Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Issues of professionalism and teachers: critical observations from research and the literature

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The concept of ‘professionalism’ has become more evident in discourse about teacher quality in recent years. In fact, in some contexts ‘professionalism’ is used as a euphemism for quality and reform. This critical essay applies a critical theory perspective and discusses notions of educational professionalism from the academic literature. It draws on research findings about teachers’ understandings of the diverse ways the term ‘professionalism’ is used in discussions of teacher quality, and highlights three key assumptions that appear to underpin contemporary ‘professionalism’ discourses. It suggests that the reification of ‘professionalism’ may have had a number of regrettable consequences for teachers, and challenges the apparent lack of evidence that links ‘professionalism’, however it might be defined, with quality educational outcomes. The essay concludes by arguing that the emergence of ‘professionalism’ as a signifier of quality has served to obscure and confuse many other important issues concerning the quality of teaching.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Participants in this study were assigned pseudonyms .

References

  • Anyon, J. (2009). Theory and educational research: Toward critical social explanation. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. W. (1995). Education and power (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.

  • Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2011). National assessment program literacy and numeracy: 2011 summary report. Sydney, NSW: Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA). Retrieved from http://www.nap.edu.au/Test_Results/National_reports/index.html. Accessed 14 Feb 2013.

  • Australian Government Department of Education Employment and Workplace Relations. (2009). Belonging, being and becoming: The early years learning framework for Australia. Barton, ACT: Commonwealth of Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Government Productivity Commission. (2012). Schools workforce. Canberra ACT: www.pc.gov.au. Accessed 6 June 2013.

  • Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership [AITSL]. (2011). National professional standards for teachers. Education Services Australia: Retrived from http://www.teacherstandards.aitsl.edu.au/.  Accessed 5 July 2013.

  • Avalos, B. (1997). Professionalism and empowerment for teachers: Views and experiences. In K. Watson, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Teachers, teacher education and training: Educational dilemmas: Debates and diversity (Vol. 1, pp. 68–84). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in ‘Teaching and Teacher Education’ over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0742051X0710001. Accessed 19 Oct 2012.

  • Berliner, D. C., & Biddle, B. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (1996). Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity: Theory, research, critique. London, UK: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, P. (1998). Breaking some of the myths—again. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 21(1), 8–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruder, M. B., Mogro-Wilson, C., Stayton, V. D., & Dietrich, S. L. (2009). The national status of in-service professional development systems for early intervention and early childhood special education practitioners. Infants and Young Children, 22(1), 13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charmez, K. (2002). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509–535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (1996). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes: teacher stories-stories of teachers-school stories-stories of schools. Educational Researcher, 25(3), 24–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. (2012). Minding the P’s: Passion in professionalism in early childhood education in Aotearoa New Zealand. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 13(4), 344–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. (2013). Early childhood grows up: Towards a critical ecology of the profession. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 33(2), 205–206. doi:10.1080/09575146.2013.790641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, T. B. (1995). Helping teachers teach well: Transforming professional development. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/CPRE/t61/. Accessed 07 Feb 2011.

  • Dalli, C., & Urban, M. (2013). Introduction. In C. Dalli & M. Urban (Eds.), Professionalism in early childhood education and care: International perspectives (pp. 1–4). London UK: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2010). The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L., & Lieberman, A. (2012). Teacher education around the world: Changing policies and practices. London UK: Routledge Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, C., & Sachs, J. (2004). International handbook on the continuing professional development of teachers. Berkshire, GBR: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education Science and Training [DEST]. (2002). Australian government quality teacher programme. Retrieved from http://www.qualityteaching.dest.gov.au/Content/. Accesssed 01 Nov 2006.

  • Dinham, S., Ingvarson, L., & Kleinhenz, E. (2008). Time for a national approach to teacher quality. Australian policy online http://apo.org.au/commentary/time-national-approach-teacher-quality. Accessed 10 Nov 2013.

  • Dinham, S. (Feb 28th 2013). The Annual Phillip Hughes Oration. The quality teaching movement in Australia: Losing our confidence,losing our way and getting back on track, ACT Branch of ACE, Canberra. Retrieved from http://austcolled.com.au/article/2013-annual-phillip-hughes-oration.  Accessed 18 Aug 2014.

  • Duhn, I. (2011). Towards professionalism/s. In L. Miller & C. Cable (Eds.), Professionalization, leadership and management in the early years (pp. 133–146). London, UK: Sage.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L. (2008). Professionals, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenech, M., Sumsion, J., & Shepherd, W. (2010). Promoting early childhood teacher professionalism in the Australian context: The place of resistance. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(1), 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (2007). Daring to dream: Towards a pedagogy of the unfinished [Organised and presented by Ana Maraujo Freire] (A. K Oliveira, Trans.). Boulder CO: Paradigm Publishers.

