Abstract
In the present study we present a didactic method to help children aged 11 and 12 learn science in such a way as to enable a dynamic interaction between domain general strategies and the development of conceptual knowledge, whilst each type of scientific process has been considered (forming of hypotheses, experimenting and evaluating). We have used the didactics to stimulate metacognitive awareness and implemented them in a 2-month programme around eight different content domains (alternative energy, electrical circuitry, electromagnetism, the human body, slopes, the pendulum, friction, and sinking and floating). Results showed that children developed significant understanding with regard to the process and strategy domain of scientific thinking, but that this effect was dependent on the type of teacher involved (pre-service versus in-service teacher). In addition, we found that 12 year-olds showed some aspects of self-regulated learning in hands-on experimenting after they took part in the programme. At the level of attitudes, relative to controls, a significant drop in enthusiasm for science was found while both children of 11 and 12 years old viewed science as less difficult after the end of the programme. Findings were interpreted in the light of situated interest versus longer term personal interest in science and technology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
PCK pedagogical content knowledge, according to Botha and Reddy (2011), PCK, can be described as the transformation of teacher knowledge from a variety of domains of knowledge. These domains may involve subject matter, pedagogical knowledge, and knowledge of content. .
References
Abrahams, I. (2008). Does practical work really motivate? A study of the affective value of practical work in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 31(17), 2335–2353.
Appleton, K. (2003). How do beginning primary school teachers cope with science? toward an understanding of science teaching practice. Research in Science Education, 33, 1–25.
Botha, M. L., & Reddy, C. P. S. (2011). In-service teachers’ perspectives of pre-service teachers’ knowledge domains in science. South African Journal of Education, 31, 257–274.
Caleon, I. S., & Subramaniam, R. (2007). Augmenting learning in an out-of-school context: The cognitive and affective impact of two cryogenics-based enrichments programmes on upper primary students. Research in Science Education, 37, 333–351.
Campbell, B. (2001). Pupils’ perceptions of science education at primary and secondary school. In H. Behrendt, H. Dahncke, et al. (Eds.), Research in science education—past, present and future. London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Chen, Z., & Klahr, D. (1999). All other things being equal: children’s acquisition of the control of variables strategy. Child Development, 70, 1098–1120.
Cook, C., Goodman, N., & Schulz, L. E. (2011). Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play. Cognition, 120(3), 341–349.
Crawford, B. A. (1999). Is it realistic to expect a preservice teacher to create and inquiry-based classroom? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 10(3), 175–199.
Dean, D., & Kuhn, D. (2007). Direct instruction vs. discovery: The long view. Science Education, 91, 384–397.
Dejonckheere, P. J. N., Van de Keere, K., & Mestdagh, N. (2009). Training the scientific thinking circle in pre- and primary school children. The Journal of Educational Research, 103, 1–16.
Eshach, H., & Fried, M. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336.
Gooday, M., Payne, F., & Wilson, J. (1993). Primary student teachers’ scientific knowledge and their attitudes towards science. Northern College: Aberdeen and Dundee.
Inhelder, B., & Piaget, J. (1958). The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books, Inc.
Jarvis, T., & Pell, A. (2002). Changes in primary boys’ and girls’ attitudes to school and science during a two-year science in-service programme. The Curriculum Journal, 13(1), 43–69.
Kamann, M. P., & Wong, B. Y. L. (1993). Inducing adaptive coping self-statements in children with learning disabilities through self-instruction training. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 630–638.
Klahr, D. (2000). Exploring science: The cognition and development of discovery processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Klahr, D., & Nigam, M. (2004). The equivalence of learning paths in early science instruction: Effects of direct instruction and discovery learning. Psychological Science, 15, 661–667.
Klahr, D., Zimmerman, C., & Jirout, J. (2011). Educational interventions to advance children’s scientific thinking. Science, 333, 971–975.
Kort, W., Schittekatte, M., Compaan, E. L., Bosmans, M., Bleichrodt, N., Vermeir, G., et al. (2002). WISC-III NL. Handleiding. Nederlandse bewerking. London: The Psychological Corporation.
Laevers, F. (1999). The project experiential education: Concepts and experiences at the level of context, process and outcome. In Proceedings of 7th National Convention of Early Childhood Education, Nelson.
Lorch, R. F., Lorch, E. P., Calderhead, W. J., Dunlap, E. E., Hodell, E. C., & Freer, B. D. (2010). Learning the control of variables strategy in higher and lower achieving classrooms: Contributions of explicit instruction and experimentation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 90–101.
Meichenbaum, D. (1990). Stress inoculation training. New York: Pergamon Press.
Meichenbaum, D. H., & Goodman, J. (1971). Training impulsive children to talk to themselves: A means of developing self-control. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 77(2), 115–126.
Michalsky, T., Mevarech, Z. R., & Haibi, L. (2009). Elementary school children reading scientific texts: Effects of metacognitive instruction. Journal of Educational Research, 102(5), 363–376.
Murphy, C., Ambusaidi, A., & Beggs, J. (2006). Middle East meets West: Comparing children’s attitudes to school science. International Journal of Science Education, 28(4), 405–422.
Murphy, C., & Beggs, J. (2003). Primary pupils’ and teachers’ use of computers at home and school. British Journal of Education and Technology, 1, 79–83.
Myers, R. E., & Fouts, J. T. (1992). A cluster analysis of high school science classroom environments and attitude toward science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 929–937.
Nunnaly, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.
Schraw, G., Crippen, K.J., & Hartley, K. (2006). Promoting self-regulation in science education: Metacognition as part of a broader perspective on learning. Research in Science Education, 36, 111–139.
Sikes, P. J. (1992). Imposed change and the experienced teacher. In M. Fullan & A. Hargreaves (Eds.), Teacher development and educational change. New York: The Palmer Press.
Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students’. Science Education, 74(1), 1–18.
van der Steene, G. & Bos, A. (1997). WPPSI-R. Vlaams-Nederlandse Aanpassing. Voorlopige versie. Handleiding. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Woolnough, B. (1994). Effective science teaching. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Woolnough, B. E. (1998). Authentic science in schools to develop personal knowledge. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now?. London: Routledge.
Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20, 99–149.
Zohar, A., & Ben David, A. (2008). Explicit teaching of meta-strategic knowledge in authentic classroom situations. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 59–82.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dejonckheere, P.J.N., Van de Keere, K., Tallir, I. et al. Primary school science: implementation of domain-general strategies into teaching didactics. Aust. Educ. Res. 40, 583–614 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0119-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-013-0119-7