical response of BRAF mutation-positive solid tumors to MEK inhibitor monotherapy. We report the case of a 57-year-old female diagnosed with papillary thyroid carcinoma and progressive lung metastases initially treated by total thyroidectomy and subsequent thyroid-stimulating hormone suppression therapy. Next-generation sequencing revealed that the tumor harbored a BRAFV600E mutation, and the patient was enrolled in a clinical study of the oral MEK1/2 inhibitor binimetinib. Shortly after starting treatment, the patient experienced pneumothorax due to rapid regression of lung metastases, and computed tomography after 6 months of binimetinib treatment revealed a partial sustained response. One year later, the dose was reduced because of an acneiform rash. After 5 years of binimetinib treatment, lung metastases had regrown, and treatment was switched to the oral multikinase inhibitor lenvatinib. This case demonstrates the potential of MEK inhibitor monotherapy as an alternative treatment for BRAF mutation-positive papillary thyroid carcinoma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Robert C, Karaszewska B, Schachter J et al (2015) Improved overall survival in melanoma with combined dabrafenib and trametinib. N Engl J Med 372:30–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Watanabe K, Otsu S, Hirashima Y et al (2016) A phase I study of binimetinib (MEK162) in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 77:1157–1164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bahar ME, Kim HJ, Kim DR (2023) Targeting the RAS/RAF/MAPK pathway for cancer therapy: from mechanism to clinical studies. Signal Transduct Target Ther 8:455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Robert C, Flaherty K, Nathan P et al (2019) Five-year outcomes from a phase 3 METRIC study in patients with BRAF V600 E/K-mutant advanced or metastatic melanoma. Eur J Cancer 109:61–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Long GV, Flaherty KT, Stroyakovskiy D et al (2017) Dabrafenib plus trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma: long-term survival and safety analysis of a phase 3 study. Ann Oncol 28:1631–1639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bendell JC, Javle M, Bekaii-Saab TS et al (2017) A phase 1 dose-escalation and expansion study of binimetinib (MEK162), a potent and selective oral MEK1/2 inhibitor. Br J Cancer 116:575–583

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Farley J, Brady WE, Vathipadiekal V et al (2013) Selumetinib in women with recurrent low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or peritoneum: an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol 14:134–140

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson DB, Zhao F, Noel M et al (2020) Trametinib activity in patients with solid tumors and lymphomas harboring BRAF non-V600 mutations or fusions: results from NCI-MATCH (EAY131). Clin Cancer Res 26:1812–1819

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Babiker HM, Byron SA, Hendricks WPD et al (2019) E6201, an intravenous MEK1 inhibitor, achieves an exceptional response in BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic malignant melanoma with brain metastases. Invest New Drugs 37:636–645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eckstein OS, Allen CE, Williams PM et al (2022) Phase II study of selumetinib in children and young adults with tumors harboring activating mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway genetic alterations: arm E of the NCI-COG pediatric MATCH trial. J Clin Oncol 40:2235–2245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Chew SM, Lucas M, Brady M et al (2021) SKAP2-BRAF fusion and response to an MEK inhibitor in a patient with metastatic melanoma resistant to immunotherapy. BMJ Case Rep 14:e238494

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Menzies AM, Yeh I, Botton T et al (2015) Clinical activity of the MEK inhibitor trametinib in metastatic melanoma containing BRAF kinase fusion. Pigment Cell Melanoma Res 28:607–610

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Isaacson AL, Guseva NV, Bossler AD et al (2019) Urothelial carcinoma with an NRF1-BRAF rearrangement and response to targeted therapy. Cold Spring Harb Mol Case Stud 5:a003848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Kondyli M, Larouche V, Saint-Martin C et al (2018) Trametinib for progressive pediatric low-grade gliomas. J Neurooncol 140:435–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wagner LM, Myseros JS, Lukins DE et al (2018) Targeted therapy for infants with diencephalic syndrome: a case report and review of management strategies. Pediatr Blood Cancer 65:e26917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wang CY, Hsia JY, Li CH et al (2021) Lung adenocarcinoma with primary LIMD1-BRAF fusion treated with MEK inhibitor: a case report. Clin Lung Cancer 22:e878–e880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yu Y, Yu M, Li Y et al (2022) Rapid response to monotherapy with MEK inhibitor trametinib for a lung adenocarcinoma patient harboring primary SDN1-BRAF fusion: a case report and literature review. Front Oncol 12:945620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Dahlman KB, Xia J, Hutchinson K et al (2012) BRAF(L597) mutations in melanoma are associated with sensitivity to MEK inhibitors. Cancer Discov 2:791–797

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Marconcini R, Galli L, Antonuzzo A et al (2017) Metastatic BRAF K601E-mutated melanoma reaches complete response to MEK inhibitor trametinib administered for over 36 months. Exp Hematol Oncol 6:6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Croix M, Levallet G, Richard N et al (2023) Next generation sequencing for personalized therapy: about a class III BRAF N581K mutation associated to NRAS Q61L mutation in malignant melanoma: case report. Heliyon 9:e18420

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Silva R, Moran B, Das S et al (2022) Investigating a clinically actionable BRAF mutation for monitoring low-grade serous ovarian cancer: a case report. Case Rep Womens Health 34:e00395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hayes DN, Lucas AS, Tanvetyanon T et al (2012) Phase II efficacy and pharmacogenomic study of selumetinib (AZD6244; ARRY-142886) in iodine-131 refractory papillary thyroid carcinoma with or without follicular elements. Clin Cancer Res 18:2056–2065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This content was presented in a tie-up project between the 61st Annual Meeting of the Japanese Association for Cancer Therapy and the ICCJ. This work was supported by the JSPS KAKENHI Grant 19K16829. This paper was supported by a grant from the Grant-in-Aid for Human Resource Development for Science and Technology by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) under the “Initiative for Realization of Diversity Research Environment” program for the cost of reviewing manuscripts in English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuko Takano.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

YA received a speaker honorarium from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Bayer Holding Ltd. He received research funding from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Geo Holding Corporation. The other authors have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takano, Y., Shimokata, T., Urakawa, H. et al. Long-term response to MEK inhibitor monotherapy in a patient with papillary thyroid carcinoma harboring BRAF V600E mutation. Int Canc Conf J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13691-024-00670-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13691-024-00670-w

Keywords

Navigation