Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

School engagement for academically at-risk students: a participatory research project

  • Published:
The Australian Educational Researcher Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While past literature has explored school engagement in older students, there is less research for younger children specifically, and very little which engages children themselves in the research process. This paper provides insight into school engagement for academically at-risk students in the second year of school through a participatory research project. Specifically, the paper reports on a project which examined three groups of students within the Catholic Education system in Australia, namely, those not considered at-risk academically, those considered at-risk but receiving one-on-one support, and those considered to be at-risk but not receiving support. Students participated in focus groups and a photo elicitation project, with questions adapted from The School Engagement Questionnaire forming the basis of data collection. In relation to behavioural engagement, the thematic analysis demonstrated that students in each group valued social interaction, while at-risk students spoke about experiences of punishment at school and students in the group receiving support spoke about rewards. In relation to cognitive engagement, themes of boredom were evident across all groups, while students in the non at-risk group were more likely to speak about the value of learning. At-risk students also displayed some anxiety in relation to school which was not displayed by students who were receiving support. Free time, favourite lessons and technology were all identified as prominent themes in all groups in relation to affective engagement. While the study has some limitations due to restricted timeframe and sample size, it provides an insight into the utility of considering school engagement in developing an understanding of the school experience of at-risk students in primary school. Future studies in this area should examine broader, more representative samples and also consider students with multiple risk factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleton, J., Christenson, S., Kim, D., & Reschly, A. (2006). Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: Validation of the student engagement instrument. Journal of School Psychology, 44, 427–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. (2009). Adolescent behavioural, affective, and cognitive engagement in school: Relationship to dropout. Journal of School Health, 79, 408–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balfanz, R., Herzog, L., & Mac Iver, D. (2007). Preventing student disengagement and keeping students on the graduation path in urban middle-grades schools: Early identification and effective interventions. Educational Psychologist, 42, 223–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, H. (2008). Risk of resilience? What makes a difference. Australian Educational Researcher, 35, 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth, T., & Booth, W. (2003). In the frame: Photovoice and mothers with learning difficulties. Disability & Society, 18, 431–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crivello, G., Camfield, L., & Woodhead, M. (2009). How can children tell us about their wellbeing? Exploring the potential of participatory research approaches within young lives. Social Indicators of Resilience, 90, 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danby, S., & Farrell, A. (2004). Accounting for young children’s competence in educational research: New perspectives on research ethics. Australian Educational Researcher, 31(2), 35–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis, T. (2012). Helping at-risk students succeed. Monitor on Psychology, 43, 2. Retrieved February, from www.apa.org/monitor.

  • Downer, J., Rimm-Kaufman, S., & Pianta, R. (2007). How do classroom conditions and children’s risk for school problems contribute to children’s engagement in learning? School Psychology Review, 36, 413–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J., & Zimmer, K. (2012). Student engagement: What is it? Why does it matter? In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 97–126). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J., McCloskey, W., Meli, J., Mordica, J., Montrosse, B., & Mooney, K. (2011). Measuring student engagement in upper elementary through high school: A description of 21 instruments (issues and answers report, REL 2011-no. 098). Washington, DC: US. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast.

  • Furlong, M., & Christenson, S. (2008). Engaging students at school and with learning: A relevant construct for all students. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 365–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutnick, A., Robb, M., Takeuchi, L., & Kotler, J. (2010). Always connected: the new digital media habits of young children. New York: The Joan Ganz Cooney Centre at Sesame Workshop.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, S., Tunmer, W., & Chapman, J. (2005). The effects of varying group size on the Reading Recovery approach to preventative early intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 456–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klem, A., & Connel, J. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74, 262–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, C. (1989). Reading Recovery: A preventative for mislabelling young ‘at-risk’ learners. Urban Education, 24, 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H. (2000). Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 153–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Centre for School Engagement Colorado (2006). Quantifying School Engagement: Research Report. Retrieved June 6, 2012 from http://www.schoolengagement.org/TruancypreventionRegistry/Admin/Resources/Resources/QuantifyingSchoolEngagementResearchReport.pdf.

  • Skinner, E., Zimmer-Gembeck, M., & Connell, J. (1998). Individual differences and the development of perceived control. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 63, 1–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, F. (2007). Are methodologies for children keeping them in their place? Children’s Geographies, 5, 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valerio, K. (2012). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. Journal of Student Engagement: Education Matters, 2, 30–35.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clemence Due.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Toole, N., Due, C. School engagement for academically at-risk students: a participatory research project. Aust. Educ. Res. 42, 1–17 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0145-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-014-0145-0

Keywords

Navigation