  • Fullan, M. (2008). The six secrets of change: What the best leaders do to help their organisations survive and thrive. San Francisco, CA: Josey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodson, I. F. (2000). Professional knowledge and the teacher’s life and work. In C. Day, A. Fernandez, T. E. Hague, & J. Moller (Eds.), The life and work of teachers: International perspective in changing times (pp. 13–25). London: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, I. (2009). The production of Australian professional development policy texts as a site of contest: The case of the federal quality teacher programme. The Australian Educational Researcher, 36(1), 73–88. doi:10.1007/bf03216893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, I., & Boyle, C. (2011). My school? Critiquing the abstraction and quantification of education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 39(3), 211–222. doi:10.1080/1359866X.2011.588312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school New York. NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves, A., & Shirley, D. (2009). The fourth way. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A. (1997). The deprofessionalization and deskilling of teachers. In K. Watson, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Teachers, teacher education and training: Educational dilemmas: Debate and diversity (Vol. 1, pp. 57–65). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, D., Klopper, A., Osanyin, A., & Vanderlee, M.-L. (2012). ‘It’s more than care’: Early childhood educators’ concepts of professionalism. Early Years: An International Research Journal, 33(1), 4–17. doi:10.1080/09575146.2012.667394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helterbran, V. R. (2008). Professionalism: Teachers taking the reins. The Clearing House, 81(3), 123–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilferty, F. (2008). Teacher professionalism and cultural diversity: Skills, knowledge and values for a changing Australia. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(3), 53–70. doi:10.1007/bf03246289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hindess, B. (1996). Discourses of power: From Hobbes to Foucault. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyle, E. (1997). Teaching as a profession. In K. Watson, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Teachers, teacher education and training: Educational dilemmas: Debate and diversity (pp. 47–56). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hursh, D. (2000). Neoliberalism and the control of teachers, students and learning: The rise of standards, standardization and accountability [online journal]. Retrieved from http://eserver.org/clogic/4-1/hursh.html.  Accessed 27 June 2009.

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2003a). Teacher accountability and control in schools [draft paper]. Retrieved from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/bota/Ingersoll_paper.pdf. Accessed 28 Oct 2008.

  • Ingersoll, R. M. (2003b). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarson, L. (1998). Teaching standards: Foundations for professional development reform. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.), Educational change (Vol. 2, pp. 1006–1031). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingvarson, L., Elliott, A., Kleinhenz, E., & McKenzie, P. (2006). Teacher education accreditation: A review of the national and international trends and practices. Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) http://research.acer.edu.au/teacher_education/1. Accessed 21 Oct 2014.

  • Johnson, B., Down, B., Rosie, L. C., Peters, J., Sullivan, A., Pearce, J., & Hunter, J. (2010). Conditions that support early career teacher resilience. Paper presented at the Australian Teacher Education Association June 2010, Townsville, QLD. Retrieved from http://www.ectr.edu.au/publications/8-full-publication-list/42-atea-conference-2010.html. Accessed 20 Aug 2014.

  • Johnston, J. (2012). Using identity as a tool for investigation: A methodological option in the researcher’s toolbox. International Journal of Arts and Sciences, 5(5), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, J. (2013). Building quality into Australian teacher education. In D. Lynch & T. Yeigh (Eds.), Teacher education in Australia: Investigations into programming, practicum and partnership (pp. 142–190). Tarragindi QLD: Oxford Global Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelchtermans, G., & Vandenberghe, R. (1994). Teachers’ professional development: A biographical perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 26(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L. (2008). Critical pedagogy primer. Oxford UK: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kincheloe, J. L., & McLaren, P. L. (2002). Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In Z. Yali & T. E. Henry (Eds.), Ethnography and schools: Qualitative approaches to the study of education (pp. 87–138). Lanhma MA: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardo, Z. (2004). Critical social theory and transformative knowledge: The functions of criticism in quality education. Educational Researcher, 33(6), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, J. W. (1994). Teachers’ professional development in a climate of educational reform. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/pubs/EdReformStudies/SysReforms/little1.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2014.

  • Lofty, J. S. (2003). Standards and the politics of time and teacher professionalism. English Education, 35(3), 195–222.

  • Louis, K. S. (2007). Trust and improvement in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 8, 1–24. doi:10.1007/s10833-006-9015-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, D., Madden, J., & Knight, B. A. (2014). Harnessing professional dialogue, collaboration and content in context: An exploration of a new model for teacher professional learning. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 1(3), 1–15. Retrieved from http://www.ijicc.net/. Accessed 03 Feb 2012.

  • Maeroff, G. I. (1989). The principles of teacher empowerment: Status, knowledge and access to decision making. The Education Digest, 54(6), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malm, B. (2009). Towards a new professionalism: Enhancing personal and professional development in teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 35(1), 77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (1999). Education and the trends to markets. Australian Journal of Education, 43(3), 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, J. (April 13th 2012). Supporting effective teacher learning in Americal schools. Teachers college record (ID number 16751), http://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=16751. Accessed 20 Sep 2014.

  • Nadelson, L. S., Fuller, M., Briggs, P., Hammons, D., Bubak, K., & Sass, M. (2012). The tension between teacher accountability and flexibility: The paradox of standards-based reform. Teacher Education and Practice, 25(2), 196–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • New South Wales Department of Education and Training. (2003). Quality teaching in NSW public schools. Retrieved from https://www.det.nsw.edu.au/proflearn/areas/qt/index.html. Accessed 2 Oct 2009.

  • O’Brien, P., Goddard, R., & Keefe, M. (2007, Nov/Dec 2007). Burnout confirmed as a viable explanation for beginning teacher attrition. Paper presented at the AARE, Fremantle, WA. Retrieved from http://www.aare.edu.au/07pap/abs07.html. Accessed 14 April 2013.

  • Ohanian, S. (1999). One size fits few: The folly of educational standards. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing teacher professional learning. Review of educational research, 81(3), 376–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overton, J. (2006). Teacher identity and power relationships in contexts of change: A case study of teachers, Unpublished PhD thesis, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory.

  • Overton, J. (2009). Early childhood teachers in contexts of power: Empowerment and a voice. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 34(2), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne, W. I. (1997). Professionalism and market forces: With special reference to education in the United Kingdom. In K. Watson, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Teachers, teacher education and training: Educational dilemmas: Debate and diversity (pp. 35–46). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, L. C., & Moomaw, W. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 37–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polkinghorne, D. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pring, R. (2006). Philosophy of educational research (2 ed.). London, UK: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J. (2001). Teacher professional identity: Competing discourses, competing outcomes. Journal of Education Policy, 16(2), 149–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, J., Dempster, N., & Logan, L. (1996). Planning led professional development. In J. Sachs, L. Logan, & N. Dempster (Eds.), Planning for better primary schools (pp. 74–86). Fyshwick, ACT: National Capital Printing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland?. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Servage, L. (2009). Who is the “Professional” in a professional learning community? An exploration of teacher professionalism in collaborative professional development settings. Canadian Journal of Education, 32(1), 149–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2001). Critical politics of teachers’ work: An Australian perspective. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2002). Unmasking teachers’ subjectivities in local school management. Journal of Education Policy, 17(4), 463–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, J. (2006). The politics of reform of teachers’ work and the consequences for schools: Some implications for teacher education. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(3), 301–319.

  • Stevenson, A. (2012, July 31st). Minister targets inadequate teachers to improve classroom standards. Sydney morning Herald http://www.smh.com.au/national/education/minister-targets-inadequate-teachers-to-improve-classroom-standards-20120730-23a7m.html. Accessed 21 Oct 2014.

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1999). Grounded theory methodology: An overview. In A. Bryman & R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Qualitative research (Vol. 3, pp. 72–93). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronach, I., Corbin, B., McNamara, O., Stark, S., & Warne, T. (2001). Towards an uncertain politics of professionalism: Teacher and nurse identities in flux. Retrieved from http://www.mmu.ac.uk/ioe/research/docfolders/papers/prof0601.htm. Accessed 24 March 2009.

  • Urban, M. (2010). Editorial: Rethinking professionalism in early childhood: Untested feasibilities and critical ecologies. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 11(1), 1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vukelich, C., & Wrenn, L. C. (1999). Quality professional development: What do we think we know? Childhood Education: Infancy Through Adolescence, 75(3), 153–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, M. R. (2009). Making sense of the links: Professional development, teacher practices, and student achievement. Teachers College Record, 111(2), 573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherall, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (Eds.). (2001). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. (2008). Measuring teacher quality for professional entry. In D. H. Gitomer (Ed.), Measurement issues and assessment for teaching quality. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. In A. Iran-Nejad & D. P. Pearson (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 173–210). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wodak, R., & Meyer, M. (Eds.). (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour Campus, Hogbin Drive, Coffs Harbour, NSW, 2450, Australia

    Jenny Johnston

Authors
  1. Jenny Johnston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenny Johnston.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Johnston, J. Issues of professionalism and teachers: critical observations from research and the literature. Aust. Educ. Res. 42, 299–317 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0159-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0159-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation