Skip to main content
Log in

Non-contact measurement of vibration modes of large cable-stayed bridge under ambient conditions: a convenient way of condition monitoring of bridges

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-contact vibration measurement of civil engineering structures is one of the most emphasized areas in structural health monitoring. Conventional methods have many limitations and challenges when used for the vibration testing of large civil engineering structures. Devices such as accelerometers must be mounted at appropriate locations to be able to record structure’s motion, which can pose a major accessibility issue. Laser-based far-field displacement measurement systems that can only measure motion in the direction of the laser beam also require mounting of reflectors at the point of interest. Other limitations include upper and lower frequency limits and greater inaccuracies at higher frequencies, higher cost and multichannel applications for plotting mode shapes are impractical. In this research, a previously validated microwave interferometric radar is used for taking the response of cable-stayed bridge under impact and ambient conditions. The apparatus namely VirA can image the target in 3-dimensions from a single point of measurement with a least count of ≤ 0.1 mm. The accuracy of VirA was checked by the identification of lower-order modes of vibrations of the main girder. Several stay cables were then measured to identify natural frequencies for potential use in the condition monitoring of the bridge. VirA was found to be reliable in the measurement of natural frequencies of different structural components. Lower modes of vibrations were identified but mode shapes showed variation. Lower-order natural frequencies for cables were identified by VirA which suggests that it may be used for condition monitoring of cable-stayed bridges.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Mitchell D, Marchand J, Croteau P, Cook WD (2011) Concorde overpass collapse: structural aspects. J Perform Constr Facil 25:545–553. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Feldman BJ (2010) The collapse of the I-35W bridge in Minneapolis. Phys Teach 48:541–542. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.3502509

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Morgese M, Ansari F, Domaneschi M, Cimellaro GP (2020) Post-collapse analysis of Morandi’s Polcevera viaduct in Genoa Italy. J Civ Struct Health Monit 10:69–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13349-019-00370-7/FIGURES/18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Collapse of the Nanfangao bridge in Taiwan, (n.d.). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336445331_Collapse_of_the_Nanfangao_bridge_in_Taiwan (Accessed September 26, 2022).

  5. Pittsburgh Bridge Collapse Emphasizes Need for Bridge Repairs–ProQuest, (n.d.). https://www.proquest.com/docview/2700400553?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true (Accessed September 26, 2022).

  6. Javed A, Krishna C, Ali K, Afzal MFUD, Mehrabi A, Meguro K (2023) Micro-scale experimental approach for the seismic performance evaluation of RC frames with improper lap splices. Infrastructures 8: 56. https://doi.org/10.3390/INFRASTRUCTURES8030056

  7. Javed A, Mantawy IM, Azizinamini A (2021) 3d-printing of ultra-high-performance concrete for robotic bridge construction. Transp Res Rec 2675:307–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981211011645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chang CC, Chang TYP, Zhang QW (2001) Ambient vibration of long-span cable-stayed bridge. J Bridg Eng 6:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2001)6:1(46)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyashita T, Int MN, Struct JS (2022) undefined 2008, Vibration-based structural health monitoring for bridges using laser Doppler vibrometers and MEMS-based technologies, Kssc.or.Kr. (n.d.). http://kssc.or.kr/wonmun/KSSC_3_2008_8_4_325(C).pdf (Accessed September 27, 2022)

  10. Hu J, Guo J, Xu Y, Zhou L, Zhang S, Fan K (2019) Differential ground-based radar interferometry for slope and civil structures monitoring: two case studies of landslide and bridge. Remote Sens 11:2887. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS11242887

  11. Pieraccini M, Miccinesi L (2019) An interferometric MIMO radar for bridge monitoring. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 16:1383–1387. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2019.2900405

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang Q, Wang Y, Luzi G, Crosetto M, Monserrat O, Jiang J, Zhao H, Ding Y (2020) Ground-based radar interferometry for monitoring the dynamic performance of a multitrack steel truss high-speed railway bridge. Remote Sens 12:2594. https://doi.org/10.3390/RS12162594

  13. Bridge J, Li C, Gu C, Rice JA, Hernandez JC (2011) A wireless multifunctional radar-based displacement sensor for structural health monitoring. Spiedigitallibrary Org. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.879243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li C, Chen W, Liu G, Yan R, Qi Y (2015) A noncontact FMCW radar sensor for displacement measurement in structural health monitoring. Sensors 15:7412–7433. https://doi.org/10.3390/S150407412

  15. Rodrigues D, Zuo D (2022) Z.T.-I.T. on, undefined 2020, Adaptive displacement calibration strategies for field structural health monitoring based on Doppler radars, Ieeexplore.Ieee.Org. (n.d.). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9049408/ (Accessed September 28, 2022)

  16. Nonis C, Niezrecki C, Yu T-Y, Ahmed S, Su C-F, Schmidt T (2013) Structural health monitoring of bridges using digital image correlation. 8695:51–63. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2009647

  17. Mousa MA, Yussof MM, Udi UJ, Nazri FM, Kamarudin MK, Parke GAR, Assi LN, Ghahari SA (2021) Application of digital image correlation in structural health monitoring of bridge infrastructures: a review. Infrastructures 6:176. https://doi.org/10.3390/INFRASTRUCTURES6120176

  18. Kim SW, Jeon BG, Kim NS, Park JC (2013) Vision-based monitoring system for evaluating cable tensile forces on a cable-stayed bridge. Struct Health Monit 12:440–456. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921713500513/FORMAT/EPUB

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Reagan D, Sabato A, Niezrecki C (2018) Feasibility of using digital image correlation for unmanned aerial vehicle structural health monitoring of bridges. Struct Health Monit 17:1056–1072. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921717735326/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_1475921717735326-FIG2.JPEG

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Feng D, MF-MS (2022) S. Processing, undefined 2017, Experimental validation of cost-effective vision-based structural health monitoring, Elsevier. (n.d.). https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0888327016304976 (Accessed October 1, 2022)

  21. Ngeljaratan L, Moustafa MA (2020) Structural health monitoring and seismic response assessment of bridge structures using target-tracking digital image correlation. Eng Struct 213:110551. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENGSTRUCT.2020.110551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abu Dabous S, Feroz S (2020) Condition monitoring of bridges with non-contact testing technologies. Autom Constr 116:103224. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AUTCON.2020.103224

  23. Alamdari MM, Ge L, Kildashti K, Zhou Y, Harvey B, Du Z (2019) Non-contact structural health monitoring of a cable-stayed bridge: case study 15:1119–1136. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2019.1609529

  24. Mustafa AE, Javed A, Ali K (2022) Safety assessment of cables of suspension bridge under blast load. In: Structures Congress 2022—Selected Papers from the Structures Congress 2022, pp 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784484180.008

  25. Ali K, Javed A, Mustafa AE, Saleem A (2022) Blast-loading effects on structural redundancy of long-span suspension bridge using a simplified approach. Pract Period Struct Design Construct. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000699

  26. Abedin M, Mehrabi AB (2021) Health monitoring of steel box girder bridges using non-contact sensors. Structures 34:4012–4024. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2021.10.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Javed A, Sadeghnejad A, Rehmat SE, Yakel A, Azizinamini A, University FI (2021) Magnetic flux leakage (MFL) method for damage detection in internal post-tensioning tendons. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503647

  28. Hameed A, Rasool AM, Ibrahim YE, Afzal MFUD, Qazi AU, Hameed I (2022) Utilization of fly ash as a viscosity-modifying agent to produce cost-effective, self-compacting concrete: a sustainable solution. Sustainability 14:11559. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU141811559

  29. Ashraf S, Ali M, Shrestha S, Hafeez MA, Moiz A, Sheikh ZA (2022) Impacts of climate and land-use change on groundwater recharge in the semi-arid lower Ravi River basin Pakistan. Groundw Sustain Dev 17:100743. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.GSD.2022.100743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Basit S, Maki T, Mutsuyoshi H, Ishihara Y, Tajima H (2020) Influence of reinforcement arrangement details on mechanical behavior of precast concrete barrier with loop connection. Structures 27:1682–1692. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2020.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pieraccini M (2013) Monitoring of civil infrastructures by interferometric radar: a review. Sci World J. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/786961

  32. Afzal MFUD, Matsumoto Y, Nohmi H, Sakai S, Su D, Nagayama T (2022) Comparison of radar based displacement measurement systems with conventional systems in vibration measurements at a Cable Stayed Bridge, 2016. Available online: www.researchgate.net/publication/307932143 (Accessed 28 Nov 2022)

  33. Neitzel F, Niemeier W, Weisbrich S, Lehmann M (2022) Investigation of low-cost accelerometer, terrestrial laser scanner and ground-based radar interferometer for vibration monitoring of bridges 6th european workshop on structural health monitoring-Fr.2.C.2, (n.d.). http://www.ndt.net/?id=14063 (Accessed October 2, 2022)

  34. Gentile C, Bernardini G (2011) Radar-based measurement of deflections on bridges and large structures. 14:495–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2010.9693238

  35. H. Nohmi (2019) Development of vibration-imaging radar (VirA). In: 2019 IEEE Radar Conference, Radar Conf 2019. https://doi.org/10.1109/RADAR.2019.8835776

  36. Caicedo JM (2011) Practical guidelines for the natural excitation technique (NExT) and the eigensystem realization algorithm (ERA) for modal identification using ambient vibration. Exp Tech 35:52–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1747-1567.2010.00643.X

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend our sincere gratitude to Alouette Technology Inc., Japan and the Saitama University, Japan for data sharing, providing facilities and support to conduct this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Faheem Ud Din Afzal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Afzal, M.F.U.D., Javed, A. Non-contact measurement of vibration modes of large cable-stayed bridge under ambient conditions: a convenient way of condition monitoring of bridges. J Civil Struct Health Monit 14, 339–353 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-023-00735-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-023-00735-z

Keywords

Navigation