Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Public money and private interests: United States government contract awardees’ contribution to industrial pollution production

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Point source emissions generated by facilities that have been awarded government contracts raise questions regarding the relationship between the State and industrial facilities, particularly when those facilities’ emissions are disproportionately high. While providing public goods or services, many facilities also produce harmful emissions and toxic waste. We examine whether government contract awardees differ in the amount of hazardous pollution they produce when compared to their non-awardee counterparts. Using facility information from permitted industrial facilities over 12 years, we examine whether awardees produce more pollution than counterpart facilities. We theorize this difference using Louis Althusser’s structural theory of power in which he contends that the State acts above all to reproduce itself through the reinforcement of its economic base and the ruling class. As an economic determinist whose theories heavily engage ideology as a mechanism of control, Althusser’s structural approach provides a framework for understanding the apparatuses and mechanisms through which the State works to maintain power. Through a comparative analysis between proportionate contribution to industrial releases by government contract awardees and non-awardees, we find that awardees contribute to disproportionality within and across industries. In addition, linear mixed model regression methods are used to test whether the associations observed are due to contract awardee status or other variables such as facility size and ownership. We theorize that the act of awarding contracts to the lowest bidder supports the State’s goals but also results in awards being won by facilities with higher pollution production than counterpart facilities within their industrial sector.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Althusser L (2008a) On ideology. Verso

  • Althusser L (2008b) Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (notes towards and investigation). Translated by Ben Brewster. In: Lenin Philos. Other essays. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/althusser/1970/ideology.htm. Accessed 10 Oct 2019

  • Althusser L (2014) On the reproduction of capitalism: ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses. Verso

  • Amadeo K (2019) Current US federal government spending. In: Balanc. https://www.thebalance.com/current-u-s-federal-government-spending-3305763. Accessed 20 May 2019

  • Ash M, Boyce JK (2018) Racial disparities in pollution exposure and employment at US industrial facilities. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115:10636–10641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldi S, Bottasso A, Conti M, Piccardo C (2016) To bid or not to bid: that is the question: public procurement, project complexity and corruption. Eur J Polit Econ 43:89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Softw 67:1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry LM (2007) Inequality in the creation of environmental harm: looking for answers from within. In: Equity and the environment. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp 239–265

  • Berry LM (2008) Inequality in the creation of environmental harm: looking for answers from within. Res Soc Probl Public Policy 15:239–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi X (2017) “Cleansing the air at the expense of waterways?” Empirical evidence from the toxic releases of coal-fired power plants in the United States. J Regul Econ 51:18–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-016-9314-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi X, Khanna M (2012) Reassessment of the impact of the EPA’s voluntary 33/50 program on toxic releases. Land Econ 88:341–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blott J, Boardman N, Cady A, et al (2015) Auction and game theory based recommendations for DOD acquisitions (No. USAFA-AM-14-189). Colorado Springs, CO

  • Buttel FH (2000) Ecological modernization as social theory. Geoforum 31:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins MB, Munoz I, Jaja J (2016) Linking ‘toxic outliers’ to environmental justice communities. Environ Res Lett 11:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  • Croen LA, Shaw GM, Sanbonmatsu L, et al (1997) Maternal residential proximity to hazardous waste sites and risk for selected congenital malformations. Epidemiology 347–354

  • Davidson DJ, Grant D (2012) The double diversion: mapping its roots and projecting its future in environmental studies. J Environ Stud Sci 2:69–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeHoog RH (1990) Competition, negotiation, or cooperation: three models for service contracting. Adm Soc 22:317–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited : institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domhoff GW (2017) The power elite and the state. Routledge

  • Edquist C, Vonortas NS, Zabala-Ituriagagoitia JM, Edler J (2015) Public procurement for innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing

  • EPA (2019) Toxics release inventory. In: Environ. Prot. Agency. https://www.epa.gov/toxics-release-inventory-tri-program

  • Exec.OrderNo13693 (2015) Planning for federal sustainability in the next decade. Federal Register, United States

  • Fox J, Weisberg S (2011) An R companion to applied regression, 2nd edn. Sage

  • Freudenburg WR (2005) Privileged access, privileged accounts: toward a socially structured theory of resources and discourses. Soc Forces 84:89–114. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2005.0096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant D, Jorgenson AK, Longhofer W (2018) Pathways to carbon pollution: the interactive effects of global, political, and organizational factors on power plants’ CO2 emissions. Sociol Sci 5:58–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall S (1985) Signification, representation, ideology: Althusser and the post-structuralist debates. Crit Stud Mass Commun 2:91–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooks G, Smith CL (2005) Treadmills of production and destruction: threats to the environment posed by militarism. Organ Environ 18:19–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026604270453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson AK (2006) Unpacking international power and the ecological footprints of nations: a quantitative cross-national study. Sociol Perspect 48:383–402. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2005.48.3.383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jorgenson AK, Clark B (2009) The Economy, military, and ecologically unequal exchange relationships in comparative perspective: a panel study of the ecological footprints of nations, 1975–2000. Soc Probl 56:621–646. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan N (2018) Public procurement fundamentals: lessons from and for the field. Emerald Publishing Limited

  • Landrigan PJ, Fuller R, Acosta NJR et al (2017) The Lancet Commission on pollution and health. Lancet

  • Legal Information Institute (2019) Federal acquisition regulation. In: Cornell Law Sch. https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/federal_acquisition_regulation. Accessed 2 Oct 2019

  • Lewis G, Bajari P (2014) Moral hazard, incentive contracts, and risk: evidence from procurement. Rev Econ Stud 81:1201–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Chan CG (2016) Who Pollutes ? Ownership type and environmental performance of Chinese firms of Chinese firms. J Contemp China 25:248–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2015.1075718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan JR, Molotch H (2007) Urban fortunes: The political economy of place. Unversity of California Press

  • Malarvizhi P, Matta R (2016) “Link between Corporate Environmental Disclosure and Firm Performance”–perception or reality? Br Account Rev 36:107–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangiafico S (2019) rcompanion: functions to support extension education program evaluation

  • Marx K (1976) Capital Volume 1. Vintage, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Maung M, Wilson C, Tang X (2016) Political connections and industrial pollution: evidence based on state ownership and environmental levies in China. J Bus Ethics 138:649–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McAfee RP, McMillan J (1986) Bidding for contracts : a principal-agent analysis. RAND J Econ 17:326–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills CW (1956) The power elite. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohai P, Pellow D, Roberts JT (2009) Environmental justice. Annu Rev Environ Resour 34:405–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mol AP, Sonnenfeld DA (2014) Ecological modernisation around the world: perspectives and critical debates Title. Routledge

  • OECD (2003) The environmental performance of public procurement.

  • Rainville A (2017) Standards in green public procurement--a framework to enhance innovation. J Clean Prod 167:1029–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson Galli AM, Collins MB (2019) Super emitters in the United States coal-fired electric utility industry: comparing disproportionate emissions across facilities and parent companies. Environ Sociol 5:70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savabieasfahani M, Ahamadani FB, Damghani AM (2020) Living near an active US military base in Iraq is associated with significantly higher hair thorium and increased likelihood of congenital anomalies in infants and children. Environ Pollut 256:113070

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg A (1980) The environment: from surplus to scarcity. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnaiberg A, Gould KA (2000) Environment and society: the enduring conflict. Blackburn Press

  • Schnaiberg A, Pellow DN, Weinberg A (2002) The treadmill of production and the environmental state. In: The environmetnal state under pressure. Emerald Publishing Limited, pp 15–32

  • Sherman DON, Andrew G (2002) Organizational size and pollution : the case of the U.S. Chemical Industry. Am Sociol Rev 67:389–407

  • Stern PC (1993) A second environmental science: human-environment interactions. Science (80- ) 260:1897–1899

  • Sun X, Huang R (2016) Extension of state-led growth coalition and grassroots management: a case study of Shanghai. Urban Aff Rev 52:917–943. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087415605187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor D (2014) Toxic communities: environmental racism, industrial pollution, and residential mobility. NYU Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls D (2015) National Establishment Time-Series (NETS) database: database description. www.youreconomy.org/nets/NETSDatabaseDescription.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2019

  • Wang H, Jin Y (2007) Industrial ownership and environmental performance: evidence from China. Environ Resour Econ 36:255–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9027-x

  • West BT, Welch KB, Galecki AT (2015) Linear mixed models: a practical guide using statistical software, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research presented in this paper was made possible in part by funding from the National Science Foundation grant number 1534976.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Environmental Medicine and Informatics, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    Dustin T. Hill & Mary B. Collins

  2. Department of Environmental Studies, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 106 Marshall Hall, 1 Forestry Drive, Syracuse, NY, 13210, USA

    Elizabeth S. Vidon

Authors
  1. Dustin T. Hill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth S. Vidon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mary B. Collins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dustin T. Hill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hill, D.T., Vidon, E.S. & Collins, M.B. Public money and private interests: United States government contract awardees’ contribution to industrial pollution production. J Environ Stud Sci 10, 213–225 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-020-00614-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-020-00614-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation