Abstract
Background
Vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) is a rare disease with a poor prognosis. To date, there’s no proper in vitro modeling system for VSCC to study its pathogenesis or for drug evaluation.
Methods
We established healthy vulvar (HV)- and VSCC-like 3D full thickness models (FTMs) to observe the tumor-stroma interaction and their applicability for chemotherapeutic efficacy examination. VSCC-FTMs were developed by seeding VSCC tumor cell lines (A431 and HTB117) onto dermal matrices harboring two NF subtypes namely papillary fibroblasts (PFs) and reticular fibroblasts (RFs), or cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) while HV-FTMs were constructed with primary keratinocytes and fibroblasts isolated from HV tissues.
Results
HV-FTMs highly resembled HV tissues in terms of epidermal morphogenesis, basement membrane formation and collagen deposition. When the dermal compartment shifted from PFs to RFs or CAFs in VSCC-FTMs, tumor cells demonstrated more proliferation, EMT induction and stemness. In contrast to PFs, RFs started to lose their phenotype and express robust CAF-markers α-SMA and COL11A1 under tumor cell signaling induction, indicating a favored ‘RF-to-CAF’ transition in VSCC tumor microenvironment (TME). Additionally, chemotherapeutic treatment with carboplatin and paclitaxel resulted in a significant reduction in tumor-load and invasion in VSCC-FTMs.
Conclusion
We successfully developed in vitro 3D vulvar models mimicking both healthy and tumorous conditions which serve as a promising tool for vulvar drug screening programs. Moreover, healthy fibroblasts demonstrate heterogeneity in terms of CAF-activation in VSCC TME which brings insights in the future development of novel CAF-based therapeutic strategies in VSCC.
Graphic abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
A. Tan, A.K. Bieber, J.A. Stein, M.K. Pomeranz, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol. 81, 1387–1396 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.07.055
K.N. Gaarenstroom, G.G. Kenter, J.B. Trimbos, I. Agous, F. Amant, A.A. Peters, I. Vergote, Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 13, 522–527 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.2003.13304.x
L.S. Nooij, F.A. Brand, K.N. Gaarenstroom, C.L. Creutzberg, J.A. de Hullu, M.I. van Poelgeest, Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 106, 1–13 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.07.007
G. Biffi, D.A. Tuveson, Physiol. Rev. 101, 147–176 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00048.2019
D.T. Woodley, Dermatol. Clin. 35, 95–100 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.det.2016.07.004
H. Dongre, N. Rana, S. Fromreide, S. Rajthala, I. Bøe Engelsen, J. Paradis, J.S. Gutkind, O.K. Vintermyr, A.C. Johannessen, L. Bjørge, D.E. Costea, Exp. Cell. Res. 386, 111684 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.111684
K. Lõhmussaar, M. Boretto, H. Clevers, Trends Cancer 6, 1031–1043 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trecan.2020.07.007
N.E. Sharpless, R.A. Depinho, Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 5, 741–754 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2110
J. Chollet, F. Mermelstein, S.C. Rocamboli, D.R. Friend, Int. J. Pharm. 570, 118691 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2019.118691
H.T. Nguyen-Xuan, R. Montero Macias, H. Bonsang-Kitzis, M. Deloménie, C. Ngô, M. Koual, A.S. Bats, M. Hivelin, F. Lécuru, V. Balaya, J. Gynecol. Obstet. Hum. Reprod. 50, 101768 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101768
S. Commandeur, S.J. Sparks, H.L. Chan, L. Gao, J.J. Out, N.A. Gruis, R. van Doorn, A. El Ghalbzouri, Melanoma Res. 24, 305–314 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1097/cmr.0000000000000079
V. van Drongelen, E.M. Haisma, J.J. Out-Luiting, P.H. Nibbering, A. El Ghalbzouri, Clin. Exp. Allergy 44, 1515–1524 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12443
A. El Ghalbzouri, R. Siamari, R. Willemze, M. Ponec, Toxicol. In Vitro 22, 1311–1320 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2008.03.012
R.S. Raktoe, M.H. Rietveld, J.J. Out-Luiting, M. Kruithof-de Julio, P.P. van Zuijlen, R. van Doorn, A.E. Ghalbzouri, Scars Burn Heal 6, 2059513120908857 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059513120908857
J.A. Bouwstra, R.W.J. Helder, A.E. Ghalbzouri, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 175, 113802 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2021.05.012
D. Janson, G. Saintigny, C. Mahé, A.E. Ghalbzouri, Exp. Dermatol. 22, 48–53 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/exd.12069
S. Wu, M. Rietveld, M. Hogervorst, F. de Gruijl, S. van der Burg, M. Vermeer, R. van Doorn, M. Welters, A. El Ghalbzouri, Int. J. Mol. Sci. 23, 11651 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms231911651
N. Scola, T. Gambichler, H. Saklaoui, F.G. Bechara, D. Georgas, M. Stücker, R. Gläser, A. Kreuter, Br. J. Dermatol. 167, 591–597 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11110.x
M. Sadrkhanloo, M. Entezari, S. Orouei, M. Ghollasi, N. Fathi, S. Rezaei, E.S. Hejazi, A. Kakavand, H. Saebfar, M. Hashemi, M. Goharrizi, S. Salimimoghadam, M. Rashidi, A. Taheriazam, S. Samarghandian, Pharmacol. Res. 182, 106311 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2022.106311
A. Waseem, B. Dogan, N. Tidman, Y. Alam, P. Purkis, S. Jackson, A. Lalli, M. Machesney, I.M. Leigh, J. Invest. Dermatol. 112, 362–369 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00535.x
I.M. Freedberg, M. Tomic-Canic, M. Komine, M. Blumenberg, J. Invest. Dermatol. 116, 633–640 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2001.01327.x
R. Moll, W.W. Franke, D.L. Schiller, B. Geiger, R. Krepler, Cell 31, 11–24 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(82)90400-7
O.H. Kwon, J.L. Park, M. Kim, J.H. Kim, H.C. Lee, H.J. Kim, S.M. Noh, K.S. Song, H.S. Yoo, S.G. Paik, S.Y. Kim, Y.S. Kim, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 406, 539–545 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.02.082
H. Zhang, Y.Z. Pan, M. Cheung, M. Cao, C. Yu, L. Chen, L. Zhan, Z.W. He, C.Y. Sun, Cell Death Dis. 10, 230 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-019-1320-z
M. Tran, P. Rousselle, P. Nokelainen, S. Tallapragada, N.T. Nguyen, E.F. Fincher, M.P. Marinkovich, Cancer Res. 68, 2885–2894 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.Can-07-6160
D. Nassar, C. Blanpain, Annu. Rev. Pathol. 11, 47–76 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-pathol-012615-044438
S. Chen, M. Takahara, M. Kido, S. Takeuchi, H. Uchi, Y. Tu, Y. Moroi, M. Furue, Br. J. Dermatol. 159, 952–955 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2008.08731.x
M.P. Gomez Hernandez, A.M. Bates, E.E. Starman, E.A. Lanzel, C. Comnick, X.J. Xie, K.A. Brogden, Antibiot. (Basel). 8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics8040161
Y. Du, Y. Yang, W. Zhang, C. Yang, P. Xu, Transl. Oncol. 27, 101582 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranon.2022.101582
M. Hogervorst, M. Rietveld, F. de Gruijl, A. El Ghalbzouri, Br. J. Cancer. 118, 1089–1097 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-018-0024-y
J.P. Thiery, Nat. Rev. Cancer 2, 442–454 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc822
Z. Abdulrahman, K.E. Kortekaas, P.J. De Vos Van Steenwijk, S.H. Van Der Burg, M.I. Van Poelgeest, Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 18, 1223–1233 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/14712598.2018.1542426
K. Räsänen, A. Vaheri, Exp. Cell Res. 316, 2713–2722 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2010.04.032
P.O. Witteveen, J. van der Velden, I. Vergote, C. Guerra, C. Scarabeli, C. Coens, G. Demonty, N. Reed, Ann. Oncol. 20, 1511–1516 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdp043
S.N. Han, I. Vergote, F. Amant, Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 22, 865–868 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0b013e31824b4058
H. Wang, P.C. Brown, E.C.Y. Chow, L. Ewart, S.S. Ferguson, S. Fitzpatrick, B.S. Freedman, G.L. Guo, W. Hedrich, S. Heyward, J. Hickman, N. Isoherranen, A.P. Li, Q. Liu, S.M. Mumenthaler, J. Polli, W.R. Proctor, A. Ribeiro, J.Y. Wang, R.L. Wange, S.M. Huang, Clin. Transl. Sci. 14, 1659–1680 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.13066
S. Breslin, L. O’Driscoll, Drug Discov. Today 18, 240–249 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2012.10.003
K. Dame, A.J. Ribeiro, Exp. Biol. Med. (Maywood) 246, 317–331 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1535370220959598
S.N. Ooft, F. Weeber, K.K. Dijkstra, C.M. McLean, S. Kaing, E. van Werkhoven, L. Schipper, L. Hoes, D.J. Vis, J. van de Haar, W. Prevoo, P. Snaebjornsson, D. van der Velden, M. Klein, M. Chalabi, H. Boot, M. van Leerdam, H.J. Bloemendal, L.V. Beerepoot, L. Wessels, E. Cuppen, H. Clevers, E.E. Voest, Sci. Transl. Med. 11, eaay2574 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.aay2574
K.E. Kortekaas, S.J. Santegoets, L. Tas, I. Ehsan, P. Charoentong, H.C. van Doorn, M.I.E. van Poelgeest, D.A.M. Mustafa, S.H. van der Burg, J. Immunother Cancer 9, e003671 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2021-003671
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the Roosevelt Clinics and the Dermatology department of the LUMC for providing fresh vulvar tissues. The authors thank the donors of the Bontiusstichting (project 8222–32146) of the Leiden University Medical Center for their financial contribution. The authors would also like to thank China Scholarship Council (CSC) for supporting the stay of Shidi Wu in the Netherlands. Graphic abstract, Figs. 1a and 2a were created with BioRender.com.
Funding
This study was partially funded by the Bontiusstichting (project 8222–32146).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: S.W., B.H, M.P. and A.E.G. Investigation and formal analysis: S.W., B.H and M.R. Writing-original draft preparation: S.W. and B.H. Writing-review and editing: M.P., A.E.G., M.V., and R.R. Supervision: M.P., A.E.G, M.V., and R.R. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Declaration of Helsinki principles were followed during the obtainment of primary cells from human skin originating from surplus breast tissue, vulvar labial tissue and cutaneous tumor biopsies. All subjects remained anonymous. Experiments were conducted in accordance with article 7:467 of the Dutch Law on Medical Treatment Agreement and the Code for Proper Use of Human Tissue of the Dutch Federation of Biomedical Scientific Societies (https://www.federa.org). According to this national legislation, surplus tissue can be used for scientific research purposes when no written objection is made by the informed donor. Therefore, additional approval of an ethics committee regarding the scientific use of surplus tissue was not obligatory.
Consent for publication
For the manuscript solitary tissue of anonymous donors was used, no individual person’s data was included.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Shidi Wu and Bertine W. Huisman contributed equally to this work, shared first authorship.
Supplementary information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(DOCX 2.67 MB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, S., Huisman, B.W., Rietveld, M.H. et al. The development of in vitro organotypic 3D vulvar models to study tumor-stroma interaction and drug efficacy. Cell Oncol. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-023-00902-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13402-023-00902-w