Abstract
Differing research worldviews have typically resulted in interpretations at odds with one another. Yet, leveraging distinct perspectives can lead to novel interpretations and theoretical construction. Via an empirically grounded research commentary, we describe the value of such activity through the lens of previously reported findings. This synthesis of research from dissimilar scholarly traditions is one example of how paradigms in related but sometimes disconnected fields were used to provide a more comprehensive model of foundational numeracy development. While critique and skepticism may be valuable scholarly tools, we argue that such practices should be balanced with openness and belief towards ideas from worldviews different than our own. This balance can provide new and creative interpretations and extend our collective research power.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arzarello, F., Bosch, M., Lenfant, A., & Prediger, S. (2007). Different theoretical perspectives in research from teaching problems to research problems. In D. Pitta-Pantazi, G. Phillipou, et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 5) (pp. 1618–1627). Cyprus: ERME.
Brownell, W. A. (1947). The place of meaning in the teaching of arithmetic. Elementary School Journal, 47(5), 256–265.
Carpenter, T. P. (1985). Toward a theory of construction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 70–76.
Chen, Z., & Siegler, R. S. (2000). Overlapping waves theory. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 65(2), 7–11.
Clements, D. H. (1989). Review: consensus, more or less. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 111–119.
Clements, D. H. (1999). Subitizing: what is it? Why teach it? Teaching Children Mathematics, 5(7), 400–405.
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: the learning trajectories approach. New York: Routledge.
Cobb, P., Yackel, E., & Wood, T. (1992). A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 23(1), 2–33.
Erickson, F. (2006). Definition and analysis of data from videotape: some research procedures and their rationales. In J. L. Green, G. Camilli, P. B. Elmore, A. Skukauskaite, & E. Grace (Eds.), Handbook of complementary methods in education research (pp. 177–192). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Fazio, L. K., DeWolf, M., & Siegler, R. S. (2016). Strategy use and strategy choice in fraction magnitude comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 42(1), 1–16.
Fosnot, C., & Dolk, M. (2001). Young mathematicians at work: constructing number sense, addition and subtraction. Portsmouth: Heinemann.
Fuson, K. C. (1982). An analysis of the counting—on solution procedure in addition. In T. P. Carpenter, J. M. Moser, & T. A. Romberg (Eds.), Addition and subtraction: a cognitive perspective (pp. 67–81). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Fuson, K. C. (1988). Children’s counting and concepts of number. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Fuson, K. C., Richards, J., & Briars, D. J. (1982). The acquisition and elaboration of the number word sequence. In C. J. Brainerd (Ed.), Children’s logical and mathematical cognition (pp. 33–92). New York: Springer.
Fuson, K. C., Secada, W. G., & Hall, J. W. (1983). Matching, counting, and conservation of numerical equivalence. Child Development, 54(1), 91–97.
Fuson, K. C., Pergament, G. G., & Lyons, B. G. (1985). Collection terms and preschoolers’ use of the cardinality rule. Cognitive Psychology, 17(6), 1429–1436.
Gallistel, C. R., & Gelman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44(1/2), 43–74.
Gelman, R., & Gallistel, C. R. (1978). The child’s understanding of number. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gelman, R., & Meck, E. (1983). Preschoolers counting: principles before skill. Cognition, 13(3), 343–359.
Gelman, R., & Tucker, M. F. (1975). Further investigations of the young child’s conception of number. Child Development, 46(1), 167–175.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of the grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Groen, G. J., & Parkman, J. M. (1972). A chronometric analysis of simple addition. Psychological Review, 79(4), 329–343.
Ilg, F., & Ames, L. B. (1951). Developmental trends in arithmetic. Journal of Genetic Pschology, 79(1), 3–28.
Karp, A., & Schubring, G. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook on the history of mathematics education. New York: Springer.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1980). Image and mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Mental images and the brain. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3/4), 333–347.
Moschkovich, J. N., & Brenner, M. E. (2000). Integrating a naturalistic paradigm into research on mathematics and science cognition and learning. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 457–486). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Olive, J. (2001). Children's number sequences: an explanation of Steffe's constructs and an extrapolation to rational numbers of arithmetic. The Mathematics Educator, 11(1), 4–9.
Piaget, J. (1952). The child 's concept of number. London: Routledge.
Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: first steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM, 40(2), 165–178.
Putnam, H. (1988). Representation and reality. Cambridge: Bradford.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1974). What the mind’s eye tells the mind’s brain: a critique of mental imagery. In J. M. Nichols (Ed.), Images, perceptions, and knowledge (pp. 1–36). New York: Springer.
Pylyshyn, Z. W. (2002). Mental imagery: In search of a theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(2), 157–238.
Rathgeb-Schnierer, E., & Green, M. (2013). Flexibility in mental calculation in elementary students from different math classes. In B. Ubuz, C. Haser, & M. A. Mariotti (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 353–362). Ankara: Middle East Technical University.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of our nature. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Seigler, R. S. (2000). The rebirth of children's learning. Child Development, 71(1), 26–35.
Siegler, R. S. (1987). Strategy choices in subtraction. In J. A. Sloboda & D. Rogers (Eds.), Cognitive processes in mathematics (pp. 81–106). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Siegler, R. S. (1994). Cognitive variability: a key to understanding cognitive development. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 3(1), 1–5.
Siegler, R.S. & Crowley, K. (1994). Constraints on nonprivileged domains. Cognitive Psychology, 27(2), 194-226.
Siegler, R. S. (2006). Microgenetic analyses of learning. In D. Kuhn, R. S. Siegler, W. Damon, & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Vol. 2. Cognition, perception, and language (6th ed., pp. 464–510). Hoboken: Wiley.
Siegler, R. S., & Robinson, M. (1982). The development of numerical understandings. In H. W. Reese & L. P. Lipsett (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 16, pp. 242–312). New York: Academic Press.
Siegler, R. S., & Shrager, J. (1984). Strategy choices in addition and subtraction: How do children know what to do? In C. Sophian (Ed.), The origins of cognitive skills (pp. 229–293). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Smith, T. M., Cobb, P., Farran, D. C., Cordray, D. S., & Munter, C. (2013). Evaluating Math Recovery: assessing the causal impact of a diagnostic tutoring program on student achievement. American Education Research Journal, 50(2), 397–428.
Sophian, C. (2007). The origins of mathematical knowledge in childhood. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steffe, L. (1992). Learning stages in the construction of the number sequence. In J. Bideaud, C. Meljac, & J. Fischer (Eds.), Pathways to number: children’s developing numerical abilities (pp. 83–88). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Steffe, L. P. (2013). Establishing mathematics education as an academic field: a constructive odyssey. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(2), 354–370.
Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: underlying principles and essential elements. In A. E. Kelly & R. A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267–307). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Steffe, L. P., von Glasersfeld, E., Richards, J., & Cobb, P. (1983). Children’s counting types: philosophy, theory, and application. New York: Praeger Scientific.
Steffe, L. P., Cobb, P., & von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Construction of arithmetical meanings and strategies. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Svenson, O., & Sjöberg, K. (1983). Evolution of cognitive processes for solving simple additions during the first three school years. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 24(1), 117–124.
Thomas, J. & Tabor, P.D. (2012). Developing Quantitative Mental Imagery. Teaching Children Mathematics, 19(3), 174-183.
Thomas, J. & Harkness, S. S. (2013). Implications for intervention: Categorizing the quantitative mental imagery of children. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 25(2), 231-256.
Thomas, J. & Harkness, S.S. (2016). Patterns of Non-verbal Social Interaction within Intensive Mathematics Intervention Contexts. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(2), 277-302.
Thomas, J., Tabor, P. D., & Wright, R. J. (2010). Three aspects of first-graders' number knowledge: Observations and instructional implications. Teaching Children Mathematics, 17 (5), 299-308.
Thompson, P. W. (1979). The Soviet-style teaching experiment in mathematics education. Paper presented at the Annual Research Meeting of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Boston, MA.
Thompson, P. W. (1982). Were lions to speak, we wouldn't understand. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 3(2), 147–165.
Threlfall, J. (2002). Flexible mental calculation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(1), 29–47.
Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2016). Elementary and middle school mathematics: teaching developmentally (9th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Wirszup, I., & Kilpatrick, J. (Eds.). (1975). Soviet studies in the psychology of mathematics education (Vol. 1-14). Palo Alto and Reston: School Mathematics Study Group and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Wright, R. J. (1994). A study of the numerical development of 5-year-olds and 6-year-olds. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(1), 25–44.
Wright, R.J., Ellemor-Collins, D. (2016). The Learning Framework in Number: Pedagogical Tools for Assessment and Instruction. London: Paul Chapman Publications/Sage.
Wright, R. J., Martland, J., Stafford, A., & Stanger, G. (2002). Teaching number: advancing children’s skills and strategies. London: Paul Chapman Publications/Sage.
Wright, R. J., Martland, J., & Stafford, A. (2006). Early numeracy: assessment for teaching and intervention (2nd ed.). London: Paul Chapman publications/Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomas, J.N., Harkness, S.S. Tethering towards number: synthesizing cognitive variability and stage-oriented development in children’s arithmetic thinking. Math Ed Res J 31, 325–347 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-00256-9
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-00256-9