Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Essential dynamic characterization of a historical bridge: integrated experimental and numerical investigations

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reports on a series of experimental tests and a numerical study carried out on the historic masonry bridge of Santa Teresa of Bitonto, located in Bari (Southern Italy). A systematic working technique was planned and carried out with the final objective of defining the dynamic properties of the bridge and verifying the seismic repose by means of a response spectrum analysis. Initial stages were carried out including historical research, visual inspection, and geometric integrated aerial and ground survey on-site using UAV technique for the identification of the geometric details of the structural and non-structural elements of the bridge. An experimental campaign was scheduled and executed by performing free and forced-vibration tests using uniaxial and biaxial accelerometers placed at 22 monitoring points to retrieve the main vibration modes of the bridge with their corresponding frequencies and damping ratios. Although the free vibration tests detected only the main mode of vibration due to the squat nature of the structure, the forced-vibration tests help to confirm the findings and identify further modes of vibration. The consistency of the experimental frequencies was statistically confirmed by varying the conditions of the forced-vibration tests. A Finite-Element (FE) model was constructed and calibrated qualitatively (i.e., order of vibration modes) with respect to the experimental ones, based on both the geometric survey and the visual inspection outputs. Then, a second phase of calibration was undertaken by tuning the remaining free parameters to match the numerical values of all the detected modes. The calibrated model, capable of producing the experimental results, was adopted for performing a response spectrum analysis for the global response evaluation of the bridge. The results showed a globally acceptable level of stress, while excessive values were limitedly observed in a few critical zones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Addessi D, Liberatore D, Nocera M (2020) Damaging behavior of masonry arch bridges: analysis of ‘ponte delle Torri’ in Spoleto, Italy. J Earthq Eng 00:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1690599

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. AgiSoft PhotoScan User Manual (2019). Professional Edition, version 1.4. https://www.agisoft.com/downloads/user-manuals/.

  3. Avossa AM, Di Giacinto D, Malangone P, Rizzo F (2018) Seismic retrofit of a multi-span prestressed concrete girder bridge with friction pendulum devices. Shock Vib 5679480:22. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5679480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aytulun E, Soyoz S, Karcioglu E, Bridge A (2019) System identification and seismic performance assessment of a stone arch bridge system identification and seismic performance assessment of. J Earthq Eng 00:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2019.1692740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Azzara RM, De FA, Girardi M, Pellegrini D (2017) Ambient vibration recording on the Maddalena Bridge in Borgo a Mozzano (Italy): data analysis. Ann Geophys. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bayraktar A, Türker T, Altunis AC (2015) Experimental frequencies and damping ratios for historical masonry arch bridges. Constr Build Mater 75:234–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Biscarini C, Catapano I, Cavalagli N et al (2020) NDT and E International UAV photogrammetry, infrared thermography and GPR for enhancing structural and material degradation evaluation of the Roman masonry bridge of Ponte Lucano in Italy. NDT E Int 115:102287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blasi C, Foraboschi P (1994) Analytical approach to collapse mechanisms of circular masonry arch. J Struct Eng 120(8):37–41. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1994)120:8(2288)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Boscato G, Dal Cin A (2017) Experimental and numerical evaluation of structural dynamic behavior of Rialto Bridge in Venice. J Civ Struct Heal Monit 7:557–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-017-0242-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brincker R, Ventura C (2015) Introduction to operational modal analysis. Wiley

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Castellazzi G, De MS, Mazzotti C (2012) Finite element modelling tuned on experimental testing for the structural health assessment of an ancient masonry arch bridge. Math Probl Eng. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/495019

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. CIRCOLARE 21 gennaio 2019, n. 7 C.S.LL.PP.

  13. Circolare di applicazione del D.M. 21 Gennaio 2019 - NTC 2018.

  14. Conde B, Ramos LF, Oliveira DV et al (2017) Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and three-dimensional numerical modelling: Application to Vilanova bridge. Eng Struct 148:621–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Corbi O, Tropeano F, Corbi I et al (2021) Structural analysis of historical infrastructures: the case of the bridge on the Furore Fiord. J Struct Integr Maint. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2020.1862964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Costa C, Arêde A, Costa A et al (2014) International journal of architectural heritage: conservation, analysis, and restoration updating numerical models of masonry arch bridges by operational modal analysis. Int J Archit Herit Conserv Anal Restor. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2013.850557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Diaferio M, Foti D, Sepe V. Dynamic Identification of the Tower of the Provincial Administration Building, Bari, Italy, Proceedings of the “Eleventh International Conference on Civil, Structural and Environmental Engineering Computing, Malta, paper n. 2, 18–21 Sept. 2007.

  18. Diaferio M, Foti D, Lerna M, Sabbà MF (2021) A procedure for the seismic risk assessment of the cultural heritage. Bull Earthq Eng 19:1027–1050. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-020-01022-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Diaferio M, Foti D, La Scala A, Sabbà MF. Selection Criteria of Experimental Setup for Historical Structures, AEIT 2021 International Annual Conference, 2nd Virtual Edition, 4–8 Oct. 2021

  20. Diaferio M, Foti D, La Scala A, Sabbà MF. Design of the Set-Up for Ambient Vibration and Dynamic forced Tests on a Cable-Stayed Bridge, AEIT 2021 International Annual Conference, 2nd Virtual Edition, 4–8 Oct. 2021

  21. Diaferio M, Foti D, Giannoccaro NI, Sabbà MF (2022) Dynamic identification on an irregular structure. Appl Sci 12:3445. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12073445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Foraboschi P (2019) Masonry does not limit itself to only one structural material: Interlocked masonry versus cohesive masonry. J Build Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Foti D, Sabbà MF, Pavone R, Cucumazzo F. A dynamically validated model verified by drone photos of the masonry bridge of the XIX century, Atti del Convegno ANIDIS 2022, Torino, 11–15 September 2022, Structural Integrity (2023).

  24. Gioffrè M, Gusella V, Cluni F (2008) Performance evaluation of monumental bridges: testing and monitoring ‘Ponte delle Torri’ in Spoleto. Struct Infrastruct Eng 4(2):95–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470601155300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Huerta S (2008) The analysis of masonry architecture: A historical approach. Archit Sci Rev 51(4):297–328. https://doi.org/10.3763/asre.2008.5136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lerna M, Sabbà MF, Diaferio M, Carnimeo L, Ivorra S, Foti D (2020) Seismic risk assessment of a medieval tower: the case study of Craco. EURODYN 2020, XI International Conference on Structural Dynamics, M. Papadrakakis, M. Fragiadakis, C. Papadimitriou (eds.), Athens, Greece, November

  27. Lorenzoni F, De CN, Claudio P (2019) Ambient and free - vibration tests to improve the quantification and estimation of modal parameters in existing bridges. J Civ Struct Heal Monit 9:617–637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-019-00357-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Norme Tecniche per le Costruzioni (NTC), Decreto Ministeriale 17–01–2018.

  29. Onat O (2019) Fundamental vibration frequency prediction of historical masonry bridges. Struct Eng Mech 2:155–162. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2019.69.2.155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roselli I, Malena M, Mongelli M et al (2018) Health assessment and ambient vibration testing of the ‘“Ponte delle Torri”’ of Spoleto during the 2016–2017 Central Italy seismic sequence. J Civ Struct Heal Monit 5:199–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-018-0268-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sánchez-aparicio LJ, Castro ÁB, Conde B et al (2019) Automation in construction non-destructive means and methods for structural diagnosis of masonry arch bridges. Autom Constr 104:360–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2019.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Di Sarno L, da Porto F, Guerrini G et al (2019) Seismic performance of bridges during the 2016 Central Italy earthquakes. Bull Earthquake Eng 17:5729–5761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0419-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Scozzese F, Ragni L, Tubaldi E, Gara F (2019) Modal properties variation and collapse assessment of masonry arch bridges under scour action. Eng Struct 199:109665. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shimpi V, Sivasubramanian MVR, Kesavan SBSD (2021) Seismic vulnerability assessment and fragility curves for a multistorey gallery arch bridge. SN Appl Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04652-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Silva R, Costa C, Arêde A (2022) Numerical methodologies for the analysis of stone arch bridges with damage under railway loading. Structures 39:573–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2022.03.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sorrentino L, Cattari S (2019) Seismic behaviour of ordinary masonry buildings during the 2016 central Italy earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 17:5583–5607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-018-0370-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sorrentino L, Liberatore L, Liberatore D, Masiani R (2014) The behaviour of vernacular buildings in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bull Earthq Eng 12:2367–2382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9455-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. De Stefano A, Clemente P (2009) Structural health monitoring of historic buildings. In: Karbhari VM, Ansari F (eds) Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure systems, cap, vol 13. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 412–434 https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845696825.2.412

  39. De Stefano A, Matta E, Clemente P (2016) Structural health monitoring of historical heritage in Italy: some relevant experiences. J Civil Struct Health Monit 6(1):83–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-016-0154-y(Springer)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support provided through the S-MoSES (Smart Monitoring for Safety of Existing Structures and Infrastructures) Project (Research Project of National Interest, PRIN 2020) by the MUR (Italian Ministry of University and Research) is gratefully acknowledged. Moreover, the authors would like to thank architect Remo Pavone for his collaboration during the geometric survey and experimental campaign.

Funding

Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN)—2020CLBMYL, Dora Foti.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Architecture, Construction and Design, Polytechnic University of Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125, Bari, Italy

    Sulyman Mansour, Fabio Rizzo, Armando La Scala, Maria Francesca Sabbà & Dora Foti

  2. Department of Engineering for Innovation, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy

    Nicola Ivan Giannoccaro

Authors
  1. Sulyman Mansour
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabio Rizzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nicola Ivan Giannoccaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Armando La Scala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Maria Francesca Sabbà
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Dora Foti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Rizzo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mansour, S., Rizzo, F., Giannoccaro, N.I. et al. Essential dynamic characterization of a historical bridge: integrated experimental and numerical investigations. J Civil Struct Health Monit 14, 85–102 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-023-00744-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-023-00744-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation