Abstract
Many university natural resource (NR) programs in the U.S. have external partners and stakeholders who serve on advisory boards. These boards can influence programs in multiple ways by guiding curriculum, program initiatives, strategic planning, and more. Here, we examine the demographics of NR program external advisory board members in 2017 (nine boards, 167 members) and 2022 (12 boards, 194 members), including perceived gender and race/ethnicity and employer affiliation. Our results reveal advisory boards are dominated by white men, with little improvement in gender diversity from 2017 to 2022. However, there has been an increase in people of color during the same period. The three most common employee affiliations of board members are NR businesses and consulting, government, and NGOs. We find gender is not evenly distributed across employer affiliations; more women are in government and NGOs than NR businesses and consulting. Because advisory board membership is often up to program leadership, external advisory boards may be “low hanging fruit” for improving the diversity of natural resource programs and departments. We recommend department leadership critically examine whether their boards represent the full range of partners and constituents with whom they wish to collaborate.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arismendi I, Penaluna BE (2016) Examining diversity inequities in fisheries science: a call to action. In: BioScience. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw041
Bal TL, Sharik TL (2019) Web content analysis of university forestry and related natural resources landing webpages in the United States in relation to student and faculty diversity. J For 117(4):379–397. https://doi.org/10.1093/jofore/fvz024
Balcarczyk KL, Smaldone D, Selin S, Douglas J, Maumbe K, Pierskalla C (2016) Barriers and supports to pursuing a natural resource degree. Nat Sci Educ 45(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2015.11.0028
Cruz S, Batavia C, Arismendi I, Spalding A, Nelson MP (2022) Diversity beyond demographics: environmental worldviews of forestry and natural resource undergraduate students. Ecol Evol 12(8). https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9203
Dokes TJ, Roloff GJ, Millenbah KF, Wolter BHK, Montgomery RA (2020) Natural resource undergraduate students in the new millennium. Wildl Soc Bull. https://doi.org/10.1002/wsb.1128
Gould RK, Phukan I, Mendoza ME, Ardoin NM, Panikkar B (2018) Seizing opportunities to diversify conservation. Conserv Lett 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12431
Penaluna BE, Arismendi I, Moffitt CM, Penney ZL (2017) Nine proposed action areas to enhance diversity and inclusion in the American Fisheries Society. Fisheries 42(8):399–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/03632415.2017.1345549
Rapp C, Nelson MP, Hadella LC (2022) Gender and ethnic diversity of members of US university natural resource program external advisory board members, 2017-2022 ver 2. Environ Data Initiat. https://doi.org/10.6073/pasta/03c9519fe0dbd918ddd9329127a8fa4d
Rouleau M, Sharik TL, Whitens S, Wellstead A (2017) Enrollment decision-making in U.S. forestry and related natural resource degree programs. Nat Sci Educ 46(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.4195/nse2017.05.0007
Sample V, Alaric RP, Bixler MH, McDonough SH, Bullard, and Mary M. Snieckus. (2015) The promise and performance of forestry education in the United States: results of a survey of forestry employers, graduates, and educators. J For 113(6):528–537. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-122
Sharik TL, Lilieholm RJ, Lindquist W, Richardson WW (2015) Undergraduate enrollment in natural resource programs in the United States: trends, drivers, and implications for the future of natural resource professions. J For 113(6):538–551. https://doi.org/10.5849/jof.14-146
Taylor DE (2015) Gender and racial diversity in environmental organizations: uneven accomplishments and cause for concern. Environ Justice 8(5):165–180. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2015.0018
Taylor DE (2018) Racial and ethnic differences in the students’ readiness, identity, perceptions of institutional diversity, and desire to join the environmental workforce. J Environ Stud Sci 8(2):152–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-017-0447-4
Acknowledgements
Data were provided by the H.J. Andrews Experimental Forest and Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) program, administered cooperatively by Oregon State University, the USDA Forest Service Pacific Northwest Research Station, and the Willamette National Forest.
Funding
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under the grant LTER8 DEB-2025755.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Supplementary information
ESM 1
(DOCX 34 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hadella, L., Rapp, C., Arismendi, I. et al. An examination of race/ethnicity, gender, and employer affiliations on university natural resource program advisory boards. J Environ Stud Sci 13, 668–673 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00852-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00852-7