Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The optimization of in-situ tar reduction and syngas production on a 60-kW three-staged biomass gasification system: theoretical and practical approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to develop more efficient biomass thermochemical conversion technology, a 60-kW three-staged biomass gasification system was constructed, and pinewood was used as material to investigate the effect of key influential factors on gasifier operation. Results show that the tar yield in pyrolysis stage was around 43,023 mg/Nm3, which was mainly consisted of primary tar compounds, such as acids, furans, and phenols. Sum of phenols compounds account for about 50.1% of total tar compounds. With the increase of excess air coefficient, the temperature of char-bed was improved, which benefited the reduction reactions in char bed. At ER = 0.35, the operation of the gasifier achieved an optimization value: gasification efficiency, carbon conversion rate, and tar yield were 76.77%, 81.91%, and 99 mg/Nm3 respectively. Subsequently, a 3D CFD (computational fluid dynamics) model of the throat section was built. Six kinds of air injection styles were designed and simulated. Results show that tangential air blow with reasonable angle (θ = 30° in this work) improves the flow field in the furnace and eliminate flow stagnation zone near the wall, which benefits the tar cracking in the throat section.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bridgwater A (1995) The technical and economic feasibility of biomass gasification for power generation. Fuel 74(5):631–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(95)00001-l

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Czernik S, Bridgwater A (2004) Overview of applications of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Energy Fuel 18(2):590–598. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef034067u

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bridgwater A (2003) Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chem Eng J 91(2):87–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1385-8947(02)0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vreugdenhil B, Zwart R, Neeft JPA (2009) Tar formation in pyrolysis and gasification. ECN. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264090579_Tar_formation_in_pyrolysis_and_gasification

  5. Han J, Kim H (2008) The reduction and control technology of tar during biomass gasification/pyrolysis: an overview. Renew Sust Energ Rev 12(2):397–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2006.07.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zwart R, van der Heijden S, Emmen R, Dall Bentzen J, Ahrenfeldt J, Stoholm P, Krogh J (2010) Tar removal from low-temperature gasifiers. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands (ECN) https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/4974583/Tar%20removal%20from.pdf

  7. Fjellerup J, Ahrenfeldt J, Henriksen U, Gøbel B (2005) Formation, decomposition and cracking of biomass tars in gasification. Technical University of Denmark. Department of Mechanical Engineering. https://orbit.dtu.dk/files/3220398/pyrotar2.pdf

  8. Beaty P Nexterra-gasification of bark–a pragmatic development roadmap for gasification. In: TAPPI 2007 International Conference on Renewable Energy, May, 2007. pp 10–11

  9. Neubert M, Reil S, Wolff M, Pöcher D, Stork H, Ultsch C, Meiler M, Messer J, Kinzler L, Dillig M (2017) Experimental comparison of solid phase adsorption (SPA), activated carbon test tubes and tar protocol (DIN CEN/TS 15439) for tar analysis of biomass derived syngas. Biomass Bioenergy 105:443–452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2017.08.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Simell P, Ståhlberg P, Kurkela E, Albrecht J, Deutsch S, Sjöström K (2000) Provisional protocol for the sampling and anlaysis of tar and particulates in the gas from large-scale biomass gasifiers. Version 1998. Biomass Bioenergy 18(1):19–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0961-9534(99)00064-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Su Y, Luo Y, Chen Y, Wu W, Zhang Y (2011) Experimental and numerical investigation of tar destruction under partial oxidation environment. Fuel Process Technol 92(8):1513–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2011.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brandt P, Larsen E, Henriksen U (2000) High tar reduction in a two-stage gasifier. Energy Fuel 14(4):816–819. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef990182m

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Henriksen U, Ahrenfeldt J, Jensen TK, Gøbel B, Bentzen JD, Hindsgaul C, Sørensen LH (2006) The design, construction and operation of a 75 kW two-stage gasifier. Energy 31(10–11):1542–1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2005.05.031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kan T, Strezov V, Evans TJ (2016) Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis: a review of product properties and effects of pyrolysis parameters. Renew Sust Energ Rev 57:1126–1140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang S, Dai G, Yang H, Luo Z (2017) Lignocellulosic biomass pyrolysis mechanism: a state-of-the-art review. Prog Energy Combust Sci 62:33–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.05.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bu Q, Lei H, Zacher AH, Wang L, Ren S, Liang J, Wei Y, Liu Y, Tang J, Zhang Q (2012) A review of catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived phenols from biomass pyrolysis. Bioresour Technol 124:470–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.08.089

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Amen-Chen C, Pakdel H, Roy C (2001) Production of monomeric phenols by thermochemical conversion of biomass: a review. Bioresour Technol 79(3):277–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-8524(00)0018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. El-Rub ZA, Bramer EA, Brem G (2008) Experimental comparison of biomass chars with other catalysts for tar reduction. Fuel 87(10–11):2243–2252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2008.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shen Y (2015) Chars as carbonaceous adsorbents/catalysts for tar elimination during biomass pyrolysis or gasification. Renew Sust Energ Rev 43:281–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Philopp Morf PH, Nussbaumer T (2002) Mechanisms and kinetics of homogeneous secondary reactions of tar from continuous pyrolysis of wood chips. Fuel 81:843–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00216-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jess A (1995) Reaktionskinetische Untersuchungen zur thermischen Zersetzung von Modellkohlenwasserstoffen. Erdol Erdgas Kohle 111(11):479–484

    Google Scholar 

  22. Duffy NT, Eaton JA (2013) Investigation of factors affecting channelling in fixed-bed solid fuel combustion using CFD. Combustion and flame 160(10):2204–2220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.04.01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bryden KMRK (1996) Numerical modeling of a deep, fixed bed combustor. Energy Fuel 10:269–275. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef950193p

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Westbrook CKDF (1984) Chemical kinetic modeling of hydrocarbon combustion. Prog Energy Combust Sci 10:1–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(84)90118-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. DONGHOON SHINSC (2000) The combustion of simulated waste particles in a fixed bed. Combustion and Flame 121(1–2):167–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-2180(99)0012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. RPL WPJ (1988) Global reaction schemes for hydrocarbon combustion. Combustion and Flame 73(233–249). https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(88)90021

  27. Blasi CD (2000) Dynamic behaviour of stratied downdraft gasiers. Chem Eng Sci 55:2931–2944. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2509(99)00562-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Biba VMJ, Klose E, Malecha J (1978) Mathematical model for the gasification of coal under pressure. Ind Eng Chem Process Des Dev 17:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1021/i260065a017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Jess A (1996) Mechanisms and kinetics of thermal reactions of aromatic hydrocarbons from pyrolysis of solid fuels. Fuel 75(12):1441–1448. https://doi.org/10.1016/0016-2361(96)00136-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by Science Foundation of Nanjing Institute of Technology (YKJ201813) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51706094).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nanjing Institute of Technology, Nanjing, China

    Shanhui Zhao, Xiaolong Bi & Xiaojun Pan

  2. Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

    Shanhui Zhao, Yi Su & Wenguang Wu

Authors
  1. Shanhui Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaolong Bi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xiaojun Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Su
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Wenguang Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shanhui Zhao.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhao, S., Bi, X., Pan, X. et al. The optimization of in-situ tar reduction and syngas production on a 60-kW three-staged biomass gasification system: theoretical and practical approach. Biomass Conv. Bioref. 11, 1835–1846 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00536-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00536-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation